Hard to believe. I thought they used devices to block signals for phones, perhaps drones at sites like this? On the surface, I do not believe this story.
I watched Tim Pool's livestream tonight (TimcastIRL on YouTube) and his panel talked about this story. According to Pool, modern drones make an Internet connection to check their current location, and if they are in a "no-fly" zone... they won't fly. Which to my mind, means four possibilities:
1) the federal agency (probably the Secret Service working with the FAA?) tasked with establishing no-fly zones, didn't declare one over the Trump rally that day. This should be easy to check, since these declarations are made public;
2) the shooter had an older (or cheaper?) drone that doesn't make the check for no-fly zones;
3) the shooter had a home-made drone, that again didn't check for no-fly zones;
4) the story is fake, and someone is putting out industrial-strength misinformation to the media to cloud the story.
At this time, I'm thinking 4) is most likely.
