Author Topic: Alec Baldwin fatally shoots woman with prop gun on movie set (Read 25389 times)

LegalAmerican · « **Reply #375 on:** December 06, 2021, 10:32:32 pm »

Quote from: Right_in_Virginia on December 06, 2021, 10:15:26 pm

https://mobile.twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1468051315611914245

I have said from the beginning..on purpose. He is a woman hater. Many men, like this, like to intimidate a woman, bringing out a gun. In BATTERED BOOK INFO FOR WOMEN. He picked his target. He pointed the gun at her. He cocked the gun, he pulled the trigger. Notice, how he treated his present wife. Not to mention his temper and run in with police. His vile tape recording threatening his daughter with Kim. Calling her a pig, and wanting to set her 'straight'. How?

Hoodat · « **Reply #376 on:** December 07, 2021, 08:30:35 am »

Alec Baldwin Erupts At Reporter Asking Questions, Wife Forced To Hold Him Back

Ryan Saavedra • Dec 6, 2021

Actor Alec Baldwin erupted at a New York Post reporter on Monday evening for asking him questions and had to be restrained by his wife.

Reporter Jon Levine ran into Baldwin while walking around New York City and asked him what brought him to the area.

Baldwin’s wife, Hilaria, immediately tried to get Levine to leave as she recorded him.

Alec Baldwin erupted, pointing an umbrella at Levine and angrily walking toward him.

“You are not allowed to photograph onto somebody’s private home,” Alec Baldwin said as he had to be restrained by his wife. “You can’t photograph onto somebody’s private home.”

https://twitter.com/LevineJonathan/status/1468037683633168391

https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-alec-baldwin-erupts-at-reporter-asking-questions-wife-forced-to-hold-him-back

This is the same person who shouted we should go to Henry Hyde's private home and kill his wife and children.

mountaineer · « **Reply #377 on:** December 07, 2021, 08:45:58 am »

You can't photograph "onto" someone's home? What a nitwit.

mountaineer · « **Reply #378 on:** December 07, 2021, 10:51:13 am »

Tweeted by Jack Posobiec

Cyber Liberty · « **Reply #379 on:** December 07, 2021, 10:55:22 am »

Who is this Doug Bands guy?

Right_in_Virginia · « **Reply #380 on:** December 08, 2021, 10:28:44 am »

https://mobile.twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1468328213831106563

Hoodat · « **Reply #381 on:** December 08, 2021, 09:03:14 pm »

Quote from: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2021, 10:55:22 am

Who is this Doug Bands guy?

Doug Band is shocked — shocked! — to discover the Clintons are slimy

Maureen Callahan | December 3, 2020 | 6:28pm

Et tú, Doug Band?

In a stunning political and personal betrayal, Bill Clinton’s erstwhile consigliere has spilled his guts to Vanity Fair. It’s impossible to look away.

“Confessions of a Clintonworld Exile,” by its very existence, proves beyond a doubt that the Clintons have lost whatever waning political capital remained. Consider that, at the height of their powers, Clinton loyalists would sooner go to prison (as Susan McDougal did, 18 months served, eight months of those in solitary) rather than compromise the ever-comprised Clintons.

Bill must have done something very, very bad — worse than his usual self-dealing and pathological deceit — for Band, a surrogate son, to lash out like this.

As the piece opens, we meet the middle-aged Band in his Manhattan office, framed photos of Bill Clinton covering walls, tables — “virtually every surface,” Gabriel Sherman writes, “except for windows.” . . .

https://nypost.com/2020/12/03/doug-band-is-shocked-shocked-to-discover-the-clintons-are-slimy/

GtHawk · « **Reply #382 on:** December 08, 2021, 10:22:34 pm »

Quote from: Hoodat on December 08, 2021, 09:03:14 pm

Doug Band is shocked — shocked! — to discover the Clintons are slimy

Maureen Callahan | December 3, 2020 | 6:28pm

Et tú, Doug Band?

In a stunning political and personal betrayal, Bill Clinton’s erstwhile consigliere has spilled his guts to Vanity Fair. It’s impossible to look away.

“Confessions of a Clintonworld Exile,” by its very existence, proves beyond a doubt that the Clintons have lost whatever waning political capital remained. Consider that, at the height of their powers, Clinton loyalists would sooner go to prison (as Susan McDougal did, 18 months served, eight months of those in solitary) rather than compromise the ever-comprised Clintons.

Bill must have done something very, very bad — worse than his usual self-dealing and pathological deceit — for Band, a surrogate son, to lash out like this.

As the piece opens, we meet the middle-aged Band in his Manhattan office, framed photos of Bill Clinton covering walls, tables — “virtually every surface,” Gabriel Sherman writes, “except for windows.” . . .

https://nypost.com/2020/12/03/doug-band-is-shocked-shocked-to-discover-the-clintons-are-slimy/

Sounds like Band is about to or is shopping a book deal to squeeze the last few millions he can out of his Clinton relationship. I sure hope he doesn't accidently like gets suicided before he can. Maybe this is why Hitlary was out trying to cry up some sympathy.

Right_in_Virginia · « **Reply #383 on:** December 09, 2021, 05:59:42 pm »

https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1469054125350526977

GtHawk · « **Reply #384 on:** December 09, 2021, 07:19:23 pm »

Quote from: Right_in_Virginia on December 09, 2021, 05:59:42 pm

https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1469054125350526977

I never new you could get PTSD from being a condescending ass to others.

LegalAmerican · « **Reply #385 on:** December 09, 2021, 09:40:00 pm »

Quote from: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2021, 10:55:22 am

Who is this Doug Bands guy?

I see Mike Lee on there a few times. BFFs of Ted Cruz. Mike Lee. R. Senator from Utah.
-----

Bill Clinton Aide Doug Band Details Clinton Involvement with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell
Mar 5, 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KX1a9fYY4C4

Kamaji · « **Reply #386 on:** December 10, 2021, 09:05:03 am »

mountaineer · « **Reply #387 on:** December 10, 2021, 09:24:06 am »

Quote from: LegalAmerican on December 09, 2021, 09:40:00 pm

I see Mike Lee on there a few times. BFFs of Ted Cruz. Mike Lee. R. Senator from Utah.

I take with a grain of salt some of the common names that appear on the flight logs. "Mike Lee" or "John Roberts" might be anyone, or they might be a member of Congress, Supreme Court justice, etc. Not sure we have enough information to know for sure.

EdinVA · « **Reply #388 on:** December 10, 2021, 10:30:10 am »

Quote from: mountaineer on December 10, 2021, 09:24:06 am

I take with a grain of salt some of the common names that appear on the flight logs. "Mike Lee" or "John Roberts" might be anyone, or they might be a member of Congress, Supreme Court justice, etc. Not sure we have enough information to know for sure.

And I am sure photo ID's were required...

Kamaji · « **Reply #389 on:** December 10, 2021, 10:32:42 am »

Quote from: EdinVA on December 10, 2021, 10:30:10 am

And I am sure photo ID's were required...

But were copies thereof maintained? Was there a provable log showing they were actually checked? And, considering that the first name "John" is, shall we say, rather common, and the surname "Roberts" not uncommon, is it outlandish to think that there might have been another "John Roberts" on the flight?

mountaineer · « **Reply #390 on:** December 10, 2021, 11:53:23 am »

Wait a minute, did we get derailed and start talking about the Epstein case on Alec's thread? Two upstanding citizens, to be sure.

LegalAmerican · « **Reply #391 on:** December 10, 2021, 04:38:57 pm »

Quote from: mountaineer on December 10, 2021, 09:24:06 am

I take with a grain of salt some of the common names that appear on the flight logs. "Mike Lee" or "John Roberts" might be anyone, or they might be a member of Congress, Supreme Court justice, etc. Not sure we have enough information to know for sure.

I agree, however, it would NOT be a common man on those flights. People with money and connections.

DB · « **Reply #392 on:** December 10, 2021, 05:21:33 pm »

Quote from: LegalAmerican on December 10, 2021, 04:38:57 pm

I agree, however, it would NOT be a common man on those flights. People with money and connections.

And you base that on what? There are likely thousands of people named "Mike Lee" in the US.

LegalAmerican · « **Reply #393 on:** December 10, 2021, 05:29:47 pm »

Quote from: DB on December 10, 2021, 05:21:33 pm

And you base that on what? There are likely thousands of people named "Mike Lee" in the US.

I already GAVE the answer. How many common men, named Mike Lee, would be invited on the LOLITA EXPRESS or fly on it? People with money, power and connections, would be invited or want to go. Common sense.

DB · « **Reply #394 on:** December 10, 2021, 05:49:47 pm »

Quote from: LegalAmerican on December 10, 2021, 05:29:47 pm

I already GAVE the answer. How many common men, named Mike Lee, would be invited on the LOLITA EXPRESS or fly on it? People with money, power and connections, would be invited or want to go. Common sense.

If there are thousands of people with that name, the odds are that some number of them are "people with money".

Kamaji · « **Reply #395 on:** December 10, 2021, 05:53:39 pm »

Quote from: DB on December 10, 2021, 05:49:47 pm

If there are thousands of people with that name, the odds are that some number of them are "people with money".

Yup. Whitepages.com finds more hits than it can list for that name: https://www.whitepages.com/name/Mike-Lee?fs=1&searchedName=mike%20lee&searchedLocation=

mountaineer · « **Reply #396 on:** December 10, 2021, 06:37:40 pm »

Is there any connection between Alec Baldwin and Jeffrey Epstein (other than both being massive pieces of cowdung)?

Edited to say: Oh, yes, there is! https://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,455669.0/topicseen.html

mountaineer · « **Reply #397 on:** December 14, 2021, 02:06:31 pm »

John Schnieder - Why Wasn’t Alec Baldwin Surprised When the Gun Went Off?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=81&v=0Sa5LIfNaKs&feature=emb_logo

Smokin Joe · « **Reply #398 on:** December 15, 2021, 07:49:57 am »

Quote from: LegalAmerican on December 10, 2021, 04:38:57 pm

I agree, however, it would NOT be a common man on those flights. People with money and connections.

I agree. These people would have money, connections, etc.

While possible more than one have the same name, or the name of someone else who is prominent but not involved, it becomes far less likely that 'just any' person would be on those flights.
Money, influence, power, or motives of looking for leverage on the person would shrink the pool. Fry cooks need not apply.
Those criteria would limit the pool from which the passengers on the 'express' would be drawn, and increase the probability that someone on the list would be "The" (fill in name) rather than just another (fill in name).

DB · « **Reply #399 on:** December 15, 2021, 11:23:22 am »

Quote from: Smokin Joe on December 15, 2021, 07:49:57 am

I agree. These people would have money, connections, etc.

While possible more than one have the same name, or the name of someone else who is prominent but not involved, it becomes far less likely that 'just any' person would be on those flights.
Money, influence, power, or motives of looking for leverage on the person would shrink the pool. Fry cooks need not apply.
Those criteria would limit the pool from which the passengers on the 'express' would be drawn, and increase the probability that someone on the list would be "The" (fill in name) rather than just another (fill in name).

She's claiming Mike Lee the senator from Utah is the guy on the flights. Her only evidence is the name - which is a pretty common one. I'll wait for some actual evidence that it was that Mike Lee.