He's correct. Roy Moore is sooo yesterday. A walking Frag grenade.Agreed
Agreed
I have one bumper sticker on my Truck.... my old Roy Moore one was getting kinda ragged.... so I scraped it off and put on my new Roy Moore bumper sticker. If I have to write him in, I will vote for Roy.
Even if a less controversial Conservative or Trump Supporter is running against him?
You got some 'splain'n to do, @Sighlass :laugh:
Even if a less controversial Conservative or Trump Supporter is running against him?
You got some 'splain'n to do, @Sighlass :laugh:
(http://66.media.tumblr.com/951abded1b8f3be2474e6fe04292c943/tumblr_nn53z5E2dj1suu3yio1_500.gif)
Even if a less controversial Conservative or Trump Supporter is running against him?
You got some 'splain'n to do, @Sighlass :laugh:
He's correct. Roy Moore is sooo yesterday. A walking Frag grenade.
I have one bumper sticker on my Truck.... my old Roy Moore one was getting kinda ragged.... so I scraped it off and put on my new Roy Moore bumper sticker. If I have to write him in, I will vote for Roy.
Trump Junior can kiss my bumper.
So you like losers???
A trove of reports show two Obama-era officials are partially responsible for a misinformation campaign designed to derail Republican Roy Moore’s senatorial campaign in Alabama.
Former President Barack Obama campaign organizer, Mikey Dickerson, was instrumental in a disinformation campaign targeting Moore, reports show. He was not alone. Evan Coren, who has worked for the National Archives unit since Obama’s first term, also targeted the Republican’s campaign.
Trump: 'Roy Moore cannot win' Alabama Senate seat
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/445882-trump-roy-moore-cannot-win-alabama-senate-seat
Translation: The Swamp is not going to allow Roy Moore in Washington in any official capacity at any cost. They are scared to death of him.
So you like losers???
Translation: The Swamp is not going to allow Roy Moore in Washington in any official capacity at any cost. They are scared to death of him.
Translation: The Swamp is not going to allow Roy Moore in Washington in any official capacity at any cost. They are scared to death of him.If I lost a seat in a state that is 2:1 Republican, they'd be scared of me, too! He has proven he cannot win. That is all that matters.
Yep, he has proven time and time again he can not be tainted and that scares the devil out of the establishment.
If I lost a seat in a state that is 2:1 Republican, they'd be scared of me, too! He has proven he cannot win. That is all that matters.
So one race lost out of how many political campaigns he's run within the state?Oh, please. Reagan was running against an incumbent. In a primary. (Which, by the way, Moore also lost two of those. Fourth in a six-way race for the Governor nomination in 2010, lost 2-to-1 in the primary for Governor in 2006.)
Good thing we didn't just someone like Reagan so harshly after he lost the 1976 nomination to Ford after the 3rd recount.
Imagine if we'd held Lincoln to that standard of one lost political race and you're done.
If I lost a seat in a state that is 2:1 Republican, they'd be scared of me, too! He has proven he cannot win. That is all that matters.
Oh, please. Reagan was running against an incumbent. In a primary. (Which, by the way, Moore also lost two of those. Fourth in a six-way race for the Governor nomination in 2010, lost 2-to-1 in the primary for Governor in 2006.)
Why don't we go dig up Harold Stassen under that logic?!
Roy Moore lost a race that any other Republican COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY LOST. That level of absolutely stunning incompetence should be a complete disqualification for the office until he proves he can win at a lower level. He destroyed his own credibility.
Roy Moore lost a race that any other Republican COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY LOST. That level of absolutely stunning incompetence should be a complete disqualification for the office until he proves he can win at a lower level. He destroyed his own credibility.
Why? @Sighlass actually lives in Alabama. If I lived there I would be supporting Roy Moore as well.Yep. Me, too.
Maybe if spent more time campaigning, had a sane plan (Going after Mitch is not a plan),
actually debated Doug Jones he could have won.
But he lost fair and square.
LOTS of brainwiped people on TBR when it comes to Roy Moore it seems to me.
I have to disagree. IMO, it's because his personal belief system and his personality provide the opposition too many sound bites to paint Conservatives in general as less than intelligent and/or bigots.You get a New York centric Mass Media who know all about the South because they watched Beverly Hillbillies and Dukes of Hazard, they're going to paint most anyone from south of the Mason Dixon Line as a dumb hick.
Burn me once...shame on you. Burn me twice...shame on me. DJT, Jr. is right.
:beer:
Who needs that added drama with the Southern States already planting flags on Abortion Hill??? :shrug:
This Thread is useless without @Catherine of Aragon
LOTS of brainwiped people on TBR when it comes to Roy Moore it seems to me.Says the FairTax-hawking birther.
LOTS of brainwiped people on TBR when it comes to Roy Moore it seems to me.
Roy Moore: 'Everybody knows I can win'
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/446000-roy-moore-everybody-knows-i-can-win
Roy Moore says he won't listen to Trump telling him not to run
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/roy-moore-says-he-wont-listen-to-trump-telling-him-not-to-run (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/roy-moore-says-he-wont-listen-to-trump-telling-him-not-to-run)
Roy Moore says he won't listen to Trump telling him not to run
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/roy-moore-says-he-wont-listen-to-trump-telling-him-not-to-run (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/roy-moore-says-he-wont-listen-to-trump-telling-him-not-to-run)
Says the FairTax-hawking birther.
Excellent news! He shouldn't!
Sure. I can see the ads now from the judge pointing out how many libel/slander suits he's won against the women formerly known as teenagers. :smokin:
The senate seat is more important than the ego of this three time loser.
Unless you like the liberal agenda. :shrug:
I don't care much for being a slave but apparently you love it.
Oh! Thanks for reminding me! What we need in the senate is one more Mitch butt boy!
Oh! Thanks for reminding me! What we need in the senate is one more Mitch butt boy!
There are legitimate, non-slave reasons to not jump on that particular train yet.
Really? Care to point them out?
Really? Care to point them out?
Not on this topic.
What a dumba**..
Start a thread! Never mind! I no longer care. Sheep get what they deserve.
i already said what i think about it on a thread on the subject, and I'n no sheep. I don't care for the expression.
there are only two kinds of Alabama voters who want him to run for state wide public office....Democrats...and fools...who are usually synonymous..
Could be worse, I have been called a fool offhandedly in one post.Looks to me like there's a new swamp, a whole lot like the old swamp. Or maybe just the other side of the creek. Country club Republicans in DC were gaming this election for one of their circle when Moore got the nomination in the primary, and they really didn't relish the idea of a man who'd twice lost his job standing on Constitutional Principles as part of their bayou in DC. That's why the stories of them dropping support for Moore ran purt'near in the same issue as the breaking accusations of impropriety. Others, for whatever hot button got hit, couldn't throw Moore to the wolves fast enough, and remain adamant to this day. (Whatever their personal issues, I pray The Almighty brings them peace, at least enough to restore rational thought and the concept of innocent until proven guilty).
People here talk about Trump like he would run away with the election.... Well Biden is the fave democrat in state by like 18 points, but Warren vs Trump would have Warren beating Trump in state...
(https://i.postimg.cc/L4zw2p9p/Trump-vs-Warren.jpg)
Quit saying Trump carried the state without mentioning that he probable would not carry the state (yes Alabama) now.... perhaps he shouldn't run. You know, best viable candidate in a state that is mostly conservative and all that jazz yall have been saying.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_warren-6251.html (https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_warren-6251.html)
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-biden-up-by-double-digits-in-democratic-race (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-biden-up-by-double-digits-in-democratic-race)
Looks to me the rot started at the top... but I'm just a fool to the boot lickers. Made your bed now you can sleep in it.
Republican officials in Washington are reportedly committed to preventing Moore from winning the nomination after he lost to Jones in 2017 amid allegations of sexual misconduct involving underage girls. Moore has denied all the allegations.The allegations were debunked, paid (fake) social media campaigns exposed, and timing was all aimed at scuttling Moore. Folks will believe the Washington Post at their peril. Strange the story didn't break in Alabama.
President Trump endorsed Moore’s primary opponent, former Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange, before endorsing Moore in the general election. After Jones’s victory, Trump Jr. sarcastically thanked former White House strategist Stephen Bannon, a major Moore backer, for his “good work.â€
Trump Jr. previously urged West Virginia Republicans to vote against former coal executive Don Blankenship in the 2018 primary, writing “no more fumbles like Alabama.†Blankenship lost in the primary to West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey (R), who lost in the general election"Good work", there, Junior.
Have you ever spoke to Roy, shook his hand, had lunch with him... didn't think so.... and Roy is probable better off for it also.
I don't shake hands with pedophiles
Sure. I can see the ads now from the judge pointing out how many libel/slander suits he's won against the women formerly known as teenagers. :smokin:
The senate seat is more important than the ego of this three time loser.
Unless you like the liberal agenda. :shrug:
i already said what i think about it on a thread on the subject, and I'n no sheep. I don't care for the expression.
The Dems took back the House last time by running relative centrists in districts where Trump had won. In other words, they played smart. Alabama Republicans itching for a re-match between Jones and Moore aren't playing smart; as others have pointed out Moore is practically the only conservative who could lose a Senate seat to a Democrat in Alabama. Jones this time around will have the power of incumbency, and, given that the numbers strongly favor the Dems to retake the Senate (most of those up for re-election this time are GOP), flipping the Alabama seat becomes crucial.
No time for clown shows, folks. What's at stake in 2020 is, well, everything.
So sending another Mitch butt boy from Alabama is the answer? I think not.
I rather win with Mitch butt boys than lose the Senate by running losers like Moore (who got fired twice and lost three times).
If he made any mistake last time, it was taking things for granted and not getting out there and working enough.
What exactly do you "win" with people like that?
So sending another Mitch butt boy from Alabama is the answer? I think not.False dilemma. Plenty of more electable conservatives would be preferable to saddling to a three-time loser.
I'm well past the point of caring what you, or anyone else here, cares for.Then why do you keep posting your blatant falsehoods? Did we accidentally chop your legs off so you couldn't leave? Or was that just a flesh wound?
Then why do you keep posting your blatant falsehoods? Did we accidentally chop your legs off so you couldn't leave? Or was that just a flesh wound?
No time for clown shows, folks. What's at stake in 2020 is, well, everything.
So you like losers???
It is ALWAYS time for a showdown.
If we don't stand up for what we believe in, who will?
Dems and Repubs - Not a dime's worth of difference... And this is exactly why.
What's at stake this election year is no damn different form every other election year.
If you really want to change DC and drain the swamp, the only ones who will are actual Conservatives. Men not ashamed to stand upon principles.
Roy Moore is exactly that, and I would stand by him.
How is schmucks like Moore going to drain the swamp??
So sending another Mitch butt boy from Alabama is the answer? I think not.
That's a false choice, notwithstanding your slander of the Senate majority leader, who is doing more to advance conservative principles than anyone else in Washington, including the President. You are suggesting there are no good conservatives in Alabama other than proven loser and accused bigot and pedophile Moore. That's a sad reflection on the state of Alabama.
It is ALWAYS time for a showdown.
If we don't stand up for what we believe in, who will?
Dems and Repubs - Not a dime's worth of difference... And this is exactly why.
What's at stake this election year is no damn different form every other election year.
If you really want to change DC and drain the swamp, the only ones who will are actual Conservatives. Men not ashamed to stand upon principles.
Roy Moore is exactly that, and I would stand by him.
I'm suggesting that Roy Moore spent his LIFE in the services of his country and state and is likely more conservative than all the rest put together! Which is EXACTLY why they, and you, fear him so!
How is schmucks like Moore going to drain the swamp??
I don't fear Roy Moore, other than for the damage he will do to the goal of keeping the Senate out of Democratic hands. Remember, the Senate is the body that confirms the judges. Judicial appointments are where your sort of unalloyed conservativism can find purchase. Allowing Doug Jones to be re-elected by supporting a turkey like Roy Moore is cutting off your nose to spite your face. It's foolishness.
Spoken from the perspective of a hermit on some mountain. Folks like Roy Moore can't drain the swamp because they can't get elected to do so. It is a pipe dream to think that your very narrowly-defined brand of conservatives can gain political power in D.C. Unrealistic idealism is the refuge of those who don't choose to exist as members of a community.
Bullcrap! YOU in particular fear him and anyone like him to the inth degree!
I'm well past the point of caring what you, or anyone else here, cares for.
You shouldn't. Thought we were better friends than to call each other sheep. :shrug:
I wasn't referring to you specifically.
I appreciate that. I felt wounded.
In a nutshell, the problem I have is I fear the loopy courts would permit Income and Consumption taxes together. Make it impossible to return to an Income tax I'd switch to consumption in a heartbeat.
On this topic: I think the Republican voters of AL should decide this. Not Mitch McConnell or Donald Trump.
Point out a single blatant falsehood I have posted @jmyrlefuller! I dare you!I already have, repeatedly, but you continue to recognize you are wrong. When I explained to you why you have no concrete evidence of your claim Obama is not an American citizen, you doubled down. When I explained the negative consequences and impossible claims of the FairTax using math, you denied it.
The bill does EXACTLY that. Including requiring the destruction of all IRS records.
I already have, repeatedly, but you continue to recognize you are wrong. When I explained to you why you have no concrete evidence of your claim Obama is not an American citizen, you doubled down. When I explained the negative consequences and impossible claims of the FairTax using math, you denied it.
Can someone please explain how nominating a candidate, who is likely the ONLY Republican candidate who is certain to LOSE this critically important Alabama Senate seat, advances conservatism?
The truth is, losing advances nothing AND Roy Moore is...again...far from the only solid Conservative in Alabama who can fill this seat. The proviso of the great Buckley is to choose the most conservative candidate who can win, not the most conservative candidate who will lose...his assertion is a great expression of common sense. Those supporting Moore, have sadly left common sense in the mud...they seem quite content to lose a key Senate seat so they can proclaim their conservative purity to the world.
Dumb. Just plain dumb.
The man's a fool. Why would I fear him? Why not nominate a conservative who can defeat Doug Jones? No, you'd rather pound your chest and "stick it" to folks like me.
Don't be an idiot.
I didn’t like the way they went after Moore in their standard, coordinated, media smear campaign, right out of the democrats’ playbook, and I defended him then.
Unfortunately, Roy Moore is no Donald Trump and didn’t have Trump’s pugnacious abilities to fend off his opponents attacks and Moore lost. His reputation and the perception that he can win was severely damaged. A damaged candidate is not a good bet on which to risk the farm.
So for the good of the senate republican majority he should not seek the nomination.
Can someone please explain how nominating a candidate, who is likely the ONLY Republican candidate who is certain to LOSE this critically important Alabama Senate seat, advances conservatism?
The truth is, losing advances nothing AND Roy Moore is...again...far from the only solid Conservative in Alabama who can fill this seat. The proviso of the great Buckley is to choose the most conservative candidate who can win, not the most conservative candidate who will lose...his assertion is a great expression of common sense. Those supporting Moore, have sadly left common sense in the mud...they seem quite content to lose a key Senate seat so they can proclaim their conservative purity to the world.
Dumb. Just plain dumb.
The bottom line here, to me, is if the people of Alabama want to vote for Moore. It is their prerogative.
The bottom line here, to me, is if the people of Alabama want to vote for Moore. It is their prerogative.Have we not established that they don't?
The conservative cause?
Well, help me out here about what the Pubs back @jmyrlefuller . Collins, Murkouski, Romney? And in the past..McCain and others.
To me the bottom line is as I said...whoever the people in Alabama want. I wouldn't like Trump coming out and d*amning a senatorial candidate running in Texas.
Dang, @DCPatriot . Rush said f**king around? Who knew? I don't listen to his show, but that sounds more like Howard Stern, who I don't listen to either.
Lots of people have had their posteriors handed to them when running for office...multiple times. I can think of a few and I'm sure you can.
Exactly, and prior to that, it will be solely up to the Republican primary voters in Alabama to choose the nominee.
I'm not going to patronize Alabama Republicans by stating the obvious, but Alabama Republicans do have the choice whether to act selfishly. Seeking vindication for the Dems' hardball tactics Is a selfish motivation, and so is wanting to stick it in the eye of mainstream Republicans who view Moore as a caricature, or who recognize full well that Moore provides Jones with his weakest opponent at a time when the NATION needs the Senate to stay GOP.If Alabama Republicans do not serve the interests of Alabama Republicans, it is patently obvious that NO ONE ELSE WILL.
There's a thin line that separates rebelliousness and self-martyrdom. I think Alabama Republicans are smart enough to recognize that Moore is on the wrong side of that line.
Of course. But that doesn't mean they have to make the same mistake twice. Just how does Doug Jones provide a voice for Alabama Republicans or conservatives?
If Alabamans want a voice, it is up to Alabamans.
Of course. But that doesn't mean they have to make the same mistake twice. Just how does Doug Jones provide a voice for Alabama Republicans or conservatives?
The ONLY mistake they made previously was in allowing the GOPe hucksters and their media accomplices to railroad them into abandoning a fine man at the 11th hour.
That's a false choice, notwithstanding your slander of the Senate majority leader, who is doing more to advance conservative principles than anyone else in Washington, including the President. You are suggesting there are no good conservatives in Alabama other than proven loser and accused bigot and pedophile Moore. That's a sad reflection on the state of Alabama.
He’s no more Conservative or interested in Conservative principals than you are.
I said it back when, and wayyy up this thread: It's up to Alabamans.
It's the height of arrogance to assume I, as a Desert Southwesterner, or a Northeasterner like @Jazzhead can pick their candidates for them. Contrary to posts I've read, a Senator is one of two Senators of his/her State, not a Senator of the Nation.
It's up to the GOP of Alabama.
I said it back when, and wayyy up this thread: It's up to Alabamans.
It's the height of arrogance to assume I, as a Desert Southwesterner, or a Northeasterner like @Jazzhead can pick their candidates for them. Contrary to posts I've read, a Senator is one of two Senators of his/her State, not a Senator of the Nation.
It's up to the GOP of Alabama.
So when the people of Kentucky nominates Mitch are you going to respect their decision as well?
Of course. But the GOP of Alabama nominated a loser last time around, and its mistake had consequences for conservatives nationwide. I see no reason why I shouldn't point out that it would be foolish to repeat that mistake.
Of course. But the GOP of Alabama nominated a loser last time around, and its mistake had consequences for conservatives nationwide. I see no reason why I shouldn't point out that it would be foolish to repeat that mistake.
What I'm interested in is conservative policies, and conservative judges. This bullshit about "conservative principals" and six bits will get you a cup of coffee.
Go on and nominate Roy Moore and see him get trounced in one of the most conservative states in the nation. Sure, you've stuck to your "principles". But you get Doug Jones as Senator, and how does that advance the cause of conservatism?
I'll say the same thing to you as I did to Bigun - don't be an idiot.
Did they? Really? Or.... did the leftist Christian-hating media and accusers create that loser scenario.... because they have a huge bullseye target painted on any and every strong, Christian candidate. Just like they attempted to do with Kavanaugh. Just like they succeeded in doing with Herman Cain. It's a pattern. And idiots keep falling for it.
Ayup. I'm not particularly happy about it, but I respect the choice made by voters of Kentucky, as I do the voters in other states who elect Republicans. Dittos for that idjit in Utah. It's not my place to impose my will on them.The choice of Roy Moore as the Republican nominee led directly to the election of a DEMOCRAT. I hate partisan politics, but it's an unfortunate reality that the actions of people in states other than our own have an impact on our own lives.
The choice of Roy Moore as the Republican nominee led directly to the election of a DEMOCRAT. I hate partisan politics, but it's an unfortunate reality that the actions of people in states other than our own have an impact on our own lives.
The choice of Roy Moore as the Republican nominee led directly to the election of a DEMOCRAT.
Jones was the result of Rat dirty tricks.
I try to pick my battles in wars I have some control over. It's not up to me who the Alabama GOP chooses to run for Senate.
I have a battle right here in AZ to keep a seat in Republican hands. 2020 has a Special Election for McStain's old seat, and the current occupant has shown much difficulty winning state-wide elections. Flake the Fake ensured his old seat went to the Rats and I don't want AZ to be represented in the Senate by two communists.
IOW...I have trouble enough without sticking my nose in Alabamans' business.
Then we must endeavor to only nominate pussified milquetoast quasi-liberal republicans, because every hard-core Conservative is given the same treatment as Moore. Then we'll win *****rollingeyes*****
What I'm interested in is conservative policies, and conservative judges. This bullshit about "conservative principals" and six bits will get you a cup of coffee. Go on and nominate Roy Moore and see him get trounced in one of the most conservative states in the nation. Sure, you've stuck to your "principles". But you get Doug Jones as Senator, and how does that advance the cause of conservatism?
I'll say the same thing to you as I did to Bigun - don't be an idiot.
There’s always a knee-jerk response, after an unexpected result, that chicanery must have been the reason for it. More was not popular with establishment types. It was the same, with Trump, in the election one year before. Nevertheless, the voters came out in a 2-1 margin for Trump, because they understood the danger of a Clinton presidency.
The special election brought unprecedented nationwide coverage. It’s not like the average voter was not aware of the importance of the seat held. Still, they stayed home. Moore didn’t lose, due to cheating. He lost, because he was a uninspiring candidate. Trump would not even cross the line into the state. He campaigned in Pensacola, at the last minute. Now, he has urged Alabama voters to select someone else. Has the president become establishment or is Moore just a bad choice?
Spoken as a non-conservative. What under-girds your so-called 'conservative policies, and conservative judges' is necessarily Conservative principle, else they are not conservative. Conservatism IS adherence to Conservative principles. That is what it is. So your statement is contradictory.
What's the difference? Tell me what makes the Republicans any better than the democrats? Not a damn thing. R'
The choice of Roy Moore as the Republican nominee led directly to the election of a DEMOCRAT. I hate partisan politics, but it's an unfortunate reality that the actions of people in states other than our own have an impact on our own lives.
Jones? Who dat?
I hate to break it to ya, but we stick our collective noses in everyone's business right here....
on a daily basis. It's how we roll. :laugh:
I think he lost mostly because he was successfully Herman Cained (slimed) by the leftists. And for the life of me, I can't understand how anyone, even GOP establishment types, could applaud that ssdd BS .... since it results in the leftists winning and the GOP losing.
Nah. He was ahead by 40 points before the smear campaign began. He was literally walking away with it.
OK - back to my question. Does that now mean Trump is among the establishment types, since he’s kneecapping Moore, ahead of the primary?
OK - back to my question. Does that now mean Trump is among the establishment types, since he’s kneecapping Moore, ahead of the primary?
:laugh: :beer:
(I got a fresh keg of Shock Top in yesterday, to be tapped later.)
Good for you. I could use a beer or two right about now. It's raining outside (so no gardening)....I am therefore forced to do house cleaning (yuck).... and it always puts me in a wacky mood whenever I am forced to do something I loathe...lolol.
Lol! Touché. :laugh:
I need to get into it a bit earlier than expected. My Phoenix friend is bringing us a new kitteh today. Oh well...ten was never enough anyway.
***evilkitty
Well, honestly, it was a serious question, not a ‘gotcha.’ Whatever you think of the tactics against Moore, or their origins, his response to it was exceptionally poor. In the case of Trump, I think his motivations are geared more towards the optics. If he is on the short end of the situation, it is always someone else’s fault, like the ‘rigged system’ or ‘enemy of the people’ media types. Moore, on the other hand, is a loser, in his view. Also, I believe Trump holds people like Moore in contempt. The whole horse riding, hat wearing, pistol waving image makes him an ass-backwards yokel. His overall view of southerners should have been apparent, in this year’s CPAC speech.
When the slime started falling though, he didn't do much to counter it and it eventually got him.
I'm not sure though the Left can use that tactic this time around. Their accusers have been discredited, and I think this time most people would be like 'Geez, not this sh** again!'
I don't think that's true - I think they took all the air out of him - He got *NO* airtime to retaliate. He was effectively stifled, unless you actually were paying attention and trying to hear his side of things by seeking it out... Even the GOP and talking heads were against him... He goes onto Hannity for an obvious 'Hannitizing'... a nice softball interview to give him a chance to say his piece... But that ain't what happened - I do not think he was ready to get roasted by Hannity, and I do not think he would have gone on if he'd have seen that coming.
And it doesn't matter about the left (you really have to get over the whole left/right thing - Other than Conservatives, it is a monolithic same-damn-thing)... Sure the left will go after him - But his enemy is the so-called 'right', like Tumpy Jr in this OP. His own party will try to cut his throat, which is exactly the thing that wrecked him last time, not the overtures of the Left.
Which is one reason why the GOP is called the stupid party. They eat their own, while the rats march in lock-step every time. Unity is key (united we stand, divided we fall). And the GOP ain't got it.
And likewise many of the the inhabitants of this thread.
Pick a Moore thread...any Moore thread. rrthree
And likewise many of the the inhabitants of this thread.
True dat. Inhabitants that would rather see a damned DemocRat in that Senate seat than Moore. Which I really don't get.... or agree with.
That's right. Their abhorrence of us yokels is noted.
Which is one reason why the GOP is called the stupid party. They eat their own, while the rats march in lock-step every time. Unity is key (united we stand, divided we fall). And the GOP ain't got it.
I could swear I’ve seen a few threads, discussing their disarray and splintering over impeachment. :shrug:
I don't think that's true - I think they took all the air out of him - He got *NO* airtime to retaliate. He was effectively stifled, unless you actually were paying attention and trying to hear his side of things by seeking it out... Even the GOP and talking heads were against him... He goes onto Hannity for an obvious 'Hannitizing'... a nice softball interview to give him a chance to say his piece... But that ain't what happened - I do not think he was ready to get roasted by Hannity, and I do not think he would have gone on if he'd have seen that coming.
And it doesn't matter about the left (you really have to get over the whole left/right thing - Other than Conservatives, it is a monolithic same-damn-thing)... Sure the left will go after him - But his enemy is the so-called 'right', like Tumpy Jr in this OP. His own party will try to cut his throat, which is exactly the thing that wrecked him last time, not the overtures of the Left.
I could swear I’ve seen a few threads, discussing their disarray and splintering over impeachment. :shrug:
True dat. Inhabitants that would rather see a damned DemocRat in that Senate seat than Moore. Which I really don't get.... or agree with.
That's right. Their abhorrence of us yokels is noted.
Your virtue-signaling is boring.
Your virtue-signaling is boring.
You misunderstand, @Jazzhead. Virtue signaling is done by people who lack virtue in order to make them appear to have virtue.
@roamer_1 does not fall into that category.
Did they? Really? Or.... did the leftist Christian-hating media and accusers create that loser scenario.... because they have a huge bullseye target painted on any and every strong, Christian candidate. Just like they attempted to do with Kavanaugh. Just like they succeeded in doing with Herman Cain. It's a pattern. And idiots keep falling for it.It goes back past Clarence Thomas, actually. Same gambit, only the Media are even less fair (Dem biased) than they were then.
It goes back past Clarence Thomas, actually. Same gambit, only the Media are even less fair (Dem biased) than they were then.
You misunderstand, @Jazzhead. Virtue signaling is done by people who lack virtue in order to make them appear to have virtue.
@roamer_1 does not fall into that category.
It goes back past Clarence Thomas, actually. Same gambit, only the Media are even less fair (Dem biased) than they were then.
Your virtue-signaling is boring.
The choice of Roy Moore as the Republican nominee led directly to the election of a DEMOCRAT. I hate partisan politics, but it's an unfortunate reality that the actions of people in states other than our own have an impact on our own lives.The choice of Moore only meant that the Country Club and the Liberals joined hands to keep someone out who just might give 'em all Hell. If you're a fan of the shenanigans the GOP Congress has pulled in the first two years of the Trump Presidency, mainly refusing to pass the legislation needed for him to implement policy (until they lost the House and had a real excuse), then keep hitting the same button.
Which is one reason why the GOP is called the stupid party. They eat their own, while the rats march in lock-step every time. Unity is key (united we stand, divided we fall). And the GOP ain't got it.Ironic, ain't it? Since Lincoln himself talked about "a house divided..."
True dat. Inhabitants that would rather see a damned DemocRat in that Senate seat than Moore. Which I really don't get.... or agree with.A vote for Moore is a vote for a Democrat.
Which is one reason why the GOP is called the stupid party. They eat their own, while the rats march in lock-step every time. Unity is key (united we stand, divided we fall). And the GOP ain't got it.Give us a candidate we can unite behind, then we will unite. Moore has already proven he's not it.
You misunderstand, @Jazzhead. Virtue signaling is done by people who lack virtue in order to make them appear to have virtue.
@roamer_1 does not fall into that category.
@roamer_1 is constantly citing his sacred "principals" as he lives atop his mountain, proclaiming his virtue over us lowly pragmatists who dare to want to do such things as win elections and solve real problems. I'm sick of his shit.
@roamer_1 is constantly citing his sacred "principals" as he lives atop his mountain, proclaiming his virtue over us lowly pragmatists who dare to want to do such things as win elections and solve real problems. I'm sick of his shit.
So that means you've finally given up on John Kasich?
If those who throw principles to the wind for the sake of "winning" would stand their ground, on principle,maybe this country wouldn't be such a mess.
Your virtue-signaling is boring.
@roamer_1 is constantly citing his sacred "principals" as he lives atop his mountain, proclaiming his virtue over us lowly pragmatists who dare to want to do such things as win elections and solve real problems. I'm sick of his shit.
False choice. What is your objection to the Buckley principle?
False choice. What is your objection to the Buckley principle?Voting for the lesser evil just gets you to the greater evil by a more circuitous route.
Sad comment, really.
[...]
If those who throw principles to the wind for the sake of "winning" would stand their ground, on principle,maybe this country wouldn't be such a mess.
Ain't that the fact of it.Thanks! :seeya:
Nice to see you Smoke. Hope it's all good for you...
:beer:
The choice of Moore only meant that the Country Club and the Liberals joined hands to keep someone out who just might give 'em all Hell. If you're a fan of the shenanigans the GOP Congress has pulled in the first two years of the Trump Presidency, mainly refusing to pass the legislation needed for him to implement policy (until they lost the House and had a real excuse), then keep hitting the same button.
If you really want to drain the swamp, you need people who don't mind telling where the mud is.
As for it being unfortunate that people in other states influence our politics, whichever state we're in, well, yes, it is.
From faux social media campaigns to well funded astroturf organizations that spring up like mushrooms and are toxic to local policy, it is a real blight on the electoral process.
Considering that is EXACTLY the sort of crap that kept Moore out last time, along with the concerted efforts of the homomedia who hated him since he upheld the Alabama Constitution on the issue of same sex 'marriage', I'd think any Conservative would be happy to see him get another shot at office, especially since the air has been cleared.
YMMV.
Thanks to all y'all for your defense in my absence.
I consider myself to be in the best of company!
@Bigun
@Sanguine
@XenaLee
@Cyber Liberty
:beer: :patriot: :seeya:
Thanks! :seeya:
Working down in NV, on an exploration well. Life is good. :beer:
Ugh! That's gotta be hotter than a popcorn fart, and twice as dusty! Hope you've got air conditioning or a nice swimmin hole.
Though maybe not as bad for a feller used to NoDak summers...
As for me, I'll stay up here in the pines and the birches where the shade works.
:beer:
You want hot? 100 here today.
We're around 75 today, and the house is wide open, with the smell of lilacs wafting through... Blowing all the heat from the stove right out the window.
(I have chili, brownies, and chocolate pudding all going right now in anticipation of Shabbat.)
:beer:
June and July will be 80's with cool nights between 40 and 50
Hopefully, we won't see 90's till August, and won't see 100's at all.
Your virtue-signaling is boring.
@roamer_1 is chili, brownies, and chocolate pudding typical Sabbath food?
Ugh! That's gotta be hotter than a popcorn fart, and twice as dusty! Hope you've got air conditioning or a nice swimmin hole.Had rain every day (snow, even!) and night time temps in the 30s. Feels a lot like home, only wetter (some desert, huh? :shrug:)
Though maybe not as bad for a feller used to NoDak summers...
As for me, I'll stay up here in the pines and the birches where the shade works.
:beer:
@roamer_1 I think avocados are illegal now. MSNBC told me so.
Had rain every day (snow, even!) and night time temps in the 30s. Feels a lot like home, only wetter (some desert, huh? :shrug:)
It's the second time I have worked in a desert area in the last year and been rained on for better'n a week. Maybe I should go on the road to drought areas and charge to hang out.....
WAT?
I have no idea what you're sayin. :shrug:
That's the Good Lord lookin out for a poor northern boy (Ha! see what I did there :silly:):nono: Slander me, sir, if you must, but recall I was born and raised South of the Mason-Dixon Line!
:beer:
Because Trump. Mexico I think.
:nono: Slander me, sir, if you must, but recall I was born and raised South of the Mason-Dixon Line!
:silly:
(The next conflict won't be between North and South). :beer:
And Yep, He's definitely looking out for me!
:silly: :silly: :silly:Yep! (I'm just pokin' back!) :silly:
You know I am just pokin fun.
:beer:
LOL!
@Sanguine
Well, the pudding is because I found out my milk has almost turned, and I have to use it up... BTW, make it with cream skimmed off of raw milk and you will never go back...
But yeah - Sabbath is a celebration. I try not to cook after friday sundown, so I go at it early on friday afternoon and make what I need for Shabbat.
So egg/bacon/cheese salad on sourdough for breakfast, a nice beef salsa thing on a pretzel roll for lunch, and chili or chili mac for tonight and saturday night... Plenty of fruit (to include my first watermelon for the year), and of course, the brownies in a salted caramel sauce...
I wish I had an avacado for under the egg salad, but I'll make due without. :shrug:
:nono: Slander me, sir, if you must, but recall I was born and raised South of the Mason-Dixon Line!
:silly:
(The next conflict won't be between North and South). :beer:
And Yep, He's definitely looking out for me!
Yep! (I'm just pokin' back!) :silly:
:beer:
I wondered. People have different customs...
These pokins are making me thirsty. 888mouth
:shrug:
No custom... Just trying to go by what the Bible says.
Don't work (other than chores), don't travel (other than a little hiking), don't cook (so cold-cuts, I guess).
A day of rest with family to include the Father above... By definition, it is a feast, not a fast.
So a Bible study down at the fishin hole ought not be out of the ordinary.
and if I happen to bring a sammich and some brownies (in a perfect home-made salted caramel sauce), what could be wrong with that?
And that's the plan.
:shrug:
I've got a porch and PBR, Jussayin.
Thanks to all y'all for your defense in my absence.
I consider myself to be in the best of company!
@Bigun
@Sanguine
@XenaLee
@Cyber Liberty
:beer: :patriot: :seeya:
I call um like I see um. Always have and always will.
As to good company, I doubt there is any better to find.
And a PERFECT home made salted caramel sauce...
Yeah, sorry to crash the party on exclusivity, nobody needs the South's heritage of slavery or lynching, Romer1 doesn't need to lecture us on religion or the south, he abandoned the unborn. Enough, of this one way drama here at the expense of others. It took real bravery to fight against a side that had this evil on its side, that being slavery. Slavery has nothing to do with being a good Christian, don't bully your bankrupt morals into this thread.
A "Roy Moore thread" here at the Briefing Room is always a good time to find out which way the sentiments and true political "tilts" of the members of this forum REALLY lean...
Fishrrman <-- keepin' notes
@roamer_1
OK, I'll bite... can you share your secrets for the PERFECT home made salted caramel sauce?
(One of my favorites and would love a good recipe and/or tips!)
Look on the bright side @EdJames he didn't accuse you of facilitating the killing of Christians in the Middle East.
@EdJames
Kinda this:
Error 404 (Not Found)!!1 (http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/watch?v=SFUu6KEbGl4#)
I put the measured (salted) butter in the freezer just as I start, and I suspect I am using more vanilla. and the only trick I have is that I want a deeper tone, so I put a tiny bit of blackstrap molasses in it once the cream and butter calm down, but while it is still hot...
I mean I take a regular table spoon, dunk it in the room temp molasses before I start, and let it drip back into the bottle the whole time till there is just a skiff of it left on the spoon... whatever will not fall off... Then I drag that through the caramel till the most of it comes off... That gave me that deep tone I wanted.
I had one heck of a time not getting toffee at the end, my old way, but this stays nice and soft.
A nice hunk of brownie, scatter some finely chopped walnuts on top (pecans are better if you have em), drizzle liberally with the caramel sauce, and finish with a very light dust of sea salt.
It is perfection.
@roamer_1
Thank you kindly, sir!
Video opened in a new tab and your notes copied into a recipe text file!!
Thank you kindly, sir!
Yeah, sorry to crash the party on exclusivity, nobody needs the South's heritage of slavery or lynching, Romer1 doesn't need to lecture us on religion or the south, he abandoned the unborn. Enough, of this one way drama here at the expense of others. It took real bravery to fight against a side that had this evil on its side, that being slavery. Slavery has nothing to do with being a good Christian, don't bully your bankrupt morals into this thread.Read your Bible, boy, and you will find out the South didn't invent slavery, Learn your history, and you can pack your Yankee sanctimony away for the tourists. You act as if the North never had slaves or never traded in them. You act as if the North never hanged a man who didn't deserve it, yet they invaded and burned a whole region in the name of "unity" and stole much of what wasn't nailed down, and some of what was (See:Carpetbaggers).
Read your Bible, boy, and you will find out the South didn't invent slavery, Learn your history, and you can pack your Yankee sanctimony away for the tourists. You act as if the North never had slaves or never traded in them. You act as if the North never hanged a man who didn't deserve it, yet they invaded and burned a whole region in the name of "unity" and stole much of what wasn't nailed down, and some of what was (See:Carpetbaggers).
Spare me.
It's a long fall from a high horse, so maybe you'd better get down.
Let us know how it turns out!
I will, but it won't be soon.... I pretty much reserve desserts (aside from fruit) for special occasions... maybe Independence Day!
@Smokin Joe 's bitter screed reminds me that Southerners have always had an uneasy relationship with the Republican Party. The GOP is unashamedly the Party of Lincoln, which indeed fought a war to unify a nation and, in the process, cleanse it of the moral stain of slavery. It is the GOP that passed the 14th amendment that added the Constitution's guarantee of the law's equal protection. It is, in that sense, the party of the North, and the Democrats the historic apologists for the slavers' lost cause. It was Nixon who changed that, and turned the GOP into a party that could attract Southerners. Today, of course, it is dominated by them, and it is Republicans like me that are in the eclipse.How conveniently you leave out the Northerners' slaves ( Newport, Rhode Island, was one of the busiest ports of the slave trade), and the actions of their Generals, hanging civilians in the South (George Armstrong Custer was one of the worst).
I don't have rose colored glasses; the GOP and the North created with Reconstruction and the failure to carry through with it the conditions which spawned lynching and the reaction of Jim Crow. It was Southerners who insisted on Jim Crow, and the North was too spineless to resist it. But, again, the defining mission of the GOP as set out by Lincoln itself was reconciliation, and it would take a century to understand that acquiescing to southern whites' bitterness would lead to today's identity politics by creating a wound that could never heal.
Same here. I was trying to live vicariously through you. :laugh:
How conveniently you leave out the Northerners' slaves ( Newport, Rhode Island, was one of the busiest ports of the slave trade), and the actions of their Generals, hanging civilians in the South (George Armstrong Custer was one of the worst).
I suppose you are going to tell me the North never had 'those people' come and go by the 'servant's entrance', wait on a different bench and drink from different water fountains--in Washington DC, even (don't bother, I saw it). As I said, spare me your sanctimony.
When the South no longer gave the consent of the governed, a requirement for 'just power', the North invaded and imposed it, murdering and burning along the way. The aftermath was often overseen by Yankees or their appointees, or the slim pickings offered in sham elections supervised by the occupiers. The post bellum problems are a result of those policies, and not native to the South, but imposed by a conqueror, not a 'reunifier'.
On April 16, 1864, the New York Times reported that rebel forces under the command of General Nathan Bedford Forrest, after twice using a “flag of truce†to maneuver prior to attack, overwhelmed defenders. After taking the fort, “the Confederates commenced an indiscriminate butchery of the whites and blacks, including those of both colors who had been previously wounded.†Black women and children in the fort were also slaughtered. “Out of the garrison of six hundred, only two hundred remained alive.†In the same issue, the Times published an account of events from a “correspondent of the Union, who was on board the steamer Platte Valley at Fort Pillow.†This correspondent “gives even a more appalling description of the fiendishness of the rebels.â€
“On the morning after the battle the rebels went over the field, and shot the negroes who had not died from their wounds . . . . Many of those who had escaped from the works and hospital, who desired to be treated as prisoners of war, as the rebels said, were ordered to fall into line, and when they had formed, were inhumanly shot down. Of 350 colored troops not more than 56 escaped the massacre, and not one officer that commanded them survives.â€
The Black soldiers who were butchered in cold blood by the Confederate troops were regularly enlisted in the Union army, were in full uniform, and were defending the United States flag.
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/168687
(https://angryamericanbirds.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/lynching-map.gif)That didn't stop ships sailing from there from being involved in the trade.
https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4956&context=etd (https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4956&context=etd)
Slavery, emancipation and Black freedom in RhodeIsland, 1652-1842
http://slavenorth.com/rhodeisland.htm (http://slavenorth.com/rhodeisland.htm)
Sorry, slavery ended in Rhode Island well before the war.
If you are talking about "murdering", then ask those people in Kansas about raids. There's going to be enough to go all around.
Poll: Mo Brooks Will Crush Roy Moore In 2020 Alabama State Primary
2:56 PM 03/14/2019 | Politics
Phillip Stucky | Contributor
The conservative action group Club for Growth released a poll Thursday that revealed Rep. Mo Brooks could demolish Roy Moore in the 2020 Alabama Senate primary.
Republican Rep. Mo Brooks earned 52-percent support, compared to Moore who only earned 32 percent. An additional 16 percent remained undecided in the poll.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/14/moore-trails-brooks/
Good grief, are you serious? Another stupid Roy Moore thread devolving into refighting the war between the states and "proving" how evil southerners were?
I was trying to figure out why this thread generated so many comments, and now I get it. Roy Moore, imperfect though he may be, is seen as a symbol of the common man, the common Southern man. Those who despise the common man and particularly despise the southern part are anti-Moore. Those who see him as a wronged symbol of common southern men, see him as another victim of the elitists. That's not very well worded, but I think I captured the essence.
Good grief, are you serious? Another stupid Roy Moore thread devolving into refighting the war between the states and "proving" how evil southerners were?You did just fine, imho. :beer:
I was trying to figure out why this thread generated so many comments, and now I get it. Roy Moore, imperfect though he may be, is seen as a symbol of the common man, the common Southern man. Those who despise the common man and particularly despise the southern part are anti-Moore. Those who see him as a wronged symbol of common southern men, see him as another victim of the elitists. That's not very well worded, but I think I captured the essence.
No, there are others in this race, why is not Mo Brooks seen as the quintessential Southern Man???
Others run with Roy Moore in this manner. He has no monopoly on this. And Mo Brooks may well trounce Roy Moore in primaries. Moore had his shot, he had his time, Brooks deserves to be spoken up for as well.
Oh, yes, anti-Trumpers should set the tempo, even though Trump won the deep red states of the South in general big time.
They speak up for Moore but some or all were anti-Trump, don't like the turn-of-events, sorry. Sure, they have a right to speak. So do others.
No, there are others in this race, why is not Mo Brooks seen as the quintessential Southern Man???
Others run with Roy Moore in this manner. He has no monopoly on this. And Mo Brooks may well trounce Roy Moore in primaries. Moore had his shot, he had his time, Brooks deserves to be spoken up for as well.
Oh, yes, anti-Trumpers should set the tempo, even though Trump won the deep red states of the South in general big time.
They speak up for Moore but some or all were anti-Trump, don't like the turn-of-events, sorry. Sure, they have a right to speak. So do others.
Don't be so self-righteous. History books always whitewash the victors and demonize the vanquished. It's the way of the world.
Who do you consider the vanquished? Southern whites? The ones who formed the Klan, imposed Jim Crow, and sowed the Strange Fruit? My apologies for daring to "demonize" such saintly behavior.Read my comments on Jim Crow above. You act as if it was just a southern phenomenon, and I assure you it was not. I make no excuses for the Klan, except to say they were not as endemic as you seem to think.
For all we know, Trump Jr. might have made his statements on behalf of some interested parties of Alabama.So who made JUNIOR lord and master over the fiefdom of Alabama?
This other is just divisive. These others speak for the South which voted overwhelmingly for Trump in the primaries and general election but now, all of a sudden, anti-Trumpers define what the South is and are free to ignore this other. It's ludicrous. They asked for it, this should not be just set aside.
And I'm sorry furthermore, Senator Jeff Sessions is known to have prosecuted and convicted those white supremacists, Klan, whatever they are, they are part of the equation. I guess, it's more like a Roy Moore fan club but he might get defeated well in the coming primary race.
Allow me, @TomSea to expound on your excellent theory degrading the South, in general, We are a bunch of dumb hicks, proving it by voting for Trump but the majority of Northerners proved they're stupider than US by voting majority hellary.
Allow me, @TomSea to expound on your excellent theory degrading the South, in general, We are a bunch of dumb hicks, proving it by voting for Trump but the majority of Northerners proved they're stupider than US by voting majority hellary.
OUCH! The Democrats are the party of slavery. They still keep African Americans enslaved with their govment payments. As if they are not egumecated enuf to rise above poverty and welfaar. Not even to mention black genocide called Planned Parenthood.
This is all very true.
Allow me, @TomSea to expound on your excellent theory degrading the South, in general, We are a bunch of dumb hicks, proving it by voting for Trump but the majority of Northerners proved they're stupider than US by voting majority hellary.
Yeah, sorry to crash the party on exclusivity, nobody needs the South's heritage of slavery or lynching, Romer1 doesn't need to lecture us on religion or the south, he abandoned the unborn. Enough, of this one way drama here at the expense of others. It took real bravery to fight against a side that had this evil on its side, that being slavery. Slavery has nothing to do with being a good Christian, don't bully your bankrupt morals into this thread.
Quote from: TomSea on May 31, 2019, 07:47:25 PM
Yeah, sorry to crash the party on exclusivity, nobody needs the South's heritage of slavery or lynching, Romer1 doesn't need to lecture us on religion or the south, he abandoned the unborn. Enough, of this one way drama here at the expense of others. It took real bravery to fight against a side that had this evil on its side, that being slavery. Slavery has nothing to do with being a good Christian, don't bully your bankrupt morals into this thread.
@mystery-ak
@Mod1
In the first damn place, I 'lectured' NO ONE on religion - @Sanguine asked about a comment I made in passing, and I replied in two posts which only offered my practices, and that in a cheery and off-hand way.
In the second damn place, Nothing the hell AT ALL was said by me about the South, except again, an off-hand implied joke directly pointed at @Smokin Joe
And in the third damn place, the most scurrilous charge, I have neither 'abandoned the unborn' nor will I EVER.
I have ignored @TomSea 's insipid posts for years - Him being the only person to remain on my ignore list for extended periods of time - mostly because of his inability to type a coherent sentence...
But now I am calling him out.
<<Cyber Note: We weren't aware of Tom's violation of the Personal Attack rule because nobody reported it to the Mods. Let's not escalate the fight.>>
You want to know why folks are fallin off here, it's shit like this.
That I should even have to defend myself against this crap is an amazement to me.
@roamer_1
Its expected that people attack us because of our faith. It gets annoying but count it all joy!
Words from the mouths of babes, your way would have abandoned Christians in the Middle East. Syria and Iraq but you don't seem to know anything about fioreign policy to begin with. That's what Trump's policy has done and that means stopping their slaughter from ISIS, yet, your way would have nullified that. Your way would have continued persecution of Christians in the Middle East a la Obama, your views are just too uninformed to even realize that in your anti-Trump rants. I repeat, genocide against Christians would have likely continued with no GOP or Trump in the White House.
Too busy talking about Gog and Magog coming down from the North and the 144,000 saved to know about modern current events!
As for Romer, there seems to be a certain faith, he can't let go, without detracting remarks, so let's not be hypocrites, what? St. Jerome's Bible, Latin Vulgate, poor translation? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. No authoritative position here, St. Jerome was just of the wrong faith.
@Chosen Daughter
My last word on the topic, Jesus had humility too, end of topic.
Roy Moore is close to irrelevant, Mo Brooks will give him a good ol' Texas a$$ whupin', people like to dish it out but can't take it.
And maybe you don't represent Christianity either, if it would have abandoned Christians to the worse. I make no such claim.
But I'm not here just to shoot my mouth off about guns or whatever, just being self-promoting in all. That's it is just about me-me-me.
<<Cyber Note: We weren't aware of Tom's violation of the Personal Attack rule because nobody reported it to the Mods. Let's not escalate the fight.>>
I still say that the Republican nominee for the Alabama Senate seat is up to the good Republican primary voters of the great state of Alabama.
Trump, Jr. should keep his mouth shut. 888mouth
Why? @Sighlass actually lives in Alabama. If I lived there I would be supporting Roy Moore as well.
I still say that the Republican nominee for the Alabama Senate seat is up to the good Republican primary voters of the great state of Alabama.
Trump, Jr. should keep his mouth shut. 888mouth
There is a reason why there is no Religion Cat at TBR...not because I lack faith, quite the contrary.
This is a Political Forum and a political thread and once you start allowing it posts start sounding like sermons.
I am trying to be reasonable about this but please keep it off political threads...I will allow it on the Life News Cat to some extent.
I still say that the Republican nominee for the Alabama Senate seat is up to the good Republican primary voters of the great state of Alabama.Absolutely right on both counts!
Trump, Jr. should keep his mouth shut. 888mouth
Just for you @jmyrlefuller @TomSea:Oh, a tabloid report! I'm SO convinced now. /sarc
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2146622/amp/Barack-Obama-Kenyan-born-2007-according-literary-agency--months-announcing-bid-U-S-presidency.html?__twitter_impression=true&fbclid=IwAR07bRkskhRhxxTulXXvj3IkXzhw3hKXc0iS8af9CwB5ktK7DH8Y8EJSzDw (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2146622/amp/Barack-Obama-Kenyan-born-2007-according-literary-agency--months-announcing-bid-U-S-presidency.html?__twitter_impression=true&fbclid=IwAR07bRkskhRhxxTulXXvj3IkXzhw3hKXc0iS8af9CwB5ktK7DH8Y8EJSzDw)
Oh, a tabloid report! I'm SO convinced now. /sarc
Buzz off, troll.
Tom, you do remember that Mo (whom I also like) lost to that "loser" Roy last time.... yet folks like to call Roy the loser.... what changed?
(https://i.postimg.cc/2jgLwVNv/Roy-Moore-1.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/J0YDVzsw/Roy-Moore-2.jpg)
Big deal he won the primary.. He lost the general election, that makes him a loser.