The Briefing Room

General Category => Elections 2020 => Topic started by: mystery-ak on December 01, 2020, 07:55:18 pm

Title: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: mystery-ak on December 01, 2020, 07:55:18 pm
 Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
By MICHAEL BALSAMO
35 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

His comments come despite President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that the election was stolen, and his refusal to concede his loss to President-Elect Joe Biden.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election.

“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.

The comments are especially direct coming from Barr, who has been one of the president’s most ardent allies. Before the election, he had repeatedly raised the notion that mail-in voter fraud could be especially vulnerable to fraud during the coronavirus pandemic as Americans feared going to polls and instead chose to vote by mail.

more
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-elections-william-barr-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: mystery-ak on December 01, 2020, 07:55:46 pm
...and there you have it...that's all folks!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 08:09:29 pm
About flippin' time.   There are two GA Senate contests to win, and not a moment to lose.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 01, 2020, 08:18:40 pm
Amazing.  Cant wait to see how he will be savaged.  Truth is not welcome in a lot of parts here.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: aligncare on December 01, 2020, 08:23:50 pm
apnews says “ Barr, (is) one of the president’s most ardent allies.  :silly:

Barr was a moderately safe pick after the Sessions mistake, that’s all.

Presidents usually select close friends and ‘wing men’ for their AG, which was decidedly not Barr.

Unfortunately, this was another of Trump’s unavoidable mistakes. Unavoidable because as an outsider he had no connected friends in Washington with the critical prosecutor skills to fill the all important AG position.

He needed someone watching his back in the legal snake pit that is Washington politics. A situation that repeatedly bogged his presidency down in personnel issues and controversy.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 08:28:35 pm
...and there you have it...that's all folks!
He says he hasn't seen enough evidence.

I would ask him what the DOJ has done by way of investigating this election. Has he been looking?

I don't know, I haven't heard.

What is the margin of victory in AZ, 10k votes? In MI, 150k votes? GA - 12k votes? PA, 80k votes? WI, 20k votes?

There's not alot of fraud required to swing things there, I'm not AG but I've heard plenty of circumstantial evidence. I'm not sure how Barr can make such an assertion.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: FeelNoPain on December 01, 2020, 09:04:31 pm
He says he hasn't seen enough evidence.

I would ask him what the DOJ has done by way of investigating this election. Has he been looking?

I don't know, I haven't heard.

What is the margin of victory in AZ, 10k votes? In MI, 150k votes? GA - 12k votes? PA, 80k votes? WI, 20k votes?

There's not alot of fraud required to swing things there, I'm not AG but I've heard plenty of circumstantial evidence. I'm not sure how Barr can make such an assertion.

Crooked Hillary lost by less.
And James "Deep State" Comey absolutely killed her with that letter. Late deciders in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania broke heavy for Trump in 2016.

That's tangible election interference right there. Not that Trump complained about it, of course.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 01, 2020, 09:10:29 pm
Crooked Hillary lost by less.
And James "Deep State" Comey absolutely killed her with that letter. Late deciders in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania broke heavy for Trump in 2016.

That's tangible election interference right there. Not that Trump complained about it, of course.

No, Trump instead searched for those three million illegals that cast ballots for Hillary. He assured us this was the reason for the difference in the popular vote.

As soon as we find those ballots, we should move on to the ones from this election...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 01, 2020, 09:15:35 pm
Quote
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

A scathing indictment of the Justice Department.  Because there are random Americans uncovering evidence all across the country that would absolutely change the outcomes of several 2020 elections including the Presidency.  The fact that the Justice Department hasn't proves that they are incompetent, worthless, or downright corrupt.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 09:16:36 pm
Crooked Hillary lost by less.
And James "Deep State" Comey absolutely killed her with that letter. Late deciders in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania broke heavy for Trump in 2016.

That's tangible election interference right there. Not that Trump complained about it, of course.
I’m sure your post makes complete sense to CNN’s audience and others with no capacity for critical thought. Others might consider it a tad sophistic.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 01, 2020, 09:18:05 pm
...and there you have it...that's all folks!

Exactly ... and is if we didn't see this coming!  AG Barr has been worthless from the start.  What continues to trouble me and I continue to question is why Trump selected Barr in the first place.  His association with past administrations and being part of the swamp have been obvious.  Who suggested him to Trump?? ....OR better yet .... perhaps even Trump has been in on this manipulation?

Here come the daggers and spears, I know ... but his poor selection hasn't just been limited to Barr; Sessions, Rosenstein, Giuliani ....and many others.  Why?  If these people were selected on someone's advice; who advised him?  My guess is Jared.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: cato potatoe on December 01, 2020, 09:19:24 pm
Trump made a habit of claiming the elections were rigged whenever he lost a primary.  I remember when he claimed to have evidence that Obama was born abroad.  Bottom line, he says a lot of things he can't prove ... and now that he needs people to listen to him, most are tuning him out.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 01, 2020, 09:20:00 pm
A scathing indictment of the Justice Department.  Because there are random Americans uncovering evidence all across the country that would absolutely change the outcomes of several 2020 elections including the Presidency.  The fact that the Justice Department hasn't proves that they are incompetent, worthless, or downright corrupt.

I've brought that point up in here numerous times .... since Trump named Sessions AG.  I cringed when he was selected.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 09:21:21 pm
Trump made a habit of claiming the elections were rigged whenever he lost a primary.  I remember when he claimed to have evidence that Obama was born abroad.  Bottom line, he says a lot of things he can't prove ... and now that he needs people to listen to him, most are tuning him out.
Then they should watch the state hearings ongoing now.

This has nothing to do with what Trump is saying. If Rasmussen is to be believed half the nation, and 30% of democrats, think the election was bogus.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 01, 2020, 09:23:26 pm
...and there you have it...that's all folks!

Another deep state POS has spoken.   Now he and his wife can go back to openly being best buds with Mueller & Co.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 01, 2020, 09:30:27 pm
Then they should watch the state hearings ongoing now.

This has nothing to do with what Trump is saying.

No, it has nothing to do with what Trump is saying but Trump not know where his heads of the CIA, FBI, and now this statement by Barr, is very telling.  It's absolutely over.  Those that Trump thought were on his side, especially Barr have never been on his side.  The question still remains ... why in the heck did he appoint him/them in the first place?

Certainly raises questions in my mind.

Don't get me wrong.  Trump has done a lot of good and certainly exceeded a lot of expectations .... but I can't help but question his selection of a lot of people and his lack of actions on several issues; border security when he had a full majority and his failure to utilize the Insurrection Act...tearing down every Republican candidate but going soft on Hillary .... there are other instances...and I can make other speculations now as well...but I don't want to be burned at the stake in here...so I'll leave well enough alone.

I don't think we'll ever know some of the answers.

Do I believe this election was rigged and fraudulent?  Absolutely without a doubt!!!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 09:33:07 pm
Because Trump, the outsider, had only the GOPe and deep state beltway denizens to choose from and depend upon. He was screwed from the outset. I’m amazed he did as well as he did.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 09:34:41 pm
Trump made a habit of claiming the elections were rigged whenever he lost a primary.  I remember when he claimed to have evidence that Obama was born abroad.  Bottom line, he says a lot of things he can't prove ... and now that he needs people to listen to him, most are tuning him out.

Yup.  He's the boy who cried "wolf" one too many times.  Only the cultists believe him now. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 01, 2020, 09:35:09 pm
   IOW, He AND Sessions wouldn't make a pimple on either of these girl's azzes.

(https://hulshofschmidt.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/janet-reno.jpg)   (https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/C7LogCRENn-6Tr2404RmhFi7314=/0x120:3114x2456/1200x800/filters:focal(0x120:3114x2456)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/45569984/462409060.0.jpg)

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 09:37:09 pm
Yup.  He's the boy who cried "wolf" one too many times.  Only the cultists believe him now.
Cultists, that’s funny.

Seems you’ve slipped the chain, JH. What happened to unity? Maybe you should hold off on the usual overt expressions of contempt for a majority chunk of your party until after the GA runoffs.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: 240B on December 01, 2020, 09:37:48 pm
...and there you have it...that's all folks!
I agree. That is the end of everything.
But there is some schadenfreude in knowing that these people have no idea on Earth what they are ushering in.
We will all suffer. But we all know that. They think they will be unaffected. And that makes all the difference to me.
They literally have no idea what they are inviting down on their own heads.
If I have to suffer so that they suffer, it is not anything I would wish for.
But so be it. Alright. Let's go. Let's welcome in President NoBody Idiot who works for the Chinese.
This is going to be one wild ride folks.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 01, 2020, 09:38:05 pm
Another deep state POS has spoken.   Now he and his wife can go back to openly being best buds with Mueller & Co.

Biden will be sworn in and it will be back to business as usual at the ole country club.  The GOPe is in for a huge surprise when they realize that they are going to be thrown out on their azzes!  There aren't enough true conservatives left in the Senate or the House to make a darn bit of difference.

Freedom and the Constitution are worth fighting for and we have an absolute uphill battle; especially since there is no integrity left at the ballot box.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 01, 2020, 09:39:08 pm
I agree. That is the end of everything.
But there is some schadenfreude in knowing that these people have no idea on Earth what they are ushering in.
We will all suffer. But we all know that. They think they will be unaffected. And that makes all the difference to me.
They literally have no idea what they are inviting down on their own heads.
If I have to suffer so that they suffer, it is not anything I would wish for.
But so be it. Alright. Let's go. Let's welcome in President NoBody Idiot who works for the Chinese.
This is going to be one wild ride folks.

Exactly right.  Those idiots are in for a very rude awakening.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 01, 2020, 09:39:54 pm
   IOW, He AND Sessions wouldn't make a pimple on either of these girl's azzes.

(https://hulshofschmidt.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/janet-reno.jpg)   (https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/C7LogCRENn-6Tr2404RmhFi7314=/0x120:3114x2456/1200x800/filters:focal(0x120:3114x2456)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/45569984/462409060.0.jpg)

 :amen:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: mystery-ak on December 01, 2020, 09:40:37 pm
Because Trump, the outsider, had only the GOPe and deep state beltway denizens to choose from and depend upon. He was screwed from the outset. I’m amazed he did as well as he did.

I agree..he got advice from other deep staters...

My husband keeps asking me if any of these people have a conscience...I tell him their reasoning is the ends justify the means....
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 01, 2020, 09:42:55 pm
Because Trump, the outsider, had only the GOPe and deep state beltway denizens to choose from and depend upon. He was screwed from the outset. I’m amazed he did as well as he did.

With Trump being an outsider, he had every opportunity to select people from the outside.  He had a couple of very good and reliable conservatives in house; (Cruz being one of them), who he failed to utilize.

Could of, should of .... too late.  We have to now deal with the blow that we've been dealt.

How do we now save our Republic????  Can we??
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 01, 2020, 09:43:36 pm
Cultists, that’s funny.

Seems you’ve slipped the chain, JH. What happened to unity? Maybe you should hold off on the usual overt expressions of contempt for a majority chunk of your party until after the GA runoffs.

Some might think that speaking the truth is worth the discord.

If just one person can break free of the strange spell trump has people under...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: mystery-ak on December 01, 2020, 09:45:11 pm
Biden will be sworn in and it will be back to business as usual at the ole country club.  The GOPe is in for a huge surprise when they realize that they are going to be thrown out on their azzes!  There aren't enough true conservatives left in the Senate or the House to make a darn bit of difference.

Freedom and the Constitution are worth fighting for and we have an absolute uphill battle; especially since there is no integrity left at the ballot box.

This is what I keep telling my sons..it will be up to them to preserve the Constitution and the USA as our founders saw it...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 09:46:51 pm
Biden will be sworn in and it will be back to business as usual at the ole country club.  The GOPe is in for a huge surprise when they realize that they are going to be thrown out on their azzes!  There aren't enough true conservatives left in the Senate or the House to make a darn bit of difference.

Freedom and the Constitution are worth fighting for and we have an absolute uphill battle; especially since there is no integrity left at the ballot box.
The GOPe will be fine - they’ll simply slide further left and become the party of the not-so-nucking-futs liberal. The rats, of course will don their Mao jackets and campaign on prosecuting running dog lackey Trump supporters, something both parties can get behind.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: 240B on December 01, 2020, 09:48:38 pm
I agree..he got advice from other deep staters...

My husband keeps asking me if any of these people have a conscience...I tell him their reasoning is the ends justify the means....
Welcoming China to have a seat in the White House is not a 'means' to justify any 'ends'. Taiwan is gone. Israel will be under constant attack, just as a beginning. The China Sea is gone. Japan will face major aggression from China. North Korea will become exponentially stronger. The war(s) in the Middle East will escalated until a near world war, or an actual world war erupts. Shortages, unemployment will skyrocket. Who will buy the products of Hollywood or Amazon when no one has any money? Who will use Twitter and Facebook when nobody can afford internet?

Short sighted idiots have shit in their own nest. They better buy gold and fly to the Azores or something. Because America is going to be the new Cuba in less than a year.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: aligncare on December 01, 2020, 09:52:46 pm
Some might think that speaking the truth is worth the discord.

If just one person can break free of the strange spell trump has people under...

Yeah, I’m mesmerized by a stronger military, booming economic growth, exploding job markets and the peeling away of soul-sucking federal regulations on business and industry.  *****rollingeyes*****
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 09:54:09 pm
Some might think that speaking the truth is worth the discord.

If just one person can break free of the strange spell trump has people under...
Ah your intent is charitable. Then by all means speak it brother.

But later when youre home tonight enjoying your six fish sticks and lime jello you might consider the reasons why there are so darn many in your own party seem to disagree with you.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: mystery-ak on December 01, 2020, 09:55:10 pm
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
Statement of Trump Legal Team on Bill Barr’s Comments on Voter Fraud.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EoLVy0-XYAM-Rcs?format=jpg&name=medium)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 01, 2020, 10:02:50 pm
Ah your intent is charitable. Then by all means speak it brother.

But later when youre home tonight enjoying your six fish sticks and lime jello you might consider the reasons why there are so darn many in your own party seem to disagree with you.

Hey it worked in 12 angry men.

And I'm making liver for dinner.  Moms recipe.  No dessert

Also, publicly a lot of Republicans will say things that are politically expedient.  They are very much worried about crossing Trump and his supporters.  Being primaried out is a real threat.  They are cowards that are useless to any of us in the end.

I really think there are a lot more Republicans than commonly acknowledged that loathe trump and now that he's lost will discard him like an empty box of fishsticks at Kanye's house.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 01, 2020, 10:09:54 pm
Because Trump, the outsider, had only the GOPe and deep state beltway denizens to choose from and depend upon. He was screwed from the outset. I’m amazed he did as well as he did.

   I am too @skeeter  Beating hellary, was phenomenally tremendous and surprising.  But I early on realized, IMHO, how corrupt the GOP really was and to this day I think Trump, in all his Business Acumen, bought a 'Broken Item'.  Not unlike The Taj Mahal in NJ, in his haste to become POTUS or Casino King or whatever, somehow it got seriously derailed along the way, not unlike some Threads here. 
   The events of the last 4 years, other than the Judges McConnell crammed through his Senate I would ask what significant changes have occurred?

(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/ae/c1/f9/aec1f9ab6adae1d96d9b1ba2d5186295.jpg)

   We can and must do better in the future.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: aligncare on December 01, 2020, 10:10:55 pm
Hey it worked in 12 angry men.

And I'm making liver for dinner.  Moms recipe.  No dessert

Also, publicly a lot of Republicans will say things that are politically expedient.  They are very much worried about crossing Trump and his supporters.  Being primaried out is a real threat.  They are cowards that are useless to any of us in the end.

I really think there are a lot more Republicans than commonly acknowledged that loathe trump and now that he's lost will discard him like an empty box of fishsticks at Kanye's house.

Sorry, but there are still legal questions remaining about state judicial activism and interference in the election, and about evidence of massive voter fraud and system tabulation tampering that have yet to be adjudicated. It’s not over yet, no matter how hard democrats, and you, apparently, are trying to sweep discovery of these crimes under the rug.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 10:11:58 pm
Hey it worked in 12 angry men.

And I'm making liver for dinner.  Moms recipe.  No dessert

Also, publicly a lot of Republicans will say things that are politically expedient.  They are very much worried about crossing Trump and his supporters.  Being primaried out is a real threat.  They are cowards that are useless to any of us in the end.

I really think there are a lot more Republicans than commonly acknowledged that loathe trump and now that he's lost will discard him like an empty box of fishsticks at Kanye's house.

And with him will go the historically low poverty rates and historically high minority employment rates , lower taxes, an unencumbered economy, low gas prices, stronger military, increasingly diverse voter base and American First ideology in general.

But it's all good 'cause the GOPe will have their franchise back!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: dfwgator on December 01, 2020, 10:13:58 pm
(https://cbsnews2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2018/12/06/bc9b0867-db2a-40e7-a69c-ccbf8fd636f5/thumbnail/1200x630g2/5726d0b8afe0c09f8713bac91efcc4b4/william-barr-ap-9111120383.jpg)

Quelle Surprise !
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: 240B on December 01, 2020, 10:14:22 pm
In the far future. In one hundred years or more.
Twitter/Facebook, their employees, and all the rest, will come to be known as the architects of Destruction.
While they may wave signs, placards, and usernames, as calling themselves that.
Wait and see if they like 'destruction' as much as they think they do.
You know that beautiful house you live in, and that car that you love, that business that was great, that's all gone now.
We are now in the age of destruction. Exactly what you wanted. Exactly what you voted for.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 10:14:48 pm
   I am too @skeeter  Beating hellary, was phenomenally tremendous and surprising.  But I early on realized, IMHO, how corrupt the GOP really was and to this day I think Trump, in all his Business Acumen, bought a 'Broken Item'.  Not unlike The Taj Mahal in NJ, in his haste to become POTUS or Casino King or whatever, somehow it got seriously derailed along the way, not unlike some Threads here. 
   The events of the last 4 years, other than the Judges McConnell crammed through his Senate I would ask what significant changes have occurred?

The attitude of the GOP's base has changed. I know mine has.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 10:21:06 pm
Yeah, I’m mesmerized by a stronger military, booming economic growth, exploding job markets and the peeling away of soul-sucking federal regulations on business and industry.  *****rollingeyes*****

Yes,  Trump did all those things,  but he also repulsed enough people to prevent his re -election.

We need Trumpism without the Trump.   I wish folks would stop trying to defend the man and his eccentricities and foibles and start advocating just as loudly for those POLICIES  which voters showed they clearly still favor.

I still see a bright future for this Republic,  and I thank Trump for his blueprint.   But the tragedy is that he was fatally flawed.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 10:31:01 pm
Yes,  Trump did all those things,  but he also repulsed enough people to prevent his re -election.

We need Trumpism without the Trump.   I wish folks would stop trying to defend the man and his eccentricities and foibles and start advocating just as loudly for those POLICIES  which voters showed they clearly still favor.

I still see a bright future for this Republic,  and I thank Trump for his blueprint.   But the tragedy is that he was fatally flawed.
Sigh. Trump was popular simply because he tried to deliver what the base has been asking for from the GOPe for decades. What the GOPe promised and never delivered. Trump made the attempt - sometimes succeeding, others times not.

As long as you believe it's a 'cult' thing you'll never get it.

And if you think with Trump out of the way the GOPe will now pursue what you call 'Trumpism' you are irretrievably naive or just plain dishonest.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 01, 2020, 10:32:48 pm
Hey it worked in 12 angry men.

And I'm making liver for dinner.  Moms recipe.  No dessert

Also, publicly a lot of Republicans will say things that are politically expedient.  They are very much worried about crossing Trump and his supporters.  Being primaried out is a real threat.  They are cowards that are useless to any of us in the end.

I really think there are a lot more Republicans than commonly acknowledged that loathe trump and now that he's lost will discard him like an empty box of fishsticks at Kanye's house.

Who the hell let Sinkspur back in the house??
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 01, 2020, 10:37:58 pm
Sigh. Trump was popular simply because he tried to deliver what the base has been asking for from the GOPe for decades. What the GOPe promised and never delivered. Trump made the attempt - sometimes succeeding, others times not.

As long as you believe it's a 'cult' thing you'll never get it.

And if you think with Trump out of the way the GOPe will now pursue what you call 'Trumpism' you are irretrievably naive or just plain dishonest.

Try not to feed the troll @skeeter   A hungry one will go looking elsewhere for food.   happy77
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 10:40:44 pm
Try not to feed the troll @skeeter   A hungry one will go looking elsewhere for food.   happy77

I guess. He's certainly not trying to win converts pasting that same nonsensical theory over & over.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 01, 2020, 10:41:17 pm
Who the hell let Sinkspur back in the house??

 :laugh:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 01, 2020, 10:41:40 pm
Hey it worked in 12 angry men.

And I'm making liver for dinner.  Moms recipe.  No dessert

Also, publicly a lot of Republicans will say things that are politically expedient.  They are very much worried about crossing Trump and his supporters.  Being primaried out is a real threat.  They are cowards that are useless to any of us in the end.

I really think there are a lot more Republicans than commonly acknowledged that loathe trump and now that he's lost will discard him like an empty box of fishsticks at Kanye's house.

Enjoy your impending bout of gout.   You earned it.    :smokin:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 01, 2020, 10:42:56 pm
I guess. He's certainly not trying to win converts pasting that same nonsensical theory over & over.

I've found he has no interest in discussion.  He really gets off on just insulting Trump supporters.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: dfwgator on December 01, 2020, 10:56:22 pm

We need Trumpism without the Trump.   

How do you propose to do that?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 10:59:27 pm
Try not to feed the troll @skeeter   A hungry one will go looking elsewhere for food.   happy77

Sorry to be expressing optimism at GOP gains in the midst of your whine-fest.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 11:05:42 pm
Sigh. Trump was popular simply because he tried to deliver what the base has been asking for from the GOPe for decades. What the GOPe promised and never delivered. Trump made the attempt - sometimes succeeding, others times not.

As long as you believe it's a 'cult' thing you'll never get it.

And if you think with Trump out of the way the GOPe will now pursue what you call 'Trumpism' you are irretrievably naive or just plain dishonest.

I do get it, @skeeter.   I do get Trump's "he fights" appeal.   And I'm sorry about the "cult" thing, but I'm angry at too many Trumpsters' penchant for paranoia, negativism and, ultimately, self destruction.  AG Barr,  whose loyalty to Trump and the Republic should be unquestioned, spoke the truth today - whatever fraud there was didn't rise to a level that would change the election.  That is a hard truth,  but it is best that it be swallowed,  because unless we focus, the loss of Senate will crush us,  not to mention Trump personally.     
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 01, 2020, 11:10:09 pm
I do get it, @skeeter.   I do get Trump's "he fights" appeal.   And I'm sorry about the "cult" thing, but I'm angry at too many Trumpsters' penchant for paranoia, negativism and, ultimately, self destruction.  AG Barr,  whose loyalty to Trump and the Republic should be unquestioned, spoke the truth today - whatever fraud there was didn't rise to a level that would change the election.  That is a hard truth,  but it is best that it be swallowed,  because unless we focus, the loss of Senate will crush us,  not to mention Trump personally.   

It damned sure as hell does rise to the level that SHOULD prove that Biden LOST... and bigly.   Anyone not willing to admit or recognize that reality is stuckonstupid and/or a partisan hack for the commie left that is in on or A-OK with this election theft attempt.

Just.... sayin.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 11:11:26 pm
How do you propose to do that?

Of course there can be Trumpism without the Trump.   That is, unless you don't think Trump's policies are meritorious enough to stand on their own.   Or unlessyou don't think Trump supporters are willing to consider their self-interest beyond their devotion to the man.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 01, 2020, 11:13:18 pm
The attitude of the GOP's base has changed. I know mine has.

My attitude is I will NEVER vote for someone who isn't a conservative and will not support anyone who isn't a Constitutional conservative -- both are few and few between.

I find it deeply troubling that no one from the GOP, including Cruz has stood up and cried foul.  Cruz stated that he saw a pathway to Trump overturning this election, but that's it.  Perhaps he came forward to offer his expertise and maybe was told "no" or perhaps he saw that Trump tapped Giuliani for the win ... but everyone else has for the most part remained silent.

The GOP is done.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 11:13:40 pm
I do get it, @skeeter.   I do get Trump's "he fights" appeal.   And I'm sorry about the "cult" thing, but I'm angry at too many Trumpsters' penchant for paranoia, negativism and, ultimately, self destruction.  AG Barr,  whose loyalty to Trump and the Republic should be unquestioned, spoke the truth today - whatever fraud there was didn't rise to a level that would change the election.  That is a hard truth,  but it is best that it be swallowed,  because unless we focus, the loss of Senate will crush us,  not to mention Trump personally.   
Nah, you don't get it.  In fact you still have no clue. Your above two posts prove it.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 01, 2020, 11:18:01 pm
You don't think Trump's policies are meritorious enough to stand on their own?   Or is it you don't think Trump supporters can think beyond their devotion to the man?

Trumps economy is the only thing he has going for him but its obviously the one you want.  The low interest rates along with deregulation and lower taxes proved a lot of people wrong.  But he had a million other negatives that will ultimately drag down the party if it stuck with him.

With Trump gone, a normal person can take the mantle of the party.  Say thanks for the roadmap that shows full employment is not 4.5 percent, thanks for shedding light on the feds need to go back to school on rate setting.

But like Churchill was voted out after ww2, trump has already doled out any positive thing he could have. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 01, 2020, 11:20:00 pm
Nah, you don't get it.  In fact you still have no clue. Your above two posts prove it.

He gets it @skeeter   He just hates it.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 01, 2020, 11:22:18 pm
I'm angry at too many Trumpsters' penchant for paranoia, negativism and, ultimately, self destruction.

And I'm angry at too many so-called Republicans who are willing to turn a blind eye to massive election fraud simply because they don't like Trump.  The future of our Republic is at stake here - not Trump.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 11:23:38 pm
And I'm angry at too many so-called Republicans who are willing to turn a blind eye to massive election fraud simply because they don't like Trump.  The future of our Republic is at stake here - not Trump.

Would you take a bet they'll be back here, like clockwork, blaming Trump & Trumpers when the rats steal those two GA seats.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 11:24:26 pm
My attitude is I will NEVER vote for someone who isn't a conservative and will not support anyone who isn't a Constitutional conservative -- both are few and few between.

I find it deeply troubling that no one from the GOP, including Cruz has stood up and cried foul.  Cruz stated that he saw a pathway to Trump overturning this election, but that's it.  Perhaps he came forward to offer his expertise and maybe was told "no" or perhaps he saw that Trump tapped Giuliani for the win ... but everyone else has for the most part remained silent.

The GOP is done.

It's done because of folks like you.   If you won't vote for GOP candidates unless they pass your self-defined litmus test which you assure us is "few and far between",  then how the hell can you criticize folks who declined to vote for Trump?   

At least my litmus test takes in GOP candidates from all walks of center-right life.   No,  I couldn't vote for a man who treated the Resolute Desk like a prop in a reality show,  but that's just one man.  Otherwise,  I voted straight GOP,  like I've always done. 

I'm not leaving the Party or starting a pity party because the GOP nationally turned back the progressive tide.   Yes,  Trump lost,  and I have no illusions that Joe Biden will be far FAR worse from the standpoint of policy.  I wish there had been a better choice,  where the progress we've made as a nation these last four years would have resulted in a landslide.    But Trump's flaws prevented that,  and even as he garnered a hitherto unmatched number of votes,  six miilion more rose up to declare they were sick and tired of it all. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 01, 2020, 11:24:32 pm
- whatever fraud there was didn't rise to a level that would change the election.

So you're OK with the fact that your own county has more registered voters than it has people eligible to vote.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 01, 2020, 11:28:02 pm
Would you take a bet they'll be back here, like clockwork, blaming Trump & Trumpers when the rats steal those two GA seats.

That is a certainty.  I'm anticipating a minimum of 3 million votes for the Dem candidates next month since the Governor and Secretary of State have already tipped them off that there will be no signature checks on mail-in ballots.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 11:28:37 pm
So you're OK with the fact that your own county has more registered voters than it has people eligible to vote.

Citation, please.  What frosts me about Montgomery County is that support for the GOP simply collapsed this year.  Not because of fraud.  Because of Trump.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 01, 2020, 11:31:53 pm
I do get it, @skeeter.   I do get Trump's "he fights" appeal.   And I'm sorry about the "cult" thing, but I'm angry at too many Trumpsters' penchant for paranoia, negativism and, ultimately, self destruction.  AG Barr,  whose loyalty to Trump and the Republic should be unquestioned, spoke the truth today - whatever fraud there was didn't rise to a level that would change the election.  That is a hard truth,  but it is best that it be swallowed,  because unless we focus, the loss of Senate will crush us,  not to mention Trump personally.   

Barr's loyalty to Trump and the Republic?  Sorry, but IMHO I never saw his loyalty to Trump his loyalty has been to the deep state all along.

As for the fraud ... seriously ... anyone who can't blatantly see the fraud needs to get a grasp on reality.  Glenn Beck has had on several experts who have stated that there is no way mathematically the way things stand that Biden could have won.  On Limbaugh's show, also experts who state the same.

There was blatant overwhelming fraud ... the deep state planned it that way and kept their promise of ensuring that Trump was a one term President.  Fraud is fraud.  The integrity of our election system is gone. 

The leftists and globalists will lead us into socialism and those that don't see it coming are going to be blindsided.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 01, 2020, 11:32:17 pm
That is a certainty.  I'm anticipating a minimum of 3 million votes for the Dem candidates next month since the Governor and Secretary of State have already tipped them off that there will be no signature checks on mail-in ballots.

This is your GOPe in action preparing to lose the GA Senate race @Jazzhead   ... Why don't you dazzle us with your wisdom on this.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 01, 2020, 11:33:13 pm
It's done because of folks like you.   If you won't vote for GOP candidates unless they pass your self-defined litmus test which you assure us is "few and far between",  then how the hell can you criticize folks who declined to vote for Trump?

For the umpteenth time, this isn't about Republicans who didn't vote for Trump, (especially considering that 11 million MORE people voted for him in 2020 after he was a known commodity than did in 2016).  This has always been about ballot stuffing for Biden.  Stop replacing the goal posts with a soccer net.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 01, 2020, 11:34:32 pm
Citation, please.  What frosts me about Montgomery County is that support for the GOP simply collapsed this year.  Not because of fraud.  Because of Trump.

The GOP collapsed because of the leftists corruption.  Many people vote a straight ticket.  Don't you find it a little odd that most seats in the state the GOP won but Trump didn't?  Please.  I declare b.s.

The GOPe deserves to collapse.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Fishrrman on December 01, 2020, 11:41:16 pm
Hoodat wrote:
"That is a certainty.  I'm anticipating a minimum of 3 million votes for the Dem candidates next month since the Governor and Secretary of State have already tipped them off that there will be no signature checks on mail-in ballots."

Agreed.
Both of the Georgia Senate Republican seats are gonna be lost to the communists.

The powers-that-be down there will do nothing to constrain or reverse the "election fraud apparatus" the democrat-communists have constructed.

The apparatus worked on November 3rd.
It will work BETTER on January 5th.

Georgia has "turned blue".
Might be time to move north to Tennessee, Kentucky or West Virginia.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 11:41:21 pm

There was blatant overwhelming fraud ... the deep state planned it that way and kept their promise of ensuring that Trump was a one term President.  Fraud is fraud.  The integrity of our election system is gone. 


Nonsense.  That same "fraudulent" vote may have flipped a dozen House seats Republican.

Trump lost because folks were sick and tired of the chaos. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 11:43:10 pm
Hoodat wrote:
"That is a certainty.  I'm anticipating a minimum of 3 million votes for the Dem candidates next month since the Governor and Secretary of State have already tipped them off that there will be no signature checks on mail-in ballots."

Agreed.
Both of the Georgia Senate Republican seats are gonna be lost to the communists.

The powers-that-be down there will do nothing to constrain or reverse the "election fraud apparatus" the democrat-communists have constructed.

It worked on November 3rd.
It will work BETTER on January 5th.

Georgia has "turned blue".
Might be time to move north to Tennessee, Kentucky or West Virginia.

The GOPe will use the occasion of the loss to try to marginalize Trump and supporters. They're already trotting out the narrative.

They've got to get rid of the populist element in the party and if it takes losing the senate majority they'll consider it worth the bargain.


IMHO
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 11:43:43 pm
The GOP collapsed because of the leftists corruption.  Many people vote a straight ticket.  Don't you find it a little odd that most seats in the state the GOP won but Trump didn't?  Please.  I declare b.s.

The GOPe deserves to collapse.

Fine, have it your way.   But take some flippin' responsibility.   The collapse of the Republic as you predict will be because of folks like you who demand the perfect at the expense of the good.   The GOP did just fine this year.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 01, 2020, 11:46:09 pm
The GOPe will use the occasion of the loss to try to marginalize Trump and supporters. They're already trotting out the narrative.

They've got to get rid of the populist element in the party and if it takes losing the senate majority they'll consider it worth the bargain.


IMHO

What the hell are you talking about?   Trump's populism is here to stay in tomorrow's GOP,  unless all the butthurt whiners take their marbles and go home. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 01, 2020, 11:50:46 pm
What the hell are you talking about?   Trump's populism is here to stay in tomorrow's GOP,  unless all the butthurt whiners take their marbles and go home.
lol. priceless.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 01, 2020, 11:59:06 pm
Numb nuts sure developed a habit of going flaccid when the chips were down.  He had a target rich environment to do some serious swamp cleaning, and failed miserably.

But, I am in agreement with Myst.  This pretty much shuts down any way we can get any traction on challenging  "the steal"  Really dark chapter in this country's history
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 12:03:30 am
Amazing.  Cant wait to see how he will be savaged.  Truth is not welcome in a lot of parts here.

@Knox27

Hate to break it to you, but truth and perception are two distinctly different things.  There has been tons of evidence of fraud, if you cared to do any research. If you actually listened to Barr's statement he did not deny there was fraud.  In his opinion there was not "enough" fraud to overturn the election. A little intellectual honesty on your behalf would go along way to help your new rep here.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 12:08:12 am
Yup.  He's the boy who cried "wolf" one too many times.  Only the cultists believe him now.

You are so FOS.  There are plenty of us here who were very objective of our opionion of DJT.  Calling any Briefer here a "cultist" is an insult to anyone who voted for the person here.  Just becuase you are a card carrrying member of the Lincoln Project is your own business. Enjoy your new Pedo-POTUS.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 02, 2020, 12:09:51 am
Trump lost because folks were sick and tired of the chaos.

I hope no one's taking this jackassery from this troll seriously.

Just remember the truth:  In 2020 12 million more Americans voted to keep President Trump in the Oval Office than voted to send him there in 2016
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 12:11:24 am
How do you propose to do that?

Notice his post was void of a suggested replacement?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 12:18:27 am
Citation, please.

Montgomery County population:  830,915
Montgomery Co. population 18 or older:  652,268
Montgomery Co. population 18 or older who have right to vote:  581,823

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/montgomerycountypennsylvania/PST045219 (https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/montgomerycountypennsylvania/PST045219)

Number of people registered to vote in Montgomery County:  609,264

http://webapp.montcopa.org/voterservices/voters/summary/pollinglocationsummary.asp (http://webapp.montcopa.org/voterservices/voters/summary/pollinglocationsummary.asp)

That nets to 28k more registered voters than people eligible to vote.  These numbers haven't changed since the last time I posted them to you.


What frosts me about Montgomery County is that support for the GOP simply collapsed this year.  Not because of fraud.  Because of Trump.

What frosts me is how you continue to lie about this.  Trump received 25,000 more Montgomery County votes in 2020 than he received in 2016.

https://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/pennsylvania/ (https://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/pennsylvania/)
https://www.politico.com/2020-election/results/pennsylvania/ (https://www.politico.com/2020-election/results/pennsylvania/)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 02, 2020, 12:29:22 am
I hope no one's taking this jackassery from this troll seriously.

Just remember the truth:  In 2020 12 million more Americans voted to keep President Trump in the Oval Office than voted to send him there in 2016

And six million more than that wanted him gone.   This election motivated voters as never before.  A referendum on Trump,  just as both sides wanted. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: GtHawk on December 02, 2020, 12:31:38 am
...and there you have it...that's all folks!
How odd, I'm watching hearings on Youtube and witness after witness after witness is sure putting a lie to Frau Barr's assertions.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: cato potatoe on December 02, 2020, 12:31:47 am
The GOP collapsed because of the leftists corruption.  Many people vote a straight ticket.  Don't you find it a little odd that most seats in the state the GOP won but Trump didn't?  Please.  I declare b.s.

It's happened plenty of times though.  Back in 2016, Trump underperformed the congressional candidates.  Nobody is crazy about Biden, and most are wary of the far left, so they did not trust his party with a monopoly. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 02, 2020, 12:33:38 am
And six million more than that wanted him gone.   This election motivated voters as never before.  A referendum on Trump,  just as both sides wanted.

5 million more Californians (6 to 11 million) and 1 million more New Yorkers account for the difference. So much for your 'referendum'.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: dfwgator on December 02, 2020, 12:34:03 am
And six million more than that wanted him gone.   This election motivated voters as never before.  A referendum on Trump,  just as both sides wanted.

I have a feeling a couple months into the Biden nightmare, Trump will start looking pretty good. 

Fact is, he is the only one capable of literally galvanizing millions of Americans.   It's him or nobody.   You're going to have to put aside whatever misgivings you have about the guy.

You think people loved Patton, and he wasn't without his flaws?   So what?  This is war! 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 02, 2020, 12:48:34 am
Nonsense.  That same "fraudulent" vote may have flipped a dozen House seats Republican.

Trump lost because folks were sick and tired of the chaos.

Geezus, @Jazzhead   That's plain idiocy on your part.  And that's a shame, because you're obviously not stupid.

You can't actually believe that many people only voted for Biden against Pres. Trump and ignored the rest of the ballot sheet.

The simple fact that EVERY Republican incumbent got reelected, and the Dems lost House seats to end up with a very slim majority is all the proof a 10 year-old kid on the street might comprehend.

Lose the TDS, my friend.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 12:52:41 am
I have a feeling a couple months into the Biden nightmare, Trump will start looking pretty good.

Trump is looking pretty good right now, which is why he received more votes than any other President in US history.  Meanwhile, Biden was unable to draw more than 4 dozen supporters at any campaign event this entire year.

Who could forget this massive crowd that showed up at this campaign event held in someone's living room:

(http://www.theamericanmirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Jill-Biden-living-room-podium-1024x576.png)  (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_9290-600x371.jpg)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 02, 2020, 12:54:44 am
And six million more than that wanted him gone.   This election motivated voters as never before.  A referendum on Trump,  just as both sides wanted.

The election motivated people...but not in the way you think or hope.

When you break down the numbers and the percentages, even if the majority of the legit mail in ballots, percentage of Independents and Republicans who voted Democrat are added up...Biden is still down over 200k votes to Trump.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 02, 2020, 12:55:43 am
You are so FOS.  There are plenty of us here who were very objective of our opionion of DJT.  Calling any Briefer here a "cultist" is an insult to anyone who voted for the person here.  Just becuase you are a card carrrying member of the Lincoln Project is your own business. Enjoy your new Pedo-POTUS.

"Cultist"...the rabid Progressive core of Jazzy is beginning to rear its ugly head again.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: GtHawk on December 02, 2020, 01:19:02 am
Yup.  He's the boy who cried "wolf" one too many times.  Only the cultists believe him now.
Umm, I'm far from being a Trumper, EverTrumper or anything close to one and I believe him, maybe because I don't have a pre judgement and have been paying attention to the State hearings. There is some serious criminal activity that took place during the ballot counts.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: GtHawk on December 02, 2020, 01:20:24 am
And six million more than that wanted him gone.   This election motivated voters as never before.  A referendum on Trump,  just as both sides wanted.
You need to put the pipe down dude.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 02, 2020, 01:21:22 am
@Jazzhead was Gore wrong for contesting the 2000 election for 37 days in 2000?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 02, 2020, 01:22:36 am
Umm, I'm far from being a Trumper, EverTrumper or anything close to one and I believe him, maybe because I don't have a pre judgement and have been paying attention to the State hearings. There is some serious criminal activity that took place during the ballot counts.

Agreed and unfortunately, the criminals once again are getting away with it and won't be held responsible.

Question is :  what can we do about it?  Only thing I see -- the GOP is going to collapse anyways.  We need to find a courageous, fearless, conservative who can lead the millions who believe how great this country is and restore our Republic. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: christian on December 02, 2020, 02:03:03 am
Never Trump 4 yr coupe has extended into this election.  Dominion and the other software cheating programs had no use in a legitimate election.  It worked well in Venezuela to install a dictator, and so it might well in
America.  The stupidity of denial mentalities dooms our society to 3rd world status or below.  Useful fools and idiots do not take responsibility for the disasters they take part in.  Many Countries fell to there fools and idiots buying socialism's false dreams/promises!  Barr is proof that the left rammed Barr down Trumps throat for a reason.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 02, 2020, 02:15:30 am
Never Trump 4 yr coupe has extended into this election.  Dominion and the other software cheating programs had no use in a legitimate election.  It worked well in Venezuela to install a dictator, and so it might well in
America.  The stupidity of denial mentalities dooms our society to 3rd world status or below.  Useful fools and idiots do not take responsibility for the disasters they take part in.  Many Countries fell to there fools and idiots buying socialism's false dreams/promises!  Barr is proof that the left rammed Barr down Trumps throat for a reason.

Only thing that is troubling, is Trump selected Barr .... Trump also selected Sessions ... Trump also selected Rosenstein.  All 3 contributed heavily to the failure of his re-election.    It's hard to believe that Trump was absolutely oblivious of their past.  Sessions I believe was on board the Trump train at first and was bought by the left.  Rosenstein and Barr though ... had Trump even glanced at their background you would think that he would have steered clear.  WHY on earth did he select them??  Now presently he again selects one of of the worst people to help him fight election fraud; Giuliani.  Why?  It sure as heck makes me wonder.  IMHO he surrounded himself with swamp creatures.  WHY?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 02, 2020, 02:15:46 am
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EoL6RN5WEAUUIfh?format=jpg&name=medium)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 02, 2020, 02:18:02 am
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EoL6RN5WEAUUIfh?format=jpg&name=medium)

You can see the true blue wave in China.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Bigun on December 02, 2020, 02:21:40 am
Never Trump 4 yr coupe has extended into this election.  Dominion and the other software cheating programs had no use in a legitimate election.  It worked well in Venezuela to install a dictator, and so it might well in
America.  The stupidity of denial mentalities dooms our society to 3rd world status or below.  Useful fools and idiots do not take responsibility for the disasters they take part in.  Many Countries fell to there fools and idiots buying socialism's false dreams/promises!  Barr is proof that the left rammed Barr down Trumps throat for a reason.

I do not disagree wit a thing you said there @christian.  The leftists have gone all-in with this hand and either win it all or go down in flames forever.  I'm going do do all I can to make sure its the latter!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Absalom on December 02, 2020, 02:22:39 am
Amazing. Cant wait to see how he will be savaged. Truth is not welcome in a lot of parts here.
------------------------
Intuitive yet predictable; in fact, for some, truth is a mortal enemy!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 02:25:04 am
BEHOLD THE BLUE WAVE

(https://media.tenor.com/images/9c1cf80077c8907a38687b88b374f9de/tenor.gif)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Absalom on December 02, 2020, 02:30:18 am
Trump made a habit of claiming the elections were rigged whenever he lost a primary.  I remember when he claimed to have evidence that Obama was born abroad.  Bottom line, he says a lot of things he can't prove ... and now that he needs people to listen to him, most are tuning him out.
-----------------------------------
Trump has behaved this way, all his life, which is why his wise Mother sent him to early
Military School. Predictably, it had absolutely no positive impact on his persona.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 02, 2020, 02:51:43 am
Trump made a habit of claiming the elections were rigged whenever he lost a primary.  I remember when he claimed to have evidence that Obama was born abroad.  Bottom line, he says a lot of things he can't prove ... and now that he needs people to listen to him, most are tuning him out.

From the research that was presented today from several guest speakers on Beck and Limabuagh's talk shows today; this election fraud that just occurred has been happening in our elections for quite sometime, so Trump was absolutely correct!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 02, 2020, 02:56:19 am
-----------------------------------
Trump has behaved this way, all his life, which is why his wise Mother sent him to early Military School.  Predictably, it had absolutely no positive impact on his persona.

Oh FFS.   You just never miss an opportunity to sing that same stale old tune and bash/trash Trump.  You must really like Biden's persona then, eh?  Or Harris's?   

Btw....DU called.   They're missing their favorite village idiot.     888mouth

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 02, 2020, 03:10:23 am
Quote
Trump made a habit of claiming the elections were rigged whenever he lost a primary.  I remember when he claimed to have evidence that Obama was born abroad.  Bottom line, he says a lot of things he can't prove ... and now that he needs people to listen to him, most are tuning him out.

@cato potatoe let's not forget the shit storm he caused over losing the Colorado primary.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Bigun on December 02, 2020, 03:26:04 am
DOJ looking for evidence of voter fraud!

(https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/blindfolded-elderly-senior-business-man-going-social-media-data-portrait-57640483.jpg)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Absalom on December 02, 2020, 04:26:35 am
Oh FFS.   You just never miss an opportunity to sing that same stale old tune and bash/trash Trump.  You must really like Biden's persona then, eh?  Or Harris's?   
Btw....DU called.   They're missing their favorite village idiot.   
----------------------------
FYI, Biden and Trump radiate the same stench.
Stunning how your scrawling's show such class,
intelligence and wisdom.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 02, 2020, 04:41:31 am
----------------------------
FYI, Biden and Trump radiate the same stench.
Stunning how your scrawling's show such class,
intelligence and wisdom.


Ditto.... and right back atcha.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 02, 2020, 04:42:07 am
And six million more than that wanted him gone.   This election motivated voters as never before.  A referendum on Trump,  just as both sides wanted.

More jackassery from a bitter troll  pointing-up   Ignore s/he (I'm not sure what it identifies as)

To our guests, please take a look at the legal updates by swing state in this section of the Forum.  You'll hear and read about hours of public testimony explaining where much of the "more" votes for Biden actually came from.

For example, a couple of hundred thousand of those votes were curated ballots trucked into PA from Bethpage, NY.  There's also video testimony explaining the algorithm used through Dominion Voting Systems to add non-existent votes to Biden and deduct existing votes from Trump.

(But don't tell the troll  happy77 )



Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Sighlass on December 02, 2020, 04:43:02 am
Timeline: TBR as I observed it (subjective of course).

Yeah ! Sessions is on the Trump Train.

Sessions is a rat for doing the honorable thing. He should throw himself under the bus for Trump.

Sessions sucks and talks funny too. Lets watch Trump insult him for months in public.... what Sessions offers his resignation and Trump turns him down.... well lets just insult him some more.

Yeah ! Sessions hands in his resignation at Trump's request...

Trump continues to insult Jeff, Jeff ignores it until finally he replies with utmost dignity.

Yeah ! Trump finally assigns a good AG... Barr is the man....

Barr is gonna get them now....

Barr is getting nothing done...

Barr is more of the same swamp....

Barr turns full commie on Trump....

Trump just can't seem to get a good man...

Groan... /end sarcasm

_______________________

You guys elected the head clown that Fox, Breitbart and Drudge news pushed over a decent crowd of good conservatives (at least 3 were acceptable to me even)...  it was a slow train wreck... and painful to observe.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 04:46:01 am
Timeline: TBR as I observed it (subjective of course).

Yeah ! Sessions is on the Trump Train.

Sessions is a rat for doing the honorable thing. He should throw himself under the bus for Trump.

Sessions sucks and talks funny too. Lets watch Trump insult him for months in public.... what Sessions offers his resignation and Trump turns him down.... well lets just insult him some more.

Yeah ! Sessions hands in his resignation at Trump's request...

Trump continues to insult Jeff, Jeff ignores it until finally he replies with utmost dignity.

Yeah ! Trump finally assigns a good AG... Barr is the man....

Barr is gonna get them now....

Barr is getting nothing done...

Barr is more of the same swamp....

Barr turns full commie on Trump....

Trump just can't seem to get a good man...

Groan... /end sarcasm

_______________________

You guys elected the head clown that Fox, Breitbart and Drudge news pushed over a decent crowd of good conservatives (at least 3 were acceptable to me even)...  it was a slow train wreck... and painful to observe.

Sad!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Sighlass on December 02, 2020, 05:01:22 am
I guess I also better point a finger back at my own so-called religious right that pushed Trump. Heck have a picture made with him, by his Playboy mag cover. Using Trump's lawyer to cover up embarrassing pictures with another young couple. Perhaps wanting to be on that same Playboy mag if they didn't want to lose their jobs.

Yeah, lot of disappointment to go around.

Just having a jolly time being down in the dumps tonight.... dang I hate how crooked politics are now days. When a good man is shot down by the same GOP that gave us this joke of a president. Perhaps it is time to go Galt.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 02, 2020, 05:02:36 am
You guys elected the head clown that Fox, Breitbart and Drudge news pushed over a decent crowd of good conservatives (at least 3 were acceptable to me even)...  it was a slow train wreck... and painful to observe.

Look at this five year old butt hurt  --- you must have blistering boils by now.   **nononono*
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Sighlass on December 02, 2020, 05:06:16 am
Look at this five year old butt hurt  --- you must have blistering boils by now.   **nononono*


We are now all tending boils now because idiots like you pushed the most hated person (next to Hillary) on us. Got 20 trillion dollars to help the deficit while you are typing a response.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 02, 2020, 05:18:18 am
We are now all tending boils now because idiots like you pushed the most hated person (next to Hillary) on us. Got 20 trillion dollars to help the deficit while you are typing a response.

How does the "most hated person" garner 75 million legal votes and have coattails wide enough and strong enough to return every incumbent Republican to the House of Representatives (first time this has happened EVAH) and flip 14 seats in Nancy's turf from "D" to "R"?

Be sure to show your math.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Sighlass on December 02, 2020, 05:26:54 am
How does the "most hated person" garner 75 million legal votes and have coattails wide enough and strong enough to return every incumbent Republican to the House of Representatives (first time this has happened EVAH) and flip 14 seats in Nancy's turf from "D" to "R"?

Be sure to show your math.

By now even you have to admit they won but Trump didn't for a reason... Why, because he is even more hated now than when he ran against Hillary (who had the lowest liked polling in America, a few points above Trump). Conservatives won, but it wasn't on Trump coattails.

Character matters... for the media setting up Trump vs Hillary was a dream, someone that was nearly as hated as she was gave her a chance of winning. Alan Keyes could of beat Hillary (and I would of voted for him).
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 05:28:00 am
How does the "most hated person" garner 75 million legal votes and have coattails wide enough and strong enough to return every incumbent Republican to the House of Representatives (first time this has happened EVAH) and flip 14 seats in Nancy's turf from "D" to "R"?

Be sure to show your math.

He inspires 80 million people to vote against him when he had the best thing that an incumbent can have going for him, a good economic record in terms of jobs and wages....and still he was so hated that 80 million people said "you're fired".

Even when running against a generic old man.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 02, 2020, 05:38:17 am
By now even you have to admit they won but Trump didn't for a reason...

The President did win.  But apparently recognizing this would threaten the world you've created for yourself.

Nonetheless, I hope you work up the courage to take a peek at the legal update threads and listen to and read about some of the hours of testimony given by average joes who witnessed the most outrageous and coordinated voter fraud in US history.  And sit back and learn about where the Dominion Voting System added non-existent votes to Biden and deducted actual voted from Trump in the most coordinated election fraud ever conceived in the US.

Pay special attention to the legal updates for the State of Georgia.  GA Marxists are readying their next steal on Jan 5.  Educate yourself, please.  Let's leave the "LIV" label for the socialists/marxists.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 02, 2020, 05:43:49 am
 :whistle:

Catherine Herridge
@CBS_Herridge


#Election2020results From a DOJ spokesperson: “Some media outlets have incorrectly reported that the Department has concluded its investigation of election fraud and announced an affirmative finding of no fraud in the election. That is not what the Associated Press reported nor

what the Attorney General stated. The Department will continue to receive and vigorously pursue all specific and credible allegations of fraud as expeditiously as possible.”


7:53 PM · Dec 1, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1333937356185997312
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Sighlass on December 02, 2020, 05:45:17 am
The President did win.  But apparently recognizing this would threaten the world you've created for yourself.

You might be correct here (and I honestly think the same), I do not discount the cheating against Trump. It is built in liberal bastions (cities) in great numbers.... You have to win in such number that overcomes the numbers they feel they can cheat without having their cover blown. As stated before, I don't like Trump, never will, but I am rooting for the corruption to have it's head blown off in such a way that we have at least somewhat fair elections in liberal controlled districts.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 02, 2020, 09:21:19 am
A scathing indictment of the Justice Department.  Because there are random Americans uncovering evidence all across the country that would absolutely change the outcomes of several 2020 elections including the Presidency.  The fact that the Justice Department hasn't proves that they are incompetent, worthless, or downright corrupt.
Or that they just haven't looked.

Watching CNN isn't exactly "investigating" and twitter and Fecebook have been sanitized for the Dems and the NWO.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 02, 2020, 09:25:17 am
You might be correct here (and I honestly think the same), I do not discount the cheating against Trump. It is built in liberal bastions (cities) in great numbers.... You have to win in such number that overcomes the numbers they feel they can cheat without having their cover blown. As stated before, I don't like Trump, never will, but I am rooting for the corruption to have it's head blown off in such a way that we have at least somewhat fair elections in liberal controlled districts.
I think Trump did what he did with Hillary--he did win in numbers that surpassed the fraud levels written in, only this time, the Dems had a "Plan B" to bring in reserves of ballots in that exigency. The Dems implemented that plan where it was safest--in previously notably corrupt urban jurisdictions that were Democrat controlled, albeit not smoothly, exposing the fraud with irregularities which indicate the desperation involved.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 02, 2020, 09:28:19 am
He inspires 80 million people to vote against him when he had the best thing that an incumbent can have going for him, a good economic record in terms of jobs and wages....and still he was so hated that 80 million people said "you're fired".

Even when running against a generic old man.
He didn't inspire any such thing. The MSM beating the "Hate Trump" drum for four years with every pejorative phrase they could concoct, synchronized across their channels and pitched by shills on social media just might have had something to do with it.

Even when the man did well, he got no credit from ABCNNBCBS.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 02, 2020, 10:05:08 am
The President did win.  But apparently recognizing this would threaten the world you've created for yourself.

Nonetheless, I hope you work up the courage to take a peek at the legal update threads and listen to and read about some of the hours of testimony given by average joes who witnessed the most outrageous and coordinated voter fraud in US history.  And sit back and learn about where the Dominion Voting System added non-existent votes to Biden and deducted actual voted from Trump in the most coordinated election fraud ever conceived in the US.

Pay special attention to the legal updates for the State of Georgia.  GA Marxists are readying their next steal on Jan 5.  Educate yourself, please.  Let's leave the "LIV" label for the socialists/marxists.

What infuriates me most?

That history is written by the 'Victors'.

An international coup hatched in China and in the boardrooms of the corporate media elite.  The Democrat Party is merely an arm of the media...not the other way around.

A faux pandemic with a 95% survival rate...national shut downs, mail-in ballots and felonious ballot machines changing data in the middle of the night.

And people pretending that it never happened.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Fishrrman on December 02, 2020, 02:59:33 pm
Knox wrote:
"He inspires 80 million people to vote against him when he had the best thing that an incumbent can have going for him, a good economic record in terms of jobs and wages....and still he was so hated that 80 million people said "you're fired"."

Sigh...
Under 100 posts and you earned the privilege of getting onto my "ingore list" already.

So long..!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 02, 2020, 03:44:45 pm
Knox wrote:
"He inspires 80 million people to vote against him when he had the best thing that an incumbent can have going for him, a good economic record in terms of jobs and wages....and still he was so hated that 80 million people said "you're fired"."

Sigh...
Under 100 posts and you earned the privilege of getting onto my "ingore list" already.

So long..!

 :beer:    :laugh:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Absalom on December 02, 2020, 08:02:48 pm
How does the "most hated person" garner 75 million legal votes and have coattails wide enough and strong enough to return every incumbent Republican to the House of Representatives (first time this has happened EVAH) and flip 14 seats in Nancy's turf from "D" to "R"?
Be sure to show your math.
----------------------------
Even a brick knows that answer!!!
It's because the Narcissist-in-Chief had 75 million unhinged sycophants, in thrall to
his relentless infantile noise.
While the Presidential vote rang loud and clear as an emphatic vote of NO CONFIDENCE
in Trump and his antics; the Congressional vote affirmed support for R House & Senate
members bringing them ever closer to a House majority!!!
As Koko mused (Mikado)........"He nevah will be missed, oh no, not evah....." !
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 02, 2020, 08:05:30 pm
----------------------------
Even a brick knows that answer!!!
It's because the Narcissist-in-Chief had 75 million unhinged sycophants, in thrall to
his relentless infantile noise.
While the Presidential vote rang loud and clear as an emphatic vote of NO CONFIDENCE
in Trump and his antics; the Congressional vote affirmed support for R House & Senate
members bringing them ever closer to a House majority!!!
As Koko mused (Mikado)........"He nevah will be missed, oh no, not evah....." !

Flawlessly logical.  22222frying pan
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 08:15:27 pm
While the Presidential vote rang loud and clear as an emphatic vote of NO CONFIDENCE
in Trump and his antics; the Congressional vote affirmed support for R House & Senate
members bringing them ever closer to a House majority!!!

How do you reconcile that nonsense with the fact that Trump received more votes than did all GOP Congressional candidates combined?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Victoria33 on December 02, 2020, 09:02:37 pm
Yes,  Trump did all those things,  but he also repulsed enough people to prevent his re -election. But the tragedy is that he was fatally flawed.
@Jazzhead

Yes, you are right.  He had a nasty name for every world leader and all individual Republicans and every individual Democrat - every person in the world.  He hasn't yet tossed his kids out because his blood runs in them.  He destroyed companies because he would not pay them for work on big projects - they went bankrupt when they could not stay in court as long as he did.  This is the life of this man - stay in court and nothing happens.

I know Senate Republicans talked to psychologists about Trump; then, they knew what he was and had to deal with it until he was no longer president.  That is coming up soon, after January 20, and if they are not still afraid of Trump destroying their livelihood, they will begin to talk.  Trump will try to hurt them the rest of his life.  That is what he does.
He is not a conservative - he is whatever he needs to be to get what he wants.

He is now gathering money from people across the nation, saying the money is for his PAC he is forming, but he has that money, about $170 million now, placed so he can use the money for whatever he wants.  He was a scammer when he got here and is one now.  Scammer: "A person who swindles you by means of deception or fraud."

He did some actions to please Republicans using EOs - not going through congress; he did not care for congress since he wanted to do actions by himself so he got all the "credit" for whatever it was.  Biden can cancel Trump's EOs, which he will begin doing his first day as President.

Some will say that old claim to me, "You hate Trump".  I did not hate any of my patients who had serious mental problems.  I do not hate him but he was and is, too flawed to be president. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 09:14:55 pm
@Jazzhead

Yes, you are right.  He had a nasty name for every world leader and all individual Republicans and every individual Democrat - every person in the world.  He hasn't yet tossed his kids out because his blood runs in them.  He destroyed companies because he would not pay them for work on big projects - they went bankrupt when they could not stay in court as long as he did.  This is the life of this man - stay in court and nothing happens.

I know Senate Republicans talked to psychologists about Trump; then, they knew what he was and had to deal with it until he was no longer president.  That is coming up soon, after January 20, and if they are not still afraid of Trump destroying their livelihood, they will begin to talk.  Trump will try to hurt them the rest of his life.  That is what he does.
He is not a conservative - he is whatever he needs to be to get what he wants.

He is now gathering money from people across the nation, saying the money is for his PAC he is forming, but he has that money, about $170 million now, placed so he can use the money for whatever he wants.  He was a scammer when he got here and is one now.  Scammer: "A person who swindles you by means of deception or fraud."

He did some actions to please Republicans using EOs - not going through congress; he did not care for congress since he wanted to do actions by himself so he got all the "credit" for whatever it was.  Biden can cancel Trump's EOs, which he will begin doing his first day as President.

Some will say that old claim to me, "You hate Trump".  I did not hate any of my patients who had serious mental problems.  I do not hate him but he was and is, too flawed to be president.

I appreciate your experitse in the psychological arena, but honestly it still boiled down to this.....

Do you prefer a naricissist, who was turning the country's economy around, and was successfull in fighting the Chicom threat?  I have one thread on the Economy forum, where Trump's actions have forced the Chicoms to nearly default on some of their high flying AAA Corporate Bonds.  He allmost beat them in this game of High Stakes Chicken.  Also a POTUS who would continued to do his best to put conservative leaning judges in the judiciary.  Plus continued advocacy toward keeping energy independence.

Or do you prefer a pre-demenita candidate who has admittedly endorsed the NGD, and the loss of 20M jobs in the energy sector.  One who hired a woman as VPOTUS who will willlfully take this country down a wreckless SJW, envirowhacko, and socialist path.  One who pundits think will add $15T to the national debt by 2024?  And that doesn't include the likelyhood of Biden's association with the Chicoms, and influence peddling to the biggest threat to our country.

Seemed like a pretty easy choice to me.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 09:22:47 pm
How do you reconcile that nonsense with the fact that Trump received more votes than did all GOP Congressional candidates combined?
We are still waiting for something, anything from him that makes sense.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 09:25:57 pm
Or that they just haven't looked.

Watching CNN isn't exactly "investigating" and twitter and Fecebook have been sanitized for the Dems and the NWO.
Or perhaps this instead.

When Trump installed Bill Barr as his attorney general, most conservatives thought this was a good thing.  Barr was seen as a straight shooter who had come out of retirement to help clean up the Justice Department that Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch had corrupted and that Jeff Sessions had been helpless to repair.  In his two years in office, he's accomplished some excellent things but much less than conservatives had hoped he would.  Things went haywire today, though, when Barr said the DOJ has "not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election."  What?!

Barr made that statement during an interview with AP, which is resolutely anti-Trump.  Indeed, although the article purports to be an interview with Barr, most of it is another mean girl–style AP article that attacks Trump and his supporters.  In the whole article, there's only one other quotation from Barr that comes from the current interview (as opposed to recycled quotations from prior interviews):

There's been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven't seen anything to substantiate that.

The same article relays that Barr appointed U.S. attorney John Durham as special counsel back in October in order to allow Durham to continue to investigate the Trump-Russia hoax (the AP calls it a "probe") after Biden moves into the White House.  In theory, a special counsel is hard to fire, but that's only if you're Trump.  We know that if Biden wants to fire Durham, Durham will be gone in minutes, with the media throwing rocks at him on his way out.

So what's the story here?  In 2019, Barr got off to a good start by ending the Russia hoax.  He's also spoken out forcefully about religious freedom.  And it wasn't his fault that after he agreed that the case against General Flynn should be dismissed, a corrupt judge violated all applicable legal principles to keep the case alive.  Still, I can't help noticing that every person who perverted the American intelligence system is thriving with television appearances and lucrative book deals.

Also, Barr's statements during the interview that the DOJ and DHS have not seen either evidence of fraud or evidence sufficient to change the election outcome make no sense.  There's been a mountain of eyewitness evidence that fraud occurred on such a large scale that it would easily affect the outcome of the election.

Gateway Pundit has been best at tracking the fraud stories, so here are just some examples from the last 48 hours:

Truckloads of ballots arrived in Arizona 10 days after vote-counting seemingly ended.
Biden ballots in Michigan were scanned 8 to 10 times.
Over 100,000 Wisconsin late ballots backdated to November 3.
Dominion, by failing to pay taxes, was not allowed to operate in Missouri.
Michigan poll watcher watched dollies full of Biden ballots arrive at 4 a.m.
Two trailers full of completed ballots went from Pennsylvania to New York, with one traveling on November 4.
Georgia election officials alleged filmed destroying evidence.
Michigan and Georgia campaign operatives tampered with military ballots.
The above list not only does not include the preceding three weeks of eyewitness evidence from across the contested states, but also doesn't touch upon all the statistical and mathematical testimony.  There is a lot of evidence.

What Barr could have quibbled with is whether the evidence can be trusted.  However, to date, no one has done so.  Media leftists have simply announced that there is no evidence or that it's been "debunked," without actually debunking it.  Could Bar have committed the same fallacy of discounting the evidence without weighing its veracity or probative value?

Interestingly, Trump did not brutally attack Barr, opting to say nothing. Instead, Trump's legal team simply pointed out, "with all due respect," that the DOJ hadn't bothered yet to conduct an investigation.


Trump's unusual silence may mean we're watching a magician's misdirection.  This school of thought says the real investigative work has been taking place far from the swamp in which Barr finds himself — and Trump wants to keep it that way.  By having Barr make a technically accurate statement, which is that his Justice Department hasn't seen anything, Trump can keep the media from paying attention to just how much evidence there really is.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/is_bill_barr_a_bad_guy_or_helpfully_spreading_disinformation.html (https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/is_bill_barr_a_bad_guy_or_helpfully_spreading_disinformation.html)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 09:26:13 pm
I appreciate your experitse in the psychological arena, but honestly it still boiled down to this.....

Do you prefer a naricissist, who was turning the country's economy around, and was successfull in fighting the Chicom threat?  I have one thread on the Economy forum, where Trump's actions have forced the Chicoms to nearly default on some of their high flying AAA Corporate Bonds.  He allmost beat them in this game of High Stakes Chicken.  Also a POTUS who would continued to do his best to put conservative leaning judges in the judiciary.  Plus continued advocacy toward keeping energy independence.

Or do you prefer a pre-demenita candidate who has admittedly endorsed the NGD, and the loss of 20M jobs in the energy sector.  One who hired a woman a VPOTUS who will willlfully take this country down a wreckless SJW, envirowhacko, and socialist path.  One who pundits think will add $15T to the national debt by 2024?  And that doesn't include the likelyhood of Biden's association with the Chicoms, and influence peddling to the biggest threat to our country.

Seemed like a pretty easy choice to me.

There 11 million more Americans who chose the former than there were 4 years ago.  Yet we still have people here pushing the totally false narrative that Trump lost votes from then until now.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 09:28:31 pm
@Jazzhead

Yes, you are right.  He had a nasty name for every world leader and all individual Republicans and every individual Democrat - every person in the world.  He hasn't yet tossed his kids out because his blood runs in them.  He destroyed companies because he would not pay them for work on big projects - they went bankrupt when they could not stay in court as long as he did.  This is the life of this man - stay in court and nothing happens.

I know Senate Republicans talked to psychologists about Trump; then, they knew what he was and had to deal with it until he was no longer president.  That is coming up soon, after January 20, and if they are not still afraid of Trump destroying their livelihood, they will begin to talk.  Trump will try to hurt them the rest of his life.  That is what he does.
He is not a conservative - he is whatever he needs to be to get what he wants.

He is now gathering money from people across the nation, saying the money is for his PAC he is forming, but he has that money, about $170 million now, placed so he can use the money for whatever he wants.  He was a scammer when he got here and is one now.  Scammer: "A person who swindles you by means of deception or fraud."

He did some actions to please Republicans using EOs - not going through congress; he did not care for congress since he wanted to do actions by himself so he got all the "credit" for whatever it was.  Biden can cancel Trump's EOs, which he will begin doing his first day as President.

Some will say that old claim to me, "You hate Trump".  I did not hate any of my patients who had serious mental problems.  I do not hate him but he was and is, too flawed to be president.

Well said.

And I'd go a step further and say that after he leaves office he can be viewed as a threat to national security. He hates the DOJ, hates American intelligence services, has put them down and taken the side of the Intel of a foreign govt I shall not name.

A man with massive debts to foreign banks, with no integrity, no love of country, and a trove of valuable intelligence...not a great mix.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 09:29:58 pm
He inspires 80 million people to vote against him when he had the best thing that an incumbent can have going for him, a good economic record in terms of jobs and wages....and still he was so hated that 80 million people said "you're fired".

Even when running against a generic old man.
The fallacy in that claim is in saying all those counted votes came from real people.

Exactly how do you know that anyway?

Isn't that exactly why a number of states are examining or challenging the count in their own state?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Victoria33 on December 02, 2020, 09:31:17 pm
I find it deeply troubling that no one from the GOP, including Cruz has stood up and cried foul.  Cruz stated that he saw a pathway to Trump overturning this election, but that's it.  Perhaps he came forward to offer his expertise and maybe was told "no" or perhaps he saw that Trump tapped Giuliani for the win ... but everyone else has for the most part remained silent.
@libertybele

The Republicans, including Cruz, knew Trump had to go, so they stayed silent.  They were willing to see Biden in, to remove Trump. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 09:32:02 pm
Well said.

And I'd go a step further and say that after he leaves office he can be viewed as a threat to national security. He hates the DOJ, hates American intelligence services, has put them down and taken the side of the Intel of a foreign govt I shall not name.

A man with massive debts to foreign banks, with no integrity, no love of country, and a trove of valuable intelligence...not a great mix.
Wow, we can all see we have a Biden supporter here.

Exactly why are you on this GOP conservative website anyway?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 09:36:26 pm
The fallacy in that claim is in saying all those counted votes came from real people.



The mere fact that Pedo Joe secured 15M votes more than Hitlery is way beyond the realm of plausibility. As bad of a candidate as she was, she still was a hell of a lot more persuavive than their Weekend at Bernie's candidate this time.   I just don't believe it, and never will.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 09:39:48 pm
The fallacy in that claim is in saying all those counted votes came from real people.

Exactly how do you know that anyway?

Isn't that exactly why a number of states are examining or challenging the count in their own state?

As bad as I hate to say it, Barr's statment yesterday was pretty much the death knell blow. He as top law enforcerment officer just gave SCOTUS practical cover to refuse hear any of the cases.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 09:42:53 pm
Wow, we can all see we have a Biden supporter here.

Exactly why are you on this GOP conservative website anyway?

Where do you see evidence i support biden?

Trump is not a republican or a conservative.  Being honest about him is not a political stance. Im an American first, then a republican. Followed closely by an absurdist and a selfless lover.

I oppose biden on his economic philosophy, his regulation philosophy and those are two pretty big concerns among a host of others.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Victoria33 on December 02, 2020, 09:45:23 pm
Well said.  And I'd go a step further and say that after he leaves office he can be viewed as a threat to national security. He hates the DOJ, hates American intelligence services, has put them down and taken the side of the Intel of a foreign govt I shall not name.
A man with massive debts to foreign banks, with no integrity, no love of country, and a trove of valuable intelligence...not a great mix.
@Knox27

I have read intelligence officials are concerned about his "secrets" knowledge; thinking he may tell it (them) for whatever reason.  I never worried about this with other presidents, but this ex-president soon, is different than other ex-presidents.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Absalom on December 02, 2020, 09:46:58 pm
[quote author=Victoria33 link=topic=421528.msg2337460#msg2337460 date=16069429
Yes, you are right.  He had a nasty name for every world leader and all individual Republicans and every individual Democrat - every person in the world.  He hasn't yet tossed his kids out because his blood runs in them.  He destroyed companies because he would not pay them for work on big projects - they went bankrupt when they could not stay in court as long as he did.  This is the life of this man - stay in court and nothing happens.
I know Senate Republicans talked to psychologists about Trump; then, they knew what he was and had to deal with it until he was no longer president.  That is coming up soon, after January 20, and if they are not still afraid of Trump destroying their livelihood, they will begin to talk.  Trump will try to hurt them the rest of his life.  That is what he does.
He is not a conservative - he is whatever he needs to be to get what he wants.

He is now gathering money from people across the nation, saying the money is for his PAC he is forming, but he has that money, about $170 million now, placed so he can use the money for whatever he wants.  He was a scammer when he got here and is one now.  Scammer: "A person who swindles you by means of deception or fraud."
He did some actions to please Republicans using EOs - not going through congress; he did not care for congress since he wanted to do actions by himself so he got all the "credit" for whatever it was.  Biden can cancel Trump's EOs, which he will begin doing his first day as President.
Some will say that old claim to me, "You hate Trump".  I did not hate any of my patients who had serious mental problems.  I do not hate him but he was and is, too flawed to be president.
[/quote]
-----------------
An observation.
The Almighty was beyond gracious in sparing his Mother
the experience of witnessing his performance as POTUS.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 02, 2020, 09:47:39 pm
Where do you see evidence i support biden?

Trump is not a republican or a conservative.  Being honest about him is not a political stance. Im an American first, then a republican. Followed closely by an absurdist and a selfless lover.

I oppose biden on his economic philosophy, his regulation philosophy and those are two pretty big concerns among a host of others.

So @Knox27 ...aren't "those [same] two pretty big concerns" for you to vote for Donald J. Trump? 

Furthermore, please explain why you believe "Trump is not Republican or a Conservative"?  Give examples.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: mystery-ak on December 02, 2020, 09:47:42 pm
Wow, we can all see we have a Biden supporter here.

Exactly why are you on this GOP conservative website anyway?

That's what I want to know...hmmm!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 09:48:36 pm
My attitude is I will NEVER vote for someone who isn't a conservative and will not support anyone who isn't a Constitutional conservative -- both are few and few between.

I find it deeply troubling that no one from the GOP, including Cruz has stood up and cried foul.  Cruz stated that he saw a pathway to Trump overturning this election, but that's it.  Perhaps he came forward to offer his expertise and maybe was told "no" or perhaps he saw that Trump tapped Giuliani for the win ... but everyone else has for the most part remained silent.

The GOP is done.
I watched both the GOP Pennsylvanian and Arizonian legislators stating in meetings that there were serious questions to the legitimacy of the way the elections in their states transpired so I find it odd you make a statement like that.

I also listened to Cruz's statement here http://twitter.com/i/status/1325568443740008455 (http://twitter.com/i/status/1325568443740008455) and I thought he clearly thought it premature to declare Biden a winner and said there were serious disputes on the vote totals.  In the interview, the question posed to him was concerning whether Biden should be considered the President-Elect.

As an aside, I did hear him also say that the American people are the ones that elect the President, which they in fact do not due directly.  He knows full well that the states select the electors which vote on the Presidency instead.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: mystery-ak on December 02, 2020, 09:49:36 pm
As bad as I hate to say it, Barr's statment yesterday was pretty much the death knell blow. He as top law enforcerment officer just gave SCOTUS practical cover to refuse hear any of the cases.

Totally agree....time is running out if they ARE going to SCOTUS..
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 09:50:59 pm
Where do you see evidence i support biden?

Trump is not a republican or a conservative.  Being honest about him is not a political stance. Im an American first, then a republican. Followed closely by an absurdist and a selfless lover.

I oppose biden on his economic philosophy, his regulation philosophy and those are two pretty big concerns among a host of others.
If you don't support Biden and you most certainly don't support Trump with the characterizations you made of him, you must have gone third party or didn't vote at all.

Care to tell us who your conscience told you to vote for?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 09:57:19 pm
@Knox27

I have read intelligence officials are concerned about his "secrets" knowledge; thinking he may tell it (them) for whatever reason.  I never worried about this with other presidents, but this ex-president soon, is different than other ex-presidents.
Why are you just worried about the President here?

Do you not realize there are hundreds of people in an administration, from state dept to defense to CIA to every US attorney that have what you call 'secrets'?

If the paranoia of divulging 'secrets' keeps you up at night, you might want to think about all those other guys in ALL administrations, which have to be in many thousands.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 09:57:19 pm
So @Knox27 ...aren't "those [same] two pretty big concerns" for you to vote for Donald J. Trump? 

Furthermore, please explain why you believe "Trump is not Republican or a Conservative"?  Give examples.

Trump is a nationalist populist as far as he has any principles at all, and even then i doubt how much he cares about the welfare of any non elite member of society.  That's not a philosophy I care for.

And as for those 2 issues.  Trump is a one trick pony.  He gleaned all the benefits of a low interest rate by the fed.  He was valuable in moving the definition of full employment as well.  Ill miss the deregulation. But thats it.  He has shown he cannot be trusted with a crisis. He is a foreign security liability.  The trade war was a disaster.  He has done nothing to stop ilegal immigration.  He puts down freedom of speech and bullies protesters.  He has taken zero action for climate change.  He has too many negatives.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Victoria33 on December 02, 2020, 09:59:24 pm
I appreciate your experitse in the psychological arena, but honestly it still boiled down to this.....
Thank you @catfish1957

Wait until January 20 - see if Trump bombs Iran's underground nuclear area before that date.  He said he wants to give Israel one last gift before he leaves and that is bombing that Iran area.  He brought this up to his Pentagon official (I have that name on my other computer); the officer said don't do it and Trump fired him.  Trump has sent our bombers to the middle east now - no one knows where they are at this time.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 09:59:39 pm
Trump is a nationalist populist as far as he has any principles at all, and even then i doubt how much he cares about the welfare of any non elite member of society.  That's not a philosophy I care for.

And as for those 2 issues.  Trump is a one trick pony.  He gleaned all the benefits of a low interest rate by the fed.  He was valuable in moving the definition of full employment as well.  Ill miss the deregulation. But thats it.  He has shown he cannot be trusted with a crisis. He is a foreign security liability.  The trade war was a disaster.  He has done nothing to stop ilegal immigration.  He puts down freedom of speech and bullies protesters. He has taken zero action for climate change. He has too many negatives.

WTF folks....   We have an enviro-whacko here!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Absalom on December 02, 2020, 10:00:15 pm
Victoria@
Likely you've noticed the increasingly bitter and frenzied
commentary emerging from Trump's followers, as 1/20/21 dawns.
Be wary of this on full display throughout the next 4 years.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 10:02:21 pm
WTF folks....   We have an enviro-whacko here!!!!!!!!!
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 10:04:44 pm
:thumbsup:

I have 40 years experience in the environmental profession if the kid wants to debate it with me.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: aligncare on December 02, 2020, 10:08:38 pm
The mere fact that Pedo Joe secured 15M votes more than Hitlery is way beyond the realm of plausibility. As bad of a candidate as she was, she still was a hell of a lot more persuavive than their Weekend at Bernie's candidate this time.   I just don't believe it, and never will.

Sharp point.

Hillary and Biden are both corruptocrats, so if I had to choose, I think Hillary would have been (technically speaking) a better president than Biden. (Biden couldn’t find his own ass now if he used both hands. Hillary, no problem. Of course she’s got a heavy advantage.)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 10:15:45 pm
I have 40 years experience in the environmental profession if the kid wants to debate it with me.

I am not a geophysicist, or an atmospheric physicist.  Im aware the the overwhelming majority of people who have undergone rigorous academic training have concluded there is anthropogenic climate change.

So I cannot debate it, like I dont debate string theory vs loop gravity, or the best mechanism for a covid vaccine.  But if there is a strong concensus by experts in any of those fields, I do know enough that I believe them over raving idiots on facebook.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: aligncare on December 02, 2020, 10:18:31 pm
Why are you just worried about the President here?

Do you not realize there are hundreds of people in an administration, from state dept to defense to CIA to every US attorney that have what you call 'secrets'?

If the paranoia of divulging 'secrets' keeps you up at night, you might want to think about all those other guys in ALL administrations, which have to be in many thousands.

Yeah, but they’re not satan like Trump is, or Hitler like Trump is, or a psychotic killer like Trump is, or Putin’s plaything like Trump is. Trump is the pandora’s box of badness on earth. AND, he took two (2) scoops of ice cream.   Bad, bad man. happy77
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Victoria33 on December 02, 2020, 10:21:44 pm
Wow, we can all see we have a Biden supporter here.
Exactly why are you on this GOP conservative website anyway?
@IsailedawayfromFR

Information from a member about any candidate does not mean the member supports the other candidate unless the member says so.  Some members here do as you have done, your saying a member supports Biden because the member posted info. about the Republican candidate, Trump. 

This axiom is not true: If one speaks badly about one candidate, one must love the other candidate.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 10:39:16 pm
I am not a geophysicist, or an atmospheric physicist.  Im aware the the overwhelming majority of people who have undergone rigorous academic training have concluded there is anthropogenic climate change.

So I cannot debate it, like I dont debate string theory vs loop gravity, or the best mechanism for a covid vaccine.  But if there is a strong concensus by experts in any of those fields, I do know enough that I believe them over raving idiots on facebook.

So, how do you explain that most of the planet was warmer a 1000 years ago than now? Or times 100's of thousands of years ago, when the average globabl temperature was 5 degrees C higher than now. Or why now data shows that Antartic Ice shelf is growing? 

 The so called overwhelming consensus is a group of left leaning scientist who in concert with left wing politicans who are furthering the Climate Change narrative for a wealth redistribution effort for 3rd world countries.  About 10 years ago, did you happen to notice that the term global warming morphed into ther term "climate change".  That was not an accident.  Because if you apply causal statistics to what is happening, it is not warming at a rate or slope that meets that theory.  Furthermore, do you realize that the data gathered at NWS data reporting and collection stations has been influenced by urban/suburban creep.  When the NWS built these station, mostly in the '50's theu were located in rural areas outside the "heat island" effect.  No one cares to bring up that point.

Secondly, about drinking the kookaid.  The core of envirowhacko scientist has created an environment of harrassment and heresy, if any research climatoliogist dares to question the Oracles of AGW.  One of my favorite example is the late great Dr. William Gray of Colorado State.  He at the time was the greatest and most intelligent person on the planet as far as understanding and predicting climate trends.  If that name does not sound familar, you might have heard of him otherwise by his Hurricane Prediction skills, which were pretty much the gold standard for years. IN some of his parting shots at the scam, he make accusations of falsifications and skewing of data.  And at the direction of the "Oracles", the meteorlogical community turned on him.  Dr. Neil Frank is another who has had the courage to speak it.  But bottom line.....  If you don't drink the koolaid, you will be treated as a pariah among your peers.

3rdly, what really is long term climate about?  A 100 years of data, is a mere blink of the eye in the scheme of matters of how Mother Nature conducts herself on our planet.  Truthfully, man thinking he has the abilty to skew long term weather trends is laughable.  Sunspots, OTOH, are another matter.  In fact, we had huge solar cycles in the '90's that may have had some short term effect.  Lately though, we are seeing more slumber from Sol, and if you want a really candid opinion.  I fear a colder climate due to reduced sunspot activities than I do wilth silly man made global warming.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Victoria33 on December 02, 2020, 10:50:34 pm
Why are you just worried about the President here?  Do you not realize there are hundreds of people in an administration, from state dept to defense to CIA to every US attorney that have what you call 'secrets'?  If the paranoia of divulging 'secrets' keeps you up at night, you might want to think about all those other guys in ALL administrations, which have to be in many thousands.

There are levels of security.  Very few are on the top level as presidents are.  I could tell you about that but would have to kill you if you knew.   :nono:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Victoria33 on December 02, 2020, 10:53:55 pm
We are now all tending boils now because idiots like you pushed the most hated person (next to Hillary) on us. Got 20 trillion dollars to help the deficit while you are typing a response.
@Sighlass

Nice post; glad to see you here.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 02, 2020, 10:57:11 pm
Wow, we can all see we have a Biden supporter here.

Exactly why are you on this GOP conservative website anyway?

Please correct me if I am wrong, this forum is now called "The Briefing Room".  Generally it is Republican in nature, but it was my understanding that liberals, independents, moderates, etc., are welcome to post here. 

For the record I no longer consider myself a Republican as the Republican party has FAILED on many levels.  I consider myself a Constitutional Conservative and I am working on studying and getting to know the Constitution much more than I do now.  That's one of my goals for 2021.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 11:01:08 pm
So, how do you explain that most of the planet was warmer a 1000 years ago than now? Or times 100's of thousands of years ago, when the average globabl temperature was 5 degrees C higher than now. Or why now data shows that Antartic Ice shelf is growing? 

 The so called overwhelming consensus is a group of left leaning scientist who in concert with left wing politicans who are furthering the Climate Change narrative for a wealth redistribution effort for 3rd world countries.  About 10 years ago, did you happen to notice that the term global warming morphed into ther term "climate change".  That was not an accident.  Because if you apply causal statistics to what is happening, it is not warming at a rate or slope that meets that theory.  Furthermore, do you realize that the data gathered at NWS data reporting and collection stations has been influenced by urban/suburban creep.  When the NWS built these station, mostly in the '50's theu were located in rural areas outside the "heat island" effect.  No one cares to bring up that point.

Secondly, about drinking the kookaid.  The core of envirowhacko scientist has created an environment of harrassment and heresy, if any research climatoliogist dares to question the Oracles of AGW.  One of my favorite example is the late great Dr. William Gray of Colorado State.  He at the time was the greatest and most intelligent person on the planet as far as understanding and predicting climate trends.  If that name does not sound familar, you might have heard of him otherwise by his Hurricane Prediction skills, which were pretty much the gold standard for years. IN some of his parting shots at the scam, he make accusations of falsifications and skewing of data.  And at the direction of the "Oracles", the meteorlogical community turned on him.  Dr. Neil Frank is another who has had the courage to speak it.  But bottom line.....  If you don't drink the koolaid, you will be treated as a pariah among your peers.

3rdly, what really is long term climate about?  A 100 years of data, is a mere blink of the eye in the scheme of matters of how Mother Nature conducts herself on our planet.  Truthfully, man thinking he has the abilty to skew long term weather trends is laughable.  Sunspots, OTOH, are another matter.  In fact, we had huge solar cycles in the '90's that may have had some short term effect.  Lately though, we are seeing more slumber from Sol, and if you want a really candid opinion.  I fear a colder climate due to reduced sunspot activities than I do wilth silly man made global warming.

Should I believe in only science that comes from a right leaning scientist? Einstein was pretty left, should I disregard relativity?

The leanings of researchers is not relevant.  The publications are out there for you to refute individually.  Incidental points about the climate 1000 years ago are meaningless in a vacuum. 

If you can point me to intentional systemic fraud in academic papers, I might be inclined to listen.  But there you need to be careful and specific!

What's always interested is at what point in a doctorate students education is he or she approached by this cabal to fudge research because...97 percent of people who probably only care about research want a massive transfer of wealth to the third world?  Is that the sum of it. Prima facie absurd.

Are you sure you begin with an open mind, or do you begin with the position that its a conspiracy and find some of the 3 percent that will support your views?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 11:13:41 pm
Should I believe in only science that comes from a right leaning scientist? Einstein was pretty left, should I disregard relativity?

The leanings of researchers is not relevant.  The publications are out there for you to refute individually.  Incidental points about the climate 1000 years ago are meaningless in a vacuum. 

If you can point me to intentional systemic fraud in academic papers, I might be inclined to listen.  But there you need to be careful and specific!

What's always interested is at what point in a doctorate students education is he or she approached by this cabal to fudge research because...97 percent of people who probably only care about research want a massive transfer of wealth to the third world?  Is that the sum of it. Prima facie absurd.

Are you sure you begin with an open mind, or do you begin with the position that its a conspiracy and find some of the 3 percent that will support your views?

So what good is it, to regurgitate false or skewed data generated to slant your POV.  Dr. Gray (read his papers, if you want proof) went into decent depth of the failures of their research, and those  3% are those who have the courage to stick up for good science and common sense.  Academics are not that well paid, and understand what will commence if they become heretics. This is all part of the NWO agenda and objectives.  The narrative is set much in the manner of the Emperor's New Clothes. 

You accepting the farce of Climate Change, really makes me question your political affilliation, and your blind faith in false science.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 11:18:27 pm
@IsailedawayfromFR

Information from a member about any candidate does not mean the member supports the other candidate unless the member says so.  Some members here do as you have done, your saying a member supports Biden because the member posted info. about the Republican candidate, Trump. 

This axiom is not true: If one speaks badly about one candidate, one must love the other candidate.
Since he trashed both Biden and Trump, my interest is knowing who that person then voted for as an alternative.

I am talking about voting.

What are you talking about?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 11:20:02 pm
So what good is it, to regurgitate false or skewed data generated to slant your POV.  Dr. Gray (read his papers, if you want proof) went into decent depth of the failures of their research, and those  3% are those who have the courage to stick up for good science and common sense.  Academics are not that well paid, and understand what will commence if they become heretics. This is all part of the NWO agenda and objectives.  The narrative is set much in the manner of the Emperor's New Clothes. 

You accepting the farce of Climate Change, really makes me question your political affilliation, and your blind faith in false science.

It would do us well to believe in science more.  And fairy tales less.

I'm a republican that believes in science even if gives answers I don't like. Im a republican that doesn't believe in God. I'm a pro choice republican.  Im not going to believe its a Chinese hoax because our fat idiot of a President says it is
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 11:21:28 pm
I have 40 years experience in the environmental profession if the kid wants to debate it with me.
And I learned about 'climate change' from my father, who was a meteorologist his entire career beginning in WW2 aboard a naval ship in the Pacific.

He always told me we have climate change.  It is called the four seasons, summer, fall, winter and spring.

Do you think the kid does not know this?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 11:22:27 pm
It would do us well to believe in science more.  And fairy tales less.

I'm a republican that believes in science even if gives answers I don't like. Im a republican that doesn't believe in God. I'm a pro choice republican.  Im not going to believe its a Chinese hoax because our fat idiot of a President says it is

i.e a troll on a conservative web site.  Got cha.....
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 02, 2020, 11:25:02 pm
And I learned about 'climate change' from my father, who was a meteorologist his entire career beginning in WW2 aboard a naval ship in the Pacific.

He always told me we have climate change.  It is called the four seasons, summer, fall, winter and spring.

Do you think the kid does not know this?

I think the kid is sheeple, who can't think without an MSM crutch. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 11:26:52 pm
There are levels of security.  Very few are on the top level as presidents are.  I could tell you about that but would have to kill you if you knew.   :nono:
So we are talking about the numbers of secrets someone knows instead of the secretive nature of those secrets.  Although the President certainly has knowledge on more than most if not all, there are always people who know those specific secrets that he knows.  Otherwise, how could he know them?

Exactly how do you know that I never worked in any of those areas?

PS - I did.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 02, 2020, 11:28:13 pm
It would do us well to believe in science more.  And fairy tales less.

I'm a republican that believes in science even if gives answers I don't like. Im a republican that doesn't believe in God. I'm a pro choice republican.  Im not going to believe its a Chinese hoax because our fat idiot of a President says it is
Bully for you. But dont kid yourself you’re some kind of objective thinker, you’re just another sheep in the herd.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 11:30:41 pm
Bully for you. But dont kid yourself you’re some kind of objective thinker, you’re just another sheep in the herd.

Yes. One day I hope to be open minded and without bias like you. So far I'm a disappointment.

Its good, though, to have lofty goals
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 11:36:20 pm
I am not a geophysicist, or an atmospheric physicist.  Im aware the the overwhelming majority of people who have undergone rigorous academic training have concluded there is anthropogenic climate change.

@Knox27

I seriously doubt that the majority of people who have undergone rigorous academic training would offer any conclusion based on zero evidence.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 02, 2020, 11:36:53 pm
It would do us well to believe in science more.  And fairy tales less.

I'm a republican that believes in science even if gives answers I don't like. Im a republican that doesn't believe in God. I'm a pro choice republican.  Im not going to believe its a Chinese hoax because our fat idiot of a President says it is

I'll take "Oceander" for the win, Alex!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 02, 2020, 11:38:03 pm
Bully for you. But dont kid yourself you’re some kind of objective thinker, you’re just another sheep in the herd.

 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 11:39:57 pm
It would do us well to believe in science more.  And fairy tales less.

I'm a republican that believes in science even if gives answers I don't like. Im a republican that doesn't believe in God. I'm a pro choice republican.  Im not going to believe its a Chinese hoax because our fat idiot of a President says it is
If you do not believe in God, why do you call yourself an American?

The Declaration of Independence was quite clear on the subject of the need of our Creator to establish this country, our money has God stamped on every bill, and our National Anthem sings the blessing of God which preserved this nation.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 11:40:08 pm
@Knox27

I seriously doubt that the majority of people who have undergone rigorous academic training would offer any conclusion based on zero evidence.

I agree with that statement
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 11:42:34 pm
It would do us well to believe in science more.  And fairy tales less.

@Knox27

Here's the science.  Vostok ice core data for the last 600,000 years shows that warming/cooling is cyclical, repeating every 100,000 years.  The same scientific data shows that changes in temperature precede changes in CO2 levels.  Thus temperature drives CO2 levels, not the other way around.

Anyway, that's what the science shows.  You can either choose to believe the science, or you can choose to follow your feelings.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 02, 2020, 11:43:04 pm
I am not a geophysicist, or an atmospheric physicist.  Im aware the the overwhelming majority of people who have undergone rigorous academic training have concluded there is anthropogenic climate change.

So I cannot debate it, like I dont debate string theory vs loop gravity, or the best mechanism for a covid vaccine.  But if there is a strong concensus by experts in any of those fields, I do know enough that I believe them over raving idiots on facebook.

You use all the proper tree hugging verbiage..."overwhelming majority" "strong consensus by experts"...buzz words that people wo get their nightly information from the MSM swallow hook line and sinker.

But you're on a site with people that that don't take anything at face value...especially something as fanciful and imaginary as "anthropogenic climate change".

Here facts matter and if you're going to engage in this topic...bring your facts.

We are most certainly NOT "raging idiots on Facebook".

By the way...you do know that carbon dioxide isn't bad for the environment right?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 02, 2020, 11:44:06 pm
I'll take "Oceander" for the win, Alex!
My money is on Sinkspur or r9etb
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 02, 2020, 11:44:33 pm
Quote
Im a republican that doesn't believe in God. I'm a pro choice republican.  Im not going to believe its a Chinese hoax because our fat idiot of a President says it is

So you're not really a Republican...Big R or Little R...you're a progressive Liberal Democrat.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 11:46:02 pm
I agree with that statement

Yet the key missing ingredient here is actual scientific evidence.  So how are we to believe your contention that a majority of academics have reached this conclusion when there is no evidence to support it?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 02, 2020, 11:48:07 pm
I'll take "Oceander" for the win, Alex!

I'll take that bet.

Go with your first inclination... "Fat idiot of a President" sealed it for me that it's Sink.    :laugh:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 11:49:25 pm
I'm a pro choice republican.

I am pro-choice, too.  I believe that the people of Louisiana or any other State should have the right to choose their own abortion laws, marriage laws, etc., as is their Constitutional right under Amendment X.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 02, 2020, 11:51:09 pm
Yes. One day I hope to be open minded and without bias like you. So far I'm a disappointment.

Its good, though, to have lofty goals
oh I have biases. The difference between you and I is I’m honest about them.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 11:51:28 pm
I'll take that bet.

Go with your first inclination... "Fat idiot of a President" sealed it for me that it's Sink.    :laugh:

Acting like someone consciously aware that victory is about to be denied just before crossing the finish line.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 02, 2020, 11:54:22 pm
Yet the key missing ingredient here is actual scientific evidence.  So how are we to believe your contention that a majority of academics have reached this conclusion when there is no evidence to support it?

Very simple. Im not an expert.  An expert is someone with an advanced degree from an accredited institution who conducts research or analyzes the existing studies.

When you have 100 of those in a room, if 97 of them say the answer is A, and three say the answer is B...im going with A. 

Ill be wrong far less often than ill be right.  You take your three percent.  Ultimately I believe its important enough that our leaders should take action.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 11:55:59 pm
Here facts matter and if you're going to engage in this topic...bring your facts.

If the 'bringing of facts' was a pre-requisite for any global warming alarmist to engage in such a debate, then this topic would never be discussed.  There simply aren't any.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 02, 2020, 11:59:14 pm
Very simple. Im not an expert.  An expert is someone with an advanced degree from an accredited institution who conducts research or analyzes the existing studies.

When you have 100 of those in a room, if 97 of them say the answer is A, and three say the answer is B...im going with A. 

Ill be wrong far less often than ill be right.  You take your three percent.  Ultimately I believe its important enough that our leaders should take action.

How many of that 97% are actual "climate scientists"?  And how many are actually working in that field?

And since when did science start being governed by "consensus"?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 02, 2020, 11:59:16 pm
Very simple. Im not an expert.  An expert is someone with an advanced degree from an accredited institution who conducts research or analyzes the existing studies.

When you have 100 of those in a room, if 97 of them say the answer is A, and three say the answer is B...im going with A.

Ah, so you are incapable of thinking for yourself.  Got it.  Just to clarify, you are not aware of the existence of any actual evidence indicating that man causes global warming (even though you are aware of evidence that global temperature changes are cyclical and totally independent of man's actions).  Yet you cling to this fantasy of anthropogenic gobbly-gook.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 02, 2020, 11:59:33 pm
I'll take that bet.

Go with your first inclination... "Fat idiot of a President" sealed it for me that it's Sink.    :laugh:

I was with Sink until the "pro-choice Republican" and "I don't believe in God"  .... But you know him better than I.  @DCPatriot

It would do us well to believe in science more.  And fairy tales less.

I'm a republican that believes in science even if gives answers I don't like. Im a republican that doesn't believe in God. I'm a pro choice republican.  Im not going to believe its a Chinese hoax because our fat idiot of a President says it is









Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 12:00:08 am
If the 'bringing of facts' was a pre-requisite for any global warming alarmist to engage in such a debate, then this topic would never be discussed.  There simply aren't any.

Exactly.  But it's always amusing to see them dredge up the same disclaimed and debunked propaganda from years past.

Like the 97% claim.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 12:11:22 am
Ah, so you are incapable of thinking for yourself.  Got it.  Just to clarify, you are not aware of the existence of any actual evidence indicating that man causes global warming (even though you are aware of evidence that global temperature changes are cyclical and totally independent of man's actions).  Yet you cling to this fantasy of anthropogenic gobbly-gook.

I simply can't spare 6 years to become an expert.

Its not a fantasy. Ideally it wouldn't be a problem and we can go along our merry way.  Id say I wish it was a hoax, but then that would be an indictment of any science ever so im happy its not.

So to sum up, im saddened that its real yet simultaneously glad that we can, for the most part, believe peer reviewed science.  That's not too nuanced...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 03, 2020, 12:12:52 am
I was with Sink until the "pro-choice Republican" and "I don't believe in God"  .... But you know him better than I.  @DCPatriot

Ahhh, darn...you're right!  He would never deny God, unless it was a deflection of sorts.

Reason I doubt that it's Oceander is because his "Ego concerning legalities" is severely lacking.

But, it's a little bit of fun to guess.   :beer:   @Right_in_Virginia
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 03, 2020, 12:17:33 am
I simply can't spare 6 years to become an expert.

Good grief, man.  You can at least acknowledge that some sort of evidence is required to draw a scientific conclusion.

For example, Vostok data shows that rising temperatures preceded rising carbon dioxide levels.  Likewise, falling temperatures preceded declines in carbon dioxide levels.  This is data that even the UN published.  It is solid scientific evidence showing that there have been six temperature cycles over the last 600,000 years - long before humans started purchasing automobiles.

Evidence, evidence, evidence.  Ask yourself "Do I have any evidence?"  Because it doesn't even take a fifth grader to figure that one out.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 03, 2020, 12:20:52 am
Ahhh, darn...you're right!  He would never deny God, unless it was a deflection of sorts.

Reason I doubt that it's Oceander is because his "Ego concerning legalities" is severely lacking.

But, it's a little bit of fun to guess.   :beer:   @Right_in_Virginia

Yeah, it could be misdirection on Sink's part.  Hey, Sink   *look*

@DCPatriot
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Bigun on December 03, 2020, 12:27:03 am
My money is on Sinkspur or r9etb

I'm with you on that @IsailedawayfromFR
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 03, 2020, 12:27:21 am
Yeah, it could be misdirection on Sink's part.  Hey, Sink   *look*

@DCPatriot


 :silly:    :beer:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 12:30:05 am
Good grief, man.  You can at least acknowledge that some sort of evidence is required to draw a scientific conclusion.

For example, Vostok data shows that rising temperatures preceded rising carbon dioxide levels.  Likewise, falling temperatures preceded declines in carbon dioxide levels.  This is data that even the UN published.  It is solid scientific evidence showing that there have been six temperature cycles over the last 600,000 years - long before humans started purchasing automobiles.

Evidence, evidence, evidence.  Ask yourself "Do I have any evidence?"  Because it doesn't even take a fifth grader to figure that one out.

The vostok data! I've been told by someone that shares my ideology that this invalidates everything they've told us! Vostok!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 03, 2020, 12:34:33 am
The vostok data! I've been told by someone that shares my ideology that this invalidates everything they've told us! Vostok!

(https://www.iceagenow.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Vostok-Ice-Core-Data.jpg)

Temperature drives CO2.  This is what the science shows.  Do you believe the science?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 12:38:13 am
(https://www.iceagenow.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Vostok-Ice-Core-Data.jpg)

Temperature drives CO2.  This is what the science shows.  Do you believe the science?

He only believes in "science" that reinforces his fantasy of man made climate change.  In short he relies on an echo chamber for his data.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 12:46:01 am
(https://www.iceagenow.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Vostok-Ice-Core-Data.jpg)

Temperature drives CO2.  This is what the science shows.  Do you believe the science?

Well inasmuch as one graph can encompass the totality of an entire field i guess I'm wrong and don't have to worry!

The vostok data settles it.  The interpretation of which has been told to me
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 12:49:29 am
Well inasmuch as one graph can encompass the totality of an entire field i guess I'm wrong and don't have to worry!

The vostok data settles it.  The interpretation of which has been told to me

Since when is science ever "settled"?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 03, 2020, 12:57:15 am
Since when is science ever "settled"?
Ever since Nicolaus Copernicus created his scientific model of the universe that had the sun in the center of it.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 12:57:35 am
Since when is science ever "settled"?

A feature, not a bug, of science!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 01:03:30 am
Ever since Nicolaus Copernicus created his scientific model of the universe that had the sun in the center of it.

Christopher Columbus was told science was settled too...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 01:06:53 am
A feature, not a bug, of science!

Only when it fits your leftist narrative.

Settled science once said the earth was flat.

Settled Science once said the earth was the center of the universe.

Settled science said of a vehicle traveled over 100mph the driver would die of oxygen starvation.


Talk to me more about this myth that "settled" science is a "feature"
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 01:15:07 am
Only when it fits your leftist narrative.

Settled science once said the earth was flat.

Settled Science once said the earth was the center of the universe.

Settled science said of a vehicle traveled over 100mph the driver would die of oxygen starvation.


Talk to me more about this myth that "settled" science is a "feature"

Religion said that earth was the center of the universe. 

And yes, its a wonderful feature that new evidence and new ways of thinking are welcomed!  But id like to see evidence that your examples were "settled science"

I suspect they were not.

Why is it leftist to believe in man made climate change?  The response to it may suit some leftists for sure.  I dont conflate the two.

Is it leftist to believe the earth is 4.5 billion years old and evolution is the result of random mutations?

If its leftist then we are not gonna exist as a party in 50 years
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 01:30:06 am
Religion said that earth was the center of the universe.

No that was scientists of the day. 

As far as I know...Aristotle wasn't a priest or a religious figure.  Neither was astronomer and mathematician Ptolemy.

Quote
And yes, its a wonderful feature that new evidence and new ways of thinking are welcomed!  But id like to see evidence that your examples were "settled science"

Go back and look at the scientists pre-Enlightenment and before the Scientific Revolution.

Quote
I suspect they were not.

To an uncurious mind like yours...you'll never find that which you don't look for.

Quote
Why is it leftist to believe in man made climate change?  The response to it may suit some leftists for sure.  I dont conflate the two.

Because it's become a religion of sorts for leftists like yourself.  Green is the new Red.  The fan fiction theories on man made climate change do not stand up to peer review or a serious look at the statistical and environmental facts.

There's no better evidence of this than the infamous Hockey Stick graph.


Quote
Is it leftist to believe the earth is 4.5 billion years old and evolution is the result of random mutations?

Nope.  It's not.  Nice try at a subtle swipe at christians though.  But what you just said makes my case.  This planet has been here long before man and billions of years before the Industrial Revolution.  To believe your fantasy of man made global warming...would require a suspension if disbelief that the planet that survived natural cycles of Ice Ages warming...tectonic plate shifts...floods asteroids that wiped out entire species and play magnetic shifts that have reversed the poles is in danger of being wiped out by man and technology.

We're a virus on the surface of this globe and when God and Mother nature grow tired of the virus they will wipe us out and start over.

It's egotistical and arrogant to believe that man and man alone is this climatological disaster to the planet.


[quoteIf its leftist then we are not gonna exist as a party in 50 years
[/quote]

You're not a Republican anyway so why should it matter to you what the Republican Party looks like in 50 years?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 03, 2020, 01:50:18 am
Religion said that earth was the center of the universe.
What does that have to do with anything whatsoever?

I thought you were talking about scientific evidence, not religious beliefs.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 01:53:48 am
What does that have to do with anything whatsoever?

I thought you were talking about scientific evidence, not religious beliefs.

Right! Sometimes I get the religious beliefs in a God confused with the unquestioning slavish devotion to ideology!

My bad.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 01:56:56 am
Right! Sometimes I get the religious beliefs in a God confused with the unquestioning slavish devotion to ideology!

My bad.

You’re not as clever as you think you are.

But your contemptuous snark is duly noted.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 01:57:54 am
No that was scientists of the day. 

As far as I know...Aristotle wasn't a priest or a religious figure.  Neither was astronomer and mathematician Ptolemy.

Go back and look at the scientists pre-Enlightenment and before the Scientific Revolution.

To an uncurious mind like yours...you'll never find that which you don't look for.

Because it's become a religion of sorts for leftists like yourself.  Green is the new Red.  The fan fiction theories on man made climate change do not stand up to peer review or a serious look at the statistical and environmental facts.

There's no better evidence of this than the infamous Hockey Stick graph.


Nope.  It's not.  Nice try at a subtle swipe at christians though.  But what you just said makes my case.  This planet has been here long before man and billions of years before the Industrial Revolution.  To believe your fantasy of man made global warming...would require a suspension if disbelief that the planet that survived natural cycles of Ice Ages warming...tectonic plate shifts...floods asteroids that wiped out entire species and play magnetic shifts that have reversed the poles is in danger of being wiped out by man and technology.

We're a virus on the surface of this globe and when God and Mother nature grow tired of the virus they will wipe us out and start over.

It's egotistical and arrogant to believe that man and man alone is this climatological disaster to the planet.


[quoteIf its leftist then we are not gonna exist as a party in 50 years


You're not a Republican anyway so why should it matter to you what the Republican Party looks like in 50 years?

They have taken to calling it the hockey team now.  Because of all the independent confirmation of the data.  They must not know about vostok!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: aligncare on December 03, 2020, 02:36:07 am
We are now all tending boils now because idiots like you pushed the most hated person (next to Hillary) on us. Got 20 trillion dollars to help the deficit while you are typing a response.

Trump had a life before the presidency, a time when his name was often dropped on TV and he appeared on morning talk shows, when he was pictured on all the trendy MAGAzine covers and interviewed by fawning news and celebrity columnists, was invited to all the fabulous Hollywood soirée.

Back then everybody wanted to be Donald Trump’s friend.

Now, what event happened since then that might warrant Trump’s banishment from humanity and have his name and family reviled throughout history? Let’s see. Let’s use our reasoning. I find it helps. (In thinking about this try not referencing any Washington Post or New York Times “news” stories about Trump, either. I find that helps, too.)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 03, 2020, 03:47:46 am
I simply can't spare 6 years to become an expert.

Its not a fantasy. Ideally it wouldn't be a problem and we can go along our merry way.  Id say I wish it was a hoax, but then that would be an indictment of any science ever so im happy its not.

So to sum up, im saddened that its real yet simultaneously glad that we can, for the most part, believe peer reviewed science.  That's not too nuanced...

If the original "peer reviewed" science is fabricated (GIGO), what good is it?  I have already explained to you about the heat island anomoly of reporting stations as a skewed number. What about extrapolated data which showed it warmer a 1000 years ago?  At least answer those....

I know enough, and have read enough to know that those so called 97% are sheeple, just like yourself.  Again.....  Mets who deny the Oracle, are castigataed  into occupational hell fire.  Basing and staking the future of mankind on basically 80 years of faulty data from those having hidden politica agendas?   You may have been duped, but I know better to buy off into the scare....   

Back in the late 1970's the population was scared into thinking we were heading into an ice age.  That worked out about the same as the present cast of clowns hawking their enviro-whacko babble.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 06:20:07 am
They have taken to calling it the hockey team now.  Because of all the independent confirmation of the data.  They must not know about vostok!

The hockey stick graph is a proven fraud based on made up data.   

That tells me all I need to know about you where the myth of man made climate change is concerned. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 06:23:31 am
If the original "peer reviewed" science is fabricated (GIGO), what good is it?  I have already explained to you about the heat island anomoly of reporting stations as a skewed number. What about extrapolated data which showed it warmer a 1000 years ago?  At least answer those....

I know enough, and have read enough to know that those so called 97% are sheeple, just like yourself.  Again.....  Mets who deny the Oracle, are castigataed  into occupational hell fire.  Basing and staking the future of mankind on basically 80 years of faulty data from those having hidden politica agendas?   You may have been duped, but I know better to buy off into the scare....   

Back in the late 1970's the population was scared into thinking we were heading into an ice age.  That worked out about the same as the present cast of clowns hawking their enviro-whacko babble.

What’s really sad is that some of the same scientists from the Time article on the coming Ice Age from the ‘70’s are the same ones beating the drum for climate change today.

They were wrong then and they are wrong now. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 03, 2020, 08:45:23 am
Where do you see evidence i support biden?

Trump is not a republican or a conservative.  Being honest about him is not a political stance. Im an American first, then a republican. Followed closely by an absurdist and a selfless lover.

I oppose biden on his economic philosophy, his regulation philosophy and those are two pretty big concerns among a host of others.
I oppose Biden because he is the stalking horse by which a real Communist who isn't even a Natural Born Citizen will end up POTUS, should Biden prevail. He will not finish his term, and between Pelosi dusting off the 25th Amendment and his non compos mentis performances on his short campaign trail, I think that is obvious.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 12:17:55 pm
The hockey stick graph is a proven fraud based on made up data.   

That tells me all I need to know about you where the myth of man made climate change is concerned.

He crossed his arms and huffed, his face reddening.

"Every knows its fake! They made up the data! Everyone knows! You're a sheep!  Ice cores!  Sunspots! "

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 12:52:05 pm
He crossed his arms and huffed, his face reddening.

"Every knows its fake! They made up the data! Everyone knows! You're a sheep!  Ice cores!  Sunspots! "

Typical troll move.  Don’t engage the facts when your talking points/propaganda is exposed. 

Quote
But the hockey stick graph is a fraud. A man-made computer software algorithm generated it, and the algorithm is rigged to produce a hockey stick shape no matter what data were entered. Like everything else found in the rigged world of “climate science,” the hockey stick graph was a fraud the day it was generated.

http://www.ccfsh.org/climate/climate-change-hoax-collapses-as-michael-manns-bogus-hockey-stick-graph-defamation-lawsuit-dismissed-by-the-supreme-court-of-british-columbia/ (http://www.ccfsh.org/climate/climate-change-hoax-collapses-as-michael-manns-bogus-hockey-stick-graph-defamation-lawsuit-dismissed-by-the-supreme-court-of-british-columbia/)


Michael Mann used fraudulent data to create the graph.  There’s emails to prove it. 

Not that facts and truth matter to you. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 01:30:06 pm
Typical troll move.  Don’t engage the facts when your talking points/propaganda is exposed. 

http://www.ccfsh.org/climate/climate-change-hoax-collapses-as-michael-manns-bogus-hockey-stick-graph-defamation-lawsuit-dismissed-by-the-supreme-court-of-british-columbia/ (http://www.ccfsh.org/climate/climate-change-hoax-collapses-as-michael-manns-bogus-hockey-stick-graph-defamation-lawsuit-dismissed-by-the-supreme-court-of-british-columbia/)


Michael Mann used fraudulent data to create the graph.  There’s emails to prove it. 

Not that facts and truth matter to you.

Again, researchers have all come to the same conclusion.  Only a small minority of scientists and politicians go the other way.

Show me the emails please
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 03, 2020, 01:34:22 pm
Mark Thiessen,  in this morning's paper:

" Trump didn't lose the election because of a Cuban-Venezuelen-Chinese-Clinton-Soros conspiracy.  He lost because he alienated millions of voters who approved of his policies but did not vote for him because they were tired of chaos."

Funny,  I said something similar just the other day.  And from my vantage point -  the middle class suburbs - that result could be seen a mile away.  As Mr. Thiessen points out, "The facts speak for themselves:  In 2016,  Trump won suburban voters by 2 percentage points; in 2020 he lost them by 10.  This shift proved decisive in key swing states such as Michigan, Wisconsin,  Pennsylvania and Georgia."

Right on the mark.   The turn away from the GOP in the suburbs is the untold story of this election that needs to be addressed as soon as possible.   And in these parts,  Trump remains poison,  as he wildly challenges the election results and selfishly ignores the big picture:  two Senate seats in Georgia that, if lost, will prove the death knell for all those Trump policies that have restored prosperity even in the face of a pandemic.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: rustynail on December 03, 2020, 01:45:09 pm
-  the middle class suburbs -
Will be gone under Biden injected with section eight housing and apartments.(chaos)

Hope -  the middle class suburbs -  enjoy their sanctimony.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 03, 2020, 02:04:37 pm
-  the middle class suburbs -
Will be gone under Biden injected with section eight housing and apartments.(chaos)

Hope -  the middle class suburbs -  enjoy their sanctimony.

It's not sanctimony.  These voters abandoned Trump because of his unfiltered, inflammatory rhetoric and his improvisational behavior.   You may admire him for these things,  but they contributed to the chaos.   A second Trump term would have just made the chaos worse - remember that the Dems were almost promising there would be violence in the streets.

Folks in the suburbs like their comfort and normalcy.   What you decry as sanctimony was in fact perfectly rational behavior.   Folks were weary of it all, simple as that.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 03, 2020, 02:28:39 pm
It's not sanctimony.  These voters abandoned Trump because of .  .  . 

OMG!   STOP LYING ALREADY!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 03, 2020, 02:34:56 pm
Mark Thiessen,  in this morning's paper:

" Trump didn't lose the election"

Right on the mark.   

Now it is.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 03, 2020, 02:35:42 pm
Again, researchers have all come to the same conclusion.

BS.


Only a small minority of scientists and politicians go the other way.

More BS.


Show me the emails please

You were already given data republished by the UN and peer reviewed by hundreds of researchers.  And conspicuously absent from this entire discussion is any evidence presented by you that backs up your claim of anthropogenic BS.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 02:37:08 pm
Mark Thiessen,  in this morning's paper:

" Trump didn't lose the election because of a Cuban-Venezuelen-Chinese-Clinton-Soros conspiracy.  He lost because he alienated millions of voters who approved of his policies but did not vote for him because they were tired of chaos."

Funny,  I said something similar just the other day.  And from my vantage point -  the middle class suburbs - that result could be seen a mile away.  As Mr. Thiessen points out, "The facts speak for themselves:  In 2016,  Trump won suburban voters by 2 percentage points; in 2020 he lost them by 10.  This shift proved decisive in key swing states such as Michigan, Wisconsin,  Pennsylvania and Georgia."

Right on the mark.   The turn away from the GOP in the suburbs is the untold story of this election that needs to be addressed as soon as possible.   And in these parts,  Trump remains poison,  as he wildly challenges the election results and selfishly ignores the big picture:  two Senate seats in Georgia that, if lost, will prove the death knell for all those Trump policies that have restored prosperity even in the face of a pandemic.

Your theory works right up to the point that reality strikes and you realize that all of toss up seats and several Dem seats in the House flipped to Republican control.  We gains Republican majorities in more state governments as well. 

There wasn’t a turn away from the GOP in the suburbs. People in all social levels and skin color turned towards the GOP in this election. 

But it’s understandable this doesn’t compute with you...like all Liberals you totally misread the public and their outrage at the Dems at all levels the last four years and this last year specifically. 

The only poison around here is your tendentious line of thinking. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 03, 2020, 02:39:24 pm
OMG!   STOP LYING ALREADY!

Große Lüge - just gotta tell it often enough.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 02:42:10 pm
OMG!   STOP LYING ALREADY!

He has to keep doing that to avoid the painful truth of this last election.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 02:47:56 pm
Again, researchers have all come to the same conclusion.  Only a small minority of scientists and politicians go the other way.

That is a patently false statement. 

Not to mention there’s 30,000 scientists who have signed the Oregon Petition that would disagree with you.



Quote
Show me the emails please

From the WSJ who reviewed the emails in question:

Quote
Yet even a partial review of the emails is highly illuminating. In them, scientists appear to urge each other to present a "unified" view on the theory of man-made climate change while discussing the importance of the "common cause"; to advise each other on how to smooth over data so as not to compromise the favored hypothesis; to discuss ways to keep opposing views out of leading journals; and to give tips on how to "hide the decline" of temperature in certain inconvenient data.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354 (https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 03, 2020, 03:05:04 pm
It's not sanctimony.  These voters abandoned Trump because of his unfiltered, inflammatory rhetoric and his improvisational behavior.   

Really?  12 million more Americans voted to keep the President in office than voted in 2016 to put him there --- and you're still clinging to the jackassery that voters didn't know where and from who the chaos was coming. 

12 million more Americans let you know they understand full well that NT and Democrat obstructionists created bedlam for four years aimed at destroying our President.  Only you and your NT cohorts want to believe otherwise.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 03, 2020, 03:12:52 pm
OMG!   STOP LYING ALREADY!
 

What lie,  sir?   The facts are,  as Mark Theissen said,  that Trump won the suburbs in 2016 and lost them in 2020,  and that is what made the difference (even as GOP candidates generally held their own).

Trump lost because folks are tired of the chaos.   And if you want to blame the Dems and the media for that, go right ahead - I would agree with you.

Both Trump and the Dems were essentially allied in stoking the chaos.   That's why I say Trump lost not because of fraud but because of intimidation.   Folks in the suburbs have too much at stake to put up with another four years of the shitshow.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 03, 2020, 03:16:24 pm
 

What lie,  sir?   The facts are,  as Mark Theissen said,  that Trump won the suburbs in 2016 and lost them in 2020,  and that is what made the difference (even as GOP candidates generally held their own).

Trump lost because folks are tired of the chaos.   And if you want to blame the Dems and the media for that, go right ahead - I would agree with you.

Both Trump and the Dems were essentially allied in stoking the chaos.   That's why I say Trump lost not because of fraud but because of intimidation.   Folks in the suburbs have too much at stake to put up with another four years of the shitshow.

Like arguing with a voicemail greeting.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 03, 2020, 03:28:34 pm
Typical troll move.  Don’t engage the facts when your talking points/propaganda is exposed. 

http://www.ccfsh.org/climate/climate-change-hoax-collapses-as-michael-manns-bogus-hockey-stick-graph-defamation-lawsuit-dismissed-by-the-supreme-court-of-british-columbia/ (http://www.ccfsh.org/climate/climate-change-hoax-collapses-as-michael-manns-bogus-hockey-stick-graph-defamation-lawsuit-dismissed-by-the-supreme-court-of-british-columbia/)


Michael Mann used fraudulent data to create the graph.  There’s emails to prove it. 

Not that facts and truth matter to you.

Forget about it  Radio...  Arguing with the dumbass is pointless.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 03:45:51 pm
Folks in the suburbs have too much at stake to put up with another four years of the shitshow.

Ummm yeah about that:

Quote
Washington Post: Trump wasn’t just a rural phenomenon. Most of his supporters come from cities and suburbs.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/11/18/rural-city-trump-voters/%3foutputType=amp (https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/11/18/rural-city-trump-voters/%3foutputType=amp)

From the article:

Quote
The 11 largest metropolitan areas in the United States gave Trump more total votes than all of rural America combined. In order of population, they are New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, D.C., Miami, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Boston and Phoenix.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 03:58:39 pm
Forget about it  Radio...  Arguing with the dumbass is pointless.

Resorting to ad hominem attacks.  Illuminating.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 03, 2020, 04:07:45 pm
Resorting to ad hominem attacks.  Illuminating.

It wasn't an attack, ad hominem or otherwise.  It was the truth.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 04:25:58 pm
It wasn't an attack, ad hominem or otherwise.  It was the truth.

Member does not know definition of ad hominem.  Suspicious for other logical fallacies.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: aligncare on December 03, 2020, 04:30:46 pm
Really?  12 million more Americans voted to keep the President in office than voted in 2016 to put him there --- and you're still clinging to the jackassery that voters didn't know where and from who the chaos was coming. 

12 million more Americans let you know they understand full well that NT and Democrat obstructionists created bedlam for four years aimed at destroying our President.  Only you and your NT cohorts want to believe otherwise.

@Right_in_Virginia

That’s it in a nutshell.  :patriot:

There are FOUR lights! @Cyber Liberty    wink777
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 03, 2020, 04:34:34 pm
Resorting to ad hominem attacks.  Illuminating.

Sorry for being so brutally honest....  Exhibit A....  Here is a quote and reponse from about your 30th post concerning your sources of news......  Again these are your words......

"A variety of places. Including places you would scoff at because its not solely epoch times, gateway pundit, or frontpage magazine.  Yes that means I'll read the WSJ, NYT, the atlantic, drudge, the AP, the economist, axios, the hill.  I know... im a sheep for listening to the lamestream media."

Anyone who samples the NYT, Atlantic, Drudge, AP as credible news sources?  You've  got to be kidding.    Thusly , sheeple like you bring their POV to  ridiculous left wing biased climate change arguments, among other left of center gibberish you have been bringing to this forum.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 03, 2020, 04:52:36 pm
Sorry guys, but.... I just don't have the patience to deal with the resident Trump-hating trolls and quacks.... whom I consider enemies of a free, "non-communist" America. 

More power to you guys that 'do' have enough patience to go round and round with the idiots.  You don't want to know what I would like to happen to them.    888mouth
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 03, 2020, 04:57:12 pm
Resorting to ad hominem attacks.  Illuminating.

When all they've got is ad hominem attacks,  you know you're winning the argument.

Welcome to the board, btw, @Knox27 .   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 05:03:29 pm
Sorry for being so brutally honest....  Exhibit A....  Here is a quote and reponse from about your 30th post concerning your sources of news......  Again these are your words......

"A variety of places. Including places you would scoff at because its not solely epoch times, gateway pundit, or frontpage magazine.  Yes that means I'll read the WSJ, NYT, the atlantic, drudge, the AP, the economist, axios, the hill.  I know... im a sheep for listening to the lamestream media."

Anyone who samples the NYT, Atlantic, Drudge, AP as credible news sources?  You've  got to be kidding.    Thusly , sheeple like you bring their POV to  ridiculous left wing biased climate change arguments, among other left of center gibberish you have been bringing to this forum.

Yes the places I listed are largely credible.  The op ed section, well, that's sometimes to be taken with a grain of salt.

I dont believe much of the drivel from OANN or NNN.  I know when I'm being lied to and manipulated.  I can be a republican and rational.  Its not an oxymoron.  I hope.  We are def the stupid party though.  It will cost us.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 05:07:30 pm
When all they've got is ad hominem attacks,  you know you're winning the argument.

Welcome to the board, btw, @Knox27 .

Thanks, hermano
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 03, 2020, 05:19:46 pm
When all they've got is ad hominem attacks,  you know you're winning the argument.

Welcome to the board, btw, @Knox27 .

He's regurgiatated the AGW gibberish lies verbatim.  He hasn't won shit.

You?....   I see da trollz be stirrin'

Your whole schtick is unabated ultra-biased Trump hate.  Everybody knows that.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 03, 2020, 06:14:50 pm
Quote from: catfish1957

You?....   I see da trollz be stirrin'

Your whole schtick is unabated ultra-biased Trump hate.  Everybody knows that.

The only "unabashed hate"  around here is coming from the likes of you and other Trump lickspittles who cannot abide contrary opinions.    I have praised Trump's policies and his worker- centric vision for the GOP many times on this board.   Those policies,  and that vision, represent a viable future for our party.   It is the man himself and the chaos both he and the Dems feed off of that have alienated the suburbs.

I do not hate Donald Trump.  But one term as President is quite enough.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 03, 2020, 06:49:14 pm
He crossed his arms and huffed, his face reddening.

"Every knows its fake! They made up the data! Everyone knows! You're a sheep!  Ice cores!  Sunspots! "
Let's put it this way. In 1983, and again in the 1990s I worked in places where the official temperature was reported as -54 degrees Fahrenheit. (incidentally, that is the temperature where mercury solidifies). Unofficially, the temperature at one of those locations was -60, read on a 'spirit' thermometer that used alcohol instead of mercury. Those readings were verified in the official records when I could first access them on the internet, but have been since 'revised' upward to -50 degrees.
Such data revisions only serve to raise temperatures in the official record,which we are supposed to accept as proof that the planet is in some catastrophic warming cycle. If it is, it isn't humans, and the warming and cooling cycles in the past, where CO2 is a trailing indicator*, occurred without human intervention.
The only reason to suddenly blame humans for climate is to advance the concept of global control, something that can't be done without some boogeyman that threatens everyone equally. Of course, if you just send lots of money, that will help stabilize the planet's temperature, too.

*If you consider the solubility of CO2 in water, it is more soluble in cold water than warm, so the CO2 content of the atmosphere trails temperature because the oceans take time to cool or warm,and the solubility of CO2 in those bodies of water increases or decreases with the temperature of the water. That is why CO2 trails the temperature, and is an indicator, not a forcing factor.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 03, 2020, 07:06:13 pm
The only "unabashed hate"  around here is coming from the likes of you and other Trump lickspittles who cannot abide contrary opinions.   

Sounds like someone needs a nap @Cyber Liberty
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 03, 2020, 07:19:20 pm
The only "unabashed hate"  around here is coming from the likes of you and other Trump lickspittles who cannot abide contrary opinions.    I have praised Trump's policies and his worker- centric vision for the GOP many times on this board.   Those policies,  and that vision, represent a viable future for our party.   It is the man himself and the chaos both he and the Dems feed off of that have alienated the suburbs.

I do not hate Donald Trump.  But one term as President is quite enough.

The only time you’ve praised anything Trump has done is when it fits your Liberal world view. Support for gay “marriage” bump stock ban red flag laws.  Things that are Liberal and unconstitutional at the same time...you’re all for it. 

The rest of the time you’ve tried to convince us Trump needs to step aside for a squish like Kasich or Jeb.

You been presented mounds of legal evidence to show where your positions are wrong and unconstitutional and like your new BFF you just keep repeating the same wrongheaded dogma.

And as as for ugly things said here...you’ve dished out more than your fair share of condescending insulting and at time downright hateful words here.

You have no room nor the right to pass judgment on anyone here when it comes to invective. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 03, 2020, 07:25:36 pm
When all they've got is ad hominem attacks,  you know you're winning the argument.

Welcome to the board, btw, @Knox27 .

@Jazzhead @Knox27

Attack the message, and kindly stop attacking the other Members.  TIA.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 03, 2020, 07:30:38 pm
The only "unabashed hate"  around here is coming from the likes of you and other Trump lickspittles who cannot abide contrary opinions.    I have praised Trump's policies and his worker- centric vision for the GOP many times on this board.   Those policies,  and that vision, represent a viable future for our party.   It is the man himself and the chaos both he and the Dems feed off of that have alienated the suburbs.

I do not hate Donald Trump.  But one term as President is quite enough.
Good impose one term limits on POTUS.

One term of another Obama is not merely enough, it is too much.

As for "contrary opinions" we can repost the argument about whether the world is flat, or the sun is the center of the solar system, but those things have been sorted out in a manner which actually verifies or refutes the hypotheses involved.
The noise to signal ratio in "climate science" is off the charts, imposed by the endless static of 14 year olds testifying as experts and the endless babble of those who depend on taxpayer dollars for grant money.

Similar to the political power exerted by Fauci and the CDC, there is a panic based on models which inevitably predict doom, and which I firmly believe will be eventually exposed as heavily politicized and not science driven. There are people with their livelihoods, power and prestige, and on occasion significant sums of money on the line over their arguments, arguments which ever increasingly malign energy sources and industry which have become nothing if not consistently more environmentally friendly while forming the basis by which we may adapt to any change which may actually occur--change, I might add, which has failed to be as intense or catastrophic as the continuously revised predictions have stated, otherwise the folks at the NYT would take the boat to work, not a taxi or the subway.
Showing steam emitted through smokestacks on a cold day as if it were the soot being belched in the early 20th century is not only deceptive, but a dishonest smear of industry which has never had more clean emissions.
 
Declaring CO2, a trace gas essential to life, to be a "pollutant" is nonsense. Without that the phytoplankton which feed the world oxygen and form the base of the marine food chain cannot survive.

Just as in elections, when you start messing with data sets, the actual results become obscured. Some tampering leaves a clear trail, derivative data is not so obvious, but in the end, GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) applies, and between the obvious tampering with data ("adjustments").

Oh, to be sure climate changes. It has for the last (roughly) 4.6 Billion years, and from examining core and rock outcrops and drilled samples from just the last 600,000,000 years in North America (and a wee bit of preCambrian material as well back to 2.4 billion years old), the times when any given place on the planet has had a climate favorable to humans have been literally few and far between.

I get it. 4.6 billion years and the Climate just won't stop changing. You just want it to quit.

KInda like industry trying to reach the ever moving goalposts of the ecowhacko movement.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 03, 2020, 07:32:31 pm
Sounds like someone needs a nap @Cyber Liberty

He gets one if he calls me abusive again.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: christian on December 03, 2020, 07:47:33 pm
I do not hate Donald Trump.  But one term as President is quite enough.

Odd, those that do hate Trump sound just like you smokin.  Are we supposed to be able to tell a difference ?
Have you notified the election boards you are now the one to decide how many terms of office a politician can have ?
Trump hater/never Trumpers.  A difference of no discernible distinction.  After 4 years of felonious treason, they still despise Trumps prosperity, and still Lewinsky worship politicians like bill, hitlery, Obama.  Speaks volumes.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: rustynail on December 03, 2020, 07:57:19 pm
hey Bag Pipe:WATCH: Video footage from Georgia shows suitcases filled with ballots pulled from under a table AFTER supervisors told poll workers to leave room and 4 people stayed behind to keep counting votes

https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1334569329334083586
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 03, 2020, 07:57:27 pm
I do not hate Donald Trump.  But one term as President is quite enough.

Odd, those that do hate Trump sound just like you smokin.  Are we supposed to be able to tell a difference ?
Have you notified the election boards you are now the one to decide how many terms of office a politician can have ?
Trump hater/never Trumpers.  A difference of no discernible distinction.  After 4 years of felonious treason, they still despise Trumps prosperity, and still Lewinsky worship politicians like bill, hitlery, Obama.  Speaks volumes.
First off the line you posted is a quote from an earlier post by another member. The quote is in the box above my comment (outside the box, naturally), the source is at the top of the box.
Kindly address your assumptions of treason to them, not me.

My comment about limiting POTUS terms to one was sarcasm, although it would limit the damage the communists get to do maybe a little.

Perhaps you should look back over my past 35,000 or so posts before judging me by another person's words.
Maybe even read the whole post before going off like a short fused firecracker.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 03, 2020, 08:01:30 pm
Sounds like someone needs a nap @Cyber Liberty

Running to the mods,  I see,  like a spoiled schoolgirl.  This after labelling me a troll and worse for weeks now. *****rollingeyes***** 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 03, 2020, 08:04:14 pm
Running to the mods,  I see,  like a spoiled schoolgirl.  This after labelling me a troll and worse for weeks now. *****rollingeyes*****

Bye.  Have a nice day or two.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 03, 2020, 08:21:05 pm
Let's put it this way. In 1983, and again in the 1990s I worked in places where the official temperature was reported as -54 degrees Fahrenheit. (incidentally, that is the temperature where mercury solidifies). Unofficially, the temperature at one of those locations was -60, read on a 'spirit' thermometer that used alcohol instead of mercury. Those readings were verified in the official records when I could first access them on the internet, but have been since 'revised' upward to -50 degrees.
Such data revisions only serve to raise temperatures in the official record,which we are supposed to accept as proof that the planet is in some catastrophic warming cycle. If it is, it isn't humans, and the warming and cooling cycles in the past, where CO2 is a trailing indicator*, occurred without human intervention.
The only reason to suddenly blame humans for climate is to advance the concept of global control, something that can't be done without some boogeyman that threatens everyone equally. Of course, if you just send lots of money, that will help stabilize the planet's temperature, too.

*If you consider the solubility of CO2 in water, it is more soluble in cold water than warm, so the CO2 content of the atmosphere trails temperature because the oceans take time to cool or warm,and the solubility of CO2 in those bodies of water increases or decreases with the temperature of the water. That is why CO2 trails the temperature, and is an indicator, not a forcing factor.

Joe, thanks for a thoughtful reply.

I can not account for every fact, and intellectually I cannot use information that goes for ot against the "official story" because I don't know what I dont know.  Like rumsfield said, unknown unknowns. 

So when someone tells me about the ice cores, and a graph showing changes in co2 predate changes in temperature, what does that mean to someone who doesn't know what they don't know.  Is the data up to date and widely accepted?  Does it mean that co2 added to the atmosphere not due to preexisting warming is benign?  I cannot know how to interpret one random graph, and I know it's one of many pieces of the puzzle.

Conversely I dont argue for man made climate change with graphs of my own, although I'm sure I can fine them.  But then they are just dismissed as false, falsely!

Anecdotal evidence, ultimately, cant be useful when it's just small snapshots of a large and complicated field.

The bottom line is I do not believe that researchers fake data, fake conclusions, or get into research to further their economic views. Not without a lot of proof of that!

And despite people saying it is debunked that the vast majority of serious climate researchers agree that there is anthropogenic climate change and that it is likely to have deleterious consequences, I have seen no proof that it is debunked.

I believe that when all the scientific agencies and groups all say the same thing...well...thats the truth even with a few people saying otherwise.

But I also should mention that when someone refutes climate change science and they argue first based on ideology, it has very little weight.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 03, 2020, 08:32:31 pm
Let's get back to the Original Topic about Barr.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 03, 2020, 09:01:38 pm
Joe, thanks for a thoughtful reply.

I can not account for every fact, and intellectually I cannot use information that goes for ot against the "official story" because I don't know what I dont know.  Like rumsfield said, unknown unknowns. 

So when someone tells me about the ice cores, and a graph showing changes in co2 predate changes in temperature, what does that mean to someone who doesn't know what they don't know.  Is the data up to date and widely accepted?  Does it mean that co2 added to the atmosphere not due to preexisting warming is benign?  I cannot know how to interpret one random graph, and I know it's one of many pieces of the puzzle.

Conversely I dont argue for man made climate change with graphs of my own, although I'm sure I can fine them.  But then they are just dismissed as false, falsely!

Anecdotal evidence, ultimately, cant be useful when it's just small snapshots of a large and complicated field.

The bottom line is I do not believe that researchers fake data, fake conclusions, or get into research to further their economic views. Not without a lot of proof of that!

And despite people saying it is debunked that the vast majority of serious climate researchers agree that there is anthropogenic climate change and that it is likely to have deleterious consequences, I have seen no proof that it is debunked.

I believe that when all the scientific agencies and groups all say the same thing...well...thats the truth even with a few people saying otherwise.

But I also should mention that when someone refutes climate change science and they argue first based on ideology, it has very little weight.
But all the scientists and agencies who are on the bandwagon say the same thing is not the same as an absence of scientific dissent. It's an absence of that dissent being given even a level playing field, for political reasons. The dissent is there, and has been since the Kyoto accords were proposed. I was one of over 30,000 scientists who dissented, and went on record as having done so.

In the failed Chicago Climate Exchange scheme pushed using "carbon credits", George Soros, Al Gore, and Maurice Strong stood to make Trillions of dollars if they could just get those carbon limits and the exchange in carbon credits required by law. Amounts of money similar to that are still in play if such legislation were to be implemented.

That provides incredible motivation to tinker with data sets (as I have noted, for just a couple of examples), and to reward conclusions which benefit those who stand to make money. Research follows the grant money, which is an ugly truth. If the granting NGO or other agency is looking for confirmation of a specific theory which will benefit them with pecuniary compensation or additional power (which can also translate to monetary benefit), those researchers and programs which confirm the desired outcome will be funded, and those which do not will not and likely that research will not be published. Peer review is done by those with prestigious reputations, and prestige and funding go hand in hand. There is a circular reasoning there. Motive, means, opportunity...

Keep in mind that when I concluded my undergraduate work in 1978, the concern in geology departments throughout University systems was for the impending Ice Age.

As for data massaging, I provided two examples I found quite by accident, one in North Dakota and one in Wyoming. I worked in 146 below zero wind chill, and know the experience of urinating and having it freeze before it hits the ground. Just saying. To have my experience cheapened by someone altering the reported temperatures, even the official -54 degree readings upward, is offensive to me--especially a a scientist. At some point someone decides whether to call that rock that is 50% clay and 50% and either a sandstone or a shale, and that becomes the 'documented fact' unless and until contested.

As for the CO2 rise preceding the temperature change, no.
(http://www.euanmearns.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/vostok_T_CO2.png)
Please note that in this graph, the present is on the left, and the past to the right. From left to right, you go back in time. The coupling between CO2 and Temperature is examined in this article, and is no where near as precise as has been stated.

 http://euanmearns.com/the-vostok-ice-core-and-the-14000-year-co2-time-lag/ (http://euanmearns.com/the-vostok-ice-core-and-the-14000-year-co2-time-lag/)  Methane (CH4) tracks more precisely.

This article discusses some of the aspects of the two atmospheric gases and their  relation to climate, but not as forcing factors, rather as indicators. I recommend it. If you have difficulty relating to transit backwards through time with the data, here is a graph with the oldest on the left, and newest data on the right (note the age on the x axis).

(http://www.euanmearns.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/fig-1-inverted.png)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 03, 2020, 09:23:34 pm
Let's get back to the Original Topic about Barr.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 03, 2020, 09:39:13 pm

O'tay!

Well, as has been said, "Free beer tomorrow!"

We've been waiting for this slow walked investigation to result in arrests.

Still waiting...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 03, 2020, 09:54:23 pm
O'tay!

Well, as has been said, "Free beer tomorrow!"

We've been waiting for this slow walked investigation to result in arrests.

Still waiting...

@Smokin Joe @Knox27

 :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 03, 2020, 11:06:55 pm
Let's get back to the Original Topic about Barr.

Personally, I prefer 'torr' or 'mm Hg'.  But for all the metric system fans, 'bar' is equivalent to 100 kPa or 0.987 atm.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 03, 2020, 11:12:55 pm
    Barr will be collateral damage, before Christmas, in this Election 2020 CF, IMHO.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 03, 2020, 11:42:14 pm
    Barr will be collateral damage, before Christmas, in this Election 2020 CF, IMHO.

He out himself in that chair.  No sympathy.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 03, 2020, 11:49:42 pm
   Nor have I for him.  H3ll, Sessions did more for Trump (other than that recusal $hit) than Barr ever did.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 03, 2020, 11:59:09 pm


Ok ... he's worthless.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: LMAO on December 04, 2020, 12:02:07 am
Nonsense.  That same "fraudulent" vote may have flipped a dozen House seats Republican.

Trump lost because folks were sick and tired of the chaos.

@Jazzhead

It's hard for some to admit someone they put all their hopes behind had some serious character and behavior problems that cost him the election. My wife is convinced trump lost because of fraud. Not that I don't believe folks may have some legitimate questions regarding the election. But yes, if voter fraud was the reason why Trump lost then why did they "allow" the GOP to do well downticket in a year that, on paper, was going to be a tough one for the GOP?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 04, 2020, 12:12:09 am
   You bring up some interesting points @LMAO I believe that upwards of over 90% of Briefers believe it was a Fraudulent Election that was stolen from Trump.  He and Cocaine Mitch were the only ones to do a damn thing about it and they had 4 Freaking years.  It must be a more formidable machine than even I had imagined.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 04, 2020, 12:15:48 am
It's both fascinating and comical to see so many of you people suddenly stick your heads up out of your holes to criticize President Trump.  Contorting yourselves like pretzels to find reasons for the illusion of his defeat by a corrupt, senile idiot.

The man is the best damned President the nation has seen since Ronald Reagan.  And his record proves his first term was infinitely better than Pres. Reagan.

Who gives a fiddler's f**k if he lacked the charm of Ronald Reagan?   Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth and Mickey Mantle were also considered a**holes in their respective clubhouses.  George Patton, likewise.

Certainly not any serious American who can appreciate his successful efforts of simply wanting to "Make America Great Again"...which he most certainly did, both economically and morally positive for the American individual and his/her family.

Grow the hell, up!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 04, 2020, 12:17:26 am
   You bring up some interesting points @LMAO I believe that upwards of over 90% of Briefers believe it was a Fraudulent Election that was stolen from Trump.  He and Cocaine Mitch were the only ones to do a damn thing about it and they had 4 Freaking years.  It must be a more formidable machine than even I had imagined.

I think we should just cave to the naysayers, and close up this big shop and go home before somebody get a boo-boo.  I guess politics is just too harsh.  Maybe Jazz needs some company?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 04, 2020, 12:18:28 am
It's both fascinating and comical to see so many of you people suddenly stick your heads up out of your holes to criticize President Trump.  Contorting yourselves like pretzels to find reasons for the illusion of his defeat by a corrupt, senile idiot.

The man is the best damned President the nation has seen since Ronald Reagan.  And his record proves his first term was infinitely better than Pres. Reagan.

Who gives a fiddler's f**k if he lacked the charm of Ronald Reagan?   Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth and Mickey Mantle were also considered a**holes in their respective clubhouses.  George Patton, likewise.

Certainly not any serious American who can appreciate his successful efforts of simply wanting to "Make America Great Again"...which he most certainly did, both economically and morally positive for the American individual and his/her family.

Grow the hell, up!

We can't lose this "azzhole."  He fights.  Despite all the people demanding he just give the eff up.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 04, 2020, 12:23:28 am
We can't lose this "azzhole."  He fights.  Despite all the people demanding he just give the eff up.

Amen, brother!   :patriot:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Weird Tolkienish Figure on December 04, 2020, 12:24:52 am
@Jazzhead

It's hard for some to admit someone they put all their hopes behind had some serious character and behavior problems that cost him the election. My wife is convinced trump lost because of fraud. Not that I don't believe folks may have some legitimate questions regarding the election. But yes, if voter fraud was the reason why Trump lost then why did they "allow" the GOP to do well downticket in a year that, on paper, was going to be a tough one for the GOP?

Yeah and why didn't they pull the same fraud in 2016... with the first female president and all that?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 04, 2020, 12:35:11 am
Yeah and why didn't they pull the same fraud in 2016... with the first female president and all that?

They underestimated how much they needed to cheat in 2016.  That's why they were all so surprised she lost.  As a result, the Rats cheated so badly even retarded mice can see it.

Duh.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 04, 2020, 12:38:15 am
   Yes, I've given up Hope this Election will be overturned, truth be told, I gave up over 3 weeks ago.  Though I usually refrain from discussions concerning my cynicism, I believe it to be the colorful glow of the dying embers of Trumpism.  He gave it his BEST and no doubt will go down punching, firing and pardoning, as well he should.  I expect nothing less. 


   As a personal favor, to me, he can destroy the GOP on his way out and I'll want him on Mt Rushmore.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 04, 2020, 12:39:45 am
They underestimated how much they needed to cheat in 2016.  That's why they were all so surprised she lost.  As a result, the Rats cheated so badly even retarded mice can see it.

Duh.

So they can organize a massive voter fraud operation at the level of faking ballots, moving ballots, rigging machines all to win by small margins in key states...but were 'surprised in 2016. Thats your view.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 04, 2020, 12:42:41 am
So they can organize a massive voter fraud operation at the level of faking ballots, moving ballots, rigging machines all to win by small margins in key states...but were 'surprised in 2016. Thats your view.

Yup.  And, you are a bigger fool than I thought if you think Democrats have been cheating at this level in years past.  They amped up the cheating by at least a factor of 10.  Do you really think they only cheated "small numbers" of votes?  Have you watched a minute of the hearings this week????

If you could make meals out of the crap you are trying to put in our mouths, you could feed Napoleon's army.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 04, 2020, 12:44:51 am
They underestimated how much they needed to cheat in 2016.  That's why they were all so surprised she lost.  As a result, the Rats cheated so badly even retarded mice can see it.

Duh.

@LMAO
@Cyber Liberty

LOL!  LMAO -- CL thinks your wife is much smarter than you!!

Are you going to just sit there picking your nose?    happy77
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 04, 2020, 12:48:31 am
They underestimated how much they needed to cheat in 2016.  That's why they were all so surprised she lost.  As a result, the Rats cheated so badly even retarded mice can see it.

Duh.

Exactly.  They were absolutely blindsided when Trump won and they've been planning their victory since then.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 04, 2020, 01:05:00 am
Exactly.  They were absolutely blindsided when Trump won and they've been planning their victory since then.

Try and explain that to meatloaves who swear that because Trump beat Hillary in 2016, that's proof positive the Democrats did not cheat at all in 2020.

If that seems idiotic, then welcome to the life of me.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 04, 2020, 01:08:16 am
So they can organize a massive voter fraud operation at the level of faking ballots, moving ballots, rigging machines all to win by small margins in key states...but were 'surprised in 2016. Thats your view.

Thats my view.

An unusually accurate summary from you, I might add.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 04, 2020, 01:08:53 am
   What separates 2016 from 2020 is The Elephant in the room, Covid induced Mail-In Ballots.  How the GOP allowed themselves to be steamrolled by this, last July and August, all in the name of contrived public safety, is beyond rational, to me.   All these recounts are BS and just giving False Hope, these Machines NEED to be AUDITED!  It just appears to me that Trump's Lawyers have been unable to break that barrier, thus far.

   I hope like h3ll I'm wrong, but it's over.  Let's build something better, now is the time.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 04, 2020, 01:20:24 am
   What separates 2016 from 2020 is The Elephant in the room, Covid induced Mail-In Ballots.  How the GOP allowed themselves to be steamrolled by this, last July and August, all in the name of contrived public safety, is beyond rational, to me.   All these recounts are BS and just giving False Hope, these Machines NEED to be AUDITED!  It just appears to me that Trump's Lawyers have been unable to break that barrier, thus far.

   I hope like h3ll I'm wrong, but it's over.  Let's build something better, now is the time.

 I think you've made a very accurate assessment.  IMHO there is no greater document than the U.S. Constitution.  We need to rebuild on that and rebuild our Republic; I'm with you on building something better than the GOP and yes, absolutely NOW is the time!

When this show is over, I believe those that voted for Trump will be ready for that movement.  The question is how do we get there and who will lead?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 01:23:53 am
Try and explain that to meatloaves who swear that because Trump beat Hillary in 2016, that's proof positive the Democrats did not cheat at all in 2020.

If that seems idiotic, then welcome to the life of me.

I don't know how you do it.   Seriously.    :shrug:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 04, 2020, 01:32:53 am
I don't know how you do it.   Seriously.    :shrug:

I refuse to give up.  Not much more to it than that.  If the Rats pull off the steal, then I'll don my "Dissident" shirt (have it on right now) and begin the true resistance movement.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 01:35:45 am
I refuse to give up.  Not much more to it than that.  If the Rats pull off the steal, then I'll don my "Dissident" shirt (have it on right now) and begin the true resistance movement.

Yeah, my friend in Houston sent me a MAGA hat.  I'll have to send off for one of those T-shirts, but with that and the hat, I should be right behind you on that cattle car ramp-to-da-camp....lol.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 04, 2020, 01:39:06 am
Yeah, my friend in Houston sent me a MAGA hat.  I'll have to send off for one of those T-shirts, but with that and the hat, I should be right behind you on that cattle car ramp-to-da-camp....lol.

Here's where I got mine....

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B08DTRTKQC/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_image_o05_s00?ie=UTF8&customId=B07538GWNZ&psc=1
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 01:43:08 am
Here's where I got mine....

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B08DTRTKQC/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_image_o05_s00?ie=UTF8&customId=B07538GWNZ&psc=1

Cool.... thanks!    888high58888
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 01:46:29 am
Here's where I got mine....

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B08DTRTKQC/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_image_o05_s00?ie=UTF8&customId=B07538GWNZ&psc=1 (https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B08DTRTKQC/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_image_o05_s00?ie=UTF8&customId=B07538GWNZ&psc=1)

I also like this one..... but I'd have to figure out a way to add an "Un-".   

https://www.redbubble.com/i/t-shirt/Disciplined-Dissident-by-onelabaccident/59205276.HSDM1.XYZ (https://www.redbubble.com/i/t-shirt/Disciplined-Dissident-by-onelabaccident/59205276.HSDM1.XYZ)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 04, 2020, 01:48:36 am
I refuse to give up.  Not much more to it than that.  If the Rats pull off the steal, then I'll don my "Dissident" shirt (have it on right now) and begin the true resistance movement.

Look at the absolutely astonishing number of crowds that Trump drew. The time to continue that momentum and the spirit of Keeping America Great is now, regardless if the GOP holds the Senate or not, regardless if Trump manages somehow to be seated.  Otherwise, we will allow the same swamp creatures and the same ole country club to succeed in pushing us toward their globalist/socialist agenda.

That's why I ask ... how do we accomplish continuing the momentum that Trump built?  The ballot box is broken so how can we ever trust it again?   How do we rebuild our Republic and keep our Constitution in tact?

The "system" is broken.  Dr. Ron Paul made a very valid point years ago ... we take back our country from the ground up; trying to rebuild it from the top down is futile.  He was correct; too many swamp creatures and too much corruption.  Our DOJ and on down is corrupt. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 04, 2020, 01:52:52 am
I refuse to give up.  Not much more to it than that.  If the Rats pull off the steal, then I'll don my "Dissident" shirt (have it on right now) and begin the true resistance movement.

On a serious note, any organized "Resistance" will have to jump into their DeLorians and go back in time.

No cell phones...no computer emails. Only the use of GPS in order to track your quarry.

And only use automobiles with plugs, points and condensers.  :police:    :laugh:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 04, 2020, 01:54:27 am
   I think that it's entirely predicated on what Trump does in 2021, should he lose, @libertybele  He's proven a thousand times that he can suck almost all of the air out of a Room, or a Movement.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 04, 2020, 02:03:37 am
Yeah and why didn't they pull the same fraud in 2016... with the first female president and all that?
Who is 'they'?

China?  Soros? 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 04, 2020, 02:03:49 am
   I think that it's entirely predicated on what Trump does in 2021, should he lose, @libertybele  He's proven a thousand times that he can suck almost all of the air out of a Room, or a Movement.

I hear what your saying but he also thrives on people and has the ability to connect with them.  He's 74 years old and spent the last 4 years battling against the leftist bat crap crazies.  I believe if he loses, he'll go back to the life he left and he will remain silent IF the left doesn't continue their attacks on him. IF they continue to attack him, or drag him in to court, I think things could get very ugly.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Absalom on December 04, 2020, 02:05:35 am
Mark Thiessen,  in this morning's paper:
" Trump didn't lose the election because of a Cuban-Venezuelen-Chinese-Clinton-Soros conspiracy.  He lost because he alienated millions of voters who approved of his policies but did not vote for him because they were tired of chaos."
Funny,  I said something similar just the other day.  And from my vantage point -  the middle class suburbs - that result could be seen a mile away.  As Mr. Thiessen points out,"The facts speak for themselves:  In 2016,  Trump won suburban voters by 2 percentage points; in 2020 he lost them by 10.  This shift proved decisive in key swing states such as Michigan, Wisconsin,  Pennsylvania and Georgia."
Right on the mark.   The turn away from the GOP in the suburbs is the untold story of this election that needs to be addressed as soon as possible.   And in these parts,  Trump remains poison,  as he wildly challenges the election results and selfishly ignores the big picture:  two Senate seats in Georgia that, if lost, will prove the death knell for all those Trump policies that have restored prosperity even in the face of a pandemic.
---------------------------
Thiesssen and yourself are on the mark.
Yet Trump's attitude and behavior should be unsurprising, as he
has been a self-absorbed and neurotic Narcissist since the womb.
Sadly the R leadership missed a wonderous opportunity to rid
themselves of him during impeachment, had they the foresight.
Great leaders understand that they must seize the moment!!!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 04, 2020, 02:06:03 am
On a serious note, any organized "Resistance" will have to jump into their DeLorians and go back in time.

No cell phones...no computer emails. Only the use of GPS in order to track your quarry.

And only use automobiles with plugs, points and condensers.  :police:    :laugh:

You are correct; an underground movement so to speak; but in this high tech age, it will be very difficult.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 04, 2020, 02:08:48 am
---------------------------
Thiesssen and yourself are on the mark.
Yet Trump's attitude and behavior should be unsurprising, as he
has been a self-absorbed and neurotic Narcissist since the womb.
Sadly the R leadership missed a wonderous opportunity to rid
themselves of him during impeachment, had they the foresight.
Great leaders understand that they must seize the moment!!!

Wrong!  Had ALL the GOP stood behind Trump and did their darn jobs, especially when they had the full majority in both houses, we would be looking at a very very different country right now; a return of our country to the people and our Constitution once again held in high esteem.

Paul Ryan and cronies are traitors.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: FeelNoPain on December 04, 2020, 03:24:12 am
Mark Thiessen,  in this morning's paper:

" Trump didn't lose the election because of a Cuban-Venezuelen-Chinese-Clinton-Soros conspiracy.  He lost because he alienated millions of voters who approved of his policies but did not vote for him because they were tired of chaos."

Funny,  I said something similar just the other day.  And from my vantage point -  the middle class suburbs - that result could be seen a mile away.  As Mr. Thiessen points out, "The facts speak for themselves:  In 2016,  Trump won suburban voters by 2 percentage points; in 2020 he lost them by 10.  This shift proved decisive in key swing states such as Michigan, Wisconsin,  Pennsylvania and Georgia."

Right on the mark.   The turn away from the GOP in the suburbs is the untold story of this election that needs to be addressed as soon as possible.   And in these parts,  Trump remains poison,  as he wildly challenges the election results and selfishly ignores the big picture:  two Senate seats in Georgia that, if lost, will prove the death knell for all those Trump policies that have restored prosperity even in the face of a pandemic.

   Thiessen needs to pipe down. The Cuban-Venezuelan-Chinese-Clinton-Soros-Dominion-Storming of the Servers in Europe-CIA-Republican Governors-Fat black female poll workers-conspiracy is gold. Absolute gold.

   I knew this board was going to be fire when the election occurred but it has exceeded my wildest expectations. I appreciate President Trump and his wonderful supporting cast member Giuliani so much for their entertainment value, especially with so many playhouses, concert halls, sports venues, and theatres being currently closed.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 04, 2020, 03:38:42 am
In 2016 they underestimated how many fraudulent votes they’d need to drag Cankles to a victory.

In 2020 they underestimated how many votes Trump got. 

Hence the reason the bot counting in four states magically stopped in the middle of the night and when it resumed suddenly Biden has this massive “lead”.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 04, 2020, 03:43:21 am
Personally, I prefer 'torr' or 'mm Hg'.  But for all the metric system fans, 'bar' is equivalent to 100 kPa or 0.987 atm.
Just 0.013 atm from being full of hot air....(DC is purt'near Sea level)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: LegalAmerican on December 04, 2020, 05:29:52 am
He says he hasn't seen enough evidence.

I would ask him what the DOJ has done by way of investigating this election. Has he been looking?

I don't know, I haven't heard.

What is the margin of victory in AZ, 10k votes? In MI, 150k votes? GA - 12k votes? PA, 80k votes? WI, 20k votes?

There's not alot of fraud required to swing things there, I'm not AG but I've heard plenty of circumstantial evidence. I'm not sure how Barr can make such an assertion.

Agree, unless he is DEEP STATE....like the rest.  BARR had his chance.  He blew it.  POTUS Trump will be president for another 4 years.  GUARANTEED. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: christian on December 04, 2020, 06:16:53 am
Barr is doing a deep state investigation, very much like the FBI investigated the President for over four years.  McConnel refused to let the President replace Barr, that makes McConnel part of the deep state too.  Forget not McConnel refusing to recess the Senate to prevent the President from appointing people that were not deep staters.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Weird Tolkienish Figure on December 04, 2020, 01:36:20 pm
In 2016 they underestimated how many fraudulent votes they’d need to drag Cankles to a victory.

In 2020 they underestimated how many votes Trump got. 

Hence the reason the bot counting in four states magically stopped in the middle of the night and when it resumed suddenly Biden has this massive “lead”.

Absolutely ridiculous and asinine.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Victoria33 on December 04, 2020, 02:20:49 pm
How many of that 97% are actual "climate scientists"?  And how many are actually working in that field?  And since when did science start being governed by "consensus"?
@txradioguy

My Bob is an earth scientist/physicist/geologist.  He has been an earth physics professor. He says humans cannot affect built-in universal cycles.  In his work, wherever you live, he has likely been in that area.  He was all over the earth for 30 years.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Bigun on December 04, 2020, 02:27:23 pm
I'm thinking someone should tie AG Barr to his chair and make him watch the recordings of the Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia legislative hearings.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Victoria33 on December 04, 2020, 02:32:54 pm
In 2016 they underestimated how many fraudulent votes they’d need to drag Cankles to a victory.   In 2020 they underestimated how many votes Trump got.  Hence the reason the bot counting in four states magically stopped in the middle of the night and when it resumed suddenly Biden has this massive “lead”.

The above is incorrect.  Numerous states could not count mail ballots until after the polls close for regular voting.   Once the polls were shut down, Central Counting began evaluating mail ballots and those numbers were added to the count as they worked all night to get the mail ballots in the count.  That is what caused the numbers to go so high overnight.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 02:36:22 pm
The above is incorrect.  Numerous states could not count mail ballots until after the polls close for regular voting.   Once the polls were shut down, Central Counting began evaluating mail ballots and those numbers were added to the count as they worked all night to get the mail ballots in the count.  That is what caused the numbers to go so high overnight.

Well, you've sure got the leftie talking points down pat re: the massive election fraud that occurred.   Thanks for the honesty, at least.  Especially since the numbers got "so high" only AFTER the rats sent the Republican observers away.  Funny/odd, that.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 04, 2020, 02:38:10 pm
Well, you've sure got the leftie talking points down pat re: the massive election fraud that occurred.   Thanks for the honesty, at least.  Especially since the numbers got "so high" only AFTER the rats sent the Republican observers away.  Funny/odd, that.

Is it coincidental that the same process seemed to play out at the same time and only in 4 or 5 key swing states?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 02:40:45 pm
Is it coincidental that the same process seemed to play out at the same time and only in 4 or 5 key swing states?

I can only presume that you're asking a rhetorical question....since the obvious answer is...

no.   When it comes to the radical leftists and their penchant for corruption, cheating and illegalities...

there are no coincidences.

I just want to know who gave that "order".
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 04, 2020, 02:44:25 pm
I can only presume that you're asking a rhetorical question....since the obvious answer is...

no.   When it comes to the radical leftists and their penchant for corruption, cheating and illegalities...

there are no coincidences.

I just want to know who gave that "order".
Yes, I'm being rhetorical.

Even more significantly, the same process played out only in a handful of key counties in 4 or 5 key states. It doesn't take much imagination to understand what happened.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 02:46:39 pm
Yes, I'm being rhetorical.

Even more significantly, the same process played out only in a handful of key counties in 4 or 5 key states. It doesn't take much imagination to understand what happened.

And yet... so many (even right here at this forum) refuse to admit to or acknowledge that "what happened".   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 04, 2020, 03:19:58 pm
Is it coincidental that the same process seemed to play out at the same time and only in 4 or 5 key swing states?

And at the exact same time.  This required national cooridination.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 04, 2020, 03:25:43 pm
And at the exact same time.  This required national cooridination.
This is what Giuliani has been publicly alleging - a concerted effort by the nat'l democrat party.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 04, 2020, 03:27:09 pm
And yet... so many (even right here at this forum) refuse to admit to or acknowledge that "what happened".

Go back to the Election thread, and read what happens about 12:30 a.m. CDT.  RIV and I were here manning the thread.  Trump was maintaining sizeable leads in GA, OH, PA, MI, AZ, WI.....   And at an exact moment, vote counting stopped in all those states at the EXACT same time.  I had 6 tabs going on my PC monitoring this, and had the remote thumbing between all the networks.  Another strange point?  At that exact time, each network went from the counts to maps, where each network had a pundit explain where Biden had strengths and advantages in each.

I watched it, I witnessed it.  Read what RIV and I were saying.  I am certain something happened to sway the election.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 03:27:48 pm
This is what Giuliani has been publicly alleging - a concerted effort by the nat'l democrat party.

An effort that goes all the way up to the top echelons of the DemocRats.... ie Nancy Pelosi.   Which explains why she was so shock-sure that Trump would no longer be president after the election.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 03:31:03 pm
Go back to the Election thread, and read what happens about 12:30 a.m. CDT.  RIV and I were here manning the thread.  Trump was maintaining sizeable leads in GA, OH, PA, MI, AZ, WI.....   And at an exact moment, vote counting stopped in all those states at the EXACT same time.  I had 6 tabs going on my PC monitoring this, and had the remote thumbing between all the networks.  Another strange point?  At that exact time, each network went from the counts to maps, where each network had a pundit explain where Biden had strengths and advantages in each.

I already know (don't have to 'go back').  I was watching, reading, monitoring.

Quote
I watched it, I witnessed it.  Read what RIV and I were saying.  I am certain something happened to sway the election.

I witnessed it too.... which is why I'm livid.   That "something" was the order from on high to stop the counting and begin the cheating.   But who gave the order?  I'm sure the FBI/CIA knows.   However, since they have long since been compromised, we'll probably never know.


Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 04, 2020, 03:36:44 pm
Absolutely ridiculous and asinine.

That you take the MSM narrative, and believe there wasn't fraud?  Your comment kind of describes yourself.  What happened at 12:30a.m. my time election night defies logic and plausibility.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 04, 2020, 03:42:09 pm
The above is incorrect.  Numerous states could not count mail ballots until after the polls close for regular voting.   Once the polls were shut down, Central Counting began evaluating mail ballots and those numbers were added to the count as they worked all night to get the mail ballots in the count.  That is what caused the numbers to go so high overnight.

And yet there’s a growing amount of evidence showing otherwise. 

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: mystery-ak on December 04, 2020, 03:50:29 pm
DOJ Issues Critical Update On Voter Fraud Investigations, Slams Media For False Reporting

Quote
On Tuesday, Trump’s supporters, including a number of high-profile conservatives, were understandably upset when many mainstream media networks reported that U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and the Department of Justice had concluded their investigations into voter and ballot fraud only to turn up nothing of significance.

However, that line of reporting — as badly as the media wanted it to be true — was outright false, according to The Post Millennial. It’s true that, so far, the DOJ hasn’t discovered any fraudulent activity on a scale that would actually reverse results in any of the battleground states, but that wasn’t to conclude that the investigations were finished.

Not surprisingly, the mainstream media seized the moment after the DOJ’s initial statement, claiming that it was especially “notable” as it had been issued by Barr, one of Trump’s closest allies in his inner-circle.

“Some media outlets have incorrectly reported that the Department has concluded its investigation of election fraud and announced an affirmative finding of no fraud in the election. That is not what the Associated Press reported nor what the Attorney General stated. The Department will continue to receive and vigorously pursue all specific and credible allegations of fraud as expeditiously as possible,” a DOJ spokesperson wrote.

more
https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/doj-issues-critical-update-voter-fraud-investigations-slams-media-false-reporting
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 04, 2020, 03:55:55 pm
Absolutely ridiculous and asinine.
Not at all. All four states stopped with Trump leading. All four states continued to count even though they said they'd stopped. All four had 'miraculous' vote dumps for Biden. The more you dig, the worse it gets, with consistent additions of votes in the same ratios, with ballots being delivered in the middle of the night, and observers dismissed (or chased off) before any of that.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 04, 2020, 04:28:48 pm
Not at all. All four states stopped with Trump leading. All four states continued to count even though they said they'd stopped. All four had 'miraculous' vote dumps for Biden. The more you dig, the worse it gets, with consistent additions of votes in the same ratios, with ballots being delivered in the middle of the night, and observers dismissed (or chased off) before any of that.

I think back to 2016 and the confidence and behavior of the rats leading up to that night, Hillary neglecting to campaign in key states etc, as well as their reaction afterwards.

It all makes the theory they thought they had that race in the bag, too, but underestimated the amount of fraud required to win extremely believable.

There are remarkable similarities between that election and this election, except the COVID wrinkle and the election night stopping dumps, and restarting of tabulating in key states.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Absalom on December 04, 2020, 06:03:59 pm
Wrong!  Had ALL the GOP stood behind Trump and did their darn jobs, especially when they had the full majority in both houses, we would be looking at a very very different country right now; a return of our country to the people and our Constitution once again held in high esteem.
Paul Ryan and cronies are traitors.
-------------------------------
Opinions aren't wrong; they're opinions!
Agree that Ryan was an R establishment flunkey and little more.
As for Trump, this election was a clear vote of NO CONFIDENCE, as after
4 years of his antics, blathering and tweets, plain people said, GO AWAY!
They did NOT say the same for Congressional R's who will most likely control
the Senate and come very close to control of the House. Fact, not an opinion!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 04, 2020, 06:15:44 pm
-------------------------------

They did NOT say the same for Congressional R's who will most likely control
the Senate
and come very close to control of the House. Fact, not an opinion!

Wrong again bud....

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/ (https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/)

From RCP...



Thursday, December 3
Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)   Poll   Results   Spread
Georgia Senate Run-Off Election - Perdue vs. Ossoff   WXIA-TV/SurveyUSA   Perdue 48, Ossoff 50   Ossoff +2
Georgia Senate Special Election Run-Off - Loeffler vs. Warnock   WXIA-TV/SurveyUSA   Warnock 52, Loeffler 45   Warnock +7

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Absalom on December 04, 2020, 06:51:45 pm
@txradioguy
My Bob is an earth scientist/physicist/geologist.  He has been an earth physics professor. He says humans cannot affect built-in universal cycles.  In his work, wherever you live, he has likely been in that area.  He was all over the earth for 30 years.
------------------------------
Intuitive per usual.
While not a Scientist, many in my family are, each of whom would affirm that the Almighty created everything in the Universe, among them Nature.
Further they would affirm that the notion that Man is superior to Nature is a conceit too brainless for words.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 04, 2020, 06:55:05 pm
------------------------------
Intuitive per usual.
While not a Scientist, many in my family are, each of whom would affirm that the Almighty created everything in the Universe, among them Nature.
Further they would affirm that the notion that Man is superior to Nature is a conceit too brainless
for words.

Apparently none of that intelligence rubbed off.  Coincidence?  "Too brainless for words" has been popping up a lot in my teeny, tiny mind lately.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Absalom on December 04, 2020, 07:21:48 pm
From RCP...
Race/Topic   (Click to Sort)   Poll   Results   Spread
Georgia Senate Run-Off Election - Perdue vs. Ossoff   WXIA-TV/SurveyUSA   Perdue 48, Ossoff 50   Ossoff +2
Georgia Senate Special Election Run-Off - Loeffler vs. Warnock   WXIA-TV/SurveyUSA   Warnock 52, Loeffler 45   Warnock +7
------------------------
After the polling performance of this election, polls should be suspect but hardly for some.
* In the Perdue /Ossoff race, Perdue won by 88,000 votes @ 49.7%
* In the Loeffler (+Collins/R ) Warnock race, she won by 636,000 votes @ 59%.
The only reason Loeffler and Purdue are not already seated in the Senate is because of Georgia's quirky 50% Rule. Your poll belongs in the garbage.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 04, 2020, 07:28:40 pm
And yet... so many (even right here at this forum) refuse to admit to or acknowledge that "what happened".

That's because they're all ardent Never Trumpers with acute terminal butt hurt who for the most part have been 'hiding' in our basement for the better part of the past 4 years here.

Now, they feel 'brave' enough to show their pig snouts seeing allied support for their ignorant hate-filled pie holes. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 04, 2020, 07:30:08 pm
And at the exact same time.  This required national cooridination.

It's actually 4-5 Democrat-run cities/counties in said Swing States...so let's narrow it down a bit.   :beer:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 04, 2020, 07:31:23 pm
Absolutely ridiculous and asinine.

Yes, you certainly are.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 04, 2020, 07:33:22 pm
------------------------
After the polling performance of this election, polls should be suspect but hardly for some.
* In the Perdue /Ossoff race, Perdue won by 88,000 votes @ 49.7%
* In the Loeffler (+Collins/R ) Warnock race, she won by 636,000 votes @ 59%.
The only reason Loeffler and Purdue are not already seated in the Senate is because of Georgia's quirky 50% Rule. Your poll belongs in the garbage.

Not my  poll, but a non-push poll by a station in Ga.  But considering on going fraud too?  The GOP candidates are underdogs.....    But you've been wrong so many times here, I won't bother with your silliness any further....  Carry on.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Weird Tolkienish Figure on December 04, 2020, 07:35:55 pm
Yes, you certainly are.

(https://media1.giphy.com/media/3ohBV8qkSl8cfN3kU8/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 07:41:53 pm
That's because they're all ardent Never Trumpers with acute terminal butt hurt who for the most part have been 'hiding' in our basement for the better part of the past 4 years here.

Now, they feel 'brave' enough to show their pig snouts seeing allied support for their ignorant hate-filled pie holes.

Yeah..... allied with the radical left Democrats (commies).   They're showing who and 'what' they are every day in every way.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 04, 2020, 07:42:59 pm
Yes, you certainly are.

Hey!  My first instinct, when I saw his comment, was to say exactly what you said....lol.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 04, 2020, 07:47:21 pm
That's because they're all ardent Never Trumpers with acute terminal butt hurt who for the most part have been 'hiding' in our basement for the better part of the past 4 years here.

Now, they feel 'brave' enough to show their pig snouts seeing allied support for their ignorant hate-filled pie holes.
Yeah, one of the qualities of supposed allies that is compelling me to quit the GOP altogether and just focus on mine only. I can stand the weasels no longer.

Our last chance has exited stage left anyway.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 05, 2020, 06:45:39 am
I think back to 2016 and the confidence and behavior of the rats leading up to that night, Hillary neglecting to campaign in key states etc, as well as their reaction afterwards.

It all makes the theory they thought they had that race in the bag, too, but underestimated the amount of fraud required to win extremely believable.

There are remarkable similarities between that election and this election, except the COVID wrinkle and the election night stopping dumps, and restarting of tabulating in key states.
That pretty well sums it up, imho.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 05, 2020, 07:00:05 am
Is it coincidental that the same process seemed to play out at the same time and only in 4 or 5 key swing states?
Well, they only broke the toilet in georgia... :shrug:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 05, 2020, 07:03:48 am
It's actually 4-5 Democrat-run cities/counties in said Swing States...so let's narrow it down a bit.   :beer:
I strongly suspect some level of fraud took place in Democrat heavy precincts in most of the country. You, regardless, still have to keep up the pretense of popularity in democrat enclaves in order to support the fraud elsewhere. It makes no difference in the electoral process, in that the electoral votes go with the state unless the City has the greater population, but it makes the support level seem to be less anomalous.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Sighlass on December 05, 2020, 08:59:05 am
Placemarker , page 30...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: AL on December 05, 2020, 09:07:20 am
...and there you have it...that's all folks!

Yep.  Barr's in on the cheat.  Washington corruption has no limit.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 05, 2020, 10:33:15 am
I’m sure your post makes complete sense to CNN’s audience and others with no capacity for critical thought. Others might consider it a tad sophistic.

@skeeter

You misspelled the word "actual".
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 05, 2020, 10:38:00 am
Because Trump, the outsider, had only the GOPe and deep state beltway denizens to choose from and depend upon. He was screwed from the outset. I’m amazed he did as well as he did.

@skeeter

And there it is.

Trump is not a career politician,and you can NOT run a Presidency like you run a corporation because unlike businesses,politicians have an entire media network established to stab you in the back and spin even your victories into defeats.

It is impossible to come in as a political outsider,and select the "insider pros" you need to cover your back because they have made whole careers out of covering no one's backs but their own.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 05, 2020, 02:46:20 pm
@skeeter

You misspelled the word "actual".
:laugh:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: GtHawk on December 05, 2020, 07:49:32 pm
(https://media1.giphy.com/media/3ohBV8qkSl8cfN3kU8/giphy.gif)
SHIITE! And I thought wrestling when I was a kid was ridiculous, seeing what they do now makes me long for the days of wrestling at the Olympic Auditorium with Dick Lane(after his film career) Johnny 'Red Shoes' Dugan and Freddie Blassie, John Tolos, Earl Maynard Mr. Universe, Man Mountain Mike and the like.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 07, 2020, 06:22:20 am
Judge Jeanine had a few things to say to Mr. Barr.  Watch at least her opening statement. 

Error 404 (Not Found)!!1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTyzBz8ybZQ#)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTyzBz8ybZQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTyzBz8ybZQ)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 07, 2020, 12:54:35 pm
SHIITE! And I thought wrestling when I was a kid was ridiculous, seeing what they do now makes me long for the days of wrestling at the Olympic Auditorium with Dick Lane(after his film career) Johnny 'Red Shoes' Dugan and Freddie Blassie, John Tolos, Earl Maynard Mr. Universe, Man Mountain Mike and the like.
It was Ernie Ladd of NFL fame, and Tony Borne for me at the old Austin Coliseum.  Had a guest bear wrestle as well at times.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 01:37:34 pm
@Jazzhead

It's hard for some to admit someone they put all their hopes behind had some serious character and behavior problems that cost him the election. My wife is convinced trump lost because of fraud. Not that I don't believe folks may have some legitimate questions regarding the election. But yes, if voter fraud was the reason why Trump lost then why did they "allow" the GOP to do well downticket in a year that, on paper, was going to be a tough one for the GOP?

Well of course.   The fraud didn't extend down ballot?   That's absurd on its face.

But let's back up a bit.  AG Barr didn't say there wasn't any fraud; indeed there may have been substantial fraud.  Nor did he say that the Justice Department was wrapping up its investigation.  What he said was,  almost a month following the election,  that there was no evidence of fraud at the kind of level that would change the results of the election.

In other words, it is time to accept reality.  Or,  I guess, one of two versions of reality.

The American tradition has long been to accept the results of the election as the verdict of the people,  a force,  polity,  greater than the tribal concerns of the parties.    Keep up the fight, but on the new battleground established by the results of the election.  After all,  the situation may well be reversed in two or four years.   

The new, subversive tradition was established by Stacey Abrams.    Never concede, never acknowledge the outcome of the vote,  and claim that the peoples' verdict was illegitimate and unworthy of respect.   Now Trump is following that playbook to the letter, with the same poisonous results, the same subversion of faith and confidence in democratic norms.   

I think all of us will likely agree that Abrams'  play was that of a selfish scumbag,  both dangerous and destructive of the fabric the holds our  polyglot nation together.   But only a handful here will say the same of the President,  and indeed will admonish the few of who do as disloyal to the tribe.

My loyalty is to the Republic, not Donald Trump.   If that's not you as well  then you ought to think long and hard of the consequences of such naked hypocrisy.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 07, 2020, 01:59:37 pm
Well of course.   The fraud didn't extend down ballot?   That's absurd on its face.

But let's back up a bit.  AG Barr didn't say there wasn't any fraud; indeed there may have been substantial fraud.  Nor did he say that the Justice Department was wrapping up its investigation.  What he said was,  almost a month following the election,  that there was no evidence of fraud at the kind of level that would change the results of the election.

In other words, it is time to accept reality.  Or,  I guess, one of two versions of reality.

The American tradition has long been to accept the results of the election as the verdict of the people,  a force,  polity,  greater than the tribal concerns of the parties.    Keep up the fight, but on the new battleground established by the results of the election.  After all,  the situation may well be reversed in two or four years.   

The new, subversive tradition was established by Stacey Abrams.    Never concede, never acknowledge the outcome of the vote,  and claim that the peoples' verdict was illegitimate and unworthy of respect.   Now Trump is following that playbook to the letter, with the same poisonous results, the same subversion of faith and confidence in democratic norms.   

I think all of us will likely agree that Abrams'  play was that of a selfish scumbag,  both dangerous and destructive of the fabric the holds our  polyglot nation together.   But only a handful here will say the same of the President,  and indeed will admonish the few of who do as disloyal to the tribe.

My loyalty is to the Republic, not Donald Trump.   If that's not you as well  then you ought to think long and hard of the consequences of such naked hypocrisy.   
You conveniently forgot this part

"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr told The Associated Press.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 07, 2020, 02:04:15 pm
Well of course.   The fraud didn't extend down ballot?   That's absurd on its face.

But let's back up a bit.  AG Barr didn't say there wasn't any fraud; indeed there may have been substantial fraud.  Nor did he say that the Justice Department was wrapping up its investigation.  What he said was,  almost a month following the election,  that there was no evidence of fraud at the kind of level that would change the results of the election.

In other words, it is time to accept reality.  Or,  I guess, one of two versions of reality.

The American tradition has long been to accept the results of the election as the verdict of the people,  a force,  polity,  greater than the tribal concerns of the parties.    Keep up the fight, but on the new battleground established by the results of the election.  After all,  the situation may well be reversed in two or four years.   

The new, subversive tradition was established by Stacey Abrams.    Never concede, never acknowledge the outcome of the vote,  and claim that the peoples' verdict was illegitimate and unworthy of respect.   Now Trump is following that playbook to the letter, with the same poisonous results, the same subversion of faith and confidence in democratic norms.   

I think all of us will likely agree that Abrams'  play was that of a selfish scumbag,  both dangerous and destructive of the fabric the holds our  polyglot nation together.   But only a handful here will say the same of the President,  and indeed will admonish the few of who do as disloyal to the tribe.

My loyalty is to the Republic, not Donald Trump.   If that's not you as well  then you ought to think long and hard of the consequences of such naked hypocrisy.   
If you have no fealty to the truth your loyalty is worthless. Ponder that.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 07, 2020, 02:09:59 pm
If you have no fealty to the truth your loyalty is worthless. Ponder that.

 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 02:14:45 pm
If you have no fealty to the truth your loyalty is worthless. Ponder that.

You can't handle the truth, sir.   Don't drag the rest of us into your pernicious vision for America.  Stacy Abrams was wrong.  So are you.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 07, 2020, 02:52:01 pm
You can't handle the truth, sir.   Don't drag the rest of us into your pernicious vision for America.  Stacy Abrams was wrong.  So are you.
Us? Hilarious.

It's not me doggedly ignoring facts and repeating the same discredited lines.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 02:52:57 pm
You can't handle the truth, sir.   Don't drag the rest of us into your pernicious vision for America. 

Hello pot...this is kettle...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 07, 2020, 03:10:30 pm
Hello pot...this is kettle...

Is there anyone else noticing that even post election we have a handfull of members here who are slamming Trump 10 X versus Biden or say any other democrat or liberal?  Hmmmm...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 07, 2020, 03:13:34 pm
Is there anyone else noticing that even post election we have a handfull of members here who are slamming Trump 10 X versus Biden or say any other democrat or liberal?  Hmmmm...

They're anxious to slam the lid on the Trump administration and get back to shoving their sh*t sandwich down our throats. Totally disconnected from reality.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 07, 2020, 03:27:50 pm
Well of course.   The fraud didn't extend down ballot?   That's absurd on its face.

But let's back up a bit.  AG Barr didn't say there wasn't any fraud; indeed there may have been substantial fraud.  Nor did he say that the Justice Department was wrapping up its investigation.  What he said was,  almost a month following the election,  that there was no evidence of fraud at the kind of level that would change the results of the election.

In other words, it is time to accept reality.  Or,  I guess, one of two versions of reality.

The American tradition has long been to accept the results of the election as the verdict of the people,  a force,  polity,  greater than the tribal concerns of the parties.    Keep up the fight, but on the new battleground established by the results of the election.  After all,  the situation may well be reversed in two or four years.   

The new, subversive tradition was established by Stacey Abrams.    Never concede, never acknowledge the outcome of the vote,  and claim that the peoples' verdict was illegitimate and unworthy of respect.   Now Trump is following that playbook to the letter, with the same poisonous results, the same subversion of faith and confidence in democratic norms.   

I think all of us will likely agree that Abrams'  play was that of a selfish scumbag,  both dangerous and destructive of the fabric the holds our  polyglot nation together.   But only a handful here will say the same of the President,  and indeed will admonish the few of who do as disloyal to the tribe.

My loyalty is to the Republic, not Donald Trump.   If that's not you as well  then you ought to think long and hard of the consequences of such naked hypocrisy.   
Permit me to exercise my futility as much as you have overworked your towel throwing arm.

My loyalty, too, is to the Republic, but even more to a sense of fair play. I detest thieves of any stripe with a passion that cannot be expressed here. the theft of even one vote is intolerable, the theft of millions which is likely a capital crime, imho.

Barr said he hadn't seen evidence. Perhaps it hasn't been shown to him, perhaps because of his slow walking other investigations, no one will. His office has failed to charge even the most egregious violators, even those who have publicly admitted guilt. I no longer consider him a worthwhile source, and if it was up to me, his ass would be out the door fast enough there would be no chance of the handle contacting his backside. As just one of 330,000,000 plus employers, I'm seriously disappointed in his performance.

So, frankly, when it comes down to what he says, i don't give a shit. At least charge the bastards so Biden has to go on record pardoning them to save his cronies the sort of economic misery associated with providing a defense.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Weird Tolkienish Figure on December 07, 2020, 03:51:56 pm
Well of course.   The fraud didn't extend down ballot?   That's absurd on its face.

But let's back up a bit.  AG Barr didn't say there wasn't any fraud; indeed there may have been substantial fraud.  Nor did he say that the Justice Department was wrapping up its investigation.  What he said was,  almost a month following the election,  that there was no evidence of fraud at the kind of level that would change the results of the election.

In other words, it is time to accept reality.  Or,  I guess, one of two versions of reality.

The American tradition has long been to accept the results of the election as the verdict of the people,  a force,  polity,  greater than the tribal concerns of the parties.    Keep up the fight, but on the new battleground established by the results of the election.  After all,  the situation may well be reversed in two or four years.   

The new, subversive tradition was established by Stacey Abrams.    Never concede, never acknowledge the outcome of the vote,  and claim that the peoples' verdict was illegitimate and unworthy of respect.   Now Trump is following that playbook to the letter, with the same poisonous results, the same subversion of faith and confidence in democratic norms.   

I think all of us will likely agree that Abrams'  play was that of a selfish scumbag,  both dangerous and destructive of the fabric the holds our  polyglot nation together.   But only a handful here will say the same of the President,  and indeed will admonish the few of who do as disloyal to the tribe.

My loyalty is to the Republic, not Donald Trump.   If that's not you as well  then you ought to think long and hard of the consequences of such naked hypocrisy.   

 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 03:52:30 pm
Is there anyone else noticing that even post election we have a handfull of members here who are slamming Trump 10 X versus Biden or say any other democrat or liberal?  Hmmmm...

It's like having a bunch of McStain mini-mes.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 05:27:02 pm
Is there anyone else noticing that even post election we have a handfull of members here who are slamming Trump 10 X versus Biden or say any other democrat or liberal?  Hmmmm...

Well I despise Stacy Abrams as a dangerous and destructive sore loser.   And you apparently are demanding we replicate her tactics and disrespect for the people.

I don't like it that Biden trounced Trump to the tune of seven million votes.   Perhaps we should consider just why that was and how to change things for the future.


Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 05:51:27 pm
Well I despise Stacy Abrams as a dangerous and destructive sore loser.   And you apparently are demanding we replicate her tactics and disrespect for the people.

I don't like it that Biden trounced Trump to the tune of seven million votes.   Perhaps we should consider just why that was and how to change things for the future.

Evidence has been presented to you many, many times that there are likely millions of illegal and "switched" ballots, so I have a cattle-sized salt block handy for reading posts like this one.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 06:19:24 pm
Evidence has been presented to you many, many times that there are likely millions of illegal and "switched" ballots, so I have a cattle-sized salt block handy for reading posts like this one.

And I should believe such evidence - why?   Forgive me for insisting on information from reputable sources.   Right wing kook media I will believe if and when their charges are echoed by the Wall St Journal,  National Review or credible actors like AG Barr.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 07, 2020, 06:22:58 pm
And I should believe such evidence - why? 

To demonstrate that you have the ability to think, and that 'truth is something you value?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 07, 2020, 06:24:56 pm
To demonstrate that you have the ability to think, and that 'truth is something you value?

  ****slapping
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 06:29:01 pm
It's like having a bunch of McStain mini-mes.

And oddly enough, they have only doubled down on their BS.   Hmm.....

seems that they are desperate to portray Trump as the loser here.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 06:32:39 pm
To demonstrate that you have the ability to think, and that 'truth is something you value?

Uh.... you realize who you are addressing here...

right?     :whistle:

(or did you forget the sarc tag...lol)

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 06:39:04 pm
And I should believe such evidence - why?   Forgive me for insisting on information from reputable sources.   Right wing kook media I will believe if and when their charges are echoed by the Wall St Journal,  National Review or credible actors like AG Barr.

And they think you're the fool for not believing frontpage or gateway pundit...they believe without question everything fed to them from epoch times.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 06:39:43 pm
To demonstrate that you have the ability to think, and that 'truth is something you value?

Do you value truth,  or only that "truth" that scratches your itch?   I reject kook media unless and until it is confirmed by sources I know to be reliable. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 06:42:01 pm
And they think you're the fool for not believing frontpage or gateway pundit...they believe without question everything fed to them from epoch times.

As you are (apparently) believing everything spewed at you from SeeBS, CNN (Commie News Network), and from all the other leftist Pravda substitutes.

Thing is.... we on the right (not you) know how much, how often and how consistently the leftist lamestream media lies.   You should probably try to catch up to that reality.


Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 06:43:20 pm
And I should believe such evidence - why?   Forgive me for insisting on information from reputable sources.   Right wing kook media I will believe if and when their charges are echoed by the Wall St Journal,  National Review or credible actors like AG Barr.

Do you believe the security video from State Farm Arena was faked?  See, you always ignore facts you find inconvenient.  Always have, always will.  There's an adage that applies, about leading a horse to water....
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 06:44:16 pm
Do you value truth,  or only that "truth" that scratches your itch?   I reject kook media unless and until it is confirmed by sources I know to be reliable.

Oh come on, man.    Admit the truth for once.    Hell, even Dementia Biden admits the absolute truth on rare occasions.   Truth is... you reject anything or anyone that says Trump didn't lose this election.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 06:44:20 pm
And they think you're the fool for not believing frontpage or gateway pundit...they believe without question everything fed to them from epoch times.

I am happy to read that crap,  but that's with full awareness they have a partisan axe to grind.   I do not see them as purveyors of "truth" unless and until confirmed.   Until then I will not join Trumpsters in their sugar rush.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 06:45:49 pm
And they think you're the fool for not believing frontpage or gateway pundit...they believe without question everything fed to them from epoch times.

I don't believe those sources either, along with other so-called "right wing" sources.  A "fool" refuses to believe hard evidence like the security cam video.

Your test for Foolishness needs some calibration.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 06:46:12 pm
Oh come on, man.    Admit the truth for once.    Hell, even Dementia Biden admits the absolute truth on rare occasions.   Truth is... you reject anything or anyone that says Trump didn't lose this election.

And you reject overwhelming evidence that he did. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 06:47:43 pm
And you reject overwhelming evidence that he did.

You're rejecting overwhelming evidence of voter/election fraud in Biden's favor.   So...

guess which one of us is correct.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 06:49:08 pm
And you reject overwhelming evidence that he did.

I dream of a day...when you actually believed solid evidence that challenges you world view.  That will happen when we start judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Still waiting...and not holding my breath.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 06:51:58 pm
And I should believe such evidence - why?   Forgive me for insisting on information from reputable sources.   Right wing kook media I will believe if and when their charges are echoed by the Wall St Journal,  National Review or credible actors like AG Barr.

There are none so blind as those that will not see.

The Wall Street Journal and National Review...explains a lot.  They have the same squish moderate worldview as you do.  They also dislike Trump as much as you do.

You won't believe anything unless it's from your favorite echo chamber news sources.

Duly noted.

Tell me...how much of the sworn testimony that's been broadcast in Michigan and Georgia have you watched and heard first hand statements from people that were there on election night.

I'm guessing the answer is not one minute.

I'll reiterate what I said above...there's none so blind...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 06:55:56 pm
As you are (apparently) believing everything spewed at you from SeeBS, CNN (Commie News Network), and from all the other leftist Pravda substitutes.

Thing is.... we on the right (not you) know how much, how often and how consistently the leftist lamestream media lies.   You should probably try to catch up to that reality.

Why do such a "healthy" portion of Republicans label everything on the left as communism.  Do you people know what communism is?

CNN slants left but it in no way is communist. Neither were biden, obama, or Clinton.

Labelling everything as communist takes away from reasoned argument.  Its like leftists calling Republicans nazis.  It's stupid and counterproductive.

But id believe CNN before OAN.

Polls all said biden would win in the EC and popular vote. He did.  Its the American voter, not some absurd fraud conspiracy theory.  Open your eyes.

Republicans needed to show integrity and come through with health care plans and a stimulus package to win. We didn't. Thats on trump.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:02:22 pm
Why do such a "healthy" portion of Republicans label everything on the left as communism.  Do you people know what communism is?

You bet we do, and we also know that "Socialism" is a gateway drug.  As PJ O'Rourke has said, "Socialism is Communism sold by the drink.  If you don't understand that, then you will never understand conservatives.  You have certainly not demonstrated any evidence that you do.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 07:06:09 pm
There are none so blind as those that will not see.

The Wall Street Journal and National Review...explains a lot.  They have the same squish moderate worldview as you do.  They also dislike Trump as much as you do.

You won't believe anything unless it's from your favorite echo chamber news sources.

Duly noted.

Tell me...how much of the sworn testimony that's been broadcast in Michigan and Georgia have you watched and heard first hand statements from people that were there on election night.

I'm guessing the answer is not one minute.

I'll reiterate what I said above...there's none so blind...

Again - the issue isn't that fraud did not occur.  It is that there is no credible evidence that it arose to a level that would even come close to changing the result.   Biden won.  Trump lost.  By over 7 million votes.   That's not me saying that,  or even the WSJ.   It is the American people.

You don't have to like it. Just respect their decision.   Or be a whining, destructive sore loser like Stacey Abrams.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 07:10:31 pm
You bet we do, and we also know that "Socialism" is a gateway drug.  As PJ O'Rourke has said, "Socialism is Communism sold by the drink.  If you don't understand that, then you will never understand conservatives.  You have certainly not demonstrated any evidence that you do.

Please show me democratic party sponsored bills and how far they've gone that amount to government taking ownership of private business? Or bills that work to outlaw private ownership in any meaningful way.  Jesus christ we're the stupid party and its sometimes embarrassing.

Yeah unchecked the left would tend to socialism...so I save that ire for the squad and one of the appeals of the right is a bulwark against the far left...but to say media that isn't far right is communist is abject idiocy.

We are in a mixed economy.  I dont want raised taxes but thats not socialism.  Overrregulation is bad, but thats not socialism.

Words mean things.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 07:15:23 pm
Why do such a "healthy" portion of Republicans label everything on the left as communism.  Do you people know what communism is?

What the hell do you think Socialism is, which most Democrats, deep staters and globalists are A-OK with?    It's Communism with a smiley face.   It's the next step (or last step, rather) on the road TO Communism.   Frigging duh.

Quote
CNN slants left but it in no way is communist. Neither were biden, obama, or Clinton.

Oh bullshit.   CNN is representative of the commie left.   All day long and twice on Sundays.  And Bill Clinton may not ""openly"" espouse communist ideology, but he and Hillary AND Biden are all "on board" with socialist policies, including Obama.   Remember Obamacare?  (another frigging duh)

Quote
Labelling everything as communist takes away from reasoned argument.  Its like leftists calling Republicans nazis.  It's stupid and counterproductive.

Realists (not you) tend to call a spade a spade.... ie call it like it IS, not like they would want it to be.   You might want to catch a clue.    And in case you haven't been paying attention (and I'm betting you haven't)..... China... Communist China, specifically.... has a vested interest in Biden winning and Trump losing.   As does other communist enemy nations.  Hell, even the non-communist 'enemy of America' nations want Biden to win.   If that doesn't clue you in, nothing EVER will.

Quote
But id believe CNN before OAN.

Yeah, and that figures AND pretty much says it all re: your stance here.  Thanks for the honesty, at least.

Quote
Polls all said biden would win in the EC and popular vote. He did.  Its the American voter, not some absurd fraud conspiracy theory.  Open your eyes.

LOL!    The same polls that said Hillary would win, because they were banking and betting on the same election fraud campaign?   Trump was way ahead on election night BEFORE the aholes in those leftist swing states stopped counting and sent observers home.   Open YOUR eyes.... unless you just like being blind, wrong and stuckonstupid. 

Quote
Republicans needed to show integrity and come through with health care plans and a stimulus package to win. We didn't. Thats on trump.

We?   Is that the Royal We?   Cause in my logic book, anyone that would believe CNN as a legit "news source" is not only NOT on my side of the aisle, but does not qualify as a real Republican or as part of "We".   

As for passing a health care plan, it's kind of hard to do that when the DemocRATS control the branch of government that creates the laws to pass (duh).   And there was a stimulus bill passed.    Guess you were asleep at the switch while that passed, eh?   Bottom line.... with @holes like Nancy Pelosi in charge of the House, I'm surprised that anything got passed.   Anything that was actually "good" for America, that is.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:16:09 pm
Again - the issue isn't that fraud did not occur.  It is that there is no credible evidence that it arose to a level that would even come close to changing the result.   Biden won.  Trump lost.  By over 7 million votes.   That's not me saying that,  or even the WSJ.   It is the American people.

You don't have to like it. Just respect their decision.   Or be a whining, destructive sore loser like Stacey Abrams.

Yup.  Still denying the evidence being presented that it does, indeed constitute fraud sufficient to overturn the will of the American People you profess to believe. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:17:26 pm
Please show me democratic party sponsored bills and how far they've gone that amount to government taking ownership of private business? Or bills that work to outlaw private ownership in any meaningful way.  Jesus christ we're the stupid party and its sometimes embarrassing.

Yeah unchecked the left would tend to socialism...so I save that ire for the squad and one of the appeals of the right is a bulwark against the far left...but to say media that isn't far right is communist is abject idiocy.

We are in a mixed economy.  I dont want raised taxes but thats not socialism.  Overrregulation is bad, but thats not socialism.

Words mean things.

As I expected, you took a swing at my point, and whiffed the ball. :rolling:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 07:21:10 pm
Please show me democratic party sponsored bills and how far they've gone that amount to government taking ownership of private business? Or bills that work to outlaw private ownership in any meaningful way.  Jesus christ we're the stupid party and its sometimes embarrassing.

Yeah unchecked the left would tend to socialism...so I save that ire for the squad and one of the appeals of the right is a bulwark against the far left...but to say media that isn't far right is communist is abject idiocy.

We are in a mixed economy.  I dont want raised taxes but thats not socialism.  Overrregulation is bad, but thats not socialism.

Words mean things.

Good effing grief.   Higher taxes and over-regulation is government control of "We, the People"....as well as redistribution of wealth.... which damned well IS socialism.   Obamacare is/was government control over "We, the People" by exerting a grip on our short hairs via that mandate.   How fricking stupid would you have to be to not know, see or realize that?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 07:24:15 pm
As I expected, you took a swing at my point, and whiffed the ball. :rolling:

No,  he hit it out of the park.   Indiscrimate labelling of conventional liberalism as communism or socialism makes it impossible to tell the real thing when it comes along.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 07:25:19 pm
Again - the issue isn't that fraud did not occur.  It is that there is no credible evidence that it arose to a level that would even come close to changing the result.   Biden won.  Trump lost.  By over 7 million votes.   That's not me saying that,  or even the WSJ.   It is the American people.

Credible evidence?  You mean like local on scene NBC reporters and stories reported by ABC kind of credible?

How about the fact that Republican ballot counters were sent home at 10:30...when Trump was leading...told to come back at 0830 to resume counting...meanwhile the Dem ballot counters stayed overnight and "counted" ballots and suddenly trump was trailing by a large margin.


Quote
The Republican poll watchers’ story matches this election night reporting perfectly. And it wasn’t just ABC that reported counting was being delayed. Many media outlets reported on counting delays. See, for example, “Fulton County stopped counting absentee ballots for the night.”

Local NBC journalists on site that night independently confirmed “they were told counting was done for the night” and given no indication it would continue before the next morning. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution even reported of a “plan” to stop scanning ballots at the same time the poll watchers said things were shut down:

https://thefederalist.com/2020/12/07/no-the-georgia-vote-counting-video-was-not-debunked-not-even-close/

There are none so blind...

Quote
You don't have to like it. Just respect their decision.   Or be a whining, destructive sore loser like Stacey Abrams.

Your attempt to smear those that disagree with you as somehow being the same as Stacey Abrams might be humorous to your Lincoln Project loving friends...but as with all your attempts at smears...it's an apples and oranges comparison.  And what makes it even more lame is you constantly complain about "personal attacks" by other members.


Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 07, 2020, 07:30:33 pm
No,  he hit it out of the park.   Indiscrimate labelling of conventional liberalism as communism or socialism makes it impossible to tell the real thing when it comes along.

Well I see more than one zebra is showing his stripes today.  AOC is delighted with this TBR infiltration.

BTW...did you even bother to read the 2020 democratic plank this year?  Tell mme how much of that was liberalism, or hinging on socialism
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 07, 2020, 07:33:44 pm
@Jazzhead

Here's but one example.  You had made the claim that in your own county, voters who voted for Trump in 2016 abandoned him in 2020.  But when you were confronted with Montgomery County vote totals from each election showing that support for Trump grew from 2016 to 2020, you suddenly went silent with no acknowledgement that the FACTS presented to you were in conflict with your claim.

A week later, you reappeared, again offering the claim that Montgomery County's 2016 Trump voters abandoned him in 2020.  Again, you were confronted with Montgomery vote totals that contradicted your claim, and again you went silent, only to resurface today.

Now step outside of yourself for a moment and consider how others view that behavior.  Each time you are confronted with truth, you run away from it, disappear for a few days, and then return with a chronic case of amnesia.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:35:40 pm
No,  he hit it out of the park.   Indiscrimate labelling of conventional liberalism as communism or socialism makes it impossible to tell the real thing when it comes along.

I see you are still making points with the truthfulness and clarity I've come to expect.  :seeya:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:37:19 pm
@Jazzhead

Here's but one example.  You had made the claim that in your own county, voters who voted for Trump in 2016 abandoned him in 2020.  But when you were confronted with Montgomery County vote totals from each election showing that support for Trump grew from 2016 to 2020, you suddenly went silent with no acknowledgement that the FACTS presented to you were in conflict with your claim.

A week later, you reappeared, again offering the claim that Montgomery County's 2016 Trump voters abandoned him in 2020.  Again, you were confronted with Montgomery vote totals that contradicted your claim, and again you went silent, only to resurface today.

Now step outside of yourself for a moment and consider how others view that behavior.  Each time you are confronted with truth, you run away from it, disappear for a few days, and then return with a chronic case of amnesia.

To be honest, the last time he "disappeared" was Management's doing.   **nononono*
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 07:38:51 pm
I see you are still making points with the truthfulness and clarity I've come to expect.  :seeya:

Hey... is that a nice way (an admin's way) of saying that he's lying out his @ss?    888mouth :whistle:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 07, 2020, 07:38:57 pm
To be honest, the last time he "disappeared" was Management's doing.   **nononono*

I'd almost wager money Jazzy is a Lincoln Project distruptor.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:41:17 pm
Well I see more than one zebra is showing his stripes today.  AOC is delighted with this TBR infiltration.

BTW...did you even bother to read the 2020 democratic plank this year?  Tell mme how much of that was liberalism, or hinging on socialism

According to commie-symps, it ain't "socialism" if people ain't being loaded onto cattle-cars on the way to the Gulags.  Now, shut up, calm down, knuckle under and hand over your guns like a good boy. 9999hair out0000
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 07:41:51 pm
Please show me democratic party sponsored bills and how far they've gone that amount to government taking ownership of private business? Or bills that work to outlaw private ownership in any meaningful way.  Jesus christ we're the stupid party and its sometimes embarrassing.

California AB 5

Obamacare

They hate private equity firms:

Quote
Progressive Democrats ramp up attacks on private equity
https://thehill.com/hilltv (https://thehill.com/hilltv)

Biden has vowed to repeal the PLCAA

They also want your 401K

Quote
Biden retirement proposal would upend traditional 401(k) plans
https://www.rollcall.com/2020/08/24/biden-retirement-proposal-would-upend-traditional-401k-plans/ (https://www.rollcall.com/2020/08/24/biden-retirement-proposal-would-upend-traditional-401k-plans/)

Quote
Yeah unchecked the left would tend to socialism...so I save that ire for the squad and one of the appeals of the right is a bulwark against the far left...but to say media that isn't far right is communist is abject idiocy

Except it's not.  I've spent my entire life dealing with the media.  The majority of them...a good 90-05% hate normal Americans and think AOC's proposals don't go far enough.  They believe that any time Republicans score a huge political win (like the 1994 GOP takeover of the House) America...in the words of Peter Jennings is having a "tantrum".

You only have to look at what stories the media promotes and the ones they ignore or spike all together to know what their true feelings are.

And everything they support...is socialist/communist in nature and outcome.

Quote
We are in a mixed economy.  I dont want raised taxes but thats not socialism.  Overrregulation is bad, but thats not socialism.

Means to an end.  Their goal is Socialist utopia.  The Cloward-Piven strategy at work.


Quote
Words mean things.

And yet you ignore the words that are put out there every day by the media that show what you're denying.

Perhaps you should actually read some of those words.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 07:43:47 pm
I'd almost wager money Jazzy is a Lincoln Project distruptor.

A troll by any other name is still a troll.   Hasn't he always been like this (ie pre-2019)....

except for the exceedingly rare occasions when either:   he was trying to confuse us with a momentary lapse of clarity ... or someone less-leftie in his household must have logged in and posted under his nic...lololol.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:44:25 pm
I'd almost wager money Jazzy is a Lincoln Project distruptor.

I think he participated in his town's blatant fraud, which is likely why he refuses to see the evidence that he and his buddies blatantly cheated.  There appears to be the zeal of the emotionally vested at work.

Besides, he has been doing this long before "Lincoln Log Republicans" existed.  Remember the "Insure your guns!" argument?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 07:44:59 pm
No,  he hit it out of the park.

You wish 


Quote
Indiscrimate labelling of conventional liberalism as communism or socialism makes it impossible to tell the real thing when it comes along.

How do you tell a Communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 07:45:44 pm
According to commie-symps, it ain't "socialism" if people ain't being loaded onto cattle-cars on the way to the Gulags.  Now, shut up, calm down, knuckle under and hand over your guns like a good boy. 9999hair out0000

Speaking of which.... it's no wonder that Jazzy seems to be on-board with a Biden win... since Biden has said he will "tax" guns owned by Americans....

just like Jazzy has  been wanting all along.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 07:45:59 pm
I'd almost wager money Jazzy is a Lincoln Project distruptor.

@catfish1957

IMHO his top two favorites for "news" is the Lincoln Project and The Bulwark.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Bigun on December 07, 2020, 07:46:55 pm
Again - the issue isn't that fraud did not occur.  It is that there is no credible evidence that it arose to a level that would even come close to changing the result.   Biden won.  Trump lost.  By over 7 million votes.   That's not me saying that,  or even the WSJ.   It is the American people.

You don't have to like it. Just respect their decision.   Or be a whining, destructive sore loser like Stacey Abrams.

Calculate what tabulation machines in 26 states converting every Trump vote to .87 votes and every Biden vote to 1.13 votes can do and get back to me.
 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 07:47:31 pm
Speaking of which.... it's no wonder that Jazzy seems to be on-board with a Biden win... since Biden has said he will "tax" guns owned by Americans....

just like Jazzy has  been wanting all along.

You also have to understand that Jazzy...along with his pet puppy Knox aren't even little R republicans.

They are Progressive Democrats through and through.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:47:39 pm
Speaking of which.... it's no wonder that Jazzy seems to be on-board with a Biden win... since Biden has said he will "tax" guns owned by Americans....

just like Jazzy has  been wanting all along.

It's worse then taxing guns...it's Insuring them which by definition requires registration, his protestations to the contrary.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:48:50 pm
Calculate what tabulation machines in 26 states converting every Trump vote to .87 votes and every Biden vote to 1.13 votes can do and get back to me.

That would require doing Arithmetic, and lawyers are notoriously bad at that. :laugh:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:49:44 pm
You also have to understand that Jazzy...along with his pet puppy Knox aren't even little R republicans.

They are Progressive Democrats through and through.

I think they voted for Shortbus Joe.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 07, 2020, 07:50:31 pm
You wish 


How do you tell a Communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

In about his 30th post, Knox27 admitted he was a MSM sheeple. So what do you expect from an individual who bases his POV and thoughts around sourcing that is nothing but a packs of lies?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 07:50:39 pm
You also have to understand that Jazzy...along with his pet puppy Knox aren't even little R republicans.

They are Progressive Democrats through and through.

You  betcha.   And considering that this is supposed to be a Conservative forum....

that qualifies them as "troll" status.... eh?   It's ok.   Every forum has to have at least a few.    For diversity.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 07, 2020, 07:54:29 pm
You  betcha.   And considering that this is supposed to be a Conservative forum....

that qualifies them as "troll" status.... eh?   It's ok.   Every forum has to have at least a few.    For diversity.

I don't mind them here at all.  It's kind of like Killer Whales playiing toss with a seal.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/3b64c86db139b1b11f097b3055f0ea7b/tenor.gif?itemid=16341785)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 07, 2020, 07:56:11 pm
Calculate what tabulation machines in 26 states converting every Trump vote to .87 votes and every Biden vote to 1.13 votes can do and get back to me.

In Montgomery County, Pennsylvania alone, correcting this would net Trump over 64,000 votes.  Add Chester County, and Trump nets another 40,000 votes.  Just those two counties alone are enough for Trump to win Pennsylvania.  So when @Jazzhead says that it isn't enough to sway the election, he is lying.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 07:57:07 pm
I don't mind them here at all.  It's kind of like Killer Whales playiing toss with a seal.

Yeah, I see the value in that.  Now, when the seals get nasty with personal attacks, Mods have to step in.   :shrug:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 07:57:41 pm
I don't mind them here at all.  It's kind of like Killer Whales playiing toss with a seal.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/3b64c86db139b1b11f097b3055f0ea7b/tenor.gif?itemid=16341785)

In keeping with the sea life theme.... I think of them more as baby sharks.   Not big enough to pose a real threat... but just annoying enough to deserve an occasional schmack to send them swimming the other way.     :smokin:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 07:59:14 pm
In Montgomery County, Pennsylvania alone, correcting this would net Trump over 64,000 votes.  Add Chester County, and Trump nets another 40,000 votes.  Just those two counties alone are enough for Trump to win Pennsylvania.  So when @Jazzhead says that it isn't enough to sway the election, he is lying.

It's what they do, after all.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 07:59:35 pm
You  betcha.   And considering that this is supposed to be a Conservative forum....

that qualifies them as "troll" status.... eh?   It's ok.   Every forum has to have at least a few.    For diversity.

Liberal trolls show up for various reasons.  Some do in hopes of getting banned immediately in order to "own the Cons" for being intolerant of other views.  DU was good at that when I was at Conservative Underground and Conservative Cave.  The Viking Kitties cleaned up a few trolls like that at TOS as well.

Others come here to try and dazzle us with their brilliant thought on why things should be the way they want them...again in order to make you and I out to be intolerant racist bigots/homophobes/xenophobes for not agreeing with them.

The ones we have here right now want to convince us that the party will be better off with a Dem Lite squish like Kasich or Jeb because of their "common sense" approach to working together in DC.

Again...with the end result of making the rest of us appearing intolerant and inflexible.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 08:01:20 pm
In about his 30th post, Knox27 admitted he was a MSM sheeple. So what do you expect from an individual who bases his POV and thoughts around sourcing that is nothing but a packs of lies?

I expect nothing less than what he's delivered so far.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 08:02:23 pm
Liberal trolls show up for various reasons.  Some do in hopes of getting banned immediately in order to "own the Cons" for being intolerant of other views.  DU was good at that when I was at Conservative Underground and Conservative Cave.  The Viking Kitties cleaned up a few trolls like that at TOS as well.

Others come here to try and dazzle us with their brilliant thought on why things should be the way they want them...again in order to make you and I out to be intolerant racist bigots/homophobes/xenophobes for not agreeing with them.

The ones we have here right now want to convince us that the party will be better off with a Dem Lite squish like Kasich or Jeb because of their "common sense" approach to working together in DC.

Again...with the end result of making the rest of us appearing intolerant and inflexible.

"Magafanatic" was worse than that.  He came on here to convince people to throw both Senate seats in GA away, in order to flip the Senate.  He got the bum's rush in less than 10 posts.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 08:02:30 pm
I think they voted for Shortbus Joe.

I have no doubt that they did.  Especially Jazzy after his diatribes earlier this year (or was it last year?) about how Trump needed to step aside "for the sake of the party" and let someone like Kasich step in to represent the GOP in the 2020 election.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 08:02:57 pm
California AB 5

Obamacare

They hate private equity firms:
https://thehill.com/hilltv (https://thehill.com/hilltv)

Biden has vowed to repeal the PLCAA

They also want your 401K
https://www.rollcall.com/2020/08/24/biden-retirement-proposal-would-upend-traditional-401k-plans/ (https://www.rollcall.com/2020/08/24/biden-retirement-proposal-would-upend-traditional-401k-plans/)

Except it's not.  I've spent my entire life dealing with the media.  The majority of them...a good 90-05% hate normal Americans and think AOC's proposals don't go far enough.  They believe that any time Republicans score a huge political win (like the 1994 GOP takeover of the House) America...in the words of Peter Jennings is having a "tantrum".

You only have to look at what stories the media promotes and the ones they ignore or spike all together to know what their true feelings are.

And everything they support...is socialist/communist in nature and outcome.

Means to an end.  Their goal is Socialist utopia.  The Cloward-Piven strategy at work.


And yet you ignore the words that are put out there every day by the media that show what you're denying.

Perhaps you should actually read some of those words.

So to be very clear. Your first two examples of socialism are:

1. A California bill that reclassifies independent contractors to employees (of the private business).  Its close to socialism to be fair, arguably the definition of excessive govt regulation but still only state level.  Its a bad law, its highly contested even in super liberal California. Its also the. Only. Thing. You. Found. One thing.

2. Obamacare, an idea that originated in a conservative think tank that requires people to buy private non govt run insurance much the same that you're required to buy car insurance to drive on public roads.  Very much not socialism but since the Democrat passed it, you dont care, ipso facto its socialistic to you.  Not the best solution to our problems maybe, but not socialism

What else did you mention...ahh biden wants to repeal the law that the government used to shield gun manufacturers.  So in your head, the law that the govt enacted that said you couldn't sue a private business was not socialism, but repealing that law is socialism??

Is that right? Is that actually how you see that law?  The repeal of which to you is socialism?  Seriously that's your best example?

Also also im not saying I agree with the repeal. But that ain't socialism.

Further more you just lie and make up numbers withiut any source about members of the media, who are assuredly more sympathetic to the left than the avg American.  But to say most are to the left of the squad is frankly retarded to use a word im hearing I shouldn't use anymore.

Socialism is not imminent, its not even close. Not on the horizon.  Read about the definitions of mixed economies, pure capitalism, socialism, state capitalism, welfare capitalism because some aspects of some of those systems are actually a potential concern.  Not the socialism one.  Is a boogeyman for stupid people here. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 08:03:46 pm
"Magafanatic" was worse than that.  He came on here to convince people to throw both Senate seats in GA away, in order to flip the Senate.  He got the bum's rush in less than 10 posts.

Some require a swifter form of justice than others.

There's a ton of Trump supporting people on social media advocating the same thing he did.  We'll probably get a few more like him the closer it gets to January.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 08:05:57 pm
Liberal trolls show up for various reasons.  Some do in hopes of getting banned immediately in order to "own the Cons" for being intolerant of other views.  DU was good at that when I was at Conservative Underground and Conservative Cave.  The Viking Kitties cleaned up a few trolls like that at TOS as well.

Others come here to try and dazzle us with their brilliant thought on why things should be the way they want them...again in order to make you and I out to be intolerant racist bigots/homophobes/xenophobes for not agreeing with them.

The ones we have here right now want to convince us that the party will be better off with a Dem Lite squish like Kasich or Jeb because of their "common sense" approach to working together in DC.

Again...with the end result of making the rest of us appearing intolerant and inflexible.

Well in my case, they can save themselves the trouble.   I AM intolerant and inflexible when it comes to tolerating the radical left.   And I don't plan to change.   Ever.    :whistle:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 08:06:20 pm
In about his 30th post, Knox27 admitted he was a MSM sheeple. So what do you expect from an individual who bases his POV and thoughts around sourcing that is nothing but a packs of lies?

I read msm but you're the one that knows to label people as sheeple.  Its beyond my knowledge and imagination to know that I was mindlessly part of a herd lapping up fake news.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 08:06:51 pm
So to be very clear. Your first two examples of socialism are:

...


@Knox27

Playing with definitions is a refuge of the scoundrels. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 08:08:44 pm
@Knox27

Playing with definitions is a refuge of the scoundrels.

Facts too it seems here
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 08:10:06 pm
Facts too it seems here

How would you know?  You haven't presented any facts.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 08:15:29 pm
So to be very clear. Your first two examples of socialism are:

1. A California bill that reclassifies independent contractors to employees (of the private business).  Its close to socialism to be fair, arguably the definition of excessive govt regulation but still only state level.  Its a bad law, its highly contested even in super liberal California. Its also the. Only. Thing. You. Found. One thing.

You asked for one example...you got that plus more.  There were dozens more...but I knew trying to show them to you would be pointless.

Like I told your alter ego Jazzy "there are none so blind"...

Quote
2. Obamacare, an idea that originated in a conservative think tank that requires people to buy private non govt run insurance much the same that you're required to buy car insurance to drive on public roads.  Very much not socialism but since the Democrat passed it, you dont care, ipso facto its socialistic to you.  Not the best solution to our problems maybe, but not socialism

Yes back in 1992...tell us something we don't know.  But after research and cost analysis that same Conservative think tank as well as Republicans in general backed away from it as quickly as they could.  The Libs like yourself own that "idea" now.  And Obama admitted that the ACA was a first step towards single payer.  That would see the government take over and federalize 1/7th of the national economy.

What do you think happens to the private businesses tied to healthcare then?

That's very much socialism and the government putting private business out of well...business.

Quote
What else did you mention...ahh biden wants to repeal the law that the government used to shield gun manufacturers.  So in your head, the law that the govt enacted that said you couldn't sue a private business was not socialism, but repealing that law is socialism??

Do you know how many small (50 people or less) businesses there are in the firearms industry that would be affected by something like this?

You don't have a clue do you?  That's not only Socialism it's proving the point about Government trying to ruin private industry.  Biden, Hillary and others have said numerous times...their goal is to bankrupt and end the firearms industry in America.

Quote
Is that right? Is that actually how you see that law?  The repeal of which to you is socialism?  Seriously that's your best example?

It's one of many best examples

Quote
Also also im not saying I agree with the repeal. But that ain't socialism.

Clearly you don't know what Socialism is...or you're being willfully ignorant.

Quote
Further more you just lie and make up numbers withiut any source about members of the media, who are assuredly more sympathetic to the left than the avg American.  But to say most are to the left of the squad is frankly retarded to use a word im hearing I shouldn't use anymore.

I don't make up numbers and unlike you I don't lie.

Quote
The answer to the press’ myopia lies elsewhere, and nobody has produced a better argument for how the national media missed the Trump story than FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver, who pointed out that the ideological clustering in top newsrooms led to groupthink. “As of 2013, only 7 percent of [journalists] identified as Republicans,” Silver wrote in March, chiding the press for its political homogeneity. Just after the election, presidential strategist Steve Bannon savaged the press on the same point but with a heartier vocabulary. “The media bubble is the ultimate symbol of what’s wrong with this country,” Bannon said. “It’s just a circle of people talking to themselves who have no bleep idea what’s going on.”

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/04/25/media-bubble-real-journalism-jobs-east-coast-215048 (https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/04/25/media-bubble-real-journalism-jobs-east-coast-215048)

Digest a large cloth container of richards you obtuse dolt.

Quote
Socialism is not imminent, its not even close. Not on the horizon.  Read about the definitions of mixed economies, pure capitalism, socialism, state capitalism, welfare capitalism because some aspects of some of those systems are actually a potential concern.  Not the socialism one.  Is a boogeyman for stupid people here.

If it wren't for cheating by the DNC itself...Bernie Sanders would have crushed Hillary in the primaries in 2016 and probably defeated Trump.

Why is that?

He preached and continues to preach socialism/communism as the answer to our problems and there is a growing number of brain dead voters who think he's right.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Bigun on December 07, 2020, 08:17:02 pm
I don't mind them here at all.  It's kind of like Killer Whales playiing toss with a seal.


In keeping with that theme, I wonder if @Jazzhead, who claims to be a lawyer in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, would explain to us what the Constitution of his state requires for election law to be changed.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 08:17:14 pm
Facts too it seems here

Present some facts then and not Liberal talking points and progressive platitudes.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 07, 2020, 08:18:18 pm
"Magafanatic" was worse than that.  He came on here to convince people to throw both Senate seats in GA away, in order to flip the Senate.  He got the bum's rush in less than 10 posts.


   I'm sorry I missed that.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 08:20:27 pm
In keeping with that theme, I wonder if @Jazzhead, who claims to be a lawyer in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, would explain to us what the Constitution of his state requires for election law to be changed.

I know...but that's because I've heard it explained by an actual Constitutional lawyer from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

He also went into great detail about why laches doesn't apply in the cases brought before the courts there.

Not that Jazzy would ever accept the truth spoken by said Constitutional lawyer.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 08:21:23 pm
@txradioguy

And that same study had 28 percent identify as democrat and 50 percent self identify as independent yet you claim the vast majority are to the left of the squad.  Blather.  Cant believe i have to take the medias position. Disgusting.  Noteworthy as to who im arguing against though.  Thats what I deserve for thinking its stupid and counterproductive to label cnn as communist.  But facts are facts and its apparently the hill im dying on.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: mystery-ak on December 07, 2020, 08:21:52 pm
You can debate all you want but right now I am seeing personal insults...this is a warning.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 07, 2020, 08:22:02 pm
I read msm but you're the one that knows to label people as sheeple.  Its beyond my knowledge and imagination to know that I was mindlessly part of a herd lapping up fake news.

Elections 2020 / Re: Donald Trump: ‘Facts Are on Our Side’ in Election Fight, but ‘Time Isn’t’
« on: November 28, 2020, 10:16:37 AM »

"A variety of places. Including places you would scoff at because its not solely epoch times, gateway pundit, or frontpage magazine.  Yes that means I'll read the WSJ, NYT, the atlantic, drudge, the AP, the economist, axios, the hill.  I know... im a sheep for listening to the lamestream media."

=================================================================================

Your repsonse around your source of news......   Your words,  not mine......
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 08:23:05 pm
Elections 2020 / Re: Donald Trump: ‘Facts Are on Our Side’ in Election Fight, but ‘Time Isn’t’
« on: November 28, 2020, 10:16:37 AM »

"A variety of places. Including places you would scoff at because its not solely epoch times, gateway pundit, or frontpage magazine.  Yes that means I'll read the WSJ, NYT, the atlantic, drudge, the AP, the economist, axios, the hill.  I know... im a sheep for listening to the lamestream media.

=================================================================================

Your repsonse around your source of news......   Your words not mine......

Lol serves me right for being a sarcastic pr*ck.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 07, 2020, 08:26:38 pm
Lol serves me right for being a sarcastic bleep.

If you were just trying to be sarcastic, you wouldn't have included a good sound reputable source like the WSJ.  Blaming this on sarcasm reeks of dishonesty. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 08:33:25 pm
@txradioguy

And that same study had 28 percent identify as democrat and 50 percent self identify as independent yet you claim the vast majority are to the left of the squad.  Blather.  Cant believe i have to take the medias position. Disgusting.  Noteworthy as to who im arguing against though.  Thats what I deserve for thinking its stupid and counterproductive to label cnn as communist.  But facts are facts and its apparently the hill im dying on.

Ok well that was 2013 numbers in an article by the heavily biased POLITICO...since you don't like that one...here's some more info.

Quote
Of the 430 people CPI identified as "journalists, reporters, news editors or television news anchors ­— as well as other donors known to be working in journalism," 96 percent gave money to Clinton, according to federal campaign finance filings. Those 430 journalists gave $382,000 to Clinton and just $14,000 to GOP nominee Donald Trump. CPI identified just 50 journalists who gave to Trump (meaning 380 gave to Clinton.)

CPI noted that the law only obligates candidates to disclose the names of donors giving more than $200 in a single election cycle, meaning many more members of the media could have donated to either campaign, but in smaller amounts.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/what-media-bias-journalists-overwhelmingly-donated-to-hillary-clinton (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/what-media-bias-journalists-overwhelmingly-donated-to-hillary-clinton)

Hmmm there's that percentage again.  Pesky little reoccurring thing isn't it?

And then there is this:

Quote
Journalists dole out cash to politicians (quietly)

Whether you sample your news feed from ABC or CBS (or, yes, even NBC and MSNBC), whether you prefer Fox News Channel or National Public Radio, The Wall Street Journal or The New Yorker, some of the journalists feeding you are also feeding cash to politicians, parties or political action committees.

Msnbc.com identified 143 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes. Only 16 gave to Republicans. Two gave to both parties.

The donors include CNN's Guy Raz, now covering the Pentagon for NPR, who gave to Kerry the same month he was embedded with U.S. troops in Iraq; New Yorker war correspondent George Packer; a producer for Bill O'Reilly at Fox; MSNBC TV host Joe Scarborough; political writers at Vanity Fair; the editor of The Wall Street Journal's weekend section; local TV anchors in Washington, Minneapolis, Memphis and Wichita; the ethics columnist at The New York Times; and even MTV's former presidential campaign correspondent.

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna19113485 (https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna19113485)


If you want to make facts your "hill to die on" then you bette start dealing in facts and drop the fan fiction BS you're currently peddling.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 08:55:59 pm
Ok well that was 2013 numbers in an article by the heavily biased POLITICO...since you don't like that one...here's some more info.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/what-media-bias-journalists-overwhelmingly-donated-to-hillary-clinton (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/what-media-bias-journalists-overwhelmingly-donated-to-hillary-clinton)

Hmmm there's that percentage again.  Pesky little reoccurring thing isn't it?

And then there is this:

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna19113485 (https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna19113485)


If you want to make facts your "hill to die on" then you bette start dealing in facts and drop the fan fiction BS you're currently peddling.

Lol I guess they were better informed of how only a sucker gives money to Donald trump.

Needless to say 96 percent was looking at 2015 16 donations and was the high water mark for partisan contributions. 

Like I said most are sympathetic to the left.  Thats not communism and thats not left of the squad and thats not indicative of hating America. I can admit people on the other side if the fence love American but have different ideas for how it can prosper.  So I stand firmly bu calling cnn commie news network is juvenile and counterproductive

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 09:03:36 pm
Lol I guess they were better informed of how only a sucker gives money to Donald trump.

Spoken like a true AOC Socialist Democrat.

Quote
Needless to say 96 percent was looking at 2015 16 donations and was the high water mark for partisan contributions.


They haven't done the numbers yet for the 2020 election.  You're assuming/hoping it was the high-water mark.

It isn't and it won't be.

Quote
Like I said most are sympathetic to the left.  Thats not communism and thats not left of the squad and thats not indicative of hating America. I can admit people on the other side if the fence love American but have different ideas for how it can prosper.  So I stand firmly bu calling cnn commie news network is juvenile and counterproductive

Its goes beyond sympathy.  It's crossed the line to advocacy.  And besides...a real report doesn't have sympathies one way or another.

I'd explain further to you about just how deep the relationship is between the media and the DNC and how both are striving for the same goal.

But it's too complicated for you to handle...even if I wrote it in crayons.


CNN has cut deals with Communist Countries to not cover and/or spike negative stories in order to keep their news bureaus open in said Communist countries when others were kicked out.

Calling them the Communist News Network is factually accurate.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 09:07:52 pm
If you were just trying to be sarcastic, you wouldn't have included a good sound reputable source like the WSJ.  Blaming this on sarcasm reeks of dishonesty.

So I wasn't being sarcastic and do genuinely think of myself as sheeple? Is that your implication?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 09:20:45 pm
That would require doing Arithmetic, and lawyers are notoriously bad at that. :laugh:

No,  we're bad at listening to unfettered bullshit.    I trust AG Barr.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 07, 2020, 09:23:02 pm
No,  we're bad at listening to unfettered bullshit.

And yet you never get tired of hearing yourself blabber on.   :pondering:   


Quote
I trust AG Barr.

Bless your heart.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 07, 2020, 09:33:04 pm
No,  we're bad at listening to unfettered bullshit.    I trust AG Barr.


   Screw Barr @Jazzhead Both of Trump's AG Appointments were crap, and for entirely different reasons, yet the same results:  Disappointment.   

   Maybe Barr can meet on a plane with Sally Yates in the near future, in Arizona.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 09:36:57 pm

   Screw Barr @Jazzhead Both of Trump's AG Appointments were crap, and for entirely different reasons, yet the same results:  Disappointment.   

   Maybe Barr can meet on a plane with Sally Yates in the near future, in Arizona.

If Barr was worth a crap as DOJ, he would have been on this election fraud like white on rice November 4.   But noooooo......

So anyone that says or thinks Barr is all that is either lying or a moron.    :whistle:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 07, 2020, 10:14:49 pm
So I wasn't being sarcastic and do genuinely think of myself as sheeple? Is that your implication?

Yeah, I think you are brutally self honest, at least in that respect. Keep watching and citing CNN...    Cuomo and Lemon are your kind of guys I'm sure.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 07, 2020, 10:54:16 pm
Well I despise Stacy Abrams as a dangerous and destructive sore loser.   And you apparently are demanding we replicate her tactics and disrespect for the people.

I don't like it that Biden trounced Trump to the tune of seven million votes.   Perhaps we should consider just why that was and how to change things for the future.
Why?

You loaded one up there.

Can you say Cheater?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 07, 2020, 10:57:40 pm
And oddly enough, they have only doubled down on their BS.   Hmm.....

seems that they are desperate to portray Trump as the loser here.
Or they are desperate to downplay the egregious violation of their offices and the public trust
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Weird Tolkienish Figure on December 07, 2020, 11:00:42 pm
It's like having a bunch of McStain mini-mes.

Who are you referring to specifically? Seemed you got really nasty because I called the forumers in general a bunch of loonies. As you are a mod, you are allowed to do what you want and get away with it. Pretty hypocritical.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 07, 2020, 11:02:54 pm
Who are you referring to specifically? Seemed you got really nasty because I called the forumers in general a bunch of loonies. As you are a mod, you are allowed to do what you want and get away with it. Pretty hypocritical.

Hate to break it to you, but a sitting senator just offered to present the fraud case to SCOTUS.  You think Cruz is a looney too?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 11:07:01 pm
Who are you referring to specifically? Seemed you got really nasty because I called the forumers in general a bunch of loonies. As you are a mod, you are allowed to do what you want and get away with it. Pretty hypocritical.

Lol!    This is what is known as..... pushing your luck..... poking the bear.... and cutting one's own cyber throat.   But hey... by all means....

carry on.     :silly:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 11:08:50 pm
No,  we're bad at listening to unfettered bullshit.    I trust AG Barr.

 :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: corbe on December 07, 2020, 11:11:36 pm
Who are you referring to specifically? Seemed you got really nasty because I called the forumers in general a bunch of loonies. As you are a mod, you are allowed to do what you want and get away with it. Pretty hypocritical.


   I knew there was a reason I always tiptoed around @catfish1957 He's a GD Moderator.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 07, 2020, 11:14:30 pm

   I knew there was a reason I always tiptoed around @catfish1957 He's a GD Moderator.

LMAO.....Yeah you better not misbehave in that Economy/Business Forum Section.....    I might thump you with my money clip.   :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 11:16:02 pm
Lol!    This is what is known as..... pushing your luck..... poking the bear.... and cutting one's own cyber throat.   But hey... by all means....

carry on.     :silly:

Yeah, that one's been shitting on me since I got the red boxes, but I don't care.  My skin is thick.  If it wasn't, people would have been gone some time ago.

Taking that crap off people comes with the Big Red Chair, and I'm fine with it because I made a solemn promise to the Boss Lady.  I'm actually one of the safest people on TBR to antagonize, but just try and tell @Weird Tolkienish Figure and that other guy that.   :laugh: :police:

(I only get angry when people personally attack Hero Members with no power.)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 07, 2020, 11:18:07 pm
I don't mind them here at all.  It's kind of like Killer Whales playiing toss with a seal.

More like having a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 07, 2020, 11:29:29 pm
Yeah, that one's been shitting on me since I got the red boxes, but I don't care.  My skin is thick.  If it wasn't, people would have been gone some time ago.

Taking that crap off people comes with the Big Red Chair, and I'm fine with it because I made a solemn promise to the Boss Lady.  I'm actually one of the safest people on TBR to antagonize, but just try and tell @Weird Tolkienish Figure and that other guy that.   :laugh: :police:

(I only get angry when people personally attack Hero Members with no power.)

I have to admire your ability to control your anger.  I don't have that.    :shrug:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 07, 2020, 11:31:36 pm
Why do such a "healthy" portion of Republicans label everything on the left as communism.  Do you people know what communism is?

CNN slants left but it in no way is communist. Neither were biden, obama, or Clinton.

Labelling everything as communist takes away from reasoned argument. Its like leftists calling Republicans nazis.  It's stupid and counterproductive.



I hope you are sitting down when you read this Bubba,but Nazism is a form of Communism. In FACT,the USSR and Nazi Germany were allies right up to the moment Hitler invaded the USSR. Suddenly,like Magic,Nazism became evil to the 'murikan left fellow travelers,and since they could no longer associate Nazism as a positive political movement and ally to Communism,Nazism instantly became evil.

So,the communists started calling traditional Americans "Nazi's" to make them look evil in the eyes of the common people in order to help the Communist program to infiltrate American politics and daily life with Communist moles.

The prime difference between Nazism and Communism was that the Nazi's were happy to allow businessmen the freedom to build up businesses,as long as they cut the Nazi Party in on the profits.

They were also happy to close down any business that was failing,and turn it over to a relative or other party member to run.

The Communists were and are insanely jealous of anyone who has anything they don't,so they started working from Day One to destroy any successful business. Everyone would be equal in poverty. Except for the Commisars,of course. They were the ones that really "owned" the USSR. Unless of course one of them pissed off someone in the Politburo. That was a one-way ticket to eventual death at a labor camp,or quick death from a pistol shot to the head.

What it boils down to at the base is both were police states,and America was free. Americans even had the right to fail and just start over again.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 07, 2020, 11:35:27 pm
No,  he hit it out of the park.   Indiscrimate labelling of conventional liberalism as communism or socialism makes it impossible to tell the real thing when it comes along.

@Jazzhead

Buy ya books and send ya to school,and you still don't learn how to think.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Texas Yellow Rose on December 07, 2020, 11:37:37 pm
@sneakypete   
 888high58888
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 11:55:03 pm
If Barr was worth a crap as DOJ, he would have been on this election fraud like white on rice November 4.   But noooooo......

So anyone that says or thinks Barr is all that is either lying or a moron.    :whistle:

Or maybe the fraud meme is well,  fraud.   The difference between the candidates was 7 million votes.   And that doesn't include the Free Americans who voted for Jorgensen.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 07, 2020, 11:55:06 pm
I hope you are sitting down when you read this Bubba,but Nazism is a form of Communism. In FACT,the USSR and Nazi Germany were allies right up to the moment Hitler invaded the USSR. Suddenly,like Magic,Nazism became even to the 'murikan left fellow travelers,and since they could no longer associate Nazism as a positive political movement and ally to Communism,Nazism instantly became evil.

So,the communists started calling traditional Americans "Nazi's" to make them look evil in the eyes of the common people in order to help the Communist program to infiltrate American politics and daily life with Communist moles.

The prime difference between Nazism and Communism was that the Nazi's were happy to allow businessmen the freedom to build up businesses,as long as they cut the Nazi Party in on the profits.

They were also happy to close down any business that was failing,and turn it over to a relative or other party member to run.

The Communists were and are insanely jealous of anyone who has anything they don't,so they started working from Day One to destroy any successful business. Everyone would be equal in poverty. Except for the Commisars,of course. They were the ones that really "owned" the USSR. Unless of course one of them pissed off someone in the Politburo. That was a one-way ticket to eventual death at a labor camp,or quick death from a pistol shot to the head.

What it boils down to at the base is both were police states,and America was free. Americans even had the right to fail and just start over again.

Wow.  Nazism was a form of communism?  The nazi ideology, explicitly anti Marxist, strongly against labor unions and pro large (nazi supporting) corporations.  Nazism, in which there was certainly no ideals or platitudes of a classless society.  Nazism a form of Communism....

Who tells you this stuff?  The best I can see you arguing was that communism in the 30s wasn't really communism. They were totalitarian with massive state influence is as far as ill spot you.  But in any case, just as you call democrats communists, it's just as stupid to call Republicans nazis.  My original point and I stand by it.

I'm shocked you didn't bring up the "Nationalsozialistische" in name as an argument it was socialist.  Kudos!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 07, 2020, 11:58:19 pm
@Jazzhead

Buy ya books and send ya to school,and you still don't learn how to think.

The difference between you and me isn't book learnin',  just cynicism. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 07, 2020, 11:59:38 pm
@Jazzhead

Buy ya books and send ya to school,and you still don't learn how to think.

Too many people are educated beyond the grasp of their intelligence.  Sad, really.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 07, 2020, 11:59:57 pm
(http://factmyth.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/comparing-fascism-and-communism.jpg)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 08, 2020, 12:00:45 am
Or maybe the fraud meme is well,  fraud.   The difference between the candidates was 7 million votes.   And that doesn't include the Free Americans who voted for Jorgensen.

I realize that you're fully invested in the BS that the election fraud didn't happen.   However....

it did happen.   And there is ample proof, video, sworn eye witness testimony, etc., that it happened.   As butthole Biden would say.... you might want to gird your loins for your impending disappointment.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 08, 2020, 12:06:50 am
Why?

You loaded one up there.

Can you say Cheater?

He didn't need to.  Folks are sick of Trump.  And now we're stuck with the consequences. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: libertybele on December 08, 2020, 12:09:42 am
He didn't need to.  Folks are sick of Trump.  And now we're stuck with the consequences.

Really?  What a crock of crappola.  We're stuck with the consequences because of the leftist/globalist corruption and fraud.  What part of that don't you comprehend?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 08, 2020, 12:10:07 am
I realize that you're fully invested in the BS that the election fraud didn't happen.   However....

it did happen.   And there is ample proof, video, sworn eye witness testimony, etc., that it happened.   As butthole Biden would say.... you might want to gird your loins for your impending disappointment.

The Dems are dishonest arseholes.   But this isn't about them.  The people rendered their verdict.  And it was overwhelming and definitive.   This wasn't a rejection of Republicans, or conservatives.   It was a rejection of a man-child who refused to grow up. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 08, 2020, 12:11:37 am
I realize that you're fully invested in the BS that the election fraud didn't happen.   However....

it did happen.   And there is ample proof, video, sworn eye witness testimony, etc., that it happened.   As butthole Biden would say.... you might want to gird your loins for your impending disappointment.

Somebody has yet to deny he was at the counting center, hip-deep in the fraud.  That's a vested interest in perpetuating the narrative.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 08, 2020, 12:19:33 am
The Dems are dishonest arseholes.   But this isn't about them.  The people rendered their verdict.  And it was overwhelming and definitive.   This wasn't a rejection of Republicans, or conservatives.   It was a rejection of a man-child who refused to grow up.

There was no rejection of Trump except by the ahole leftists, rats and morons.

Had there been, there would have been NO NEED for the lying, cheating DemocRats to indulge in a massive election fraud campaign.   Trump was clearly ahead on election night, which put the rats in a panic.... hence the magical moment all five states stopped counting the ballots.   They got the call, text or message somehow to start the fraud.  I just want to know who gave them that message.


Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 08, 2020, 12:22:23 am
Somebody has yet to deny he was at the counting center, hip-deep in the fraud.  That's a vested interest in perpetuating the narrative.

Yea, he's probably covering his own rear end by denying it.   Won't help him in the end (pardon pun...lol).

Here's another eye witness account....

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/10/i-was-in-philadelphia-watching-fraud-happen-heres-how-it-went-down/
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 08, 2020, 12:42:44 am
The Dems are dishonest arseholes.   But this isn't about them.  The people rendered their verdict.  And it was overwhelming and definitive.   This wasn't a rejection of Republicans, or conservatives.   It was a rejection of a man-child who refused to grow up.

Yet the Democrats still felt the need to count ballots behind closed doors out of sight of election monitors in violation of Commonwealth law.  And then there's the matter of 700,000 more mail-in ballots received than were requested - also a violation of Commonwealth law.  And then there was that single massive batch containing a whopping 574,000 ballots with 99.4% of them going to Biden, even though there isn't a single county in the entire Commonwealth that could receive a total this large, much less a single batch.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 08, 2020, 12:56:38 am
Wow.  Nazism was a form of communism?  The nazi ideology, explicitly anti Marxist, strongly against labor unions and pro large (nazi supporting) corporations.  Nazism, in which there was certainly no ideals or platitudes of a classless society.  Nazism a form of Communism....

Who tells you this stuff? 

@Knox27

History and common sense. They are both police states that are ruled.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 08, 2020, 12:59:51 am
Too many people are educated beyond the grasp of their intelligence.   

@Cyber Liberty

I agree,but state it differently. I state it as "Too many people are educated beyond their ability to comprehend."

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 08, 2020, 01:02:43 am
@Cyber Liberty

I agree,but state it differently. I state it as "Too many people are educated beyond their ability to comprehend."

That works, because it's true.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 08, 2020, 01:34:01 am
He didn't need to.  Folks are sick of Trump.  And now we're stuck with the consequences.

What facts do you have to back that up?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: FeelNoPain on December 08, 2020, 01:40:36 am
He didn't need to.  Folks are sick of Trump.  And now we're stuck with the consequences.

It is so fascinating that so many folks won't accept this as a possibility. Doesn't it take a high level of arrogance to presume that just because they are "This is fine" with Trumps' daily wiping of his ass with decency and conventionality, others must be okay with it, too?

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 08, 2020, 01:41:12 am
I hope you are sitting down when you read this Bubba,but Nazism is a form of Communism. In FACT,the USSR and Nazi Germany were allies right up to the moment Hitler invaded the USSR. Suddenly,like Magic,Nazism became evil to the 'murikan left fellow travelers,and since they could no longer associate Nazism as a positive political movement and ally to Communism,Nazism instantly became evil.

So,the communists started calling traditional Americans "Nazi's" to make them look evil in the eyes of the common people in order to help the Communist program to infiltrate American politics and daily life with Communist moles.

The prime difference between Nazism and Communism was that the Nazi's were happy to allow businessmen the freedom to build up businesses,as long as they cut the Nazi Party in on the profits.

They were also happy to close down any business that was failing,and turn it over to a relative or other party member to run.

The Communists were and are insanely jealous of anyone who has anything they don't,so they started working from Day One to destroy any successful business. Everyone would be equal in poverty. Except for the Commisars,of course. They were the ones that really "owned" the USSR. Unless of course one of them pissed off someone in the Politburo. That was a one-way ticket to eventual death at a labor camp,or quick death from a pistol shot to the head.

What it boils down to at the base is both were police states,and America was free. Americans even had the right to fail and just start over again.

Sorry, @sneakypete

Adolph absolutely hated the Communists with the heat of a thousand suns.

Only God stopped Hitler's  eastward march.  With snow.  They sprinted into Russia outrunning their refueling capabilities and sunk themselves.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 08, 2020, 01:45:20 am
Sorry, @sneakypete

Adolph absolutely hated the Communists with the heat of a thousand suns.

Only as political competitors.  Other than the pretense of private property ownership and limited meritocracy, there wasn't  much difference between the two.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 08, 2020, 01:49:42 am
Sorry, @sneakypete

Quote
Adolph absolutely hated the Communists with the heat of a thousand suns.

@DCPatriot

What the HELL does that have to do with anything?
 
Nazism is nothing more than Communism that has evolved to the next step.

What we are experiencing today is the 3rd step in that evolution,with George Soros as the public face because the international banking families behind all this learned centuries ago to use proxies to do all the fighting and risk taking.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 08, 2020, 01:58:09 am
@DCPatriot

What the HELL does that have to do with anything?
 
Nazism is nothing more than Communism that has evolved to the next step.

What we are experiencing today is the 3rd step in that evolution,with George Soros as the public face because the international banking families behind all this learned centuries ago to use proxies to do all the fighting and risk taking.

???

Communist are only 2nd cousins to Socialists.

Hitler wasn't interested to providing free lunch to the citizenry for their votes.  He was a staunch Nationalist who believed in Aryan superiority.

Thus, the American Left's penchant to lie in the desire to compare Pres. Trump's MAGA to Germany's Nationalists.

Not the same Church...or pew.  Not even the same league, nor sport.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Knox27 on December 08, 2020, 02:04:04 am
What facts do you have to back that up?

80 million people voted for Joe biden because they loved Joe biden?

No, everyone hated trump.  And not just them, seems like everyone who is around eventually sees the light and admits what he really is.  Lawyer, sister, niece, secretary of state, national security advisor, fbi director, deputy director, communication director...
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on December 08, 2020, 02:47:33 am
80 million people voted for Joe biden because they loved Joe biden?

No, everyone hated trump.  And not just them, seems like everyone who is around eventually sees the light and admits what he really is.  Lawyer, sister, niece, secretary of state, national security advisor, fbi director, deputy director, communication director...
You cannot even lie well, you know.

Better seek another profession like lawyering as it suits you.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 08, 2020, 03:50:22 am
Trump could have saved his movement if he wanted to.   He chose to throw it all away.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 08, 2020, 03:57:36 am
The Dems are dishonest arseholes.   But this isn't about them.  The people rendered their verdict.  And it was overwhelming and definitive.   This wasn't a rejection of Republicans, or conservatives.   It was a rejection of a man-child who refused to grow up.
We don't know what verdict the people rendered. The voting is compromised by the cheating, vote flipping, ballot box stuffing and other crap the Democrats have pulled. The People have not been heard over that noise, and the babblings of the MSM are meaningless partisan tripe.


If you were in any way a Conservative, you would be for fair and untainted elections.
If you are, well this wasn't one, and perhaps the most tainted national election, ever, here. 

This is a shining example of vote fraud, the pride of banana republics everywhere, but hardly in America, unless you are a Communist trying to overthrow our Republic.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 08, 2020, 04:20:45 am
80 million people voted for Joe biden because they loved Joe biden?

No, everyone hated trump.  And not just them, seems like everyone who is around eventually sees the light and admits what he really is.  Lawyer, sister, niece, secretary of state, national security advisor, fbi director, deputy director, communication director...
We didn't hire him to be nice. We hired him to do a job. The FBI director was in on the Russia prosecution (persecution), a strictly partisan resistance to a duly elected President. It turns out many others entrenched in the Washington bureaucracies were using their positions to oppose the will of the people also.

In the grand calculus of things, I deeply suspect the last election was heavily subject to the ministrations of the same sort of fraud, only without the added smokescreen of millions of mail in ballots which were not apparently as well screened, if at all, as they should have been, at least in the precincts where observers were denied the ability to observe. That accounts for the shock and disbelief among those who did vote for Clinton, who had all been told she had it. They underestimated the support for Trump, especially in key areas.
While determined to repeat the failures of history in re: Socialism, the Democrats learn from their personal failures. Hence the year long campaign to keep the virus in the forefront and the level of panic high to justify all sorts of behaviour which would never have been tolerated in a normal election. From imposing "social distancing" (If masks and partitions work, why six feet? why 30? why more?) No one could rig a camera and monitor so the observers could see what is being done? to mail in voting, no-excuse absentee ballots, ballots summarily mailed out to people on outdated voter rolls, and outright stuffing the box during claimed shutdowns, every possible means of fraudulent voting was apparently applied, right down to weighting the votes using the software in tabulation devices.

We know a minimum number of people who voted for Trump. We do not know how many more had their votes denigrated to a fraction by tabulation equipment, how many ballots from heavily pro Trump precincts were simply discarded, or who had their votes flipped by software.

We definitely do not know how many voted for Biden, legally, actually, voted within the constraints of the law, and how many of the totals we have been given were actually dead, nonexistent, moved outside the jurisdiction, or were "harvested" illegally. Some of those votes may be simple artifacts of fraud, and not connected to any person at all. Especially suspect are the pristine ballots described, mailed in without so much a a crease, and those only voting for the top of the ticket, but not for anyone in any of the other races. Even a president requires the support of a like minded Congress to move their agenda forward. 

So you can come up with all sorts of explanations why you think Trump might have not had as many votes as Biden is claimed to have, but I think you are looking at the wrong part of the equation. I know in this area, out in flyover country, Trump garnered 82% of the vote for POTUS in this county, but we aren't typical.

We inherently understand the impact that banning hydraulic fracturing will have on the oil industry, the price of fuel, heating costs, and even electricity because we produce oil and gas here. We know where food comes from, after all we grow it. And we know no windmills will put crops in the ground, nor heat the country.

So while it is remotely possible that the sanctimonious bicoastals, high from huffing unicorn farts, did cast that many ballots for Biden without realizing they were only ensuring their own misery, I have serious and reasonable doubts that that is the case.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 08, 2020, 04:30:20 am
We don't know what verdict the people rendered. The voting is compromised by the cheating, vote flipping, ballot box stuffing and other crap the Democrats have pulled. The People have not been heard over that noise, and the babblings of the MSM are meaningless partisan tripe.


If you were in any way a Conservative, you would be for fair and untainted elections.
If you are, well this wasn't one, and perhaps the most tainted national election, ever, here. 

This is a shining example of vote fraud, the pride of banana republics everywhere, but hardly in America, unless you are a Communist trying to overthrow our Republic.

We observe different worlds.   You see fraud on the scale of a banana republic,  I see amazing GOP gains in the face of the fiercest Dem opposition, and the most one-sided media coverage,  of any election in my very long lifetime.   I see GOP legislatures cementing their positions ahead of a critical census.   I see an election with Republicans defending twice as many Senate seats as Dems, and quite possibly retaining control.    I see GOP gains of a dozen or so seats in the House when absolutely no poll predicted such a thing.   

Here's what I've never seen -  one party turning aside an incumbent in the White House, but utterly failing to achieve its other objectives.   This was, in short, an anomalous election.   A center-right majority was sick and tired of the chaos.   This was no triumph for socialism, it was a triumph of ordinary people rising up to demand a little common decency from its leaders.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 08, 2020, 04:46:55 am
We didn't hire him to be nice. We hired him to do a job. The FBI director was in on the Russia prosecution (persecution), a strictly partisan resistance to a duly elected President. It turns out many others entrenched in the Washington bureaucracies were using their positions to oppose the will of the people also.

In the grand calculus of things, I deeply suspect the last election was heavily subject to the ministrations of the same sort of fraud, only without the added smokescreen of millions of mail in ballots which were not apparently as well screened, if at all, as they should have been, at least in the precincts where observers were denied the ability to observe. That accounts for the shock and disbelief among those who did vote for Clinton, who had all been told she had it. They underestimated the support for Trump, especially in key areas.
While determined to repeat the failures of history in re: Socialism, the Democrats learn from their personal failures. Hence the year long campaign to keep the virus in the forefront and the level of panic high to justify all sorts of behaviour which would never have been tolerated in a normal election. From imposing "social distancing" (If masks and partitions work, why six feet? why 30? why more?) No one could rig a camera and monitor so the observers could see what is being done? to mail in voting, no-excuse absentee ballots, ballots summarily mailed out to people on outdated voter rolls, and outright stuffing the box during claimed shutdowns, every possible means of fraudulent voting was apparently applied, right down to weighting the votes using the software in tabulation devices.

We know a minimum number of people who voted for Trump. We do not know how many more had their votes denigrated to a fraction by tabulation equipment, how many ballots from heavily pro Trump precincts were simply discarded, or who had their votes flipped by software.

We definitely do not know how many voted for Biden, legally, actually, voted within the constraints of the law, and how many of the totals we have been given were actually dead, nonexistent, moved outside the jurisdiction, or were "harvested" illegally. Some of those votes may be simple artifacts of fraud, and not connected to any person at all. Especially suspect are the pristine ballots described, mailed in without so much a a crease, and those only voting for the top of the ticket, but not for anyone in any of the other races. Even a president requires the support of a like minded Congress to move their agenda forward. 

So you can come up with all sorts of explanations why you think Trump might have not had as many votes as Biden is claimed to have, but I think you are looking at the wrong part of the equation. I know in this area, out in flyover country, Trump garnered 82% of the vote for POTUS in this county, but we aren't typical.

We inherently understand the impact that banning hydraulic fracturing will have on the oil industry, the price of fuel, heating costs, and even electricity because we produce oil and gas here. We know where food comes from, after all we grow it. And we know no windmills will put crops in the ground, nor heat the country.

So while it is remotely possible that the sanctimonious bicoastals, high from huffing unicorn farts, did cast that many ballots for Biden without realizing they were only ensuring their own misery, I have serious and reasonable doubts that that is the case.

There's no question the prosperity of the pre-pandemic Trump years won't be replicated anytime soon.  I think many of us, certainly me,  recognize the terrible bargain we've been presented.   We will regret a lot of things once Trump is gone.  But he had to be gone.   The ties that bind have been ripped,  replaced by the sorry symbiosis of Dems and Trump all daring the citizenry to reduce this election to a referendum on a man and his madness.

And the citizenry obliged.   Accept their verdict, and the sooner the pounding agony of the hangover will end. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 08, 2020, 04:49:03 am
 

 This was no triumph for socialism, it was a triumph of ordinary people rising up to demand a little common decency.

Your silly little lemon aid from lemons POV doesn't mean jack shit if we lose the senate.  A Biden presidency, Peolosi running the house,  Schumer the senate, and AOC running the climate change policy?  Tell me again about that great trimuph for ordinary people and common decency?

Your delusion is breath taking.

Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Hoodat on December 08, 2020, 04:53:04 am
Here's what I've never seen -  one party turning aside an incumbent in the White House, but utterly failing to achieve its other objectives.   This was, in short, an anomalous election.

It is a hallmark of massive election fraud.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 08, 2020, 04:54:51 am
Trump could have saved his movement if he wanted to.   He chose to throw it all away.

Watch how quickly 74 million Americans follow him to a new political party, whether in 2021 or 2025. 

You'll be left spewing your confused hate at tumbleweeds.  And this pleases me.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 08, 2020, 04:56:32 am
You silly little lemon aid from lemons POV doesn't mean jack shit if we lose the senate.  A Biden presidency, Peolosi running the house,  Schumer the senate, and AOC running the climate change policy?  Tell me again about that great trimuph for ordinary people and common decency?

Your delusion is breath taking.

We absolutely must retain the Senate.  To the extent Trump's and the Trumpsters' hissy fit creates a distraction from that objective,  history will judge us harshly.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 08, 2020, 04:59:01 am
And this pleases me.

I am puzzled why you care.   Focus your anger where it belongs - on Democrats.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 08, 2020, 05:31:34 am
We absolutely must retain the Senate.  To the extent Trump's and the Trumpsters' hissy fit creates a distraction from that objective,  history will judge us harshly.

Pay attention, this is important.  The President answered Senators Kelly's and Dave's clarion calls to hold a rally for their victory.  The President and First Lady took Georgia by storm on Saturday and implored Georgians, with true Trump style and enthusiasm, to vote for both of them --- even using the TrumpTron to show the extremism of both democrat candidates.

The President called both Republican candidates to the stage and handed each one the microphone.  And, here's the important part--- the crowd chased them off the stage with the spontaneous and raucous chant "Fight for Trump!  Fight for Trump!"  Notice they didn't yell, "Win for Trump" ... but fight for Trump.

So here's who history will judge harshly:  Your boy, the corrupt Governor of Georgia, Brian Kemp.  I know you fancy yourself more clever than the average Georgian, but you're just more delusional.  You can't tell Georgians we won't fight for your vote, you can't tell them their voice doesn't matter, and then turn around and demand they vote in the same election protocols that facilitated the electoral steal of the state from their candidate of choice, the President of the United States.   Rational people don't like this.

So if you want to win in Georgia, you best be grabbing your establishment boys and demand they push Kemp to call a special session of Congress and his SOS to authorize a complete audit of signatures to ballots and envelopes ...or Georgia is very likely where your political party dies.

The choice is yours.

Video: https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBugle/status/1335396980806148100

Can you hear them now: Video: https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1335424270973820931
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 08, 2020, 05:37:34 am
I am puzzled why you care.   Focus your anger where it belongs - on Democrats.

If you won't fight for the President and the sanctity of my vote, you are worse than any Democrat. 



Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 08, 2020, 06:58:27 am
There's no question the prosperity of the pre-pandemic Trump years won't be replicated anytime soon.  I think many of us, certainly me,  recognize the terrible bargain we've been presented.   We will regret a lot of things once Trump is gone.  But he had to be gone.   The ties that bind have been ripped,  replaced by the sorry symbiosis of Dems and Trump all daring the citizenry to reduce this election to a referendum on a man and his madness.

And the citizenry obliged.   Accept their verdict, and the sooner the pounding agony of the hangover will end.
This is no bargain, and I do not consent. At a minimum, 70 million (and I'd wager far more) Americans voted AGAINST that doddering crook Biden, and the socialist bitch slavering to take his place, which is the real end game.

Bargain, my ass. I do not consent.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 08, 2020, 08:34:54 am
You silly little lemon aid from lemons POV doesn't mean jack shit if we lose the senate.  A Biden presidency, Peolosi running the house,  Schumer the senate, and AOC running the climate change policy?  Tell me again about that great trimuph for ordinary people and common decency?

Your delusion is breath taking.

@catfish1957

Yep!  Talk about "delusion". 

As evidenced by the huge number of BIDEN/HARRIS lawn signs in Chevy Chase, Bethesda and Potomac, Maryland ---some of the wealthiest zip codes in the nation, to me COVID-19 should be a helluva lot LESS frightening.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: AL on December 08, 2020, 10:39:14 am
Barr: No evidence of crime.

We the people: No evidence of a Department of Justice.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 08, 2020, 11:23:57 am
???

Communist are only 2nd cousins to Socialists.

Hitler wasn't interested to providing free lunch to the citizenry for their votes.  He was a staunch Nationalist who believed in Aryan superiority.

Thus, the American Left's penchant to lie in the desire to compare Pres. Trump's MAGA to Germany's Nationalists.

Not the same Church...or pew.  Not even the same league, nor sport.

@DCPatriot

What does his racism has to do with anything? It was just a tool he used to fire up his followers.

The "game" is all about world domination by dictatorship,regardless of what label you put on it or how you dress it up to fit the circumstances.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 08, 2020, 11:24:32 am
Trump could have saved his movement if he wanted to.   He chose to throw it all away.

Quitting...as you have suggested he do for about a year now...doesn’t save anything. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 08, 2020, 11:24:55 am
We absolutely must retain the Senate.  To the extent Trump's and the Trumpsters' hissy fit creates a distraction from that objective,  history will judge us harshly.

Doesn't look like we're retaining the Senate, because of the Jazz-approved cheating.  Good work, Comrade!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 08, 2020, 11:27:45 am
80 million people voted for Joe biden because they loved Joe biden?

No, everyone hated trump.  And not just them, seems like everyone who is around eventually sees the light and admits what he really is.  Lawyer, sister, niece, secretary of state, national security advisor, fbi director, deputy director, communication director...

If you think 80 million votes actually went to someone who entered the primaries several months late...couldn’t remember whether he was running for the Senate or the Presidency and couldn’t remember if he was at the top of the ticket or not...you’re more delusional that anyone here previously thought. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 08, 2020, 11:28:29 am
Doesn't look like we're retaining the Senate, because of the Jazz-approved cheating.  Good work, Comrade!

I’m sure he’s heartbroken.   
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 08, 2020, 11:30:33 am
Watch how quickly 74 million Americans follow him to a new political party, whether in 2021 or 2025. 

You'll be left spewing your confused hate at tumbleweeds.  And this pleases me.

@Right_in_Virginia

The coming death of the alleged Republican Party is the only semi-positive thing to come out of this. I can't wait to see how these selfish,self-centered SOB's react to how they are treated by the career Dims when they are forced to run as Dims in order to stay in office.

We,the people,MUST make sure these traitors are NOT allowed to apologize and join the new conservative party that emerges to replace the Republican's.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 08, 2020, 11:32:10 am
I’m sure he’s heartbroken.

His hard work at the Philly Tabulating Center paid off.  And who says midnight counting is a waste of time?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 08, 2020, 11:33:04 am
His hard work at the Philly Tabulating Center paid off.  And who says midnight counting is a waste of time?

Especially when there’s no one watching you and keeping you honest. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 08, 2020, 12:28:31 pm
Quitting...as you have suggested he do for about a year now...doesn’t save anything.

Only the Republic.  This tit for tat where the losing side won't respect the peoples'  verdict is corrosive and ultimately destructive.    There was a hand recount in Georgia that revealed no evidence of substantial corruption,  yet Trump persists at ripping off scabs.  Are you really calling on 73 million to wage war on 80 million?   Have you lost your mind?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Jazzhead on December 08, 2020, 12:32:54 pm
@Right_in_Virginia

The coming death of the alleged Republican Party is the only semi-positive thing to come out of this. I can't wait to see how these selfish,self-centered SOB's react to how they are treated by the career Dims when they are forced to run as Dims in order to stay in office.

We,the people,MUST make sure these traitors are NOT allowed to apologize and join the new conservative party that emerges to replace the Republican's.

The GOP was successful this year up and down the ballot,  defying all the polls.   The only one who lost was the one who threw it away,  and now seeks in a fit of unholy anger to stoke the whirlwind. 
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 08, 2020, 12:59:29 pm
The GOP was successful this year up and down the ballot,  defying all the polls.   The only one who lost was the one who threw it away,  and now seeks in a fit of unholy anger to stoke the whirlwind.

The successful GOP down ticket results indicate how strong and wide the President's coattails were.  His 74+ million voters knew the mission was two-fold:  Reelect the President and as the President made clear in dozens of rallies throw the Congressional Democrats out of office wherever you had the chance.

BTW, still waiting for you to explain how and what the President "threw away" .... and how he garnered at least 11 million more votes in 2020 than in 2016.





Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 08, 2020, 01:04:02 pm
@Right_in_Virginia

The coming death of the alleged Republican Party is the only semi-positive thing to come out of this. I can't wait to see how these selfish,self-centered SOB's react to how they are treated by the career Dims when they are forced to run as Dims in order to stay in office.

We,the people,MUST make sure these traitors are NOT allowed to apologize and join the new conservative party that emerges to replace the Republican's.

Can I put a couple here on the watch list?  happy77  @sneakypete
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 08, 2020, 02:17:12 pm
The GOP was successful this year up and down the ballot,  defying all the polls.   The only one who lost was the one who threw it away,  and now seeks in a fit of unholy anger to stoke the whirlwind.

The whirlwind is preferable to what allies like you want for us.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Bigun on December 08, 2020, 02:17:38 pm
Only the Republic.  This tit for tat where the losing side won't respect the peoples'  verdict is corrosive and ultimately destructive.    There was a hand recount in Georgia that revealed no evidence of substantial corruption,  yet Trump persists at ripping off scabs.  Are you really calling on 73 million to wage war on 80 million?   Have you lost your mind?

They re-ran the same corrupted ballots through the same corrupted machines and came up with the same corrupted totals! BIG whoop!  Where was the signature matching that is required by law?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 08, 2020, 02:19:17 pm
Only the Republic.

Stop the histrionics.  The downturn of the Republic started long before Trump.  And it was aided and abetted the entire way by the squish "moderate" Republicans you think we need in place to save the Republic.

The ones you support will only speed up the decline.  Same for the Liberal policies you support.
 

Quote
This tit for tat where the losing side won't respect the peoples'  verdict is corrosive and ultimately destructive.
 

Sorry...I guess I missed your objections to people not respecting the outcome of a vote back in 2000...or 2016 or any other time Pelosi and her cadre of Communists want to talk about the illegitimacy of any given election that didn't go their way. 



Quote
There was a hand recount in Georgia that revealed no evidence of substantial corruption,  yet Trump persists at ripping off scabs.


Hand recounting the same votes without an audit or verification of signatures is meaningless.  It's repeating the same fraudulent mistakes that were made the first time.

Quote
Are you really calling on 73 million to wage war on 80 million?   Have you lost your mind?

Again with the Liberal projection tactics.  Creating a hysterical argument when no one has said anything close to what you're accusing.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 08, 2020, 02:21:13 pm
The GOP was successful this year up and down the ballot,  defying all the polls.   The only one who lost was the one who threw it away,  and now seeks in a fit of unholy anger to stoke the whirlwind.

You discredit your own argument and make the argument for a recount in what you just wrote.

There is no way...nor has it ever happened before that either party has picked up down ballot the way the Republicans did this year during a Presidential election cycle only to have the top of the ticket lose the way Trump supposedly did.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: txradioguy on December 08, 2020, 02:23:39 pm
Pay attention, this is important.  The President answered Senators Kelly's and Dave's clarion calls to hold a rally for their victory.  The President and First Lady took Georgia by storm on Saturday and implored Georgians, with true Trump style and enthusiasm, to vote for both of them --- even using the TrumpTron to show the extremism of both democrat candidates.

The President called both Republican candidates to the stage and handed each one the microphone.  And, here's the important part--- the crowd chased them off the stage with the spontaneous and raucous chant "Fight for Trump!  Fight for Trump!"  Notice they didn't yell, "Win for Trump" ... but fight for Trump.

So here's who history will judge harshly:  Your boy, the corrupt Governor of Georgia, Brian Kemp.  I know you fancy yourself more clever than the average Georgian, but you're just more delusional.  You can't tell Georgians we won't fight for your vote, you can't tell them their voice doesn't matter, and then turn around and demand they vote in the same election protocols that facilitated the electoral steal of the state from their candidate of choice, the President of the United States.   Rational people don't like this.

So if you want to win in Georgia, you best be grabbing your establishment boys and demand they push Kemp to call a special session of Congress and his SOS to authorize a complete audit of signatures to ballots and envelopes ...or Georgia is very likely where your political party dies.

The choice is yours.

Video: https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBugle/status/1335396980806148100

Can you hear them now: Video: https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1335424270973820931

@Right_in_Virginia Jazzy doesn't really want the GOP to hold the Senate.  For one if that were true he wouldn't be badmouthing the recount efforts the way he does.

And besides...with a Republican controlled Senate his precious gun grabbing and border opening legislation never gets passed.

So it's not in his best interest for the Republicans to retain the senate.

Jazzy is blowing smoke.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 08, 2020, 02:25:48 pm
@Right_in_Virginia Jazzy doesn't really want the GOP to hold the Senate.  For one if that were true he wouldn't be badmouthing the recount efforts the way he does.

And besides...with a Republican controlled Senate his precious gun grabbing and border opening legislation never gets passed.

So it's not in his best interest for the Republicans to retain the senate.

Jazzy is blowing smoke.

Thanks @txradioguy   You've confirmed my worst suspicions.   :beer:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: DCPatriot on December 08, 2020, 02:26:27 pm
The successful GOP down ticket results indicate how strong and wide the President's coattails were.  His 74+ million voters knew the mission was two-fold:  Reelect the President and as the President made clear in dozens of rallies throw the Congressional Democrats out of office wherever you had the chance.

BTW, still waiting for you to explain how and what the President "threw away" .... and how he garnered at least 11 million more votes in 2020 than in 2016.

@Right_in_Virginia

The steady non-relenting drumbeat of hate toward everything "Trump" for over 4 years essentially hypnotized the common American population.

Not those of us who are politically inclined, but the ones who only pay attention on Election Day. 

STILL, it took blatant cheating.  The Democrat Deep State might disagree with the adage that "Nothing good happens after midnight".

100 MILLION Americans supposedly voted BEFORE Election Day.  Only 130 million TOTAL cast ballots in 2016.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: XenaLee on December 08, 2020, 02:35:01 pm

If you won't fight for the President and the sanctity of my vote, you are worse than any Democrat.

So....we're allowed to call him (and the other few) delusional... and worse than any Democrat.   But....why aren't we allowed to call him what he actually is?   I know it.  You know it.   And he knows it.  His own words label him clearly.

I'll call him (and a few others here) enemies of a free America....complicit with the leftist takeover of America.   I'm not afraid to speak the truth.    :patriot:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 08, 2020, 02:43:52 pm
@Right_in_Virginia

The steady non-relenting drumbeat of hate toward everything "Trump" for over 4 years essentially hypnotized the common American population.

Not those of us who are politically inclined, but the ones who only pay attention on Election Day. 

STILL, it took blatant cheating.  The Democrat Deep State might disagree with the adage that "Nothing good happens after midnight".100 MILLION Americans supposedly voted BEFORE Election Day.  Only 130 million TOTAL cast ballots in 2016.

I think Americans were watching what was happening these four years --- and saw a President absorb body blows day after day after day and STILL work for the American people, keeping his promises.  Another 11+ million Americans decided the President had earned their votes.  This election wasn't about tweets or style, no matter what the haters say ... it was about substance @DCPatriot

We would have been celebrating a landslide victory in the wee hours of Nov 4 had four states not (simultaneously) stopped counting to inject phantom votes for Biden into the vote count as part of the most extraordinary, coordinated and blatant election and voter fraud in US history.

But things just took an interesting turn.  :crossed:   See here: http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,422131.0.html (http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,422131.0.html)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 08, 2020, 02:53:09 pm

But things just took an interesting turn.  :crossed:   See here: http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,422131.0.html (http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,422131.0.html)

Let us hope so.  :patriot:

I see no reason why the Constitution would expect the rest of the united states to absorb the consequences of blatant corruption on the part of less than a handful of unscrupulous cities & state governments, federalism or no.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Bigun on December 08, 2020, 02:56:13 pm
JUSTICE GORSUCH, concurring.

"Government is not free to disregard the First Amendment in times of crisis."

Just so everyone can see it!
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: catfish1957 on December 08, 2020, 03:03:41 pm
I think Americans were watching what was happening these four years --- and saw a President absorb body blows day after day after day and STILL work for the American people, keeping his promises.  Another 11+ million Americans decided the President had earned their votes.  This election wasn't about tweets or style, no matter what the haters say ... it was about substance @DCPatriot

We would have been celebrating a landslide victory in the wee hours of Nov 4 had four states not (simultaneously) stopped counting to inject phantom votes for Biden into the vote count as part of the most extraordinary, coordinated and blatant election and voter fraud in US history.

But things just took an interesting turn.  :crossed:   See here: http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,422131.0.html (http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,422131.0.html)

@Right_in_Virginia

Last night I posted a thread with a poll showing that 83% of the GOP thinks the election is stolen.  This even with 24/7 MSM bombardment that says otherwise. That's a really good sign.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: skeeter on December 08, 2020, 03:06:41 pm
@Right_in_Virginia

Last night I posted a thread with a poll showing that 83% of the GOP thinks the election is stolen.  This even with 24/7 MSM bombardment that says otherwise. That's a really good sign.

As per the last four years, the only people buying the media's bullsh*t are those who want to.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 08, 2020, 07:32:45 pm
The GOP was successful this year up and down the ballot,  defying all the polls.   The only one who lost was the one who threw it away,  and now seeks in a fit of unholy anger to stoke the whirlwind.

@Jazzhead

Did a photo of Trump scare you when you were a child?
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: sneakypete on December 08, 2020, 07:34:28 pm
Can I put a couple here on the watch list?  happy77  @sneakypete

@Right_in_Virginia

You betcha,but you are the one that is going to have to watch them.  I no longer babysit children.
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on December 08, 2020, 07:49:01 pm
@Right_in_Virginia

You betcha,but you are the one that is going to have to watch them.  I no longer babysit children.

Fair enough @sneakypete  I'll keep 'em corralled.  :beer:
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Cyber Liberty on December 08, 2020, 08:22:32 pm
@Jazzhead

Did a photo of Trump scare you when you were a child?

(http://www.label56.com/wp-content/uploads/Muh-Feels.jpg)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: Smokin Joe on December 08, 2020, 09:55:14 pm
80 million people voted for Joe biden because they loved Joe biden?

No, everyone hated trump.  And not just them, seems like everyone who is around eventually sees the light and admits what he really is.  Lawyer, sister, niece, secretary of state, national security advisor, fbi director, deputy director, communication director...
The answer is simple, really. Eighty Million people did not vote for Joe Biden.

Error 404 (Not Found)!!1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA8a2g6tTp0&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR1uWeN6_ssxZsDnnOSkNO4iCwn_vTkh95fR0yP5TJymFEozj3cjTiR3DJ8#)
Title: Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
Post by: christian on December 15, 2020, 12:51:32 am
Trump has lead the nation morally as opposed to democrats lying and deceiving every election with false promises.  Only a ignorant blind stooge or political lockstepper would have to be so blind as to not see it.  The the Cambodian ex-soldier wants to apologize for the thousands/millions he marched out into the fields to hack them to death with machettes, he now wants a clear conscience to the millions he took part in those he took part in viciously slaughtering.  You can't undo the horror of what you have done or willingly took part in.  Not much different with abortion, or now the politics of legitimizing child molestations on a national level.  You are forever branded to be who you are and what you willingly took part in.  Jumping off the cliff, you are forever what you are.  The socialist don't tell you that.  Now you know what you are taking part in, now you know who you really are, facade removed.  It wpn't come off with a brillo pad, its forever.