The only "unabashed hate" around here is coming from the likes of you and other Trump lickspittles who cannot abide contrary opinions. I have praised Trump's policies and his worker- centric vision for the GOP many times on this board. Those policies, and that vision, represent a viable future for our party. It is the man himself and the chaos both he and the Dems feed off of that have alienated the suburbs.
I do not hate Donald Trump. But one term as President is quite enough.
Good impose one term limits on POTUS.
One term of another Obama is not merely enough, it is too much.
As for "contrary opinions" we can repost the argument about whether the world is flat, or the sun is the center of the solar system, but those things have been sorted out in a manner which actually verifies or refutes the hypotheses involved.
The noise to signal ratio in "climate science" is off the charts, imposed by the endless static of 14 year olds testifying as experts and the endless babble of those who depend on taxpayer dollars for grant money.
Similar to the political power exerted by Fauci and the CDC, there is a panic based on models which inevitably predict doom, and which I firmly believe will be eventually exposed as heavily politicized and not science driven. There are people with their livelihoods, power and prestige, and on occasion significant sums of money on the line over their arguments, arguments which ever increasingly malign energy sources and industry which have become nothing if not consistently more environmentally friendly while forming the basis by which we may adapt to any change which may actually occur--change, I might add, which has failed to be as intense or catastrophic as the continuously revised predictions have stated, otherwise the folks at the NYT would take the boat to work, not a taxi or the subway.
Showing steam emitted through smokestacks on a cold day as if it were the soot being belched in the early 20th century is not only deceptive, but a dishonest smear of industry which has never had more clean emissions.
Declaring CO2, a trace gas essential to life, to be a "pollutant" is nonsense. Without that the phytoplankton which feed the world oxygen and form the base of the marine food chain cannot survive.
Just as in elections, when you start messing with data sets, the actual results become obscured. Some tampering leaves a clear trail, derivative data is not so obvious, but in the end, GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) applies, and between the obvious tampering with data ("adjustments").
Oh, to be sure climate changes. It has for the last (roughly) 4.6 Billion years, and from examining core and rock outcrops and drilled samples from just the last 600,000,000 years in North America (and a wee bit of preCambrian material as well back to 2.4 billion years old), the times when any given place on the planet has had a climate favorable to humans have been literally few and far between.
I get it. 4.6 billion years and the Climate just won't stop changing. You just want it to quit.
KInda like industry trying to reach the ever moving goalposts of the ecowhacko movement.
