These judges are outside their authority and jurisdiction, not to mention making rulings that are not based on law or legal principle, just vague proclamations of things like 'irreparable harm'.
It's time for the Admin to ignore them, appeal, and force SCOTUS to rule one way or another.
Executive (Discretionary) Duties (Not Subject to Judicial Interference)These are duties where the President has policy-based discretion, meaning courts cannot order or prohibit the exercise of such functions.
Examples:
Pardon Power
The President has absolute discretion to issue or deny a pardon under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution. Courts cannot force the President to grant a pardon.
Commander-in-Chief Decisions
The President’s military decisions, including troop deployments, orders to engage in combat, or withdrawal from treaties, are discretionary and not subject to judicial review.
Foreign Policy and Treaty Negotiations
The President has discretion over recognizing foreign governments (Zivotofsky v. Kerry), conducting diplomacy, and negotiating treaties. Courts cannot compel the President to engage in or alter diplomatic relations.
Executive Orders and Policy Prioritization
Decisions regarding enforcement priorities, such as prosecutorial discretion in immigration and national security (United States v. Texas)(United States ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy (1950)), are generally beyond judicial interference.Appointments and Removals of Officials
The President has discretion over firing executive officers (Myers v. United States). Courts cannot force the President to retain or remove an official unless removal is statutorily restricted.
Modify message
