Anti-Trump ‘Republican’ Group to Run Pro-Impeachment Ads in Target States

[roamer_1]

With all due respect, hon.....

for someone that keeps saying they have "no dog in this hunt".....

you spend an awful lot of time here bashing Trump.   Odd, that.   

That statement is fact. How is stating a fact 'bashing' clown-boy?

[Axeslinger]

@roamer_1



You are quick to throw out “troll” and “FOS” et al, @DCPatriot
But an honest question:  what do you suppose would happen...and would have already happened...to conservatism if it were not for principled conservatives digging in their heels and holding feet to fire?

Perhaps you and others should consider that as you are so quick to cast people out..merely .for having a more nuanced opinion than your own.

[roamer_1]

Uh... nope.   Comparing the Trump administration to a "Warren administration" is not what I call equal bashing.   Just sayin...

Really? I guess you're right in that... Perhaps the democrats will reign in the RECORD SPENDING by the Tump administration   

[Cyber Liberty]

Until this site becomes another version of Free Republic, then I'll leave.  The owners have assured me that won't happen.  So I'm staying. 

It ain't gonna happen.  Yer stayin' as long as we can keep this thing goin'.

[roamer_1]

You've got tunnel vision on this thread.  I'm talking about the overall bulk of his posting on here.

And in all honesty there's not any daylight between the spending Trump has signed off on and the spending Warren wants to do.  Either way it's increasing the deficit and passing an unsustainable fiscal burden on to our grandkids.

GMTA, brother.   

[roamer_1]

I don't want you to compromise, I was just hoping you might have a coherent argument to support your position. Perhaps some sort of factual or evidentiary basis for your view. Turns out, rather clearly, you don't. Without that, you can't even be a conservative...or a liberal for that matter...because "being" something requires having some kind of intellectual basis. Quite frankly, the absence of anything resembling a defensible viewpoint makes you irrelevant to any serious discussions about Conservatism, politics and anything more complex than a comic book.

Why should anyone care about your opinion when you refuse, or are unable, to make an argument beyond "just cause I say so"...and its hard to imagine why you'd want to engage in discussion on a conservative message board that strives to be about making reasoned arguments FOR conservatism.

Riiight... When you can't beat the argument, beat the speaker.

Thanks for playing.

[Cyber Liberty]

You've got tunnel vision on this thread.  I'm talking about the overall bulk of his posting on here.

And in all honesty there's not any daylight between the spending Trump has signed off on and the spending Warren wants to do.  Either way it's increasing the deficit and passing an unsustainable fiscal burden on to our grandkids.

I'm not sure that's a fair comparison between Trump's and Warren's spending proposals.  I highly doubt she wants to fund the military at the level Trump thinks they should be.  That said, I think neither are the budget Hawks we'd like.

[XenaLee]

You've got tunnel vision on this thread.  I'm talking about the overall bulk of his posting on here.

And in all honesty there's not any daylight between the spending Trump has signed off on and the spending Warren wants to do.  Either way it's increasing the deficit and passing an unsustainable fiscal burden on to our grandkids.

Tunnel vision?   Since when is commenting on someone's bias against Trump IN A THREAD about bias against Trump called tunnel vision?   Don't break anything with that stretch.

[XenaLee]

I'm not sure that's a fair comparison between Trump's and Warren's spending proposals.  I highly doubt she wants to fund the military at the level Trump thinks they should be.  That said, I think neither are the budget Hawks we'd like.

Fair comparison?  About as distant as night vs. day.   Warren's a commie that would have the economy tanked within 6 months (or less).   Trump's economy is booming, despite the spending.  To compare Trump to ANY of the current commie candidates running in the rat party is ludicrous and assinine, IMHO.

[Emjay]

That would be interesting information if you have links.

What is the underlying crime?  And what makes an extremely corrupt country like Ukraine holy?  And, more important, why do they even deserve U.S. aid which, by the way, comes from you if you pay taxes and we all do.

Ukraine had been illegally 'cooperating' with democrats for years.  We all know about Hunter Biden and now we're finding out that Pelosi's son was on the gravy train as well.

It would have been lax of President Trump not to check out a country we were supporting and one that had wasted previous monetary help.  This whole accusation is ridiculous on the face of it.

[roamer_1]

Tunnel vision?   Since when is commenting on someone's bias against Trump IN A THREAD about bias against Trump called tunnel vision?   Don't break anything with that stretch.

Hey. I wasn't even ON this thread till @DCPatriot drug me over here.

[XenaLee]

Really? I guess you're right in that... Perhaps the democrats will reign in the RECORD SPENDING by the Tump administration   

And again (and I don't know how many MORE times I'll have to say this....)

if we don't reign in illegal immigration, rebuild our military and put America first before all the nations that hate our guts (that the idiot left so loves to waste taxpayer money on)....

we won't have a country to worry about spending on, record or otherwise.   

[XenaLee]

Hey. I wasn't even ON this thread till @DCPatriot drug me over here.

Lol!   

[XenaLee]

What is the underlying crime?  And what makes an extremely corrupt country like Ukraine holy?  And, more important, why do they even deserve U.S. aid which, by the way, comes from you if you pay taxes and we all do.

Ukraine had been illegally 'cooperating' with democrats for years.  We all know about Hunter Biden and now we're finding out that Pelosi's son was on the gravy train as well.

It would have been lax of President Trump not to check out a country we were supporting and one that had wasted previous monetary help.  This whole accusation is ridiculous on the face of it.

Well.... I think you and I both know.... that had Trump just handed the cash over without any delay or concern about corruption (which is contractual in that Treaty between the US and Ukraine)...

the rats would have been screeching and impeaching him over that!

Welcome back, btw.   

[roamer_1]

And again (and I don't know how many MORE times I'll have to say this....)

if we don't reign in illegal immigration, rebuild our military and put America first before all the nations that hate our guts (that the idiot left so loves to waste taxpayer money on)....

we won't have a country to worry about spending on, record or otherwise.   

While all are important, NO... You have that exactly backwards. *THE* primary issue is the money. Venezuela on a monumental scale. And reigning in federal spending will largely fix the rest.

[sneakypete]

@Mesaclone

No, in the first place, stop confusing 'conservative' with 'Republican'.

@roamer_1

YOU need to stop thinking that just because that is not a "fit" now,that it can't BECOME a fit in the near future. We MAY be witnessing nothing less than a peaceful political revolution. If it turns out to not be peaceful,it will be because of the left telling their thugs to hit the streets. IF they do this,and I think they will,it will then be time for us to start going after the "anointed" left and their RINO butt-buddies that have always lived in the safety and comfort of position and wealth,and take them down.

In the second place, McConnell placing actual conservatives in ANYTHING is simply laughable.

It's called "selfish self-interest",and it NEVER fails to produce.

I don't see any difference to date, your redirection toward non-provable 'witches' aside.
The witch is always there. And always has been. I will not be distracted by your pointing anymore.

Yeah,causen closing your eyes,putting your fingers in your ears,and shouting "neener,neener,neener" over and over so you can hear any "disparaging words" works so well,right?

I require PERFORMANCE. MERIT.

While doing your damnedest to prevent it from happening.

You remind me of Europe's Jews in the 30's. "So what if other people are suffering? So far "I" am being left alone to live my life! Don't make waves,go unnoticed!"

You should check out how well that plan worked out for them before adopting it for your own,because make no mistake about it,if they left wins this one,you are NOT going to be allowed to live your little "mountain man fantasy life". You WILL end up in a labor camp,or in a module somewhere doing computer stuff for the elites. Providing of course they don't just kill you when they come for you.

[XenaLee]

While all are important, NO... You have that exactly backwards. *THE* primary issue is the money. Venezuela on a monumental scale. And reigning in federal spending will largely fix the rest.

I disagree.   (but you knew that already)

[sneakypete]

@Mesaclone
 

FIFTY YEARS - My whole life, without a single real and lasting win. Put up or shut up.

@roamer_1

So according to YOU,you have been voting wrong for 50 years,and see no reason to change now?

Good plan!

I hope the authorities allow you to report back on how well it works for you if the left wins. I really want to see or hear your "Neener,neener,I told you so!" admission. Not that you will ever admit you or those who agree with you contributed to the Dim victory by refusing to fight it. You won't.

[sneakypete]

Yeah, bullcrap. Heard it all before.
Still liberalism wins.
Not by its merit.
It has no merit.

It wins because it has no opposition.

 

@roamer_1

An odd admission from a fellow-traveler.

[sneakypete]

Try reading what I posted and show me where I blame Trump for Roberts' elevation to SCOTUS.   

What I said is that after being sold a bill of goods with Roberts, I am not about to trust anyone who says Trump's court nominees are conservatives.

 

@Logic just ain't your strong point,is it?

[sneakypete]

@roamer_1  bashes the Progressives more.  Just sayin...

@txradioguy

How does he find the time when he spends most of his day here bashing Trump and Trump supporters?

[sneakypete]

And in all honesty there's not any daylight between the spending Trump has signed off on and the spending Warren wants to do.  Either way it's increasing the deficit and passing an unsustainable fiscal burden on to our grandkids.

@txradioguy

That is only true when the congress,who are the ones that write the spending bills,and the president are of the same party. They write the bills in such a way that a President from any opposition party has no choice but to sign them or shut down spending on programs vital to keep the nation running.

CONGRESS spends the money,not the President.

[roamer_1]

YOU need to stop thinking that just because that is not a "fit" now,that it can't BECOME a fit in the near future. We MAY be witnessing nothing less than a peaceful political revolution. If it turns out to not be peaceful,it will be because of the left telling their thugs to hit the streets. IF they do this,and I think they will,it will then be time for us to start going after the "anointed" left and their RINO butt-buddies that have always lived in the safety and comfort of position and wealth,and take them down.

No @sneakypete , it is going the other way... Toward globalism/liberalism, and Tumpsters ain't helping that one damn little bit.

It's called "selfish self-interest",and it NEVER fails to produce.

In every other instance, McConnell (and his ilk) have done everything they could to crush Conservatism... And you think somehow that is different when it comes to judges?

Yeah,causen closing your eyes,putting your fingers in your ears,and shouting "neener,neener,neener" over and over so you can hear any "disparaging words" works so well,right?

I am doing no such thing.

While doing your damnedest to prevent it from happening.

From the likes of Tump, and this spavined movement? That's a laugh-riot.

You remind me of Europe's Jews in the 30's. "So what if other people are suffering? So far "I" am being left alone to live my life! Don't make waves,go unnoticed!"

You should check out how well that plan worked out for them before adopting it for your own,because make no mistake about it,if they left wins this one,you are NOT going to be allowed to live your little "mountain man fantasy life". You WILL end up in a labor camp,or in a module somewhere doing computer stuff for the elites. Providing of course they don't just kill you when they come for you.

How utterly ridiculous. I am the one refusing EITHER camp. I am the one standing up above the rest yelling my fool ass off. I am the one making waves, and standing for something. And I have ALWAYS done so.
And in that, you might be right... I am a target, no doubt. FROM EITHER SIDE. And don't think for a minute that the 3rd way corporate globalists are any kinder.

No difference to me. Left foot right foot.

[FeelNoPain]

And again (and I don't know how many MORE times I'll have to say this....)

if we don't reign in illegal immigration, rebuild our military and put America first before all the nations that hate our guts (that the idiot left so loves to waste taxpayer money on)....

we won't have a country to worry about spending on, record or otherwise.   

I have always wondered what that means.
Rebuild it from what to what? Cold War levels? Under Obama, we spent higher than Cold War levels.
When will it be rebuilt? What is enough? Who decides? What is the standard used to decide?
 
Or is it just some arbitrary, unquantifiable standard where a politician can say "I rebuilt the military--we're stronger than evah!" and we just applaud like unquestioning mouth breathers (if we like the politician saying it)?

[jafo2010]

The Dems clearly see they have no chance against Trump in an election.  He is simply too smart for them.  Literally.

dfwgator
The Democrats have done to Impeachment, what Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize did,   rendered it meaningless.

Truer words have not been spoken on this thread!

And finally, for those of you that see no difference between Trump and Warren, I suggest you pull your head our of your posterior!

So, as I have repeatedly indicated, it will be TRUMP vs CLINTON

It will never be:

Biden - suffering from low level brain activity, or senility
Warren - pathological or congenital liar of the first order
Buttigieg -  USA electorate are NOT ready to elect an openly gay man POTUS.  Maybe in 40 years.
Sanders - well, the commie might become the nominee if HRC does not pull the trigger, but never POTUS
Bloomberg and Styer - no personality, no issues anyone cares about....Yawn!!!
Klobucher - needs to change her name if she wants to be POTUS
Booker - Spartacus never had a chance, not after the POS Obama
Yang - actually says some things that are intelligent, but he is wasting his time

Again, for you naysayers, it will be

TRUMP vs CLINTON in 2020