Author Topic: Trump Comes to the Rescue of Former GOP Foe Ted Cruz in “Biggest Stadium in Texas”  (Read 12825 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline INVAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,961
  • Gender: Male
  • Dread To Tread
    • Sword At The Ready
After calling Cruz a RINO?  Are you sure?

In truth she (he, we don't know for sure) is actually upset and declaring Cruz a TINO. And not the LA-tino kind either.

Fart for freedom, fart for liberty and fart proudly.  - Benjamin Franklin

...Obsta principiis—Nip the shoots of arbitrary power in the bud, is the only maxim which can ever preserve the liberties of any people. When the people give way, their deceivers, betrayers and destroyers press upon them so fast that there is no resisting afterwards. The nature of the encroachment upon [the] American constitution is such, as to grow every day more and more encroaching. Like a cancer, it eats faster and faster every hour." - John Adams, February 6, 1775

Online DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,576
After calling Cruz a RINO?  Are you sure?

Cruz may well be RINO. After all, what is a Republican these days? It isn't a small government fiscally restrained party anymore. It isn't a family values party anymore. Cruz really doesn't fit into the current Republican party. And neither do I.

Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0
Cruz may well be RINO. After all, what is a Republican these days? It isn't a small government fiscally restrained party anymore. It isn't a family values party anymore. Cruz really doesn't fit into the current Republican party. And neither do I.

@DB Government oversight?  ha.  Restraint on executive power only applies to Obama.  Principles, Ideology, Integrity, Morals, and Standards.  The GOP thinks those are punch lines, you Loser!

Online libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,130
  • Gender: Female
Cruz may well be RINO. After all, what is a Republican these days? It isn't a small government fiscally restrained party anymore. It isn't a family values party anymore. Cruz really doesn't fit into the current Republican party. And neither do I.

Cruz IS a Republican and the majority of those under the GOP umbrella ARE RINO's or GOPe.  There are a select few in both the Senate and the House that are what I would classify as Republicans.
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Offline Applewood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,361
Cruz IS a Republican and the majority of those under the GOP umbrella ARE RINO's or GOPe.  There are a select few in both the Senate and the House that are what I would classify as Republicans.

I usually don't use the term "RINO" because these days, the word "Republican" no longer means what it used to.  Various groups have hijacked the term and redefined it, but as @DB points out, it no longer means small government, moral and family values and such.  I fact, I wonder if it ever did.  Republicans have for years paid lip service to conservative, traditional values and tenets, but most haven't upheld those values and tenets in a long time.  And now when there is a Republican who upholds conservative values, he is usually maligned by the liberals who have taken over the party.  The RINOs -- Republicans In Name Only -- are real Republicans today.

The term I use for those who have stuck to conservative values and ideals is "conservative."  But even the word "conservative" is being hijacked.  I was told that because I don't support Trump, I'm not a conservative.  Well, I hate to say this, but Trump and most of his followers are not necessarily conservative, as that term used to mean.  In fact, I'm not sure what many of them are.  For example, I find that many of them who complain about the things Obama did have no problem with Trump doing the same or similar.  So, for example, racking up massive debt under Obama was liberal/socialist, but Trump adding to the debt is now conservative?  Sorry, I don't buy that.  Such liberal behavior does not become conservative because it's Trump doing it.

Ted Cruz is more conservative than Republican.  I wish people would not use the words "Republican" and "conservative" interchangeably.  They are not one and the same.  I keep hoping today's Republican Party will die on the vine so that a new conservative party will rise in its place.  Right now we have a choice between two liberal parties.  And that is no choice at all.

Online libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,130
  • Gender: Female
I usually don't use the term "RINO" because these days, the word "Republican" no longer means what it used to.  Various groups have hijacked the term and redefined it, but as @DB points out, it no longer means small government, moral and family values and such.  I fact, I wonder if it ever did.  Republicans have for years paid lip service to conservative, traditional values and tenets, but most haven't upheld those values and tenets in a long time.  And now when there is a Republican who upholds conservative values, he is usually maligned by the liberals who have taken over the party.  The RINOs -- Republicans In Name Only -- are real Republicans today.

The term I use for those who have stuck to conservative values and ideals is "conservative."  But even the word "conservative" is being hijacked.  I was told that because I don't support Trump, I'm not a conservative.  Well, I hate to say this, but Trump and most of his followers are not necessarily conservative, as that term used to mean.  In fact, I'm not sure what many of them are.  For example, I find that many of them who complain about the things Obama did have no problem with Trump doing the same or similar.  So, for example, racking up massive debt under Obama was liberal/socialist, but Trump adding to the debt is now conservative?  Sorry, I don't buy that.  Such liberal behavior does not become conservative because it's Trump doing it.

Ted Cruz is more conservative than Republican.  I wish people would not use the words "Republican" and "conservative" interchangeably.  They are not one and the same.  I keep hoping today's Republican Party will die on the vine so that a new conservative party will rise in its place.  Right now we have a choice between two liberal parties.  And that is no choice at all.

I clearly understand where you are coming from.  Cruz is a conservative, a patriot and a constitutionalist.  In current politics he really has only two choices; to run under the DEM umbrella or the GOP umbrella.  It is extremely difficult, and much more costly to run as an Independent and chances of winning due to the electoral process is slim to none.
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Offline Axeslinger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,538

I have educated myself about Ted and family. I guess I need to support him even as RINO, and hope for the best. Truth is insulting?   I don't get some people on here. You all assume, I have not done my research. SMH.

@LegalAmerican we assume that because we’re decent people....we’ve rather hoped that you are completely ignorant rather than mind numbingly stupid or tinfoil hat wearing crazy.

But don’t worry...you’re proving us wrong with every single one of your crackpot posts. 
"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." - Thomas Jefferson

Offline Applewood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,361
@LegalAmerican we assume that because we’re decent people....we’ve rather hoped that you are completely ignorant rather than mind numbingly stupid or tinfoil hat wearing crazy.

But don’t worry...you’re proving us wrong with every single one of your crackpot posts.


I decided to put this L.A. person on my Ignore list so I won't see its drivel. I've asked L.A. where it gets the things it posts, tried to correct the misinformation and have cautioned against using dubious sources, but I've received no reply.  Perhaps I'm on L.A.'s Ignore list already.  I wonder if L.A. posts this nonsense just to get a perverse rise out of us.  Well, I'm not going to oblige this person's perversions.

Online libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,130
  • Gender: Female

I have educated myself about Ted and family. I guess I need to support him even as RINO, and hope for the best. Truth is insulting?   I don't get some people on here. You all assume, I have not done my research. SMH.
 **nononono*   I think, most of you have not.  Canadian born, gave up Candian citizenship. Not American citizen. NO FORM, made out by his parents to prove citizenship. Cant remember the form name.  S 48?  I don't trust Rino's.

Ok @LegalAmerican -

What was Ted Cruz's political position in Texas before he became Senator?

What compelled him to run in politics?

Who did Ted Cruz clerk for?

How and why did he take on Mitch McConnell?

What three very (3) famous cases is he affiliated with?

What trait does he possess that very few people have?

What was the most important key issue for him during the 2016 election?

Who did he 'grill' on global warming?

What subcommittee(s) does he currently serve?


Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Offline Axeslinger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,538

I decided to put this L.A. person on my Ignore list so I won't see its drivel. I've asked L.A. where it gets the things it posts, tried to correct the misinformation and have cautioned against using dubious sources, but I've received no reply.  Perhaps I'm on L.A.'s Ignore list already.  I wonder if L.A. posts this nonsense just to get a perverse rise out of us.  Well, I'm not going to oblige this person's perversions.

I struggle with letting idiocy stand unchallenged...that’s how that nonsense advances.
"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." - Thomas Jefferson

Online Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,661
I clearly understand where you are coming from.  Cruz is a conservative, a patriot and a constitutionalist.  In current politics he really has only two choices; to run under the DEM umbrella or the GOP umbrella.  It is extremely difficult, and much more costly to run as an Independent and chances of winning due to the electoral process is slim to none.

As a conservative does Cruz actually have only two choices? More and more every day the Republican Party is no longer conservative. My Dad was an avid Reagan supporter. I voted for Nixon in my first election and have stayed Republican ever since, though becoming more and more disillusioned as time went on. I stayed Republican because of the slogan of "Limited Government". What a fool I was. During the 2008 election, when the Republican Party took no stand on Obama's unproven qualifications, I halted any and all donations to the RNC. I took those funds and donated to the lawyers who were trying to prove Obama's ineligibility. You must think me a Maroon, but that's what I did. I must be an independent now. I only donate to individual candidates and vote similarly. My 2 sons voted for the independents in the last election. I have been praying for a 3rd party to take off for a long time. I just hate to think I'm throwing my vote away, but there is something to be said about standing by your principles. So I have still been voting Republican and I dream of a Conservative third party.

Online libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,130
  • Gender: Female
Sure Cruz could run as an Independent, but keep in mind that he would have to 'qualify' to be on the ballot; it is more difficult and costly.  As an example, the Constitution Party is a 3rd party, but they were unable to qualify in all states to be on the ballot in 2016.  So what do you think that does to their chances of winning?  Then there is the issue of funding.  How much funding would he lose from larger donors and how many individuals would shy away if he ran 3rd party?

Yes, I would like nothing more than a conservative 3rd party win.  It's highly unlikely unfortunately.  I've stated this before, but it would take an exodus from conservatives like Cruz, Lee, Paul, etc., joining/running 3rd party to possibly make an impact, but their seats would be replaced.

It is very difficult for a 3rd party win because of the way the system is set up.

https://www.forbes.com/2010/05/13/third-parties-fusion-voting-elections-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html#2ef48ed05f7a

Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Sure Cruz could run as an Independent, but keep in mind that he would have to 'qualify' to be on the ballot; it is more difficult and costly.  As an example, the Constitution Party is a 3rd party, but they were unable to qualify in all states to be on the ballot in 2016.  So what do you think that does to their chances of winning?  Then there is the issue of funding.  How much funding would he lose from larger donors and how many individuals would shy away if he ran 3rd party?

Yes, I would like nothing more than a conservative 3rd party win.  It's highly unlikely unfortunately.  I've stated this before, but it would take an exodus from conservatives like Cruz, Lee, Paul, etc., joining/running 3rd party to possibly make an impact, but their seats would be replaced.

It is very difficult for a 3rd party win because of the way the system is set up.


https://www.forbes.com/2010/05/13/third-parties-fusion-voting-elections-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html#2ef48ed05f7a

And, that of course, is on purpose.

Online catfish1957

  • Laken Riley.... Say her Name. And to every past and future democrat voter- Her blood is on your hands too!!!
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,894
  • Gender: Male
Though, I am obvioulsy have not been a fan of DJT, I see nothing but good news in this visit.

DJT sees that Cruz has supported his agenda so far, and i for one can accept this olive branch as a good faith re-start towards amicable relations with the Trump and his supporters.  Hopefully the hatchet has been offically buried.

OTOH...  slanderous blather from a few in particular here towards Senator Cruz will continue to get scorn.  I hope the other Trump supporters here will help reign in this particular idiot in the spirit of a new start.

Thank you President Trump, for helping us dispose of Beto!
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,865
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Though, I am obvioulsy have not been a fan of DJT, I see nothing but good news in this visit.

DJT sees that Cruz has supported his agenda so far, and i for one can accept this olive branch as a good faith re-start towards amicable relations with the Trump and his supporters.  Hopefully the hatchet has been offically buried.

OTOH...  slanderous blather from a few in particular here towards Senator Cruz will continue to get scorn.  I hope the other Trump supporters here will help reign in this particular idiot in the spirit of a new start.

Thank you President Trump, for helping us dispose of Beto!

I'm very glad to see that the President is comming to Texas but Cruz would have won handily without the visit.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Online catfish1957

  • Laken Riley.... Say her Name. And to every past and future democrat voter- Her blood is on your hands too!!!
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,894
  • Gender: Male
I'm very glad to see that the President is comming to Texas but Cruz would have won handily without the visit.

Agree, but  it still won't hurt, and will likely help.  Don't want this thing within the moe come election day.
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Offline Mesaclone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,407
This Trump's not governing as a real Conservative meme is horsepuckey. What IS true is that he's limited by what is possible given a Senate that is 51-49 GOP but which is in truth more 57-43 Left vs Right. Like Reagan, Trump works to "get what can be got" not to tilt at windmills that cannot be vanquished but signify "moral" victories. Below are key governmental cuts/reductions Trump has proposed in his 2019 budget...and yes, they are both significant and in synch with conservative governing philosophy...Reagan-esque. At the very bottom is a list of key agencies which will be facing cuts. Also, not in there but I know this as I actually AM a Federal employee, is a national cut to cost of living raises for next year...while I'd love that money, Trump has made a wise and conservative decision to freeze that raise.

Dedicated anti-tax, shrinking government activists like Grover Norquist say it best:
“This is going very well,” said anti-tax activist Grover Norquist “Slow and steady — for all the bluster, this is how you downsize government without engendering blowback,” Norquist added.


The information below comes from Wapo, so consider the source but do not dismiss the data itself.


Key proposed changes Ag Department

 Reduces funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program by $17.2 billion in 2019 and $213.5 billion over the next 10 years.

 Limits eligibility in the crop insurance program and caps premium subsidies.

 Cuts the $136 million in funding for conservation programs.

 Eliminates the Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant Program.

 Discontinues the $166 million Food for Progress aid program.



Key proposed changes to Commerce

 Saves $300 million by eliminating the Economic Development Administration, which the administration says duplicates programs at the departments of agriculture and transportation.

 Saves $125 million by erasing the federal contribution to the Manufacturing Extension Partnership program, which funds state consulting services for small- and medium-sized companies.



Key proposed changes to Energy Department

 Slashes 66 percent of the budget for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, which studies advanced transportation, wind and solar energy.

 Eliminates the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, a program popular in Congress.

 Cuts the department's loan guarantee programs, although the existing portfolio would be maintained.

 Terminates construction of a mixed-oxide nuclear fuel fabrication facility in South Carolina that has the support of Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.).



Key proposed changes Health and Human Services

 Cuts funding of the subsidies that help more than four in five people with ACA marketplace health plans afford insurance premiums.


Key proposed changes to Department of Housing and Urban Development

 Reduces Section 8 federal housing subsidies

 Eliminates the $1.9 billion fund for public housing capital repairs

 Like last year, zeroes out community development block grants, which play a key role in disaster recovery, as well as grants to states and local governments to increase homeownership for the lowest-income Americans, and funding for neighborhood redevelopment.

 The administration plans to unveil legislation to institute work requirements for Americans receiving housing subsidies, on a broad scale.



Key proposed changes Interior Department

 Slashes $33 million, or 92 percent, of the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which supports land acquisition and restoration efforts using federal revenue from oil and gas drilling off the Outer Continental Shelf.


Key proposed changes to Justice Department

 Eliminates the Community Relations Service, a “peacemaker” office created by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to help ease conflicts and tensions in communities facing conflicts over race, gender, religion and other factors. Duties of the office, which is not an investigative or prosecutorial unit, will be merged with the Civil Rights Division, which does investigate crimes. Jobs will be eliminated when the office is moved.

 The Bureau of Prisons will close two regional offices and close two stand-alone minimum security prison camps for a savings of more than $122 million.




Key proposed changes to Labor Department

 Cut funding for National Dislocated Worker Grants — support for those who lose their jobs in natural disasters or factory closures — from $219.5 million in 2017 to $51 million in 2019.

 Shrink funding for Adult Employment and Training Activities, which serve veterans, Native Americans and young people who have dropped out of high school, by nearly half, from $810 million in 2017 to $490.3 million in 2019.




Key proposed changes to Transportation Department

 Eliminate TIGER grants, a major discretionary program. The competitive grants fund a variety of road, rail and transit efforts.

 â€œWind down” a major source of transit funding, the Capital Investment Grants program, limiting it to those projects that already have funding agreements in place.

 The White House is also re-upping its proposal to shift the nation's air traffic control system out of government hands.




-29% State Department

-25% Environmental Protection Agency

-25% Small Business Administration

-18% Transportation

-15% Agriculture

-15% Interior

-14% Housing and Urban Development

-10% Labor

-5% Education

-3% Treasury

-1% Justice




Yes, someone can go through the budget and find increases in certain areas...mostly centered on Defense and Homeland Security...two areas deeply important to the safety and security of the nation. Anyone calling for cuts in those areas...given the weakened state of our armed forces and the siege under which agencies like ICE and Border Patrol are functioning...is a peawit.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2018, 02:48:03 pm by Mesaclone »
We have the best government that money can buy. Mark Twain

Offline Night Hides Not

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Gender: Male

I decided to put this L.A. person on my Ignore list so I won't see its drivel. I've asked L.A. where it gets the things it posts, tried to correct the misinformation and have cautioned against using dubious sources, but I've received no reply.  Perhaps I'm on L.A.'s Ignore list already.  I wonder if L.A. posts this nonsense just to get a perverse rise out of us.  Well, I'm not going to oblige this person's perversions.

I must be on ignore, too. I've also asked her to correct misinformation, but she avoids those posts like the plague.

As to getting a rise out of us with her posts, I admit it's worked with me on a few occasions, particularly the (paraphrased) "walking into the ovens."
You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.

1 John 3:18: Let us love not in word or speech, but in truth and action.

Offline Mesaclone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,407
I must be on ignore, too. I've also asked her to correct misinformation, but she avoids those posts like the plague.

As to getting a rise out of us with her posts, I admit it's worked with me on a few occasions, particularly the (paraphrased) "walking into the ovens."

In every debate...even on a message board...people from the extremes will show up and post their diatribes. You can set your watch by it on any message board...be the topic sports, politics, religion or tiddly winks. The key feature of such folks is an inability to even perceive the arguments of those with whom they disagree accompanied by an unwillingness to entertain even the remote possibility that their own position should be open to movement when facts and/or argument warrant it.

In my view, L.A. and Invar are simply two sides of that same coin...they are right, and no amount of reason, data, or holy writ will dissuade them from their rigid and absolute positions...they know they are right and everyone who disagrees is an idiot or reprobate not deserving of respect or credulity. They both see it as moral certitude, but what it actually is...in both cases...is moral narcissism (a self contained, pathological certainty of belief in one's own moral, intellectual and philosophical superiority).

In the interests of civil and reasoned debate, its best to ignore such folks. Sadly, I often cannot resist getting drawn in...but nonetheless I think we all should strive to avoid engaging the implacable.

We have a healthy number of NT's and Pro-Trump (and many more who are somewhere in between those polarities) folks who are clever, who present well thought out arguments (Corbe makes me crazy at times but can REALLY make me rethink where I stand at times, for example) and who can actually be persuaded when facts and rationale become convincing. My only advice here is that we all focus less on the unmovable objects...because...well...they are unmovable. 
« Last Edit: September 01, 2018, 03:03:23 pm by Mesaclone »
We have the best government that money can buy. Mark Twain

Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,329
  • Gender: Male
  • "...and the winning number is...not yours!

In my view, L.A. and Invar are simply two sides of that same coin...they are right, and no amount of reason, data, or holy writ will dissuade them from their rigid and absolute positions...they know they are right and everyone who disagrees is an idiot or reprobate not deserving of respect or credulity. They both see it as moral certitude, but what it actually is...in both cases...is moral narcissism (a self contained, pathological certainty of belief in one's own moral, intellectual and philosophical superiority).


Excellent analysis, @Mesaclone

But, in fairness, @LegalAmerican has only been here a month or two. 

We've been putting up with @INVAR 's shit for years.   

She drops in...see's that anything goes here and decides to jump in.

Imagine.   An outspoken MAGA supporter on a Conservative forum...TWO effing years into a magnificent presidency, is viewed as an outlier and reprobate.

Everybody should take their noses off the bark, IMO.
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald

Offline Emjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,687
  • Gender: Female
  • Womp, womp
Though, I am obvioulsy have not been a fan of DJT, I see nothing but good news in this visit.

DJT sees that Cruz has supported his agenda so far, and i for one can accept this olive branch as a good faith re-start towards amicable relations with the Trump and his supporters.  Hopefully the hatchet has been offically buried.

OTOH...  slanderous blather from a few in particular here towards Senator Cruz will continue to get scorn.  I hope the other Trump supporters here will help reign in this particular idiot in the spirit of a new start.

Thank you President Trump, for helping us dispose of Beto!

Good post @catfish1957    The primaries are over.  They were pretty bad but the majority chose Trump.  He's still Trump but I support him because I believe he is trying to do what is best for the country.

Beto would be a disaster.  He's the worst kind of democrat and has a criminal record.

To loose one of the most principled conservatives in the Senate would also be a disaster.

Trump made a good decision here and it's strange and disappointing the some of the most avid Trump supporters still can't bring themselves to say anything positive about Cruz.
Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain.

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
...

We have a healthy number of NT's and Pro-Trump (and many more who are somewhere in between those polarities) folks who are clever, who present well thought out arguments (Corbe makes me crazy at times but can REALLY make me rethink where I stand at times, for example) and who can actually be persuaded when facts and rationale become convincing. My only advice here is that we all focus less on the unmovable objects...because...well...they are unmovable.

Well said, @Mesaclone.

Offline Emjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,687
  • Gender: Female
  • Womp, womp
In every debate...even on a message board...people from the extremes will show up and post their diatribes. You can set your watch by it on any message board...be the topic sports, politics, religion or tiddly winks. The key feature of such folks is an inability to even perceive the arguments of those with whom they disagree accompanied by an unwillingness to entertain even the remote possibility that their own position should be open to movement when facts and/or argument warrant it.

In my view, L.A. and Invar are simply two sides of that same coin...they are right, and no amount of reason, data, or holy writ will dissuade them from their rigid and absolute positions...they know they are right and everyone who disagrees is an idiot or reprobate not deserving of respect or credulity. They both see it as moral certitude, but what it actually is...in both cases...is moral narcissism (a self contained, pathological certainty of belief in one's own moral, intellectual and philosophical superiority).

In the interests of civil and reasoned debate, its best to ignore such folks. Sadly, I often cannot resist getting drawn in...but nonetheless I think we all should strive to avoid engaging the implacable.

We have a healthy number of NT's and Pro-Trump (and many more who are somewhere in between those polarities) folks who are clever, who present well thought out arguments (Corbe makes me crazy at times but can REALLY make me rethink where I stand at times, for example) and who can actually be persuaded when facts and rationale become convincing. My only advice here is that we all focus less on the unmovable objects...because...well...they are unmovable.

That's exactly what I was saying to @corbe yesterday @Mesaclone

Bless his heart, he always defends the worst of the NTers.  I think he can't bring himself to be quite that nasty and one-way, but he likes for someone else to be.

As for @LegalAmerican, I defended her for a couple of days because she is new, but she's completely alienated me now by a few really nasty posts. 

I don't have to put her on ignore but I do ignore her now.
Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain.

Online catfish1957

  • Laken Riley.... Say her Name. And to every past and future democrat voter- Her blood is on your hands too!!!
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,894
  • Gender: Male
Good post @catfish1957    The primaries are over.  They were pretty bad but the majority chose Trump.  He's still Trump but I support him because I believe he is trying to do what is best for the country.

Beto would be a disaster.  He's the worst kind of democrat and has a criminal record.

To loose one of the most principled conservatives in the Senate would also be a disaster.

Trump made a good decision here and it's strange and disappointing the some of the most avid Trump supporters still can't bring themselves to say anything positive about Cruz.

@Emjay

Thank you.

I for one in retrospect can only really dislike one area of Trump governance thus far, and that is signing off on the increase the federal debt.

Otherwise, pretty good so far.

OTOH....

I would really start liking him better, he could somehow reign in some of his counter-productive comments, mostly via Twitter.

The other side has entrenched itself as far to the left as I have seen in our lifetimes.  We got to stick together, depsite our minor disagreements. 
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,151
Agree, but  it still won't hurt, and will likely help.  Don't want this thing within the moe come election day.

I'm just glad to see the President on the same side with Cruz.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-