Not So Honorable: Docs Show Mueller's FBI Denied Justice To Four Innocent Men

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

dailycaller
Howie Carr 6/05/2018

[excerpt]

http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/05/mueller-fbi-wrongful-conviction-case/

As FBI director in 2002, Special Counsel Robert Mueller directed his agents to oppose the pardons of four wrongfully imprisoned men because exculpatory evidence was merely “fodder for cross-examination,” newly revealed FBI documents show.

Four years later, the four men, or their estates, were awarded $102 million by a federal judge in Boston for their wrongful decades-long imprisonment due to FBI misconduct.

Mueller ordered the Boston FBI office to answer a request to him from the Massachusetts Advisory Board of Pardons for an “official version” of the imprisonment of the four men for a gangland murder in Chelsea MA in March 1965.

[Cyber Liberty]

This is impossible. I was told the other day the Judge in the case said Mueller wasn't involved. Innocent man he is!

[Frank Cannon]

Mueller is a corrupt POS.

[WingNot]

What a Slimeball and a POS.

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

This is impossible. I was told the other day the Judge in the case said Mueller wasn't involved. Innocent man he is!

Of course Mueller didn't have anything to do with it.



https://1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf

[Concerned]

This is impossible. I was told the other day the Judge in the case said Mueller wasn't involved. Innocent man he is!

Yup.  And I was told to do a Bing search on Mueller and Whitey Bulger (which I did) and the person who suggested it apparently didn't like what I found.  Here's the article you're referencing:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/18/opinion/robert-mueller-smearing-complicit.html

[Frank Cannon]

Yup.  And I was told to do a Bing search on Mueller and Whitey Bulger (which I did) and the person who suggested it apparently didn't like what I found.  Here's the article you're referencing:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/18/opinion/robert-mueller-smearing-complicit.html

Oh wow. You really found the mother load there. Some effing opinion piece from some old whore Judge that Mueller was bribing.

Nice find.

[WingNot]

Yup.  And I was told to do a Bing search on Mueller and Whitey Bulger (which I did) and the person who suggested it apparently didn't like what I found.  Here's the article you're referencing:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/18/opinion/robert-mueller-smearing-complicit.html

Oh my.  I'm shocked you found a slimes article supporting Herr Mueller.

You are a dumbass

[Concerned]

Oh my.  I'm shocked you found a slimes article supporting Herr Mueller.

You are a dumbass

Fortunately, this thread isn't about me or your personal attacks/name calling about me.  Have a good night @Wingnut 

[Cyber Liberty]

Yup.  And I was told to do a Bing search on Mueller and Whitey Bulger (which I did) and the person who suggested it apparently didn't like what I found.  Here's the article you're referencing:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/18/opinion/robert-mueller-smearing-complicit.html

Hey, Congressman Gohmert is just a lying politician....Mueller is certainly clean.  Must be a Trump conspiracy.

[Frank Cannon]

Fortunately, this thread isn't about me or your personal attacks/name calling about me.  Have a good night @Wingnut 

No, but it is about you trying to sell people that Mueller doesn't have a history of corrupting or botching cases all based on an opinion piece in the NY Slimes.

[Cyber Liberty]

Oh wow. You really found the mother load there. Some effing opinion piece from some old whore Judge that Mueller was bribing.

Nice find.

Now now...we're supposed to take the word of a Judge recalling old events in a NYT article over the recent research of some lying Trump-supporting jackass Congressman.  Where's your patriotism?

Pay no mind to the other slew of examples in the lying Trump-supporting jackass Congressman's .pds document upthread.

[Concerned]

No, but it is about you trying to sell people that Mueller doesn't have a history of corrupting or botching cases all based on an opinion piece in the NY Slimes.

Wrong yet again @Frank Cannon I wasn't the first one to reference the piece from the judge.  I just provided a link to it.  I didn't try and "sell" anything in this thread.

[Frank Cannon]

Wrong yet again @Frank Cannon I wasn't the first one to reference the piece from the judge.  I just provided a link to it.  I didn't try and "sell" anything in this thread.

Posting a link to an article when you are trying to refute the claims of many people is trying to sell it.

[Cyber Liberty]

Wrong yet again @Frank Cannon I wasn't the first one to reference the piece from the judge.  I just provided a link to it.  I didn't try and "sell" anything in this thread.

You are defending a totally corrupt FBI Director.  I did not "direct you" to anything, you did a search (as I requested) and you ignored the article by the lying, Trump-supporting jackass Congressman.  Not my fault you got suckered by the NYT.

[Concerned]

Posting a link to an article when you are trying to refute the claims of many people is trying to sell it.

That may be your opinion but it wasn't my intent in this thread.   I was simply trying to provide the data that Cyber Liberty was referencing so others could draw their own conclusion.  I didn't try and "sell" anything.  Have a good night Frank.   

[Frank Cannon]

That may be your opinion but it wasn't my intent in this thread.   I was simply trying to provide the data that Cyber Liberty was referencing so others could draw their own conclusion.  I didn't try and "sell" anything.  Have a good night Frank.   

You keep saying goodnight to posters, yet you are still here. The box under the bridge with your bed blow away and you're having trouble finding it?

[Concerned]

You are defending a totally corrupt FBI Director.  I did not "direct you" to anything, you did a search (as I requested) and you ignored the article by the lying, Trump-supporting jackass Congressman.  Not my fault you got suckered by the NYT.

I did a search as a result of this "request" from you.  I reviewed the first 3 articles I found and none of them provided definitive evidence that Mueller was dirty but one of them did note that Mueller's name never came up in the court case of 2 innocent guys who were rewarded $100+M.  I simply provide a link to that article.

Bing "Whitey Bulger"+"Mueller."  Mueller knowingly threw innocent people in jail to cover for mob hit-man Bulger.  All but the one who died in prison were released when it was proved they were innocent of murder.

There have been a number of articles written about it lately.  Members of Congress who say there's no evidence are giving the evidence a blind eye.

[Sanguine]

Greco had been dead 19 years. He spent the last 28 years of his life in prison for a crime he did not commit – a fact Robert Mueller knew but adamantly refused to acknowledge even after Greco’s death behind bars.

This is some scary stuff.

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

I did a search as a result of this "request" from you.  I reviewed the first 3 articles I found and none of them provided definitive evidence that Mueller was dirty but one of them did note that Mueller's name never came up in the court case of 2 innocent guys who were rewarded $100+M.  I simply provide a link to that article.

From the article I posted.

"Nancy Gertner, the now-retired federal judge who presided over the civil case for damages that ended with the $102 million award, then wrote an op-ed piece in The New York Times accusing Dershowitz and Fox News host Sean Hannity, among others, of “smearing” Mueller.

Gertner, who was appointed to the bench by her Yale Law School classmate Bill Clinton, claimed Mueller “had no involvement in that case.”

However, in December 2006, during the civil trial, Judge Gertner wrote a show-cause order accusing Mueller of stonewalling production of exculpatory evidence – “a serious problem,” she wrote.

Gertner Mueller Order to FBI show cause
http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Gertner-Mueller-Order-to-FBI-show-cause.pdf

“This is a case about, inter alia, informant abuse, about the failure to disclose exculpatory evidence bearing on the innocence of the four plaintiffs, about FBI agents allegedly ‘hiding the ball,’ not disclosing critical information that would have exonerated the plaintiff… and not doing so for nearly 40 years.”

She continued, “Given those accusations, the position the FBI is taking is chilling… This Court is not remotely satisfied.”

Gertner said she had been asked by the innocent men to hold the FBI in contempt of court and that she had taken their motion “under advisement.”

“In order to make that decision,” she wrote, “the Court ORDERS that this matter be brought to the personal attention of the Director of the FBI.”

In other words, Robert Mueller III."


How does that square with the NY Rag of Record's opinion?

[Cyber Liberty]

From the article I posted.

"Nancy Gertner, the now-retired federal judge who presided over the civil case for damages that ended with the $102 million award, then wrote an op-ed piece in The New York Times accusing Dershowitz and Fox News host Sean Hannity, among others, of “smearing” Mueller.

Gertner, who was appointed to the bench by her Yale Law School classmate Bill Clinton, claimed Mueller “had no involvement in that case.”

However, in December 2006, during the civil trial, Judge Gertner wrote a show-cause order accusing Mueller of stonewalling production of exculpatory evidence – “a serious problem,” she wrote.

Gertner Mueller Order to FBI show cause
http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Gertner-Mueller-Order-to-FBI-show-cause.pdf

“This is a case about, inter alia, informant abuse, about the failure to disclose exculpatory evidence bearing on the innocence of the four plaintiffs, about FBI agents allegedly ‘hiding the ball,’ not disclosing critical information that would have exonerated the plaintiff… and not doing so for nearly 40 years.”

She continued, “Given those accusations, the position the FBI is taking is chilling… This Court is not remotely satisfied.”

Gertner said she had been asked by the innocent men to hold the FBI in contempt of court and that she had taken their motion “under advisement.”

“In order to make that decision,” she wrote, “the Court ORDERS that this matter be brought to the personal attention of the Director of the FBI.”

In other words, Robert Mueller III."


How does that square with the NY Rag of Record's opinion?

I'll just chalk it up the possibility folks tend to pick and choose facts to support preconceived beliefs.  It's kind of why I didn't just post a link a couple of days back.  I wanted to see what would be looked up and believed.

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

I'll just chalk it up the possibility folks tend to pick and choose facts to support preconceived beliefs.  It's kind of why I didn't just post a link a couple of days back.  I wanted to see what would be looked up and believed.

"Deep rooted is the Never Trump in this one young Jedi."

[libertybele]

Mueller IS a despicable, sleazeball, POS.  It is really difficult to understand how anyone can see him any differently.

[WingNot]

"Deep rooted is the Never Trump in this one young Jedi."

it's been confirmed many a time. 

[Concerned]

I'll just chalk it up the possibility folks tend to pick and choose facts to support preconceived beliefs.  It's kind of why I didn't just post a link a couple of days back.  I wanted to see what would be looked up and believed.

@Cyber Liberty

I can't speak for folks who "tend to pick and choose facts", but as noted previously, I looked at the first 3 articles found as a result of the search "requested" by you.  None of those 3 articles provided definitive evidence of Mueller dirt; however, one article did note that Mueller's name never came up in the trial awarding $100+M to two of the innocent parties.