Not So Honorable: Docs Show Mueller's FBI Denied Justice To Four Innocent Men

[libertybele]

@Cyber Liberty

I can't speak for folks who "tend to pick and choose facts", but as noted previously, I looked at the first 3 articles found as a result of the search "requested" by you.  None of those 3 articles provided definitive evidence of Mueller dirt; however, one article did note that Mueller's name never came up in the trial awarding $100+M to two of the innocent parties.

So ... does this absolve Muller from all wrong doing??   

[Concerned]

So ... does this absolve Muller from all wrong doing??   

I think people should draw their conclusion based on the available evidence.  As for me, I've seen no definitive evidence of Mueller wrong-doing as special counsel. 

[WingNot]

I think people should draw their conclusion based on the available evidence.  As for me, I've seen no definitive evidence of Mueller wrong-doing as special counsel.

Other than ignoring his past history of railroading innocent people .....of course you wouldn't.

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

I think people should draw their conclusion based on the available evidence.  As for me, I've seen no definitive evidence of Mueller wrong-doing as special counsel.

And whose brain fart was it to ignore attorney/client confidentiality to raid Cohen's office?

But it was justified based on the word of a gal who had sex for money on camera, who took 130K to shut up and go away, and then decided she could go back for even More money?

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

Stormy Daniels is gonna look Great - Gravitas out the A$$ - on the floor of the Senate testifying as one of the FBI's Star Witnesses in the President's impeachment trial, . . . . . at least in the fantasies of the NT now and forever crowd.

[Concerned]

And whose brain fart was it to ignore attorney/client confidentiality to raid Cohen's office?

But it was justified based on the word of a gal who had sex for money on camera, who took 130K to shut up and go away, and then decided she could go back for even More money?

And if the President's legal team (or Michael Cohen's) had definitive evidence that this search was actually illegal, I have no doubt they'd get the legality of this search before a judge ASAP and that they'd take it all the way to the Supreme Court.  Obviously, they haven't done that.

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

And if the President's legal team (or Michael Cohen's) had definitive evidence that this search was actually illegal, I have no doubt they'd get the legality of this search before a judge ASAP and that they'd take it all the way to the Supreme Court.  Obviously, they haven't done that.

But Obviously, there's a bleeping ELECTION coming, and even though Trump DOES have the Legal Authority to fire Mueller he's not stupid enough to rouse the Rats into turning out at the polls by dragging Mueller/the Cohen crap to Court, since it's still unraveling.

He may not have to do anything but let Mueller hang himself.

[libertybele]

I think people should draw their conclusion based on the available evidence.  As for me, I've seen no definitive evidence of Mueller wrong-doing as special counsel.

So the fact that Rosenstein appointed Mueller unconstitutionally as special counsel doesn't bother you or the fact that Rosenstein is connected to Clinton corruption?  Secondly, Mueller was appointed special counsel to investigate the possible Trump/Russia collusion, but his investigation(s) continue to reach beyond what he was originally appointed to investigate.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/31/3-reasons-rosensteins-special-counsel-appointment-illegal/

http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/384352-trump-aide-mueller-probe-has-gone-well-beyond-initial-scope

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/03/robert-mueller-is-expanding-probe-beyond-russia-to-focus-on-uae-efforts-to-influence-trump.html

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/mueller

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/383994-judge-questions-whether-doj-gave-mueller-too-much-authority-to

https://tennesseestar.com/2018/04/10/commentary-deputy-atty-gen-rosenstein-memo-to-special-counsel-mueller-proves-probe-into-former-trump-aid-manafort-is-beyond-the-scope-of-atty-gen-sessions-recusal/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2018/03/21/robert-muellers-russia-investigation-is-at-a-crossroads/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.72241dffa794

[Concerned]

So the fact that Rosenstein appointed Mueller unconstitutionally as special counsel doesn't bother you or the fact that Rosenstein is connected to Clinton corruption?  Secondly, Mueller was appointed special counsel to investigate the possible Trump/Russia collusion, but his investigation(s) continue to reach beyond what he was originally appointed to investigate.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/31/3-reasons-rosensteins-special-counsel-appointment-illegal/

http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/384352-trump-aide-mueller-probe-has-gone-well-beyond-initial-scope

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/03/robert-mueller-is-expanding-probe-beyond-russia-to-focus-on-uae-efforts-to-influence-trump.html

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/mueller

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/383994-judge-questions-whether-doj-gave-mueller-too-much-authority-to

https://tennesseestar.com/2018/04/10/commentary-deputy-atty-gen-rosenstein-memo-to-special-counsel-mueller-proves-probe-into-former-trump-aid-manafort-is-beyond-the-scope-of-atty-gen-sessions-recusal/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2018/03/21/robert-muellers-russia-investigation-is-at-a-crossroads/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.72241dffa794

@libertybele

If Trump appointee-Rosenstein ("only the best people") had done something unconstitutional, I have no doubt the "law and order" candidate would have fired him or more likely, taken him to court.  He hasn't. That's all the evidence I need to conclude Rosenstein has done nothing wrong.  Other's may draw other conclusions.

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

@libertybele

Yeah. How is a porn actress tied in to Putin trying in an illegal conspiracy with Trump people to elect Trump over Hillary?

The basic premise that Putin would Want 'Hillary K-Mart Blue Light Special Everything Must Go and Go Cheap' Clinton, . . . over Trump is beyond ridiculous.

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

@libertybele

If Trump appointee-Rosenstein ("only the best people") had done something unconstitutional, I have no doubt the "law and order" candidate would have fired him or more likely, taken him to court.  He hasn't. That's all the evidence I need to conclude Rosenstein has done nothing wrong.  Other's may draw other conclusions.

OK. Now I get it.

The only way Trump can live up to your expectations/Prove himself, is to commit suicide at the polls, hamstringing himself with 2 chambers full of Rat Congress Critters, in the majority, who have already made it unequivocal that IF they win, they will Impeach him.

Thanks for admitting it.

[libertybele]

@libertybele

If Trump appointee-Rosenstein ("only the best people") had done something unconstitutional, I have no doubt the "law and order" candidate would have fired him or more likely, taken him to court.  He hasn't. That's all the evidence I need to conclude Rosenstein has done nothing wrong.  Other's may draw other conclusions.

Some people just don't seem to be able to connect the dots.   

[Sanguine]

How the hell does this get to be about Trump except peripherally?  This is about Mueller.  Mueller has a long and disgusting history.  The Trump part is only the latest in a long string of Mueller miscarriages of justice.

[Cyber Liberty]

How the hell does this get to be about Trump except peripherally?  This is about Mueller.  Mueller has a long and disgusting history.  The Trump part is only the latest in a long string of Mueller miscarriages of justice.

It's because Trump is smearing an innocent man.  Or something.

[WingNot]

Some people just don't seem to be able to connect the dots.   

And then Some are just Stuck on stupid. 

[Frank Cannon]

Other than ignoring his past history of railroading innocent people .....of course you wouldn't.

See. You're not getting it. Mueller was a shifty lying shitbag back in the old days. Now he is an upstanding citizen.

[WingNot]

See. You're not getting it. Mueller was a shifty lying shitbag back in the old days. Now he is an upstanding citizen.

I see the error of my ways now.  Herr Mueller was a Shitbag before Trump.  Good Guy now by going after Trump.

Thanks Frank.

[Formerly Once-Ler]

I am hopeful Mueller is as ruthless as you all claim.

[WingNot]

I am hopeful Mueller is as ruthless as you all claim.

Scrotum cuffs?   Look to big for a dickless dude like Herr Mueller.

[jpsb]

I think people should draw their conclusion based on the available evidence.  As for me, I've seen no definitive evidence of Mueller wrong-doing as special counsel.

@Concerned

You should take a look at the people Mueller has hired. Mueller is a pal of Comey, that alone
creates a big conflict of interest. That conflict should have been enough to refused to accept the
job if he had any ethics.


If Mueller were an honest investigator the first thing he would have investigated is how did
Wikileaks get the DNC emails? That is a the heart of the Russia, Russia, Russia thing. But Mueller
has no interest in how that happened.  Mueller has one goal, take down Trump any way he can.

[Formerly Once-Ler]

Scrotum cuffs?   Look to big for a dickless dude like Herr Mueller.

Sick burn.

[Concerned]

@Concerned

You should take a look at the people Mueller has hired. Mueller is a pal of Comey, that alone
creates a big conflict of interest. That conflict should have been enough to refused to accept the
job if he had any ethics.


If Mueller were an honest investigator the first thing he would have investigated is how did
Wikileaks get the DNC emails? That is a the heart of the Russia, Russia, Russia thing. But Mueller
has no interest in how that happened.  Mueller has one goal, take down Trump any way he can.

Yes, I'm aware that Mueller's team has 13 registered Democrats and that Mueller himself is a registered Republican.  There's no question that the appearance of that ratio is not good; however, IMO, it, in and of itself, is not evidence of corruption on the part of Mueller or that the overall investigation is corrupt.  Generally, I believe that there still are a few people in the world capable of being objective and doing their job without allowing partisan politics to bias them.  I certainly hope there are some left. 

@jpsb 

[jpsb]

Yes, I'm aware that Mueller's team has 13 registered Democrats and that Mueller himself is a registered Republican.  There's no question that the appearance of that ratio is not good; however, IMO, it, in and of itself, is not evidence of corruption on the part of Mueller or that the overall investigation is corrupt.  Generally, I believe that there still are a few people in the world capable of being objective and doing their job without allowing partisan politics to bias them.  I certainly hope there are some left. 

@jpsb

Fine, what about his conflict of interest, he is a very good friend of Comey.

[Sanguine]

Yes, I'm aware that Mueller's team has 13 registered Democrats and that Mueller himself is a registered Republican.  There's no question that the appearance of that ratio is not good; however, IMO, it, in and of itself, is not evidence of corruption on the part of Mueller or that the overall investigation is corrupt.  Generally, I believe that there still are a few people in the world capable of being objective and doing their job without allowing partisan politics to bias them.  I certainly hope there are some left. 

@jpsb

 How do we know that Mueller is a registered Republican?  You don't have to declare a party in DC, unless you vote in the primaries, and I don't find voter rolls available that show party affiliation.

[libertybele]

Yes, I'm aware that Mueller's team has 13 registered Democrats and that Mueller himself is a registered Republican.  There's no question that the appearance of that ratio is not good; however, IMO, it, in and of itself, is not evidence of corruption on the part of Mueller or that the overall investigation is corrupt.  Generally, I believe that there still are a few people in the world capable of being objective and doing their job without allowing partisan politics to bias them.  I certainly hope there are some left. 

@jpsb

...hmm ... perhaps the problem is your definition of 'corruption' vs. others definition of 'corruption'.

Hillary is as corrupt as they come, yet she's never been held accountable because she has too many people burying her corruption for her; namely Rosenstein and Mueller.  If you don't care to connect the dots, that's ok, but at least look at the corruption from that point forward.

So ... if no one holds Rosenstein & Mueller accountable for their corruption, does that mean that they too are not corrupt? 

I declare B.S.!