Yep, this is the grandest of grand conspiracies.
@CatherineofAragon Yes, in fact, it does point to conspiracy. One of the most common things a liar does in over-recollection - Filling in with incremental detail in order to reinforce the idea of irrefutable recollection. That these folks have incremental detail about incidences thirty years past is precisely what makes it unbelievable. Ass-grab chick remembers she was wearing her black and white dress at an incidental meeting? COME ON!
The whole narrative, to include the ordered responses specific to refuting statements made by Moore - the whole thing is scripted, and at the very least, the players have been coached. NOBODY remembers a regular day at the mall thirty years ago.
Like the accuser who's a Republican and a Trump supporter?
So what?
The mall manager who was not there at the time did not say so specifically. He said "to the best of his knowledge",
Alright. We have been over this - If he was banned he would be on a banned list that that manager would have in his possession. And it is very likely that, as the next manager in line after the one who supposedly banned him, He would likely be the one Moore would be asking to let him back in. I'd say a DA coming hat-in-hand would be memorable.
and if you're going to disqualify the cop supporting the rumor because she's anti-Moore, you need to do the same with the mall guy, who supports Moore.
Leaving a null in Moore's favor. Rinse repeat.
Don't know what mall cop you're talking about, but mall employees state specifically that he was banned, and one of them sourced a cop by name.
.
Yes, DJ something is the cop in question, and he has adamantly declared it did not happen.
A "problem child" can't be abused? Shame on you.
Corfman specifically claimed her 'problem child' thing was Moore's fault. It was not. She was a problem before that, on the record...
This is stuff that can only be be found at Breitbart and fake news/conspiracy sites and will never go any further. It's crackpot material.
I am no fan of Breitbart, but standing on WAPO, who has been caught more than can be counted in their partisanship (and AL.com too) is patently absurd.
You want there to be nothing,
No, there IS nothing. Nothing but gossip and tongue waggin.
You say the same about Moore's financial dealings with his nonprofit.
More's financial dealings are being spun the other way around - He gave the nonprofit a break, deducting his take from his speaking fees and income from the Jeremiah Project FROM what the non-profit owed him annually. Thus, not only was he not lying (his income from the nonprofit was not regular, relying on his speaking fees and only making up the difference), he was doing the right thing. He didn't have to give them (in the way of deduction) the income off of the Jeremiah Project at all.
I don't know when it became conservative to pretend facts don't exist.
As soon as there is one, let me know.
I know you do, even though the facts of the timing have been explained repeatedly.
And wholly insufficiently.
You might ask yourself why this large circle of people would go to so much trouble to construct this huge conspiracy and not one of them claim rape. I brought that up days ago, in fact. Wouldn't you think at least one of them would go all the way, so to speak, and do so?
No, because if he were accused of rape (especially of underage), charges would be expected to be filed. This is nicely kept in public opinion with a 'Have you quit beating your wife' question, which cannot be proved, nor disproved, and in all likelihood, has no consequence, as the slander is nearly impossible to prove.
Yet it remains that there is not even one sexual relationship - not a single one - which is quite outside of the sexual pervert meme.
