Except you can't just toss out the 14th amendment.
Even though I believe the 14th amendment to be illegitimate because it does not accurately represent the will of the people who were forced to vote for it because they had guns pointed at them, I am not suggesting it be "tossed".
I am pointing out that the incorporation doctrine which the Roosevelt courts made up out of thin air, are an invalid interpretation of the purpose and intent of the 14th amendment, which was to secure the rights of freed slaves, not to launch an attack against state sponsorship of religion. (Or create a right to abortion, gay marriage, give away American citizenship, or rewrite the qualifications for the Presidency.)
The 14th amendment has been bastardized by the Roosevelt courts and those courts subsequent to the ones he created. Their "interpretation" of the 14th to include these powers is a bald faced lie.
You like Moore because you, too, think you're a law unto yourself.
If I thought that, why would I be arguing about proper legal process as relates to how the 14th amendment was passed? Why would I be objecting to power grabs from Liberal kook judges appointed by Roosevelt?
My point here is that the public never agreed to any of these changes. These changes were forced on the public by activist judges, not the legislative process.
I am against people being a "law unto themselves". That's why I object to what the court has done back in the 1940s when they made all this shite up.