Congressman calls for Christian holy war on Islamic radicals: ‘Kill them all’

[TomSea]

Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., posted on Facebook in the wake of the London terror attack. Kevin McGill AP
Politics & Government  June 05, 2017 2:18 PM
Congressman calls for Christian holy war on Islamic radicals: ‘Kill them all’
By Teresa Welsh

twelsh@mcclatchy.com

A U.S. congressman from Louisiana posted Sunday on Facebook that “all of Christendom” is at war with “Islamic horror” and all “radicalized Islamic suspects” should be hunted and killed.

Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., posted following a terror attack in London over the weekend that left at least six people dead.

Higgins, who is known as the “Cajun John Wayne” was elected in a December runoff between two Republicans with 56 percent of the vote and represents southwestern Louisiana on the Gulf of Mexico. Every parish in his district voted for President Donald Trump.



Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/news/politics-government/article154450109.html#storylink=cpy

Took this from another forum but it looks like a fascinating story.

[edpc]

Where's this Christiandom of which he speaks?  It's certainly not in Western Europe.

[TomSea]

Where's this Christiandom of which he speaks?  It's certainly not in Western Europe.

"The Free World... All of Christendom", those are his words, if one is arguing his point. I would take all of his quote together. Let's not forget, Christians have faced persecution throughout their history including especially at the beginning.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

This will be misconstrued as him saying holy war on all muslims (as opposed to just radicalized ones) in the media.

[Wingnut]

This will be misconstrued as him saying holy war on all muslims (as opposed to just radicalized ones) in the media.

Let the wailing of the left commence.

[DiogenesLamp]

Congressman calls for Christian holy war on Islamic radicals: ‘Kill them all’

We don't have to kill them all.   According to David P. Goldman we only need to kill 3 million of them,  and pretty much just the young males. 


https://pjmedia.com/spengler/2014/8/12/shermans-300000-and-the-caliphates-3-million/



I keep posting this,  but people don't seem to grasp the significance of it. 


   

[TomSea]

Higgins reminds me...




Watch his demeanor, maybe.

[Oceander]

Heaven preserve us from political yobbos and their social media accounts. 

[edpc]

Higgins reminds me...

Higgins, who is known as the “Cajun John Wayne”..........

Interesting, because now I'm imagining him saying something like "Gar ici, bonne rien," with a John Wayne affectation.

[endicom]

...all “radicalized Islamic suspects” should be hunted and killed.

Gee, Claude Rains just rounded up the suspects.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

We don't have to kill them all.   According to David P. Goldman we only need to kill 3 million of them,  and pretty much just the young males. 


https://pjmedia.com/spengler/2014/8/12/shermans-300000-and-the-caliphates-3-million/



I keep posting this,  but people don't seem to grasp the significance of it. 


 

Why would you not wish to kill all of the Islamic radicals like he said?

[Wingnut]

Why would you not wish to kill all of the Islamic radicals like he said?

A computer model worked the probability of terrorist events vs the muslim population at large.  Removing 3 million made for a favorable outcome.

[edpc]

A computer model worked the probability of terrorist events vs the muslim population at large.  Removing 3 million made for a favorable outcome.

That would be easier if they were all in one place, under a united banner, and engaged in stand up battles in a traditional sense that we understand war.  Over a protracted period, it doesn't have the same shock value and effect.  Look at the general ennui where Sept 11 is concerned, these days.  Most young adults weren't old enough to understand the significance.  It'll take another major attack or an American version of Beslan to get the people of today behind that sort of effort and that's beyond sad.

[Fantom]

This will be misconstrued as him saying holy war on all muslims (as opposed to just radicalized ones) in the media.

What is the difference?

Count me in on the side of The moslem Removal Act.

[edpc]

What is the difference?

What's the difference between Van Jones and Clarence Thomas?  Don't be obtuse.

[Old Warrior in Exile]

[Fantom]

What's the difference between Van Jones and Clarence Thomas?  Don't be obtuse.

Really. What is the difference between David Duke and a KKK member who actually hung a black man?

muhamhead was a terrorist....amongst his better quality's. That a certain % of muhammadans will engage in terrorism is a function of islam. Ergo ipsom facto, they are incompatible with Humanity. They are even incompatible with themselves. 

Even two M.I.N.O.s (moslem in name only) produce rabid islamist... mayhap, it is you who should pull head out of ahhhhh .. out of sand.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

A computer model worked the probability of terrorist events vs the muslim population at large.  Removing 3 million made for a favorable outcome.

The congressman never said to kill all Muslims.  He said to kill all radical Muslims.  If we have radical Muslims in our sights, I see no reason to not pull the trigger.

I wonder if our military would agree with that outcome by trusting computers instead of eliminating a known enemy?

[endicom]

The congressman never said to kill all Muslims.  He said to kill all radical Muslims.

The quote is, “radicalized Islamic suspects”.

[edpc]

Really. What is the difference between David Duke and a KKK member who actually hung a black man?

muhamhead was a terrorist....

My  Point exactly. The average muslim is as far removed from Muhammad as the average white nationalist is from the Klan.

[Old Warrior in Exile]

I suppose during WWII, not all of the Japanese were bad people.
The entire island nation was not committed to our destruction.

Yet, we dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and had plans to invade
if this didn't cause their surrender.

And if it took killing every last little Jap to bring this about,
we would've done so. The peace and safety of the American people was paramount.

But we weren't a country of effeminate surrender monkeys back then.

[Sighlass]

This is a war, like it or not, half the battle is just admitting it is a war. The other part is starting the war while it is still winnable. As a nation for the most part peace loving, not remembering how peace was obtained can be deadly in the long run.

[Smokin Joe]

This is a war, like it or not, half the battle is just admitting it is a war. The other part is starting the war while it is still winnable. As a nation for the most part peace loving, not remembering how peace was obtained can be deadly in the long run.

Asymmetrical Warfare. People need to read up on the concept. We're in one, whether we like it or not.

[edpc]

I suppose during WWII, not all of the Japanese were bad people.
The entire island nation was not committed to our destruction.

Yet, we dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and had plans to invade
if this didn't cause their surrender.

And if it took killing every last little slant eyed zipper head to bring this about,
we would've done so. Peace and safety of the American people was paramount.

But we weren't a country of effeminate surrender monkeys back then.

Yes but we were at a war with one nation and one people. Last I heard we were not as a war with   Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Jordan, Morocco, and other muslim nations that have nothing to do with the WOT.  If you are or the wholesale slaughter of muslims based on religious affiliation, just say so.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

Yes but we were at a war with one nation and one people. Last I heard we were not as a war with   Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Jordan, Morocco, and other muslim nations that have nothing to do with the WOT.  If you are or the wholesale slaughter of muslims based on religious affiliation, just say so.

We are at war with those at war with us.

If any of these countries aid and abet the terrorists at war with us, then yes, we are at war with those countries.

Otherwise, we have already surrendered.