Repeal first, replace after repeal. That is what was promised. NOT a piss-poor patch and fix job.
Just sayin....
The moderates promised to preserve some elements of ObamaCare. If they vote for a repeal but there is no replacement that includes those things, they'd be breaking
their promises.
I don't agree with the moderates on the policy -- I want a full repeal and a bunch of market reforms
without preserving the things the moderates like. I want to end things like the requirement that mental health be covered, all the "essential health coverage" items, the Medicaid expansion, etc.. People should be permitted to buy bare-bones catastrophics and pair them with HSA's, etc..
I'm just saying we have to recognize politically that the moderates themselves made promises that are not consistent with what the HFC wants. If the HFC is saying "we only want a repeal, and not this other stuff", then
they're bluntly telling the moderates that they're not going to get their replacement bill with the desired goodies after the repeal. So, the moderates aren't going along with a repeal that does not include a replacement.
Now maybe that means that nothing gets done because neither side is willing to move off the promises they made. I just think that is a result that would put the country, and the cause of conservatism -- in a much worse position.