Trump has managed to tap into the anger and frustration of the electorate; there is absolutely no denying that. Obviously what is in dispute is why? To make America great, to make himself wealthier, the need for power, to hand Hillary the White House?? We do know that he has verbally stated his thirst for 'vengeance' and he has made obvious uncalled for attacks on several individuals and groups of people in order to accomplish his objective. He continues to mirror the personality traits of Hitler; a narcissistic, psychopathic demagogue. All things considered he has the potential to be equally as dangerous as Hitler. Why give him the keys to the kingdom?
Oh, I won't. The thing that separates him from another homeless prophet on a streetcorner is his money and a willing audience. That other chap didn't have the money Trump has, but he did have a willing and angry mob, organization within that mob, very good handlers, and he frightened and browbeat enough people into not objecting or meekly following when they should not have gone along with the true believers to get along. They could have stopped him, or made him irrelevant by looking the other way. His manifesto would not have meant any more than the Unabomber's if the people had not followed him, be that willingly, grudgingly, or out of abject fear.
When we look back at that war, and the unapologetic aerial bombing of military and civilian target alike, those who study the ethics of that often leave out that without the people, the leader would have been a nobody, and not a contender. It is that synergetic symbiosis which creates tyranny most foul.
