Hannity rants against Glenn Beck, Ted Cruz & Never Trump movement: 'I’ll blame you' if Clinton wins! (AGAIN!)

[XenaLee]

@GrouchoTex
@catfish1957

I wish Gov. Good Hair, who is obviously eager to prevent cancer, would have refrained from endorsing someone he correctly said was a cancer to conservatism. If this malignancy gets into the Oval Office, you can be sure that it will metastasize rapidly.

Back on topic... I wonder if the pugnacious little pipsqueak, hissy-fit Hannity, will double down today or be contrite. I frankly don't think he has the capability to apologize. It's really interesting how Trumpsters, whether they're public figures or forum members or even people in real life, all have a tendency to take on the odious characteristics of their orange god. Ladies and gentlemen, we only thought we were divided these past eight years. The Trump phenomenon has made the Obama years look like Kumbayah in contrast.

Absolutely.   At least before Trump came along and decided to pretend to be a Republican.... we conservatives were all on the same side against the leftists.  Now we are as divided as the nation was back during the Civil War.  The left has managed to divide us  on all levels now.  And you know what usually comes next after such a division.

[Norm Lenhart]

Absolutely.   At least before Trump came along and decided to pretend to be a Republican.... we conservatives were all on the same side against the leftists.  Now we are as divided as the nation was back during the Civil War.  The left has managed to divide us  on all levels now.  And you know what usually comes next after such a division.

Oh to the contrary!

The left is UNITING with it's own.

All those people that many thought were and wanted to believe/take at their online word (that they were conservatives, weren't. Never were. Because as much as they scream about it, one cannot be conservative and support/vote for liberals.

Period.

Actions mean things. When they come into diametric opposition, the person involved is not what their words portray them to be. A Trump backing Conservative is like an Abortion backing Christian. Ain't no such thing.

[HonestJohn]

Good grief, that's a stupid statement on so many levels.

It's also a scare tactic.  A dirty bomb is no more lethal than a regular bomb. 

For all a dirty bomb *IS*... is a regular bomb with some radioactive material surrounding it.  There is no fission or fusion reaction.

All that happens is that some radioactive material is scattered around the local vicinity.  And for the type of radioactive materials that are generally procurable, the walls of a building (home/office/commercial) are thick enough to protect a person from the radiation.  Furthermore, the amount time time exposed would be very short, so no real lasting effects will occur even if someone was outside and survive the explosion.

The site would have to be decontaminated, but outside of that... it's just the same as a regular bomb. 

But *FAR* more expensive and time-consuming for a terrorist to build.  For obtaining the radioactive materials is not quick, cheap, or easy.

[beandog]

Good for Hannity, most of these folks he criticized are indeed spineless cowards. The primary season is over, I never voted for Trump in the primaries, on any online poll; I voted for Cruz, Carson and Kasich in some of those. I will gladly vote for Trump as the nominee. I figure, if Hillary is elected and we get hit with an ISIS dirty bomb, Never Trumpers should take their responsibility as well.

If the Great Orange Pumpkin tRumpkin wins and we get hit by an ISIS bomb, dirty or clean, will you and the other tRumplets take the responsibility?  Personally, I'll hold you responsible no matter which one of them wins.  The people who are spineless cowards are Hannity and his unmerry tRumplet followers. 

[Vulcan]

[Formerly Once-Ler]

That's a good point, and one that needs to be repeated.   No one, I believe, objects to those who approach this as a lesser-of-two evils election and conclude that Trump is the lesser evil.   That's doing just what Ted Cruz said - voting one's conscience. 

Great post.  Maybe if you keep repeating it, they will start hearing it.

[Norm Lenhart]

Great post.  Maybe if you keep repeating it, they will start hearing it.

I object to it in the strongest possible terms. If one person on earth cares to explain to me, with fact, how electing a documented liberal, whose positions, when he isn't reversing them are wholly in opposition to the Constitution, is not every bit is evil as a democrat, then I'll reconsider my position.

Lesser evil adds up. We now have a house and senate controlled fully by all the lesser evils that just HAD to be elected no matter what because reasons.

People that vote for evil and to knowingly empower it, are evil.

[Sanguine]

I object to it in the strongest possible terms. If one person on earth cares to explain to me, with fact, how electing a documented liberal, whose positions, when he isn't reversing them are wholly in opposition to the Constitution, is not every bit is evil as a democrat, then I'll reconsider my position.

Lesser evil adds up. We now have a house and senate controlled fully by all the lesser evils that just HAD to be elected no matter what because reasons.

People that vote for evil and to knowingly empower it, are evil.

Ah, but we all are evil, Norm, it's just a question of degree.

[Formerly Once-Ler]

Lesser evil adds up. We now have a house and senate controlled fully by all the lesser evils that just HAD to be elected no matter what because reasons.

People that vote for evil and to knowingly empower it, are evil.

I'm figuring you as one of those glass half empty kind of people. ^-^

[roamer_1]

Lesser evil adds up. We now have a house and senate controlled fully by all the lesser evils that just HAD to be elected no matter what because reasons.

People that vote for evil and to knowingly empower it, are evil.

Right on the money, Norm.

[Norm Lenhart]

I'm figuring you as one of those glass half empty kind of people. ^-^

Not at all! I'm a "Glass smashed on the floor and the dog whizzed in the puddle" kind of people.

Unfortunately, the reality of America 2016 puts me on solid, if dog whizzed ground, to hold that position.

[Norm Lenhart]

Ah, but we all are evil, Norm, it's just a question of degree.

Semantics. Empowering liberals is evil. Actual evil that causes pain, suffering and death.

[Sanguine]

Semantics. Empowering liberals is evil. Actual evil that causes pain, suffering and death.

Well, if that's what you're talking about, you're going to cast your vote against whomever has the best chance of defeating HRC.  You want to talk about pain and suffering, that woman has done it!

In fact, if it's not clear yet, go watch this:  https://www.youtube.com/embed/BdNHf1g4ivA.  I'll be interested in what you think.

[Formerly Once-Ler]

Well, if that's what you're talking about, you're going to cast your vote against whomever has the best chance of defeating HRC.  You want to talk about pain and suffering, that woman has done it!

In fact, if it's not clear yet, go watch this:  https://www.youtube.com/embed/BdNHf1g4ivA.  I'll be interested in what you think.

Very powerful internet video.
There is no question Hitlery is a horrible horrible woman, and she doesn't deserve to be President...it's too bad I don't have an acceptable candidate to vote against her.

[Norm Lenhart]

Well, if that's what you're talking about, you're going to cast your vote against whomever has the best chance of defeating HRC.  You want to talk about pain and suffering, that woman has done it!

In fact, if it's not clear yet, go watch this:  https://www.youtube.com/embed/BdNHf1g4ivA.  I'll be interested in what you think.

I think I am well versed in American and world history. And as such, I know that when you elect 'lesser evil', you get more of it.

However, Donald Trump has more than enough warning flags in his history to convince me that he is every bit the danger to everyone that Hillary is.

I know all about Clinton. More, I'd wager, than a lot of people do because I have followed politics closely for 3 decades. She is evil. No question. I also am aware of trump's business dealings, his attempts to force govt do do his dirty work for him, his bankruptcies, his ties to Bloomberg, CLINTON, both of whom he FUNDED, his psychotic behavior, His inability to maintain self control...

To put it in game terms, you have one chaotic evil and one Lawful evil. In the end, Lawful always follows a predictable course and you can defend against that. Chaotic is the Joker. And he would be within the walls. In CHARGE of the walls and everything within them.

No way in hell I vote for either evil.

[Vulcan]

No way in hell I vote for either evil.

Nor will I. 

The orange idiot isn't in it to win, he's in it to help his friend Hillary win.   Together they are hell-bent on destroying America and they'll have to do it w/o my vote.

[Norm Lenhart]

Nor will I. 

The orange idiot isn't in it to win, he's in it to help his friend Hillary win.   Together they are hell-bent on destroying America and they'll have to do it w/o my vote.

They said they didn't need us anyway so they can take all the blame. We'll still have our integrity and with luck, be able to pass it to our kids so they are ready to stop the Trumpkids' from destroying their generations as well.

[Forum member]

Instead of not voting for Trump, I've decided to not vote for Hillary. Using Hannity's logic, that will count as a vote for Trump.

[Vulcan]

Instead of not voting for Trump, I've decided to not vote for Hillary. Using Hannity's logic, that will count as a vote for Trump.

That.   

[libertybele]

Hannity has no more credibility than Trump!

[UMichConservative]

Consider me surprised that Hannity was able to remove his lips from Trump's Rump long enough to form a sentence.

[libertybele]

Beck gives an excellent response and as usual, something to really ponder.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/08/31/do-not-condemn-sean-hannity-do-not-damage-the-people-well-need-to-rebuild//?utm_source=articles&utm_medium=glenn-recommends&utm_campaign=glenn-recommends

[TomSea]

Hannity, registered with the Conservative Party of NY as he always says, is alien to the backstabbing of other Republicans.

The NY cadre has held together, meaning all of the Easterners have largely been supportive of Trump. Christie, Giuliani, Michael Savage and others.

A lot of the never-Trumpers just don't seem to like him for geographic reasons, even then, he easily did the best in the Sun belt.

[Idaho_Cowboy]

Beck gives an excellent response and as usual, something to really ponder.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/08/31/do-not-condemn-sean-hannity-do-not-damage-the-people-well-need-to-rebuild//?utm_source=articles&utm_medium=glenn-recommends&utm_campaign=glenn-recommends

Very interesting point.

[ABX]

I watched a movie last night called The Brother's Grimsby, a Sacha Baron Cohen spy comedy. It is absolutely awful, I wouldn't recommend it. However, there is one scene with elephants that for some reason reminded me of Hannity. If you've see the movie, you'll understand. That's all I'm going to say about that. ;)