Author Topic: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two  (Read 9261 times)

Right_in_Virginia, verga, 240B, Steeler, WhatWouldReaganDo, Cyber Liberty and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,065
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #650 on: Today at 10:38:46 am »
   TBR is under attack just as Iran is.

Must be! I keep getting these "Site cannot support a secure connection" warnings.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline bigheadfred

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,925
  • Gender: Male
  • One day Closer
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #651 on: Today at 10:42:48 am »

Mario Nawfal

@MarioNawfal
·
3m
🚨🇧🇭🇺🇸🇮🇷 Bahrain reportedly went from hosting U.S. bases to actively launching strikes on Iran.

HIMARS spotted in Manama.

HIMARS fires Precision Strike Missiles (PrSMs) with 500km range. That reaches deep into Iran from Bahrain.
She asked me name my foe then. I said the need within some men to fight and kill their brothers without thought of Love or God. Ken Hensley

Offline bigheadfred

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,925
  • Gender: Male
  • One day Closer
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #652 on: Today at 10:51:09 am »
Mario Nawfal

@MarioNawfal
·
15m
🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran just struck an American-owned tanker anchored at a Saudi port.

The IRGC is hunting U.S. vessels all the way into Saudi Arabia's own harbor.

Egypt's Intel Observer
She asked me name my foe then. I said the need within some men to fight and kill their brothers without thought of Love or God. Ken Hensley

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #653 on: Today at 11:09:36 am »
That doesn't mean we can't be honest with ourselves and the world about what happened, and learn from it to make sure, if possible, that it doesn't happen again.

In this and most other sane countries, we have systems in place like regulatory RMP's (Risk Managment Plans) to evaluate activities and substance storage that carefully evaluates things like blast concentric ranges, air hazardous dispersion modeling of releases, and it's impact on the public.  And specific to certain sensitive receptors.  Our infrastructure is developed to protect the public.

I oversaw this process at my plant., and I can honestly report  that if the Islamic Republic did not have at least put some form of process, to protect their young?   THATS ON THEM!!!!!!!!

Might sound callous, but we know their priorities.
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,799
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #654 on: Today at 11:12:25 am »
In this and most other sane countries, we have systems in place like regulatory RMP's (Risk Managment Plans) to evaluate activities and substance storage that carefully evaluates things like blast concentric ranges, air hazardous dispersion modeling of releases, and it's impact on the public.  And specific to certain sensitive receptors.  Our infrastructure is developed to protect the public.

I oversaw this process at my plant., and I can honestly report  that if the Islamic Republic did not have at least put some form of process, to protect their young?   THATS ON THEM!!!!!!!!

Might sound callous, but we know their priorities.

Nope.  That's not how it works.  If U.S. military planners knew, or should have known, that there was a school there, then they should have either justified a strike while school was in session based on absolute necessity, or they should have changed the timing of the attack so that it did not take place during the time school was in session.

That's on the U.S. military planners.

The exigencies of warfare do not give one a blank check to kill any civilians who might be in the way of a merely convenient target.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 415,050
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #655 on: Today at 11:15:40 am »
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) Ministry of Defense said on Saturday that the country's air defense systems intercepted 16 ballistic missiles, 15 of which were destroyed while one fell into the sea. Additionally, the air defense systems detected 121 UAVs, 119 of which were intercepted, while the other two fell within the UAE's territory.

"Since the start of the blatant Iranian aggression, a total of 221 ballistic missiles have been detected, of which 205 were destroyed, while 14 fell into the sea and two missiles landed within the territory of the UAE," the ministry wrote on X. "A total of 1,305 Iranian UAVs have also been detected, of which 1,229 were intercepted, while 76 UAVs fell within the territory of the UAE. Eight cruise missiles were also detected and destroyed."

The UAE's Ministry of Defense noted that Iran's attacks resulted in "three deaths of Pakistani, Nepali and Bangladeshi nationals, and 112 minor injuries among individuals of Emirati, Egyptian, Ethiopian, Filipino, Pakistani, Iranian, Indian, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan, Azerbaijani, Yemeni, Ugandan, Eritrean, Lebanese, Afghan, Bahraini, Comorian and Turkish nationalities."

Earlier on Saturday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian apologized to neighboring nations and said that Tehran would halt its attacks unless it was hit first.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Mark Twain


“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34


Smokin Joe: Stupid people vote. If you have enough of them, you don’t need to steal an election

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 65,721
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #656 on: Today at 11:22:39 am »
Nope.  That's not how it works.  If U.S. military planners knew, or should have known, that there was a school there, then they should have either justified a strike while school was in session based on absolute necessity, or they should have changed the timing of the attack so that it did not take place during the time school was in session.

That's on the U.S. military planners.

The exigencies of warfare do not give one a blank check to kill any civilians who might be in the way of a merely convenient target.

What are we supposed to do when they build their military offices inside of schools and hospitals?  The school we've been talking about was actually inside the perimeter of a military base.  This is the same method Hamas uses in Gaza, and the mainstream media just laps up the propaganda in order to turn us against each other. 

It works very well to the extent that we believe the press!
I don’t owe tolerance to people who disagree with my existence.
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #657 on: Today at 11:24:05 am »
Nope.  That's not how it works.  If U.S. military planners knew, or should have known, that there was a school there, then they should have either justified a strike while school was in session based on absolute necessity, or they should have changed the timing of the attack so that it did not take place during the time school was in session.

That's on the U.S. military planners.

The exigencies of warfare do not give one a blank check to kill any civilians who might be in the way of a merely convenient target.

Nope.  That particular proximal target may have been critical to saving 1000's of Allied lives.  Your theory just gives the mullahs more incentive to operate in schools, mosques, and hospitals.  Good thing you weren't Colonel in Patton's army.

I abhor the loss of these children's lives too.  But blaming us instead of the Mullahs  just plays into the enemy's narrative.  Would you allow your children to attend class at a facility that was obvious a bombing target?  Again.....  it boils down to not only to priorities, but common sense. 

There is still a lot to this story that needs to be parsed upon before we start passing judgement. 
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,799
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #658 on: Today at 11:24:38 am »
What are we supposed to do when they build their military offices inside of schools and hospitals?  The school we've been talking about was actually inside the perimeter of a military base.  This is the same method Hamas uses in Gaza, and the mainstream media just laps up the propaganda in order to turn us against each other. 

It works very well to the extent that we believe the press!

Be careful, and find other ways to accomplish goals, and only attack the location if absolutely necessary, and then only after publicly warning everyone.

Just like the Israelis do.

The fact that the enemy may use civilians as shields does not give one license to simply kill civilians.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #659 on: Today at 11:27:10 am »
Mario Nawfal

@MarioNawfal
·
15m
🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran just struck an American-owned tanker anchored at a Saudi port.

The IRGC is hunting U.S. vessels all the way into Saudi Arabia's own harbor.

Egypt's Intel Observer

And Russia is telling them where to find them.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #660 on: Today at 11:29:17 am »
Be careful, and find other ways to accomplish goals, and only attack the location if absolutely necessary, and then only after publicly warning everyone.

Just like the Israelis do.

The fact that the enemy may use civilians as shields does not give one license to simply kill civilians.

Does the fact that Israel uses soldiers to shield the civilians that Iran targets give Iran license to kill Israeli troops?  Asking for a friend.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #661 on: Today at 11:29:35 am »
@Kamaji

And btw, I am old enough to remember back pre-revolution that there were plenty of uber-brilliant Iranian Engineers.

So don't try to pull the "Somali Learing Center" argument justifying that they didn't have the technological acumen to conduct a risk assessment
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #662 on: Today at 11:32:01 am »
WarMonitor🇺🇦🇬🇧
@WarMonitor3

Iranian drones have targeted another cargo ship in the Persian gulf off Jubail Saudi Arabia.

10:09 AM · Mar 7, 2026  ·  13.1K Views

https://x.com/WarMonitor3/status/2030314806138302898
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #663 on: Today at 11:33:37 am »
Global Updates
@GlobalUpdate00

Iran has struck a vessel north of Jubail, Saudi Arabia.

The ship is believed to be linked to the United States.



10:09 AM · Mar 7, 2026  ·  289 Views

https://x.com/GlobalUpdate00/status/2030315018814726281
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Idiot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,117
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #664 on: Today at 11:34:26 am »
What are we supposed to do when they build their military offices inside of schools and hospitals?  The school we've been talking about was actually inside the perimeter of a military base.  This is the same method Hamas uses in Gaza, and the mainstream media just laps up the propaganda in order to turn us against each other. 

It works very well to the extent that we believe the press!
Just an FYI....  Our local B-1 base that houses nukes by the way, has an elementary school on the base as well as a hospital, as I'm sure other bases are similar.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #665 on: Today at 11:35:32 am »
WarMonitor🇺🇦🇬🇧
@WarMonitor3

Sirens sounding in Bahrain, just hours after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Iran would not strike neighboring Gulf states.

7:14 AM · Mar 7, 2026  ·  111.9K Views

https://x.com/WarMonitor3/status/2030270897769037993
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Online Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 86,381
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #666 on: Today at 11:37:27 am »
Nope.  That's not how it works.  If U.S. military planners knew, or should have known, that there was a school there, then they should have either justified a strike while school was in session based on absolute necessity, or they should have changed the timing of the attack so that it did not take place during the time school was in session.

That's on the U.S. military planners.

The exigencies of warfare do not give one a blank check to kill any civilians who might be in the way of a merely convenient target.

 :thumbsup:

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 65,721
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #669 on: Today at 11:42:30 am »
Be careful, and find other ways to accomplish goals, and only attack the location if absolutely necessary, and then only after publicly warning everyone.

Just like the Israelis do.

The fact that the enemy may use civilians as shields does not give one license to simply kill civilians.

Neither we nor the Israelis "simply kill civilians."  The enemy does enough of that!  We also can't allow the Iranians to immunize their assets with human shields.  The fact that we agonize about this while they don't says a lot about our morals.  They are just weaponizing our compassion for the innocents. 

Iran has been effectively neutering us for almost 50 years, and it's past time for us to re-calibrate their attitude.  That's happening now, despite our tardiness.
I don’t owe tolerance to people who disagree with my existence.
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #670 on: Today at 11:43:01 am »
Emanuel (Mannie) Fabian
@manniefabian

A key command center of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' air force was struck overnight, the IDF announces.

The command center was hit amid a wave of airstrikes carried out by the Israeli Air Force in Tehran.

According to the military, the command center served the IRGC air force's air defense unit, "whose purpose is to create an aerial picture and defend Iran's skies."

"This is the most central air defense operations room of the IRGC air force," the military says.

The IDF says it also struck Iranian air defense systems, headquarters, logistical warehouses, and other buildings near the command center.

In addition, as part of the wave of strikes, the IAF hit a ballistic missile production and launch site, which also included a weapons depot of the IRGC Quds Force, the military says.



9:29 AM · Mar 7, 2026  ·  11.7K Views

https://x.com/manniefabian/status/2030304779612667925
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,799
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #673 on: Today at 11:48:26 am »
Neither we nor the Israelis "simply kill civilians."  The enemy does enough of that!  We also can't allow the Iranians to immunize their assets with human shields.  The fact that we agonize about this while they don't says a lot about our morals.  They are just weaponizing our compassion for the innocents. 

Iran has been effectively neutering us for almost 50 years, and it's past time for us to re-calibrate their attitude.  That's happening now, despite our tardiness.

Then if we don't simply kill civilians, that necessarily implies that we take responsibility for it when we make a mistake.  I don't see anyone wanting to take responsibility.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #674 on: Today at 11:48:40 am »
Mintel World
@mintelworld

Why the US is eyeing Ukraine’s drone tech?

Ukraine has revolutionized air defense with low-cost FPV interceptors. While a Patriot missile costs $3M, these new drones neutralize Shahed threats for as little as $2,000.

​In late 2025, these systems accounted for 70%+ of downings in Kyiv, proving that asymmetric warfare requires cost-effective solutions.



6:50 AM · Mar 7, 2026  ·  1,913 Views

https://x.com/mintelworld/status/2030264746327326842
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #675 on: Today at 11:49:02 am »
.  Good thing you weren't Colonel in Patton's army.



@Kamaji

Or a Captain in General Sherman's army in 1864.

He'd had you court-martialed for insubordination....  And then who knows what.
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,799
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #676 on: Today at 11:49:51 am »
@Kamaji

Or a Captain in General Sherman's army in 1864.

He'd had you court-martialed for insubordination....  And then who knows what.

:bigsilly:

Sherman should be the standard for proper military conduct?

Wow, you really are down the rabbit-hole.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #677 on: Today at 11:50:59 am »
Then if we don't simply kill civilians, that necessarily implies that we take responsibility for it when we make a mistake.  I don't see anyone wanting to take responsibility.

 :thud:

Geez, because these things take exhaustive investigations.  And it's not like our military isn't busy at the moment,.
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,799
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #678 on: Today at 11:51:35 am »
:thud:

Geez, because these things take exhaustive investigations.  And it's not like our military isn't busy at the moment,.

I'm talking about you lot.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #680 on: Today at 11:54:41 am »
:bigsilly:

Sherman should be the standard for proper military conduct?

Wow, you really are down the rabbit-hole.

Rabbit hole?

You are the one clammering for MSM-ish table justice on Day 8 of the most important military operation of our lifetime's. 
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,799
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #681 on: Today at 11:55:26 am »
Rabbit hole?

You are the one clammering for MSM-ish table justice on Day 8 of the most important military operation of our lifetime's. 

No, I'm arguing for principle, against apparently unprincipled people.  Too bad.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #683 on: Today at 11:56:33 am »
I'm talking about you lot.

I'm responsible? :silly:

You make Captain Jack Sparrow look sane.

I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 65,721
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #684 on: Today at 11:57:34 am »
Then if we don't simply kill civilians, that necessarily implies that we take responsibility for it when we make a mistake.  I don't see anyone wanting to take responsibility.

Iran clouded the issue early on by claiming they bombed the school with an errant missile.  Most countries would have accepted that and moved on, but we choose to investigate instead.

I'm fine with letting that shake out.
I don’t owe tolerance to people who disagree with my existence.
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,799
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #685 on: Today at 11:57:36 am »
I'm responsible? :silly:

You make Captain Jack Sparrow look sane.



:shrug:

Apparently, you and the Islamists have something in common:  you feel entitled to kill any civilian who happens to get in the way.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #686 on: Today at 11:59:36 am »
No, I'm arguing for principle, against apparently unprincipled people.  Too bad.

"Apparently unprincipled"?  What is your basis for that statement?  Because I haven't seen you post one scintilla of evidence showing that the action was unprincipled.  The school was in a building on an IRGC military installation with a communication tower on the roof.    So let's see it.  Please make the case that the US military is "apparently [sic] unprincipled" based on a single strike among thousands being made in a very short time span.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #687 on: Today at 12:01:10 pm »
you feel entitled to kill any civilian who happens to get in the way.

Lies make Jesus cry.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #688 on: Today at 12:01:24 pm »
:shrug:

Apparently, you and the Islamists have something in common:  you feel entitled to kill any civilian who happens to get in the way.

Now you are outright lying.  I said I abhor the lives lost.  It was a tragedy.  The crust of the discussion was around responsibility. and about a society that likes to put their most valuable at risk. This society is infamous for the use of human shields.   So if you are going to keep up the idiotic bullshit, at least tell the truth,
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,799
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #689 on: Today at 12:02:51 pm »
"Apparently unprincipled"?  What is your basis for that statement?  Because I haven't seen you post one scintilla of evidence showing that the action was unprincipled.  The school was in a building on an IRGC military installation with a communication tower on the roof.    So let's see it.  Please make the case that the US military is "apparently [sic] unprincipled" based on a single strike among thousands being made in a very short time span.

:facepalm2:

Very simple question, for which the answer is "yes" or "no":  If U.S. military planners knew, or should have known, that there was a school within the danger zone of that attack, should they have taken that fact into account, and either (a) justified the chances of killing innocent young children because the timing of the attack was absolutely critical - but for attacking at precisely that time, the war would have been lost, or (b) rescheduled the attack to a time when the children were not likely to be there - schools have pretty well-established schedules, and do not operate 24/7.

Yes, or no.  No equivocation, no "but, but, but" - Yes, or No.

Even you should be able to answer that question.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #690 on: Today at 12:04:02 pm »
Five days notice to sail?  Not 'Sail now to get there in five days'.  But 'Hey, we might set sail in five days, so be ready.'




InsideNK/GeoPolitics
@inside_nk

ALERT | The UK has put the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier on five days' notice to sail in response to Middle East crisis.

7:57 AM · Mar 7, 2026  ·  2,639 Views

https://x.com/inside_nk/status/2030281800489025728
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,799
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #691 on: Today at 12:04:40 pm »
Now you are outright lying.  I said I abhor the lives lost.  It was a tragedy.  The crust of the discussion was around responsibility. and about a society that likes to put their most valuable at risk. This society is infamous for the use of human shields.   So if you are going to keep up the idiotic bullshit, at least tell the truth,

:facepalm2:

Then there is no material difference between you and the Islamists.  If they put innocent civilians at risk, then you believe that gives you license to simply shoot through the civilians to hit the target, and the civilians be damned.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #692 on: Today at 12:05:29 pm »
:facepalm2:

Very simple question, for which the answer is "yes" or "no":  If U.S. military planners knew, or should have known, that there was a school within the danger zone of that attack, should they have taken that fact into account, and either (a) justified the chances of killing innocent young children because the timing of the attack was absolutely critical - but for attacking at precisely that time, the war would have been lost, or (b) rescheduled the attack to a time when the children were not likely to be there - schools have pretty well-established schedules, and do not operate 24/7.

Yes, or no.  No equivocation, no "but, but, but" - Yes, or No.

Even you should be able to answer that question.

Question...  Simple Yes or No......

Do You Beat Up Your Wife Routinely?....   Just give us a simple yes or no.

Simple Yes or No...   Do you beat up your wife routinely.....   Just answer Yes or No.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:06:21 pm by catfish1957 »
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,799
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #693 on: Today at 12:06:45 pm »
Question...  Simple Yes or No......

Do You Beat Up Your Wife Routinely?....   Just give us a simple yes or no.

Simple Yes or No...   Do you beat up your wife routinely.....   Just answer Yes or No.

No.


Wow.  You really are a f**king idiot, because you can't even ask a leading question that would entrap the answerer.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Socialism is a crime against humanity

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 65,721
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #694 on: Today at 12:07:28 pm »
I'm talking about you lot.

That's not very fair...we are not privy to what's being found on the ground.  We are looking through the lens of a media we don't trust.
I don’t owe tolerance to people who disagree with my existence.
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #695 on: Today at 12:08:08 pm »
:facepalm2:

Then there is no material difference between you and the Islamists.  If they put innocent civilians at risk, then you believe that gives you license to simply shoot through the civilians to hit the target, and the civilians be damned.

Another lie,...  Show me in my posting history where I have ever endorsed bombing civilian targets.  Your lies are getting damned old.

I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,530
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #696 on: Today at 12:11:01 pm »
No.


Wow.  You really are a f**king idiot, because you can't even ask a leading question that would entrap the answerer.

And your question wasn't leading considering that  all the facts have  not been collected, and that the most of what we know is from the (cough cough..) honest MSM?

I think we all know who the f'ing idiot is.  Hoist the mirror Captain Jack,
« Last Edit: Today at 12:14:48 pm by catfish1957 »
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #697 on: Today at 12:15:14 pm »
:facepalm2:

Very simple question

No, it's a hypothetical question.


for which the answer is "yes" or "no":

Uh, no.  You don't get to dictate the terms of my answer, especially when your question is not only hypothetical but devoid of situational facts.  If you want a 'yes/no' response, then I am going to have to have a lot more details on which to base a binary conclusion.


If U.S. military planners knew, or should have known,

OK, which one is it?  Did they know?  Or did they not know?  And if they didn't know, then who elected you 'god' to judge them on whether they should have known?  This is why I hate liberal arguments.


that there was a school within the danger zone of that attack, should they have taken that fact into account

For the sake of argument, if they knew, then 'yes'.  They should have taken that fact into account along with the other 99 facts they had that were central to the attack.  You know, the other 99 facts that you purposely choose to ignore in your unrealistically vague hypothetical.


Yes, or no.  No equivocation, no "but, but, but" - Yes, or No.

Even you should be able to answer that question.

Again, do you really believe that the US military knew that there were children inside a building with a military communication tower inside an IRGC military base when it got placed on a list of 5,000 targets inside Iran?  Yes, or no.  No equivocation, no "but, but, but" - Yes, or No.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
Re: LIVE THREAD: US and Israel vs. Iran, Part Two
« Reply #698 on: Today at 12:19:17 pm »
That's not very fair...we are not privy to what's being found on the ground.

And neither is @Kamaji .  He has invented a hypothetical question while demanding the rest of us play by its rules of the judgment it makes.


We are looking through the lens of a media we don't trust.

Correctamundo.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,697
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-