Accelerationism: The next dangerous stage
January 26, 2026 | Glenn Beck
Excerpts:
For a long time, we treated political violence like a weather event: rare, localized, tragic - then over. But law enforcement and researchers have been warning for years about a mindset that is different from normal extremism. It’s not “I want my side to win.”
It’s “I want the system to break.”
This mindset has a name: accelerationism.
This is exactly what is happening in Minnesota right now. It’s moved beyond peaceful protest; it’s even moved beyond “mostly” peaceful protest. Things have begun to accelerate.
“Accelerationism” - right or left - has a recognizable logic. It is a rising ideology that believes society is corrupt beyond repair. Institutions are illegitimate. Chaos is a tool. Violence is an accelerant. That’s not a theory. That is an observable ideological pattern across multiple movements and decades. The key change in the last several years is this: it’s more connected than it used to be. It is not necessarily more disciplined.
It is not necessarily bigger in raw numbers. But it is more connected - more quickly mobilized - more capable of spreading tactics, targets, and narratives. Accelerationism is going mainstream. That changes the risk profile. The second fact: The line between “protest” and “insurgent behavior” is being tested,
Protest is protected. Even loud, offensive protests that make you furious.
But there’s a line that every stable society must defend, or it ceases to be stable. That line is crossed when groups begin to coordinate to obstruct lawful operations as a strategy, not an accident. They track or identify government personnel for intimidation. They build parallel communications networks specifically designed to evade accountability. They justify targeting state actors as morally necessary.
Those are not theoretical markers. They are historically recognizable markers. When those behaviors appear, the question is no longer, “Is this a demonstration?” The question becomes: “Is someone trying to build veto power over law enforcement through fear?” Because once a movement believes it can control outcomes by making enforcement too costly - too dangerous - too politically radioactive - then law becomes optional. And when law becomes optional, the next step is not persuasion.
It’s escalation. The third fact: Cities become laboratories when enforcement is inconsistent
--
We are not doomed. But we are in a threshold moment - where a minority of people are trying to normalize the idea that power can be taken or blocked through fear. If that threshold is crossed, you don’t get “freedom.” You get factional control. You get selective enforcement. You get vendettas. You get a country where the quiet decent people withdraw from public life, because it’s too dangerous to speak. That is not America’s future - unless we allow it. And the way you prevent it is not with rage. It’s not with denial.
It’s with one standard, applied to everyone, in daylight. Because the only thing stronger than an angry street is a public that believes the law is real.
You need to join or sign in to read:
http://glennbeck.com/read/articles/accelerationism-the-next-dangerous-stage
