That's the crazy part. There was some guy on Fox and he wouldn't define illegal orders either.
And sadly, most people will only listen to the assertation without requiring a backup explanation.
People read the headlines, not the story.
Often the story does nothing to support or substantiate the headline.
It's cheap pejoratives that are based on nothing, but gain credibly with those who don't think beccause the allegations are in bold print and a larger font size.
It is the headlines that are being used to manipulate those too lazy to find out.