Facts are that Ukraine has no nuclear capability as the weapons were Soviet Union's. Possession doesn't translate to having the technology.
Stop twisting the truth @MeganC
I understand that you couldn't pull this crap at TOS with their thousands of posters, so you think you can do it here with our several dozen? Doesn't work that way. Please stop!! 
After the fall of the Soviet Union in December 1991, the Soviet military was divided among the newly independent states that emerged from the dissolution. Here’s a breakdown of how this division occurred:
1. Formation of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)In December 1991, several former Soviet republics signed the Belavezha Accords, which led to the establishment of the CIS. The CIS was intended to facilitate cooperation among the former Soviet republics and included a framework for military collaboration.
2. Distribution of Military AssetsThe Soviet Armed Forces were officially disbanded, and military assets were divided among the republics. The division was based on the location of military units and the distribution of military hardware.
Russia retained the bulk of the military equipment, including strategic nuclear forces, as it was the largest and most powerful of the successor states.
Other republics, such as Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, also received significant portions of military hardware, particularly ground forces and air defense systems.
3. Nuclear WeaponsAt the time of the Soviet Union's dissolution, Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan found themselves with nuclear weapons on their territories. Under the Budapest Memorandum (1994), these countries agreed to relinquish their nuclear arsenals in exchange for security assurances from Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
By 1996, Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan had transferred all their nuclear weapons to Russia.
4. Military Structure and CommandEach of the newly independent states established their own military structures, often recruiting from former Soviet military personnel. The command and control systems were reorganized to adapt to the new national frameworks.
Some republics, like Ukraine and Georgia, faced challenges in establishing effective military forces due to political instability and economic difficulties.
5. Continued RelationsDespite the division, some former Soviet republics maintained military cooperation through the CIS and other agreements, although tensions existed, particularly between Russia and states like Georgia and Ukraine.
Conclusion
The division of the Soviet military was a complex process influenced by political, strategic, and security considerations. While Russia emerged as the dominant military power, the other successor states sought to establish their own military identities and capabilities in the post-Soviet landscape.
