Woman Who Refused the Jab Awarded Millions in Damages by Court

[Smokin Joe]

@PeteS in CA is not a leftist, and those posting that libel ought to know better.

No, he isn't, As evidenced by posts on other topics.

It's just that on facets of the COVID category, we disagree.
I, too have posted numerous links and presented my arguments so often, that I decline to do so yet again.
They appear to have been ignored.
He has posted his arguments, asking most commonly where all the dead people are.

Wait for it...

[ChemEngrMBA]

@PeteS in CA is not a leftist, and those posting that libel ought to know better.

Then you must provide evidence for your defense of him. 

[GtHawk]

Then you must provide evidence for your defense of him. 

Ah, guilty til proven innocent, how very odd an argument to make, one reading it could jump to the conclusion that you are making about @PeteS. i have disagreed with Pete and he with me, but never would I ever consider him a liberal/ leftist whatever. He holds his opinion on Covid vaccines for his reasons supported by evidence he believes in, that others disagree is their right…not license to slur him.

[PeteS in CA]

Ah, guilty til proven innocent, how very odd an argument to make, one reading it could jump to the conclusion that you are making about @PeteS. i have disagreed with Pete and he with me, but never would I ever consider him a liberal/ leftist whatever. He holds his opinion on Covid vaccines for his reasons supported by evidence he believes in, that others disagree is their right…not license to slur him.

 

TBR's Search function using the Search term "Kammie" might be amusing. I think I'm the only one who has used that diminutive nickname for Harris. I might also be the only member to use the nickname "LIEden". Not that I think you should do this. My posting history is easily found in my member profile, but I don't think ChemEngrMBA cares to see facts (I wonder if he's familiar with "Traddles" on another discussion forum, ).

[Kamaji]

Then you must provide evidence for your defense of him. 

No, I don’t.   The forum itself is proof enough, at least for those of us who aren’t one-trick ponies.

[Bigun]

He is Leftist for Life.  Facts mean nothing to such Leftists.  They believe only what the media have repeated to them for thirty years of hatefulness and bias.  Covid didn't kill everyone who was infected by it regardless of the number of jabs they received or if they received none.
I have presented data showing that 86% of new covid hospital cases had jab + booster.  Whoosh.  Right over his head, ignored, refuted, as opposing facts always are are by Leftists.

@PeteS in CA is FAR from a leftist as his record on this forum will readily prove.

In my judgement he is blind WRT Covid vaccines. Whether that is purposeful or not I cannot know. @ChemEngrMBA

[mountaineer]

Then you must provide evidence for your defense of him.

Welcome to America. That's not the way it works.

[Fishrrman]

Heh.

I'd like to see that chemical engineering guy provide defense of his use of enormous text all the time...

[PeteS in CA]

Heh.

I'd like to see that chemical engineering guy provide defense of his use of enormous text all the time...

  

[Hoodat]

Then you must provide evidence for your defense of him. 

Seriously?  This is what liberals do.  The burden of proof is on you, @ChemEngrMBA .  Not on @PeteS in CA .

[ChemEngrMBA]

When has "the burden of proof" ever been on any hater of "neocon/RightWingReligiousExtremist/Nazi/Racist" to prove his hateful, malicious labels?  Calling anyone a "Leftist" hardly constitutes libel, in any case.  It is well known that the Left has wildly embraced the Jab in combination with their wholesale attacks on any "Denier".  Since he was walking like a duck, quacking like a duck, I naturally called him a duck.  I accept BigUn's claim that he truly is not a duck except for his one ducky mannerism. I have not read anything of interest by Ducky, only his giggles that he is entirely correct on Jabbiness.  The evidence is not in his favor, as I have shown.

Small fonts are difficult for me to read, so I enhance them for my benefit as well as the benefit of others with less than 20/20 eyesight.  Why that would offend any of you princesses you must explain.

[PeteS in CA]

  Over the past week I've averaged around 10 posts a day, on fairly high-traffic forums. ChemEngrMBA's claim not to have seen evidence of my opinions is simply not credible. Further, I pointed out above easy ways to see samples of my posting:

* I'm one of few, if there are any others, who use the pejorative nicknames "LIEden" and "Kammie". I pointed this out several days ago, but evidently ChemEngrMBA chose to avoid seeing clear, easily accessible, facts that might complicate his perception.

* I also pointed out that a record of my recent posts can be found at my forum Profile, but, again, ChemEngrMBA evidently chose to avoid seeing clear easily accessible, facts that might complicate his perception.

Maybe anti-Covid-vaxxerism is some sort of political litmus test for ChemEngrMBA, but many conservatives don't accept that POV, including, it would seem, the President whose Administration oversaw the development, testing, logistics, authorization, and start of distribution of the three Covid vaccines authorized during his administration or ~5 weeks after he left office. I'm just vocal in rejecting anti-Covid-vaxxerism and pointing out the huge canyon between the POV's claims and facts.

Further, Covid came into being in late 2019, and in 2022 basically dropped off to a level akin to annual flu outbreaks. Is "conservative" defined by something that didn't exist around 5 years ago? And which has for over 2 years been in the background noise of life? Have conservatives descended to the point of eschewing thought and understanding, instead resorting to stereotypes and name-calling? If so, beam me up, Scotty, there's ...

[Smokin Joe]

Testing????

What testing?

Eight (8) humans and then the population of the world as lab rats.

Why were the adverse reaction sheets blank? Because there was no data.

How can you obtain informed consent, if you cannot inform?

Then any adverse reactions found are being summarily denied?

Billions of lab rats, but the data are ignored?  FFS!

I'm happy to be in the 'control group', despite the loud and long official denial of acquired immunity.

Motive? Millions for Fauci, Collins, and others (royalties), Billions (as in over $100 Billion) in profits for Pharma.
---
Now, the word is that the amount of royalty payments and number of royalty interests over COVID has been misstated. What has been made clear is that the 58 royalty payments to Fauci and Collins were mostly pre-covid. What has not been made clear is how much they DID get. (Apparently only three of the payments were made in 2020 or 2021).

Keep in mind that a royalty interest in "the low single digits" on a Billion dollars can still be a substantial sum. One percent of a Billion is still 10 million. Also, royalty payments are not immediate, but depend on the total sales, which may well have tapered off, but certainly have not stopped, so 2022-present is not represented in the article.

This is from a most likely well-whitewashed source:
https://www.factcheck.org/2023/08/scicheck-conservative-posts-misrepresent-royalty-payments-to-fauci-and-collins/
----
What is generally known is that pre-covid net worth of Fauci was on the order of $5 million, and post-covid, had risen to some $12 million.

[PeteS in CA]

Testing????

What testing?

Eight (8) humans and then the population of the world as lab rats.

Why were the adverse reaction sheets blank? Because there was no data.

If this was in reference to my comment, "... the President whose Administration oversaw the ... testing, ...", In the real world:

J&J Phase 1/2 start, July 30, 2020: https://www.janssen.com/single-dose-johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-demonstrates-robust-protection-pre-clinical ; https://www.jnj.com/single-dose-of-johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-demonstrates-robust-protection-in-pre-clinical-studies

J&J Phase 3 start, September 23, 2020: https://www.jnj.com/johnson-johnson-initiates-pivotal-global-phase-3-clinical-trial-of-janssens-covid-19-vaccine-candidate ; https://www.janssen.com/johnson-johnson-initiates-pivotal-global-phase-3-clinical-trial-janssens-covid-19-vaccine-candidate

J&J Phase 1/2 data posted September 25, 2020: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.23.20199604v1 ; published in NEJM January 13, 2021: https://www.jnj.com/johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-interim-phase-1-2a-data-published-in-new-england-journal-of-medicine

J&J Phase 3 data published April 21, 2021 in NEJM: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101544

 

Moderna Phase 1 start, March 16, 2020: https://www.kpwashingtonresearch.org/news-and-events/recent-news/news-2020/kaiser-permanente-launches-coronavirus-vaccine-study-seattle , https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2020/03/16/hhs-secretary-azar-statement-on-launch-of-phase-1-covid-19-vaccine-trial.html , https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-clinical-trial-investigational-vaccine-covid-19-begins

Moderna Phase 2 start, May 29, 2020: https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2020/Moderna-Announces-First-Participants-in-Each-Age-Cohort-Dosed-in-Phase-2-Study-of-mRNA-Vaccine-mRNA-1273-Against-Novel-Coronavirus/default.aspx

Moderna Phase 3 start, July 27, 2020: https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2020/Moderna-Announces-Phase-3-COVE-Study-of-mRNA-Vaccine-Against-COVID-19-mRNA-1273-Begins/default.aspx

Moderna Phase 1 data published July 14, 2020 in NEJM: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483

Moderna Phase 3 data published December 30, 2020 in NEJM: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389

 

Pfizer Phase 1/2 start, April 29, 2020: https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/biontech-and-pfizer-announce-completion-dosing-first-cohort

Pfizer Phase 2/3 start, July 27, 2020: https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-choose-lead-mrna-vaccine-candidate-0

Pfizer Phase 1/2 data posted July 1, 2020: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.30.20142570v1

Pfizer Phase 3 data published December 10, 2020 in NEJM: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

[goatprairie]

Testing????

What testing?

Eight (8) humans and then the population of the world as lab rats.

Why were the adverse reaction sheets blank? Because there was no data.

How can you obtain informed consent, if you cannot inform?

Then any adverse reactions found are being summarily denied?

Billions of lab rats, but the data are ignored?  FFS!

I'm happy to be in the 'control group', despite the loud and long official denial of acquired immunity.

Motive? Millions for Fauci, Collins, and others (royalties), Billions (as in over $100 Billion) in profits for Pharma.
---
Now, the word is that the amount of royalty payments and number of royalty interests over COVID has been misstated. What has been made clear is that the 58 royalty payments to Fauci and Collins were mostly pre-covid. What has not been made clear is how much they DID get. (Apparently only three of the payments were made in 2020 or 2021).

Keep in mind that a royalty interest in "the low single digits" on a Billion dollars can still be a substantial sum. One percent of a Billion is still 10 million. Also, royalty payments are not immediate, but depend on the total sales, which may well have tapered off, but certainly have not stopped, so 2022-present is not represented in the article.

This is from a most likely well-whitewashed source:
https://www.factcheck.org/2023/08/scicheck-conservative-posts-misrepresent-royalty-payments-to-fauci-and-collins/
----
What is generally known is that pre-covid net worth of Fauci was on the order of $5 million, and post-covid, had risen to some $12 million.

Pfizer tested over forty thousand people around the world and Astra-Zeneca over twenty thousand before they started using them on mass scales.

[PeteS in CA]

Pfizer tested over forty thousand people around the world and Astra-Zeneca over twenty thousand before they started using them on mass scales.

Moderna's Phase 3 testing was on similar scale. What's pathetic about my post above is that other than the link to the published J&J test result and updating Moderna links, I compiled that info about 3 years ago. I thought that the Untested Vaccine shtick would have died out years ago, but I under-estimated some people's need to believe what they want to be true.

[goatprairie]

Moderna's Phase 3 testing was on similar scale. What's pathetic about my post above is that other than the link to the published J&J test result and updating Moderna links, I compiled that info about 3 years ago. I thought that the Untested Vaccine shtick would have died out years ago, but I under-estimated some people's need to believe what they want to be true.

For some reason many people desperately want to believe that all the prominent medical people around the world wanted to foist a hoax on the world's population for reasons unknown to me.
Covid was real. The vaccines saved millions of lives. Even Trump (correctly) still defends his Covid policies.
I don't defend the Biden admin's policies concerning forced vaccinations or their shutdowns of schools that harmed millions of young Americans.
But, why many people think that this was some sort of deranged scheme by hundreds of thousands of respected medical personnel around the world is beyond me.

[Hoodat]

If this was in reference to my comment, "... the President whose Administration oversaw the ... testing, ...", In the real world:

In the real world:


Pfizer and BioNTech Provide Update on mRNA-based Combination Vaccine Program Against Influenza and COVID-19 in Individuals 18-64 Years of Age

Friday, August 16, 2024 - 06:45am

.  .  .  IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

You should NOTreceive COMIRNATY ® (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) if you had a severe allergic reaction to a previous dose of COMIRNATY or any Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine* or to any ingredient in these vaccines.
*COMIRNATY (2023-2024 Formula) is made the same way as Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (Original monovalent) and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent, but it encodes the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant lineage XBB.1.5 (Omicron XBB.1.5).

There is a remote chance that COMIRNATY could cause a severe allergic reaction. A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few minutes to 1 hour after getting a dose. For this reason, your vaccination provider may ask you to stay at the place where you received the vaccine for monitoring after vaccination. Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include:
Difficulty breathing
Swelling of your face and throat
A fast heartbeat
A bad rash all over the body
Dizziness and weakness
Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) have occurred in some people who have received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, including COMIRNATY and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines. Myocarditis and pericarditis following COMIRNATY have occurred most commonly in adolescent males 12 through 17 years of age. In most of these individuals, symptoms began within a few days following vaccination. The chance of having this occur is very low. You should seek medical attention right away if you or your child have any of the following symptoms after receiving the vaccine, particularly during the 2 weeks after receiving a dose of the vaccine:
Chest pain
Shortness of breath
Feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart  .  .  .

https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/biontech-and-pfizer-announce-completion-dosing-first-cohort


As @Smokin Joe already pointed out, testing did not begin in earnest until the federal government shelled out hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies, offering up the American public as test subjects.

[Smokin Joe]

@Hoodat That information was not available when the program of mass injections began. The sheets which accompanied the shots which normally outline the possible interactions and possible adverse effects were blank, for the most part.
Because those effects were unknown, or at least undocumented, physicians and others administering the injections could not inform the patients of those effects, and thus, the patients could not give informed consent.
We have witnessed the largest group of test subjects, who were not informed enough to give informed consent in history, dwarfing the numbers occasions that gave rise to the Nuremberg Code.

Surgical mutilation of children follows, and that's happening, too.

The medical profession is out of control.

[ChemEngrMBA]

Democrat leaders spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars to LIE to you about Covid and everything else, and their followers, PeteS included, bought it completely.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/biden-s-huge-study-misinformation-grants-were-all-about-bullying-dissent-much-of-it-correct/ar-AA1uBaBC?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=bea9a70f566340b7b6f0e960e39de98d&ei=16

[Smokin Joe]

So that's where the 20 million Biden voters went...