Project Veritas Got FDA Lawyer on the Record: War Against Ivermectin was a Mistake

[Elderberry]

Texas Scorecard by Daniel Greer August 28, 2024

Texas’ Dr. Mary Talley Bowden and other frontline doctors are vindicated, again.

Project Veritas has released footage of a Food and Drug Administration attorney admitting that the agency he represented “unquestionably” went beyond its authority by dissuading the American public from taking ivermectin to fight COVID-19.

Isaac Belfer, who defended the FDA in a legal case brought by three doctors, including Texas’ Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, was secretly recorded stating that the agency overstepped its authority by recommending what drugs should and should not be taken.

Federal, state, and local governments took unprecedented steps to direct citizen behavior during the pandemic, confining people to their homes, shuttering businesses, and alternatively limiting and then mandating treatment, specifically vaccinations.

Texas cited the federal agency repeatedly during the pandemic while making policy decisions.

According to the doctors who brought suit against the FDA, the agency’s attack on ivermectin was part of an orchestrated effort to herd the public into getting COVID-19 shots. This was after the federal government took control over and cut the supply of monoclonal antibodies, another treatment option that had been saving lives.

Why did the FDA discourage using ivermectin and strangle the supply of monoclonal treatments? Emergency use authorization for vaccines requires “that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”

More: https://texasscorecard.com/federal/project-veritas-got-fda-lawyer-on-the-record-war-against-ivermectin-was-a-mistake/

[Smokin Joe]

According to the doctors who brought suit against the FDA, the agency’s attack on ivermectin was part of an orchestrated effort to herd the public into getting COVID-19 shots. This was after the federal government took control over and cut the supply of monoclonal antibodies, another treatment option that had been saving lives.

Why did the FDA discourage using ivermectin and strangle the supply of monoclonal treatments? Emergency use authorization for vaccines requires “that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”

It was so they could sell the shots. I have been saying so all along.

[Cyber Liberty]

It was so they could sell the shots. I have been saying so all along.

That has been obvious all along, too.  The "mistake" was creating the perception that the government was willing to kill people in large numbers, in order to get rid of the hated Trump.

[Smokin Joe]

That has been obvious all along, too.  The "mistake" was creating the perception that the government was willing to kill people in large numbers, in order to get rid of the hated Trump.

Well, it is apparrent that there was a little more to it than that. Killing Trump's economy was political, no doubt.
Withholding viable and effective (and cheap) treatment options for political and no small amount of financial gain, to the detriment of millions of people was a crime against humanity, not just a mistake.

We hanged or shot many associated with the Holocaust, yet here, in plain sight, people were murdered by withholding treatment that worked to push shots that didn't.

This wasn't even ideology, it was GREED, pure and simple.