I'm not against vaccines in general.
In this case what is being called a vaccine isn't. It may work fine long term but the simple fact is we don't know that yet. It is currently a science experiment with an unknown long term result. For those who have higher risks from not taking it verses taking it then it makes sense. I'm not there.
that pretty much sums up what I think as well. As for Doctor Tenpenny, I am a scientist, and all viewpoints should at least be considered. I am willing to listen to reasonable arguments for or against something, and she has her stated reasons for opposing mass vaccinations.
The more superficial your knowledge of the subject (any subject) the easier it is to dismiss opposing viewpoints, so it takes some digging to get to the meat of the matter, whatever it is. It is easy to get caught up in the slogans and hype for either viewpoint or none at all, but for me, the picture I have is that people went to great lengths, even crafting 'studies' which were deeply flawed from the onset, to discredit an early onset regimen that has appeared (where the data are even let out (not censored)) to be effective in the vast majority of cases. Anything which supported the use of the complete regimen at the appropriate time in the course of the disease was summarily discredited by investigations which used parts (only) of that regimen, at the wrong time in the course of the disease, and then claimed the regimen to be ineffective.
That's about like saying a bucket of sand or water can't be used to put out a fire, because you waited until the whole barn was fully involved instead of snuffing the flames while they were small.
All of this, apparently, was conducted by people who were supporting a vaccine (or other, expensive, treatment alternatives) and doing so to maintain the economic malaise the panic over the disease enabled them to generate (itself a result of media manipulation and mismanagement of resources and patients on a local scale) in lieu of a vaccine, which has been sold as the panacea from the beginning.
The political and economic interweavings are gobsmacking. The science has been polluted by both, and if you dig, the flaws in the studies damning hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and even chloroquine ate glaring, because one, or sometimes two parts, of a three part regimen were used, and the most essential one left out, or dosages were insanely high (in the case of Chloroquine in the Brazilian study).
It isn't just the scientist in me that questions the motivation that would lead authority figures in politics and the medical field to blatantly compromise their integrity (what they had, anyway), resulting in the deaths of tens, if not hundreds of thousands through bad policy, both politically, and through bad science.
Be that motivation political or pecuniary, this whole sh*tshow has been a crime against humanity as experts in their fields have misled the public and abused their positions of power. That does not include the very real motivations in place from early on to tweak the statistics for direct financial and indirect political gain, likely leading to inflated death tolls, nor the questionable accuracy of testing which further fostered the panic and all that ensued from that.
So, I'm not in any hurry to buy what they are selling, and the sales pitch is almost pushy enough for the telemarketers to chime in (surprised they've missed it, actually).
