Well, admittedly the topic is one of few that are actually about the President.
@skeeter 's implication is that
@corbe and I (the Tumpy bit) defend
@Absalom because he is against Tumpy. Nothing could be further from the truth. I, at least, defended Absalom because he is right.
And if I have a bias, it is only natural, as Absalom is a studied philosophical Conservative, by the numbers. And an ancient historian... Any bias in that would be quite natural...
And he and I have had a couple barn burners... He prefers the Celto-Galatian rise of Conservative thought, while I prefer the Celto-Cimeric rise across the Northlands... But picking nits in the end. Our arguments tend to be academic.