I'm not going to play your stupid game, INVAR. And stop putting words in my mouth that I didn't say. Oceander has already dishonestly done that in this thread. Now you?
What 'stupid game'? Why so freaking defensive?
YOU SAID:
The problem is.... if you get enough folks like some here that serve only to mock and ridicule anyone wanting a thorough, further investigation (like myself)..... and before you know it... there will be no more investigation. The case will be closed, marked as unsolved or chalked up to that "botched robbery" BS, and that will be that. Mission accomplished. Right guys? (you know who you are)
Which was followed by:
You have to be leery of anyone who attempts to shut down discussion with ridicule.
Actually it's an old Leftist/Alinsky tactic.
In which you then responded:
Exactly right. And trust me.... I am.....very leery of that tactic. Especially when being used by those who claim to be other than left-leaning.
Which prompted me asking you the question to provide some proof to the subtle suggestion that your detractors on this thread are 'other than left-leaning claimants' (i.e.: Left-leaners).
I simply said you are discrediting your position here (which I am in agreement with in terms of this story stinks of nefariousness) by suggesting members here are wanting to shut down the investigation and/or are 'other than left-leaning claimants'.
How else am I supposed to take your comments?