Speculation Swirls as Sean Hannity Announces Sudden Vacation Amid Fox News Turmoil

[Oceander]

I haven't seen any punishment.  You're dreaming AND inflating yourself there.  All I see is a lot of BS thrown around by certain "ilk".

And fifths!  What a glutton.


Ah, so wanting an investigation that is based on facts is just "a lot of BS thrown around" now?  That's more or less what I figured.  I want an investigation based on facts.  What do you want?

[XenaLee]

Okay well then show us the proof that the folks dissing your assumption in this story are in -reality 'left leaning'.

I mean can we see some statements or comments that would lend us to recognize that these folks are 'left-leaning' outside of simple aversion to anything that smells of a conspiracy?

I'm not going to play your stupid game, INVAR.  And stop putting words in my mouth that I didn't say.  Oceander has already dishonestly done that in this thread.  Now you? 

[Oceander]

I'm not going to play your stupid game, INVAR.  And stop putting words in my mouth that I didn't say.  Oceander has already dishonestly done that in this thread.  Now you? 

Hardly.  I am all in favor of an investigation, and all I want are facts.  You oppose me.  Therefore, you are opposed to either an investigation or to the facts.  Which one is it?

[XenaLee]

And fifths!  What a glutton.


Ah, so wanting an investigation that is based on facts is just "a lot of BS thrown around" now?  That's more or less what I figured.  I want an investigation based on facts.  What do you want?

Good grief.   What the hell are you bleating about?   You don't want any investigation.  That much is obvious.  You've already 'bought into' that botched robbery story.  Who, really, are you trying to fool here?

[Old Warrior in Exile]

And sometimes a cigar is just a good smoke - and some people don't have anything worth saying; case in point are the fact-free conspiracy freaks on this thread.

Everyone!

May I have your attention, please?!

We're going to let Oceander do all the talking from now on. He's the only one with anything to say that is of any worth.

Proceed, your Worthiness. 

Sheesh. Lighten up, Francis.

[mountaineer]

Come on, guys.   

[Oceander]

Good grief.   What the hell are you bleating about?   You don't want any investigation.  That much is obvious.  You've already 'bought into' that botched robbery story.  Who, really, are you trying to fool here?

Ahh, so when I type the words "I want an investigation" I'm really typing something else?  Something so secret that only you are brilliant enough to figure it out?

All I want are the facts.  Where are they?  Put up or shut up.  Provide facts, not political fantasy.

[Oceander]

Everyone!

May I have your attention, please?!

We're going to let Oceander do all the talking from now on. He's the only one with anything to say that is of any worth.

Proceed, your Worthiness. 

Sheesh. Lighten up, Francis.

Thanks.

[EC]

Said it on the other Rich thread - show me the police report.

Not some journo's interpretation - show me the actual report.

[Oceander]

Said it on the other Rich thread - show me the police report.

Not some journo's interpretation - show me the actual report.

Anything that involves actual facts would be great.

[XenaLee]

Hardly.  I am all in favor of an investigation, and all I want are facts.  You oppose me.  Therefore, you are opposed to either an investigation or to the facts.  Which one is it?

I want an investigation of the incident.... so that the facts of the incident can be uncovered and revealed.  I have made that quite clear throughout this thread.  For that I've been ridiculed and mocked, throughout this thread.   Why?

You have an agenda here.  What is it?

[txradioguy]

Said it on the other Rich thread - show me the police report.

Not some journo's interpretation - show me the actual report.

Gonna have to wait until the investigation by the DC Police is officially wrapped up. 

Either that or file a FOIA request.

[Oceander]

I want an investigation of the incident.... so that the facts of the incident can be uncovered and revealed.  I have made that quite clear throughout this thread.  For that I've been ridiculed and mocked, throughout this thread.   Why?

You have an agenda here.  What is it?

My agenda is this:  facts first, speculation second, particularly political speculation.  Until and unless there are facts that suggest otherwise there is absolutely no call to start pulling out the old Clinton murder conspiracy B.S. and turning this guy's tragic death into some politically-motivated hit.

Where are the facts that would differentiate this from all of the other tragic killings in D.C.?

[XenaLee]

Ahh, so when I type the words "I want an investigation" I'm really typing something else?  Something so secret that only you are brilliant enough to figure it out?

All I want are the facts.  Where are they?  Put up or shut up.  Provide facts, not political fantasy.

And you think you're so damned clever (you'd be wrong about that too...lol).  You claim to want an investigation 'based on the facts'.  The Catch-22 here is.... (and here's the part where you 'think' you so clever).... that there are no pertinent facts yet.... unless or until there's a thorough investigation.... since the DC police have deemed it.....(according to you naysayers...and fact-less, mind you), to be a "botched robbery".

Not working.  Try again?

 

[Oceander]

And you think you're so damned clever (you'd be wrong about that too...lol).  You claim to want an investigation 'based on the facts'.  The Catch-22 here is.... (and here's the part where you 'think' you so clever).... that there are no pertinent facts yet.... unless or until there's a thorough investigation.... since the DC police have deemed it.....(according to you naysayers...and fact-less, mind you), to be a "botched robbery".

Not working.  Try again?

 

Then you need to come up with facts that say the police investigation is wrong.  So far you haven't.

So, I ask again:  where are the facts.  Put up or shut up.

[XenaLee]

My agenda is this:  facts first, speculation second, particularly political speculation.  Until and unless there are facts that suggest otherwise there is absolutely no call to start pulling out the old Clinton murder conspiracy B.S. and turning this guy's tragic death into some politically-motivated hit.

Where are the facts that would differentiate this from all of the other tragic killings in D.C.?

Well....now we're getting somewhere.  You just admitted, albeit in a round-about way (figures).... that you don't really want an investigation.   I knew it, but nice to see you being honest at least about that.  Bravo!

[INVAR]

I'm not going to play your stupid game, INVAR.  And stop putting words in my mouth that I didn't say.  Oceander has already dishonestly done that in this thread.  Now you?

What 'stupid game'?  Why so freaking defensive?

YOU SAID:

The problem is.... if you get enough folks like some here that serve only to mock and ridicule anyone wanting a thorough, further investigation (like myself)..... and before you know it... there will be no more investigation.  The case will be closed, marked as unsolved or chalked up to that "botched robbery" BS, and that will be that.   Mission accomplished.  Right guys? (you know who you are)

Which was followed by:

You have to be leery of anyone who attempts to shut down discussion with ridicule.
Actually it's an old Leftist/Alinsky tactic.

In which you then responded:

Exactly right.  And trust me.... I am.....very leery of that tactic.  Especially when being used by those who claim to be other than left-leaning.

Which prompted me asking you the question to provide some proof to the subtle suggestion that your detractors on this thread are 'other than left-leaning claimants' (i.e.: Left-leaners).

I simply said you are discrediting your position here (which I am in agreement with in terms of this story stinks of nefariousness) by suggesting members here are wanting to shut down the investigation and/or are 'other than left-leaning claimants'.

How else am I supposed to take your comments?

[EC]

since the DC police have deemed it.....(according to you naysayers...and fact-less, mind you), to be a "botched robbery".

It's a start. Did they say that? Police spox please, not a reporter.

[Oceander]

Well....now we're getting somewhere.  You just admitted, albeit in a round-about way (figures).... that you don't really want an investigation.   I knew it, but nice to see you being honest at least about that.  Bravo!

So you know who the killer is, then?  Until the killer is caught, the death should be investigated, just like every other murder.  I'm happily on board with that.

But that's not what you want.  You want your preconceived delusions validated that this was really a political hit job by the Clinton/DNC mafia.  And for that you don't have a single shred of evidence.

So, give us the facts.  Put up or shut up.

[GtHawk]

My agenda is this:  facts first, speculation second, particularly political speculation.  Until and unless there are facts that suggest otherwise there is absolutely no call to start pulling out the old Clinton murder conspiracy B.S. and turning this guy's tragic death into some politically-motivated hit.

Where are the facts that would differentiate this from all of the other tragic killings in D.C.?

Look I've tried to follow all this, there seems be a persistent TROLL at work, but what I haven't seen addressed is what part Ted Cruz's father had in Rich's death.

[XenaLee]

So you know who the killer is, then?  Until the killer is caught, the death should be investigated, just like every other murder.  I'm happily on board with that.

But that's not what you want. You want your preconceived delusions validated that this was really a political hit job by the Clinton/DNC mafia.  And for that you don't have a single shred of evidence.

So, give us the facts.  Put up or shut up.

Good God, there you go again with your bullshit lies.   I never said that....YOU said it. 

You sound desperate there, dude.   What are you so afraid of?

[catfish1957]

I find it odd that this twit who is in a career death spiral can warrant 13 pages of posts here at TBR.

[XenaLee]

What 'stupid game'?  Why so freaking defensive?

YOU SAID:

Which was followed by:

In which you then responded:

Which prompted me asking you the question to provide some proof to the subtle suggestion that your detractors on this thread are 'other than left-leaning claimants' (i.e.: Left-leaners).

I simply said you are discrediting your position here (which I am in agreement with in terms of this story stinks of nefariousness) by suggesting members here are wanting to shut down the investigation and/or are 'other than left-leaning claimants'.

How else am I supposed to take your comments?

 

Hon.... really.... seriously..... I don't give a tinker's damn how you take my comments.

Clear?

[Oceander]

I find it odd that this twit who is in a career death spiral can warrant 13 pages of posts here at TBR.

That'll happen when those who believe his death was a Clinton mafia hit job cannot find a scintilla of evidence to back up their cherished political fetishes.

All I want are facts that indicate this is something more than a botched robbery.  Until then, Occam's Razor - nay, simple logic 101 - says it wasn't some complicated byzantine political hit.

[truth_seeker]