Repeating yourselves is likely only going to continue to annoy guests following the thread who already suspect you anti-Trumpsters of being rather dull-witted. For me, it is wonderful. Please continue!
And will SOMEBODY please enlighten our fellow poster as to the meaning of a "bump". He has apparently not been around the block yet. This term has been used freely on this thread by a whole host of posters other than I.
I take it the 'Trashcan Man reference was lost on you. (A character from an earlier Stephen King novel,
The Stand. Bumpty bump your own self. Interesting the character is a pyromaniac who has sold his soul to the Devil's own henchman, Randall Flag, and yet destroys the whole show with a nuclear weapon from the arsenal (in the story) at Indian Springs.
Now you know the rest of the story, and the origin of the reference.
It's such a pity when you insult someone and they just don't get it, but I find the petty arsonist turned apocalyptic somehow appropriate for a comparison, considering your inflammable trolling the #nevertrump people on this forum with your flaming sanctimony and particular brands of insult, claiming vituperation where none has existed, only fact.
Sad. You don't bump to the top on this forum, dear FReeper, not like TOS.
Ah! I almost forgot! The latest deranged accusations of me being a troll - you may feel free to contact Admin and complain, but I doubt you will find agreement. I have fully and freely engaged in substantive debate with you lovely people and only stopped responding to them as they arose when the level of intellect in the posts sank into the submoron realm ("He's a Democrat PLANT!!" heh) and the level of vituperation rose to the hysterical ranting and raving stratosphere.
It's likely I won't engage in further substantive debate with most of you nice folks for the same reason I won't likely jump headfirst into a wood chipper. One already knows the likely result of each action.
Well, there goes that suspense.
Plants and wood chippers just go together somehow. The only stratospheric claims of abuse I see here are from your keyboard. Perhaps you need to return to your 'safe space' for a little R&R and to let the two or three neurons wildly discharging in unison settle down for a bit. Maybe you should ground them out and start over.
I stay around because I keep hoping that someone on the anti-Trump side of the issue will actually post something straightforward, brief and to the point ( as I have several times) without hateful invective and derisive, sadistic venom, (not to mention being dull and boring) worthy of a substantive response.
Oh, so now you want
brevity, too. What, was my other post too much for you to read at once? Did your lips get tired?
Wild vituperations or insults hardly rate a substantive, respectful response, wouldn't you agree? I mean, just LOOK at the content of most of the posts directed to or about me over the last twenty posts and ask yourself if they would elicit a response from any normal person!?! I think not.
There you go again, assuming you are somehow a judge of what is 'normal'. I think you have had quite a share of respectful responses, perhaps far more than you merit.
I do have a question, though.
Have you (or for that matter any of the other anti-#nevertrumpers on the thread--feel free to chime in on this one), ever considered how much progress might have been made demeaning Hillary Clinton (remember her, the supposed "enemy") had we all not been so thoroughly engaged by alleged Trump Supporters defending our stance against incontinent invective day after tedious day? How much time could have been spent by the alleged Trump supporters themselves if they had just ignored those pesky #nevertrumps and concentrated their efforts on extolling his virtues (
) and deriding her flaws--which are legion?
Considering the #nevertrump faction here appears to be basically anti-Hillary too, weeks have been wasted which could have been spent in a cooperative effort to pick through wikileaks material and demean her, too.
But no, in the mold of the fellow who runs his campaign based on vengeful attacks on Republicans and other Conservatives rather than so much on Liberals and Democrats, so much time has been spent projecting all the psychological spew of the Trump campaign onto those of us who won't support him either.
(Maybe y'all should get T-shirts marked like claymore mines: "Front. This side toward enemy").
Of course, that begs the question, cui bono? Why her Hindness, of course. Hence, people wonder if those of you who drew the short straw any given day are only here to distract those of us who don't want her either, from finding more dirt on and discussing her lack of merit, too, by keeping us engaged discussing his (lack of merit, that is).
By the tinfoil hat property of political outcomes, that makes you a pro-Hillary troll.
Oceander and some others have actually posted decently on the thread but you others...wow. It makes me think that some of you have either had too many drugs or not enough.
And now, you make an open ended and blanket accusation that the posters here are habitual users of mood altering substances either overmedicated or short a dose.
How can you rationally expect people to respond to your deranged sanctimony? Or is it just more projection?
