There is something about some 200,000 more votes than registered voters that inclines me greatly toward fraud on a massive scale. Cui bono? That's obvious, and they are the people who have most egregiously lied to us..
Right.
If true. And I would not put it past right leaning propagandists to have made it up... As there are examples thereof existing, I hold *nothing* reported to be true. I can no longer trust Right leaning sources, any more than I can trust the left.
However, I DO lean hard toward the idea of corruption,
of course, to the point of not finding this instance to be remarkable or peculiar. But how I FEEEEEL about it has no bearing.
But let me put it this way, I am supposed somehow to believe that a person who can barely articulate what day it is, who never drew a crowd the media didn't have to play camera angle tricks to make look like a funeral for someone unpopular in the rain, someone who can't get more than a couple of thousand people to follow their speeches, beat a guy who could easily pack a venue--a guy who got more votes than any sitting president in history, and was allegedly still beaten (after the 5 key states shut down and his numbers went vertical, all about the same time? And those Same jurisdictions are resisting attempts to verify those votes by any means necessary, including shredding ballots?
Sorry, but at some point the camel's back broke.
Alright. Let ME put it THIS way: Whine and cry. Throw dirt in the air. Pitch a fit, an advanced hissy.
Then what do you got? *nothing*, friend. Not a single damn thing until it is proven in a court of law.
And that is not a simple thing wrt elections. That requires a preponderance of evidence in a short time frame. The intention of the framers was that it was more important that the word is final than dickin with it incessantly... And I DO agree with that. NOW the thing will start to come out, a little here, a little there. And tiny little workerbee heads will roll. But this has been a swing-and-a-miss. And there ain't no sense in crying over spilled milk.
It is not that I am dispassionate about it. Nor even that I am in disagreement with you - I am quite tightly aligned. But that and five bucks will buy you a coffee.
And that is STILL no reason to convict by means of the court of public opinion.
I want to see a thorough investigation and the production of ALL the evidence, examination of software, logs, chains of custody, etc. But that isn't going to happen. Like Janet Reno used to say, "There is no evidence which exists....", and I believe the perpetrators have been doing all necessary to make sure none of that sees the light of day.
Hell, Yes, it was stolen.
I absolutely agree with that, and have been behind that reasoning all the way along... All that's left is the doin of it.
But as I said, and as I am still inclined - That's the hard part... As y'all are finding out.
