Author Topic: (Updates)Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Ru  (Read 17210 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,803
Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules
Breitbart, Dec 7, 2020

The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.

Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says:

Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.…

This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.

Documents follow:


More:  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/07/texas-sues-georgia-michigan-pennsylvania-and-wisconsin-at-supreme-court-election-rules/






« Last Edit: December 09, 2020, 10:22:08 pm by Right_in_Virginia »

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,803
FTA

Quote
Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,803
The violation of the Constitution is the basis of the PA case before the Supreme Court now. 

(Take a look at this @catfish1957 )











« Last Edit: December 08, 2020, 02:13:30 pm by Right_in_Virginia »

Online Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,436

Online bigheadfred

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,600
  • Gender: Male
  • One day Closer
I was thinking this this morning. These states have violated my right to participate in a free federal election. And here it is. All states should sue.
She asked me name my foe then. I said the need within some men to fight and kill their brothers without thought of Love or God. Ken Hensley

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,803
Voters in Texas and across the country were disenfranchised by these states.
 
Hopefully, amicus briefs are in the works. 

Offline skeeter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,717
  • Gender: Male
I was thinking this this morning. These states have violated my right to participate in a free federal election. And here it is. All states should sue.
This has occurred to me as well. Why should the other states accept electors of states who, for example, allow illegal aliens to vote?

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
And the obvious question is.... why is Texas the only state doing this?  Leftist rogue judges love to say that someone has no standing to sue in their courts.... but every legal citizen, eligible to vote, has standing in this case.... standing to sue those states that violated their own election laws and their own Constitution. as well as the US Constitution, committed fraud and summarily disenfranchised voters in other states as well as in their own state.   

Which is why I previously stated that there should be uniform election laws and regulations that all 50 states must abide by.... vs. this willy nilly, ripe for fraud BS.  Perhaps now there will be due to this latest election fiasco.   One would have thought that there would have been a call for such election regulations after the 2000 election circus.   But obviously, the states (run by leftists) that love to cheat will never want those changes to occur.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,803
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq


HUGE: Texas sues four states directly in the Supreme Court over election integrity!!

8:56 AM · Dec 8, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1336308623748833281


Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq


Don’t mess with Texas! Flag of United States

9:15 AM · Dec 8, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1336313544866934785

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,803

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,574
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Way to go Ken Paxton!!!
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline catfish1957

  • Laken Riley.... Say her Name. And to every past and future democrat voter- Her blood is on your hands too!!!
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,476
  • Gender: Male
The violation of the Constitution is the basis of the PA case before the Supreme Court now. 

(Take a look at this @catfish1957 )

@Right_in_Virginia

Thanks for the ping.  I forgot which Justice has TX appellate in his/her docket. 
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Online Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,436
Way to go Ken Paxton!!!

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues Battleground States, Says Changes To 2020 Election Laws ‘Unconstitutional’

21 CBS DFW

https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2020/12/08/texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-sues-battleground-states-says-changes-to-2020-election-laws-unconstitutional/

Quote
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued battleground states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, saying they made unconstitutional changes to their laws before the 2020 election.

Paxton said those states tainted the integrity of the vote in Texas and all states.

Here is his full statement on the matter:

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton today filed a lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin in the United States Supreme Court. The four states exploited the COVID-19 pandemic to justify ignoring federal and state election laws and unlawfully enacting last-minute changes, thus skewing the results of the 2020 General Election. The battleground states flooded their people with unlawful ballot applications and ballots while ignoring statutory requirements as to how they were received, evaluated and counted.

“Trust in the integrity of our election processes is sacrosanct and binds our citizenry and the States in this Union together. Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin destroyed that trust and compromised the security and integrity of the 2020 election. The states violated statutes enacted by their duly elected legislatures, thereby violating the Constitution. By ignoring both state and federal law, these states have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but of Texas and every other state that held lawful elections,” said Attorney General Paxton. “Their failure to abide by the rule of law casts a dark shadow of doubt over the outcome of the entire election. We now ask that the Supreme Court step in to correct this egregious error.”

Elections for federal office must comport with federal constitutional standards. For presidential elections, each state must appoint its electors to the electoral college in a manner that complies with the Constitution. The Electors Clause requirement that only state legislatures may set the rules governing the appointment of electors and elections and cannot be delegated to local officials. The majority of the rushed decisions, made by local officials, were not approved by the state legislatures, thereby circumventing the Constitution.

More at link.

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,574
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Online Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,436
@Right_in_Virginia

Thanks for the ping.  I forgot which Justice has TX appellate in his/her docket.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitassignments.aspx

Circuit Assignments

For the Fifth Circuit - Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice (Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas)


Online verga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,706
  • Gender: Male
In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
�More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.�-Woody Allen
If God invented marathons to keep people from doing anything more stupid, the triathlon must have taken him completely by surprise.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,522
God bless the State of Texas.

If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,803
Interesting discussion about this on Jay Sekulow's podcast today ..


Error 404 (Not Found)!!1



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0YwuBz1PNU

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,382
  • Gender: Male
The case looks pretty strong, from what I can tell, but I am no lawyer.

Offline corbe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,354
Ray Wylie Hubbard "Screw You, We're From Texas"


Error 404 (Not Found)!!1
No government in the 12,000 years of modern mankind history has led its people into anything but the history books with a simple lesson, don't let this happen to you.

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,382
  • Gender: Male

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,803
If anyone needs it, here's the docket number:


Quote
No. 22O155

Title:         Texas, Plaintiff
                 v.
                 Pennsylvania, et al.

Docketed:  December 8, 2020

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html



Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,803
« Last Edit: December 08, 2020, 09:39:55 pm by Right_in_Virginia »

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,259
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Ali
🟧
#StopTheSteal
@ali
SEVEN states have now joined Texas lawsuit, arguing that the Equal Protection Clause has been violated in this election from state-to-state.

@Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota.

#StopTheSteal • #FightForTrump
4:48 PM · Dec 8, 2020

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-louisiana-joins-texas-case-before-supreme-court/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,803
Quote
SEVEN states have now joined Texas lawsuit, arguing that the Equal Protection Clause has been violated in this election from state-to-state. @Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota. #StopTheSteal • #FightForTrump— Ali 🟧 #StopTheSteal (@ali) December 8, 2020

I count eight states   happy77

Louisiana
Arkansas
Alabama
Florida
Kentucky
Mississippi
South Carolina
South Dakota



« Last Edit: December 09, 2020, 01:16:32 am by Right_in_Virginia »