My son has had an overall very positive experience in BSA. Just this past weekend friends from two troops came out to help him with his Eagle Project, and he has staffed the local council leadership camp (NYLT, National Youth Leadership Training) now for several years. I was the Advancement Chair and de-facto Chaplain of one of his troops, and I took the Wood Badge training.
But when BSA made their membership changes regarding sexual orientation I began backing out. I didn't immediately eject; if I can help boys and parents that I know personally I will continue to do so. Nor have I pulled my son out, he's old enough to make his own decisions on it. But I can't maintain Duty to God while also pretending that His Word doesn't say what it clearly says. I resigned from personal roles and no longer participate in any leadership tasks.
The most surprising thing to me was that most of the local "Scouters" (adults who participate, often in leadership roles for the council or district) could not even understand my rationale. Scouting's Duty to God criterion has become so ecumenical that it is frankly meaningless, and Scouters don't seem to understand that Duty to God can have positive, undeniable requirements about what we are willing to associate ourselves with in an organization that professes to teach values.
My understanding is that local councils in several states were going to be sued by the various state departments of justice over discrimination, and for that reason national leadership decided to surrender on the sexual orientation question. More trivially, I was told by a prominent local scouter that had BSA not changed that policy, the World Scouting Organization would never have awarded an International Jamboree to the USA. Both indicate that what used to be called Boy Scouts of America lost its original purpose and became a self-protecting, self-perpetuating bureaucracy.
I prefer the stance of a scouter to whom I asked the rhetorical question "how much of its time, money, and resources should BSA be willing to spend in legal battles that seem less and less likely to succeed?" He replied "All of it."