That's hypocrisy.
No, the hypocrisy is found in your advocacy of rights found in the 'penumbras' and 'emanations' of the text of the Constitution that you then herald and insist are 'equal protection' when in-fact they are NOT equal protection advocacies, but SPECIAL RIGHTS to be afforded so as to intrude on institutions that predate the existence of this continent in written history.
Then again, you are one who insists that there is the explicit instruction to separate church and state written in the Constitution.