That's not the issue @txradioguy No one is debating whether or not Cruz is a citizen of the United States. The debate is whether or not he meets the Constitutional requirement to be POTUS of being a natural born citizen. Yes, Congress has made it possible for him to be a citizen. But this is not natural born, this is naturalized citizenship.
You need to learn to actually read the Constitution and quit relying on Breitbart to tell you what to think.
Article II, section 1 of the Constitution provides:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. (emphasis added)
Under U.S. law, the fact that Cruz was born to a U.S. citizen mother makes him a citizen from birth. In other words, he is a “natural born citizen” (as opposed to a naturalized citizen) and is constitutionally eligible.
If we used the perverted and totally misinterpreted version of Article II that you and the rest of the birthers believe...then most of the Founding Fathers...and a couple of other former Presidents wouldn't have been eligible for office because they weren't born in the United States.
Are you here to tell me that the Founding Fathers that went on to serve as President...who weren't born in this country were in violation of the very Constitution most of them fought for and helped work to bring to fruition?