First of all, I'm not playing a victim. I'm too old to give any sh*ts.
And I've responded on the level to which I'm addressed for going on 20 years.
And if you'd be honest, you'd see that the entire point is that when the dog-packs go after a Trump supporter and things escalate, it's only THEN...that the MODS come in.
And truth be known, because not a GD single moderator is an avid Trump supporter, there will NEVER be a bias-free decision.
If the mods are stepping in on behalf of Trump supporters that must be because they hit the button the most. I have seen a lot of crap go the other way and no mod stepped in. Now maybe my perspective is a little different, being one of those who will criticize Trump and occasionally call him by one of the many various and sundry nicknames he acquired during the election, but I'd say there is a lot of modding done on behalf of trump supporters, and it appears to be fairly equitable overall. When did the mods ever come down on you that you didn't feel it was deserved? On anyone?
I think Myst does a great job, all in all and tries to be fair to everyone. Political opinion is one thing personal attacks another. The latter are forbidden, the former are free speech.
While "dog packs" are common in response to a particularly erroneous or unsupportable post, I have seen the dog-packs go after people here who don't support Trump, for that alone. That might badger a few into the corners but most of us aren't going anywhere. So what' the point?
If there is a defense or point to be made by discussion, make it--without the personal attacks.