Author Topic: Hillary Was Tipped Off On Trump Wiretap – Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election  (Read 6829 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Hillary Was Tipped Off On Trump Wiretap – Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election

Cristina Laila Mar 5th, 2017 3:57 pm 439 Comments

TGP reported earlier that the first FISA request came right after AG Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in June of 2016.

The second FISA request was submitted in October of 2016 just before the election. Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet on October 31st stating that ‘computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based server’.

It appears she was tipped off to the wiretapping prior to the election.

Here is Hillary Clinton’s tweet from October 31st… Computer scientists?… Connect the dots, folks. This was a well coordinated attack on a Presidential candidate. AG Lynch met with Bill Clinton just before the first FISA request.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-tipped-off-trump-wiretap-tweeted-one-week-prior-election/
« Last Edit: March 06, 2017, 06:17:53 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline LonestarDream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,061
Great article.  Remember the reporting on the tweet and it struck me as odd at the time.

Now I know why....
(?) Trump Realist    (*) Trump believer   (?) Never Trump,   Which are you ?

Offline don-o

  • Worldview Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,280
  • FR Class of '98
May I be the first to say,

BOOM!

Smoking guns are raining down.

Offline LonestarDream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,061
May I be the first to say,

BOOM!

Smoking guns are raining down.

Thing is folks do not want deal with this.  Trump was playing 'nicey, nicey' after the SOTU speech and then Schumer trumped up his snide 'intelligence agencies are going to get you meme' 

da (Russian) Bears

« Last Edit: March 06, 2017, 06:50:59 pm by LonestarDream »
(?) Trump Realist    (*) Trump believer   (?) Never Trump,   Which are you ?

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Not one single source...anonymous or otherwise and yet we've got people yelling "scoreboard!"

The very same people who...if this had been a negative article on Trump...with just one solitary tweet as "proof"...would have been yelling "FAKE NEWS!!!"

 **nononono*
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline LonestarDream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,061
Not one single source...anonymous or otherwise and yet we've got people yelling "scoreboard!"

The very same people who...if this had been a negative article on Trump...with just one solitary tweet as "proof"...would have been yelling "FAKE NEWS!!!"

 **nononono*


Inundated with sources, including the front page of the NYT.  Some folks just choose to ignore
(?) Trump Realist    (*) Trump believer   (?) Never Trump,   Which are you ?

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39

Inundated with sources, including the front page of the NYT.  Some folks just choose to ignore

Where are the sources in the story in the OP?

You really need to take the blinders off put the pom poms down and return to reality.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline LonestarDream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,061
Chucky says that the intelligence agencies have six ways from Sunday to get at Trump.....

Short, one minute video.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Py25LPuv-c
« Last Edit: March 06, 2017, 06:58:53 pm by LonestarDream »
(?) Trump Realist    (*) Trump believer   (?) Never Trump,   Which are you ?

Offline LonestarDream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,061
How about in Hillary's own words...

On Halloween of last year....



Not one single source...anonymous or otherwise and yet we've got people yelling "scoreboard!"

The very same people who...if this had been a negative article on Trump...with just one solitary tweet as "proof"...would have been yelling "FAKE NEWS!!!"

 **nononono*
« Last Edit: March 06, 2017, 07:13:31 pm by LonestarDream »
(?) Trump Realist    (*) Trump believer   (?) Never Trump,   Which are you ?

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
How about in Hillary's own words...

On Halloween of last year....



For a legitimate news story...especially in context to the wacky standards some have here for what constitutes real and fake news...a tweet from here doesn't even come close to being proof or a credible source.

Besides...I thought Hillary was a proven certifiable liar who was not to be believed under any circumstances?
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline LonestarDream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,061
Incidental truth can occasionally ooze from Hillary's disclosures.  Not her intention to give up the game.

THAT, I can tell you.   

For a legitimate news story...especially in context to the wacky standards some have here for what constitutes real and fake news...a tweet from here doesn't even come close to being proof or a credible source.

Besides...I thought Hillary was a proven certifiable liar who was not to be believed under any circumstances?
(?) Trump Realist    (*) Trump believer   (?) Never Trump,   Which are you ?

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Hillary Was Tipped Off On Trump Wiretap – Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election

Cristina Laila Mar 5th, 2017 3:57 pm 439 Comments

TGP reported earlier that the first FISA request came right after AG Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in June of 2016.

The second FISA request was submitted in October of 2016 just before the election. Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet on October 31st stating that ‘computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based server’.

It appears she was tipped off to the wiretapping prior to the election.

Here is Hillary Clinton’s tweet from October 31st… Computer scientists?… Connect the dots, folks. This was a well coordinated attack on a Presidential candidate. AG Lynch met with Bill Clinton just before the first FISA request.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-tipped-off-trump-wiretap-tweeted-one-week-prior-election/

So the conspiracy (vast left wing) no longer appears to be a "theory".  Not surprised.  I put nothing past the leftist Democrats. 
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline LonestarDream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,061
So the conspiracy (vast left wing) no longer appears to be a "theory".  Not surprised.  I put nothing past the leftist Democrats.

Who are these 'compute scientist ' friends of Hillary?  Different ones that ran her home brew server?

Can congress or a grand jury question them?
« Last Edit: March 06, 2017, 07:34:26 pm by LonestarDream »
(?) Trump Realist    (*) Trump believer   (?) Never Trump,   Which are you ?

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Incidental truth can occasionally ooze from Hillary's disclosures.  Not her intention to give up the game.

THAT, I can tell you.

You ever heard the term blind follower?
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
So the conspiracy (vast left wing) no longer appears to be a "theory".  Not surprised.  I put nothing past the leftist Democrats.

Where is the proof of a conspiracy?
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,295
Now this is interesting I will say.


Although maybe she got it from the Press just like Donny did?


It all stems from an article Louise Mensche lady wrote in October. At least the Breitbart article that Levin wrote about and Trump tweeted off of.


Hillary needs to explain this though.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2017, 07:39:26 pm by Weird Tolkienish Figure »

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Where is the proof of a conspiracy?

Well, if they were 'all in on it' ..... ie if Hillary and Obama and other Democrat operatives.... knew about the wire-tapping as it was happening ....  that means it's a conspiracy.  Right?

Just trying to connect the logical dots here.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline LonestarDream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,061
The great one makes a cogent, compelling case.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91fNfGjZdM0
(?) Trump Realist    (*) Trump believer   (?) Never Trump,   Which are you ?

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,295



What is the "report from Slate" they're talking about?

Offline LonestarDream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,061
No one was talking about Louise Mensche last years.  I dont think Louise Mensche  is a 'computer scientist'.  Can we interrogate the 'computer scientists'?   :smokin:

Now this is interesting I will say.


Although maybe she got it from the Press just like Donny did?


It all stems from an article Louise Mensche lady wrote in October. At least the Breitbart article that Levin wrote about and Trump tweeted off of.


Hillary needs to explain this though.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2017, 07:43:27 pm by LonestarDream »
(?) Trump Realist    (*) Trump believer   (?) Never Trump,   Which are you ?

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Well, if they were 'all in on it' ..... ie if Hillary and Obama and other Democrat operatives.... knew about the wire-tapping as it was happening ....  that means it's a conspiracy.  Right?

Just trying to connect the logical dots here.

You need to connect dots that stand up in a court of law.

Dots that would stand up when presented to a federal grand jury.

Otherwise any talk of conspiracy is dismissed as right wing crazy talk when the only "proof" you have is a tweet from 5 months ago that could mean anything or nothing at all.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2017, 07:43:52 pm by txradioguy »
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Who are these 'compute scientist ' friends of Hillary?  Different ones that ran her home brew server?

Can congress or a grand jury question them?

I don't know who they were.  But I seem to recall something about three Muslim IT tech part time ees, three brothers (Abid, Imran and Jamal Awan), being fired from the WH for hacking. 
« Last Edit: March 06, 2017, 07:51:02 pm by XenaLee »
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline LonestarDream

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,061
Good point. maybe the slate folks know the 'computer scientists'




What is the "report from Slate" they're talking about?
(?) Trump Realist    (*) Trump believer   (?) Never Trump,   Which are you ?

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,295
Season 1 of the Trump administration is damn good. Best show on TV. Wonder how Season 2 will be?

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
You need to connect dots that stand up in a court of law.

Dots that would stand up when presented to a federal grand jury.

Otherwise any talk of conspiracy is dismissed as right wing crazy talk when the only "proof" you have is a tweet from 5 months ago that could mean anything or nothing at all.

On the contrary.  I can speculate right along with the rest of you guys.... all day long and twice on Sunday.  I don't "need" to do a thing.  It's called a discussion.  And feel free to dismiss what I say as you please.   :laugh:
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.