Hillary Was Tipped Off On Trump Wiretap – Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election

[LonestarDream]

Bingo.  Reagan would have his oval office chats.

Trump tweets.  And does his weekly video address from the Oval Office.

Liberal control of the mass broadcasting system is the lynchpin of virtually everything that is wrong in the nation currently.   

Getting correct information to the voters is essential to making the correct decisions in elections,  and therefore all of our other problems stem from this chokepoint of information flow to the voters. 


We wouldn't be having troubles with the Military,  Border Security,  Taxes,  etc,  had the Media been *FORCED*   to provide objective news instead of filtered censored propaganda.

[txradioguy]

Liberal control of the mass broadcasting system is the lynchpin of virtually everything that is wrong in the nation currently.   

Getting correct information to the voters is essential to making the correct decisions in elections,  and therefore all of our other problems stem from this chokepoint of information flow to the voters.

And yet Ronald Reagan did it without the likes of Fox News...Daily Caller et al.

You're blaming a bogeyman that will never be fixed in order to be continually outraged instead of finding a way to get things done despite them.

We wouldn't be having troubles with the Military,  Border Security,  Taxes,  etc,  had the Media been *FORCED*   to provide objective news instead of filtered censored propaganda.

Sorry...that would border on propaganda and could that you claim not to want and works both ways depending on who is in office.  We have an amendment to protect against what you desire.

[DiogenesLamp]

None of which will happen if you don't push back on the propaganda.

Tell that to Ronald Reagan.

The guy who was the most effective at pushing back on the media propaganda? 


Coincidence? 

[txradioguy]

Bingo.  Reagan would have his oval office chats.

Trump tweets.  And does his weekly video address from the Oval Office.

[endicom]

Tell that to Ronald Reagan.

Did government shrink or expand under Reagan?

[LonestarDream]

Reagan got back the Senate, but never the house.  It took Dick Morris, Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich for that to happen.

The guy who was the most effective at pushing back on the media propaganda? 


Coincidence?

[DiogenesLamp]

And yet Ronald Reagan did it without the likes of Fox News...Daily Caller et al.

Ronald Reagan was an exceptionally gifted man.   He was a "light worker",  and his like shall not come again soon.    Are you thinking it is a reasonable thing to count on the emergence of a miracle worker to overcome the media,  instead of relying on the far more common  "ordinary men" ?   


Me,  I'd rather have a system whereby you didn't have to be a communication genius to overcome the obstacle of a lying corrupt media.   I want a system that can work for ordinary men,  not one that requires an angel to vanquish it.   

You're blaming a bogeyman that will never be fixed in order to be continually outraged instead of finding a way to get things done despite them.

You aren't going to overcome a trillion dollar broadcasting infrastructure controlled by the elite left by opposing it with blogs and podcasts. 


You need to take that weapon away from them and turn it's power back against them.   

Sorry...that would border on propaganda and could that you claim not to want and works both ways depending on who is in office.  We have an amendment to protect against what you desire.

That amendment ought to be protecting us against the currently existing Government/Media cartel. 


They have completely seized the only means of mass communications with the American people,  and not a word gets on the air without the permission of Liberal censors. 

[txradioguy]

Ronald Reagan was an exceptionally gifted man.   He was a "light worker",  and his like shall not come again soon.    Are you thinking it is a reasonable thing to count on the emergence of a miracle worker to overcome the media,  instead of relying on the far more common  "ordinary men" ?

I'm saying that he wrote the book on how to do it and one simply needs to do what he did.  It can be done...just no one since RR has seemed to have to will to do it.  Reagan appealed to said "ordinary men" to get his message out. 

Me,  I'd rather have a system whereby you didn't have to be a communication genius to overcome the obstacle of a lying corrupt media.   I want a system that can work for ordinary men,  not one that requires an angel to vanquish it.   

It only doesn't work for us if we allow it not to.

You aren't going to overcome a trillion dollar broadcasting infrastructure controlled by the elite left by opposing it with blogs and podcasts.

 

Never said that. 

You need to take that weapon away from them and turn it's power back against them.

 

That's a little despotic and certainly not Conservative.

That amendment ought to be protecting us against the currently existing Government/Media cartel.

 

Thankfully the Founding Fathers didn't see it your way and chose to give voice to the people and protect them...not the king.

They have completely seized the only means of mass communications with the American people,  and not a word gets on the air without the permission of Liberal censors.

Really?  So that's how it works at Druge...Fox News...Breitbart...Daily Caller...American Thinker...National Review etc etc?

[don-o]

Still insulting members, I see. I guess everyone needs a hobby.
Any chance of giving it a rest?

[LonestarDream]

Still insulting members, I see. I guess everyone needs a hobby.
Any chance of giving it a rest?

This is how I felt in 1981 when Reagan's legislation was moving through congress.

[txradioguy]

Still insulting members, I see. I guess everyone needs a hobby.
Any chance of giving it a rest?

Not an insult if it's true. No substance to any posts. Just mindlessness and chants of "winning!".

[txradioguy]

This is how I felt in 1981 when Reagan's legislation was moving through congress.

Not even close. Only people who felt the way you describe were the Dems. 

[LonestarDream]

Not an insult if it's true. No substance to any posts. Just mindlessness and chants of "winning!".

Plenty winning on substance.  Like the rules of engagement in Mosul and the coming liberation of Tal Afar and Raqqa.

And the new travel order that requires reporting of honor killings.  Substance!!!!

Winning!!

And the release of Obamacare Repeal and Replace bills..

[240B]

Not an insult if it's true. No substance to any posts. Just mindlessness and chants of "winning!".

And yet you choose to post. You are what you hate.

[LonestarDream]

Not even close. Only people who felt the way you describe were the Dems.

???

[txradioguy]

Plenty winning on substance.  Like the rules of engagement in Mosul and the coming liberation of Tal Afar and Raqqa.

And the new travel order that requires reporting of honor killings.  Substance!!!!

Winning!!

And the release of Obamacare Repeal and Replace bills..

Do you care even remotely that you sound like a complete airhead with posts like that?

[txradioguy]

And yet you choose to post. You are what you hate.

And you decided to jump in and throw an insult why exactly?

What's that adage about those free of sin casting the first stone?

[LonestarDream]

Do you care even remotely that you sound like a complete airhead with posts like that?

Another insult.  Everything above Trump has done.  Including having Mattis come up with the Raqqa plan. 

[LonestarDream]

And you decided to jump in and throw an insult why exactly?

What's that adage about those free of sin casting the first stone?

He jumped in because your pattern of abuse of members is obvious.

[txradioguy]

Another insult.  Everything above Trump has done.  Including having Mattis come up with the Raqqa plan.

Again not an insult if there's a kernel of truth to it.

Get back to all of us when these plans...Not real action... but plans are even remotely successful.

I'll be the first to give him credit...Though you'll deny it.

No plan survives first contact.  You should remember that. 

[txradioguy]

He jumped in because your pattern of abuse of members is obvious.

People in glass houses....

[corbe]

  @txradioguy

[txradioguy]

  @txradioguy

@corbe Exactly!! 

[LonestarDream]

Logically wrong.  For example, calling someone stupid who has issues on focusing to pass their high school GED, would be very demeaning  and have a large element of truth to it.

Of course, if the person doing the insulting had THEIR GED, they would fell much better about themselves.

Again not an insult if there's a kernel of truth to it.

 

[don-o]

  @txradioguy

Interesting to come on in support of a serial abuser. You DO realize that''s what's going on across several threads. They are trying squelch the discussion by repetitive insult and ridicule. Some wit reminded me that we never seem to get out of high school. Or was it junior high?