Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!

[sneakypete]

I believe this story is from USA Today. There are many others reporting it as well.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266016/obamas-wiretaps-matthew-vadum

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266041/cia-dirty-cyber-tricks-matthew-vadum

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/03/07/wikileaks-releases-entire-hacking-capacity-cia.html

@Bigun

You still don't get it. NO source will be reliable enough for these closet Obomber fans to accept it. Trump is making their lust bunny look bad,and they just can't live with that.

[XenaLee]

@Bigun

You still don't get it. NO source will be reliable enough for these closet Obomber fans to accept it. Trump is making their lust bunny look bad,and they just can't live with that.

Yeah, in fact... I was just about to ask him "well what source 'would' you accept as credible?" .... and I realized there's no point in even asking.  They won't trust ANY source that doesn't bleat what they want to hear. 

[txradioguy]

Yeah, in fact... I was just about to ask him "well what source 'would' you accept as credible?" .... and I realized there's no point in even asking.  They won't trust ANY source that doesn't bleat what they want to hear.

All I keep seeing in reports is one source...WikiLeaks and a lot of speculation...that's it.

No official statement from the WH...nothing from the NSA or DHS to confirm if the crap Assange is spitting out is true.

If this was a negative story about Trump and the only source was a wanted criminal with an axe to grind against the U.S. as the only source...the howls of "FAKE NEWS!" by certain members of TBR from every corner of the country would be heard all the way here to my desk in Kentucky.

But because it's a story you want to believe as true about the big scary CIA...your concern where accuracy of sources is concerned flies out the window and suddenly anyone who raises the credibility issue is ridiculed and called a sheep or a closet Obama supporter by someone who buys tinfoil in bulk.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Yeah, in fact... I was just about to ask him "well what source 'would' you accept as credible?" .... and I realized there's no point in even asking.  They won't trust ANY source that doesn't bleat what they want to hear.

Trump fans really should not be yapping about that one.

[musiclady]

Trump fans really should not be yapping about that one.

Word.

[XenaLee]

All I keep seeing in reports is one source...WikiLeaks and a lot of speculation...that's it.

No official statement from the WH...nothing from the NSA or DHS to confirm if the crap Assange is spitting out is true.

Oh, so you're saying that you would believe a statement from the WH then?  Good to know.  And good luck waiting for any official statement from any alphabet agency on this.

If this was a negative story about Trump and the only source was a wanted criminal with an axe to grind against the U.S. as the only source...the howls of "FAKE NEWS!" by certain members of TBR from every corner of the country would be heard all the way here to my desk in Kentucky.

So...what?  You can't deny that there has been a plethora of legitimately FAKE news spewed against Trump lately. Right?

But because it's a story you want to believe as true about the big scary CIA...your concern where accuracy of sources is concerned flies out the window and suddenly anyone who raises the credibility issue is ridiculed and called a sheep or a closet Obama supporter by someone who buys tinfoil in bulk.

A story I want to believe about the CIA?  Lol!  You don't even know me.  My husband used to work for the CIA back when it was a legitimate, commie-fighting agency.  It's not my fault if the rabid leftists have corrupted it to the point of being another arm of the Democratic Party....America's enemy within.

Point is, you seem to not care about any news that doesn't mirror or suit your own personal viewpoint.  Why is that?

[Silver Pines]

Has no one here aware of the Vault7 Wikileaks release?  Trump is right as usual.  The Intel agencies stole the Russian malware code.  It basically allows hacking to blame Russia if it leaks.  It leads to CIA & FBI, etc. using that code to enter anywhere they want to use it.  People will think the Russians are hacking, even tho it comes from DC.  A FICA Court document needed to spy on US citizens has to be signed by the President.  That president was Barrack Obama.

Twitter: @wikileaks #Vault7  (https://twitter.com/wikileaks)  A preface was realeased early Monday morning.  Then he released at 9pm Tuesday.  It's long, but well worth the time.  It's over 8.4K pages.  Conservative Treehouse has a link to the release.  It's all over the web!  Use Dogpile & DuckDuckGo 4 search.  Some very crushing revelations and I'm only on page 100.  It exposes the shadow government & deep state.  Chilling revelations that involves all 16 US Intel Agencies, Congress and others. ($oro$, Hillary, etc.)

Best to lock and load.  We are in a very dangerous time.  This is the Globalists vs. USA and the enemy has infiltrated all agencies, from the top down.

@dancer

I'm not into the globalist-behind-a-tree conspiracy thing, personally.  It reeks of Alex Jones. 

Also, I haven't joined those on the right who've suddenly decided to gush all over Julian Assange and Wikileaks, and to trust its every utterance.  Wikileaks has always been distinctly anti-American and pro-Islamic terrorist.  For a refresher, here's a good article:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/439766/wait-we-all-trust-julian-assange-now-julian-assange

And as for "Trump is right is usual", he sure as hell isn't right when he calls Obamacare 2.0 "wonderful', is he?

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

The problem is that when Trump lies about easily verifiable things like the drone strike tweet from yesterday, it yugely affects his credibility in other areas too.

[XenaLee]

Trump fans really should not be yapping about that one.

Yeah, well.... there's a lot of things the Trump haters shouldn't be yapping about.  Yet still "they" yap on (and on, and on, and on....)

[txradioguy]

Point is, you seem to not care about any news that doesn't mirror or suit your own personal viewpoint.  Why is that?

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Yeah, well.... there's a lot of things the Trump haters shouldn't be yapping about.  Yet still "they" yap on (and on, and on, and on....)

[txradioguy]

@corbe you still got that flak meme pic handy?

[XenaLee]

@dancer

I'm not into the globalist-behind-a-tree conspiracy thing, personally.  It reeks of Alex Jones. 

Also, I haven't joined those on the right who've suddenly decided to gush all over Julian Assange and Wikileaks, and to trust its every utterance.  Wikileaks has always been distinctly anti-American and pro-Islamic terrorist.  For a refresher, here's a good article:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/439766/wait-we-all-trust-julian-assange-now-julian-assange

And as for "Trump is right is usual", he sure as hell isn't right when he calls Obamacare 2.0 "wonderful', is he?

He sure as hell isn't right about that.  Maybe he should just come out and say "this is the best we can do for now and explain the 'why'.  Not holding my breath for that explanation though.

[Cripplecreek]

@dancer

I'm not into the globalist-behind-a-tree conspiracy thing, personally.  It reeks of Alex Jones. 

Also, I haven't joined those on the right who've suddenly decided to gush all over Julian Assange and Wikileaks, and to trust its every utterance.  Wikileaks has always been distinctly anti-American and pro-Islamic terrorist.  For a refresher, here's a good article:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/439766/wait-we-all-trust-julian-assange-now-julian-assange

And as for "Trump is right is usual", he sure as hell isn't right when he calls Obamacare 2.0 "wonderful', is he?

Julian Assange is worthy of nothing more than a single sniper round after endangering American troops, their families and our allies.

Its not known how many of our Afghan allies were slaughtered at the hands of the Taliban thanks to Assange and Wikileaks.

[XenaLee]

Oh...did I forget to mention something about the Trump haters?  In addition to ad infinitum mindless yapping...

they also post lame, stupid and mindless graphics in lieu of having something substantive to say.   

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Oh...did I forget to mention something about the Trump haters?  In addition to ad infinitum mindless yapping...

they also post lame, stupid and mindless graphics in lieu of having something substantive to say.   

I don't know how else to respond to you, otherwise.

[XenaLee]

I don't know how else to respond to you, otherwise.

Well, it's nice that you (at least) know your limitations.

[txradioguy]

Julian Assange is worthy of nothing more than a single sniper round after endangering American troops, their families and our allies.

Its not known how many of our Afghan allies were slaughtered at the hands of the Taliban thanks to Assange and Wikileaks.

The conservative estimate is thousands.

[LonestarDream]

Yeah, in fact... I was just about to ask him "well what source 'would' you accept as credible?" .... and I realized there's no point in even asking.  They won't trust ANY source that doesn't bleat what they want to hear.

Wikileaks has been credible enough that assertions should be followed up on.

[Silver Pines]

He sure as hell isn't right about that.  Maybe he should just come out and say "this is the best we can do for now and explain the 'why'.  Not holding my breath for that explanation though.

@XenaLee

I don't believe he will, either.  His past support of universal health care probably has him thinking there are no problems with the plan.

[Silver Pines]

Julian Assange is worthy of nothing more than a single sniper round after endangering American troops, their families and our allies.

Its not known how many of our Afghan allies were slaughtered at the hands of the Taliban thanks to Assange and Wikileaks.

@Cripplecreek

Exactly right.  But now I'm supposed to take him at his word and fall all over him the way Hannity did?  Not a chance.

[Cripplecreek]

@Cripplecreek

Exactly right.  But now I'm supposed to take him at his word and fall all over him the way Hannity did?  Not a chance.

Assange is a Russian propaganda asset and not worthy of even the least respect.

[LonestarDream]

@corbe you still got that flak meme pic handy?

The Daily Mail takes UMBRAGE with doubters.

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,253090.0.html

[txradioguy]

The Daily Mail takes UMBRAGE with doubters.

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,253090.0.html

Bless your heart.

Good for them 

[DiogenesLamp]

And as for "Trump is right is usual", he sure as hell isn't right when he calls Obamacare 2.0 "wonderful', is he?

No.   No he isn't.