Sure you are. That's exactly what you're doing.
I think that the sort of worship services one attends reflect their attitudes. If you allow your worship to be polluted by ideas which we, as conservatives, find abhorrent, then chances are your thinking will be somewhat aligned with those ideas.
Otherwise, I wouldn't tolerate those ideas and would find another church to attend. I have walked out of sermons I didn't agree with. My twice great grandfather reminded a Catholic Priest of the codicil in the deed for the land the church sat upon that when the day came that the teachings of the Church were no longer reflected in the services, the land reverted to the family, after standing up in the middle of a Homily and respectfully disagreeing with the priest.
They took the discussion to the sacristy after the service.
It becomes a question of what principles you are willing to stand by.
We looked at Obama in Jeremiah Wright's church, and saw then he would embrace the same identity politics that were preached from the pulpit. Fergusson and Baltimore and more were encouraged by the administration's lack of interference, evidence Obama agreed with the spew from that pulpit.
Now, suddenly, no one seems willing to apply the same litmus test to a SCOTUS nominee because "our guy" made the nomination. Nonsense.
We aren't supposed to judge another's soul (that's above our pay grade), but at the same time we are supposed to use some discernment in who we would give authority, over our worship and over our lives, just as we use some discretion in who we hang out with, partly because that reflects not just on us, but on the Deity we profess to follow.
