As for my opposition to bible thumpers (which, mind you is not an opposition to Christianity in any way) and their "litmus tests"...I stand with Thomas Jefferson and John Adams.
“In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own. It is error alone that needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.”
~Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Horatio Spofford, 1814
“Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law.”
~Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814,
“The Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.”
~1797 Treaty of Tripoli signed by Founding Father John Adams
I have the deepest respect for those who live a Christian life, as I do for those who hold to the tenets of Hinduism (such Gandhi) or of Buddhism. Deeply held religious belief is a "holy" thing in my view, and brings much joy into the world. However, religion used to pick who should and should not be in politics/leadership...or religion used to condemn or attack others for their views...is destructive of freedom and democracy.
That's as much of an anti-Christian, demagogic screed as ever has been written. You're smart enough to know it, though you're not smart enough to understand that that trash you just wrote means anything to Christians or conservatives. The philosophy and history you just wrote is thoroughly secular humanist, and absolutely consistent with the philosophical tenets of moral relativism.
"Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me."
The "litmus tests" come from a Holy God, and if you like, Jesus Christ Himself. If you have a problem, take it up with Him.
You can feel free to create your own religion, and call it "Christian", or even "tooth-fairyism", but if it isn't based on an inerrant and inspired Word of God, you've got nothing in common with the historic Christian church.
You can also go with that leftist historical reinterpretation of U.S. history, and quote out of context, but that won't make it true.
Certainly, none of that makes you a "conservative", though you claim that too. Moral relativism is in vogue with progressives; not so much conservatives.
What bunk.