Right, you simply want amnesty. A difference without a distinction. Amnesty draws more illegals in search of more amnesty. A de facto open borders policy.
Rather than seek clarification, you went right to the personal attack. It's ok, I take no offense when my attacker is an impotent individual such as yourself.
The greatest conservative mind of our generation, and of many generations, examined this exact same problem, albeit in a much smaller scale, and came to the conclusion that amnesty was the only solution, because there was no way to round up and deport millions of people.
Reagan's failure was not making damned sure that securing the border happened before amnesty happened.
Today, there is no plan to deport millions more than the numbers Reagan faced. You would prefer they remain illegals (IIRC that's your position) but that's temporary. The current interpretation of the XIV Amendment says that the illegality that you would prefer disappears in one generation, since their US-born children are US citizens at birth.
If we're not going to throw them out (which we are not), then we need to account for them in one way or another.
Secure/control the borders.
Re-instate the Bracero program.
Begin a legitimization program with those illegal aliens with deep roots in this country and no criminal history.
That's simply a realistic approach, fine tuning what Reagan tried to do, and that's been my position for well over a decade.