« on: Today at 10:33 am »
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-903057Tucker Carlson says that if JD Vance were president, the United States would not be at war with Iran.
He missed the most critical point: We might instead be facing a nuclear Iran.
Carlson speaks as though the only choice was war or peace. It was not. The choice was whether America would confront Iran’s nuclear program before it became unstoppable – or leave Israel, the United States, and the entire Middle East to live under the shadow of a nuclear-armed Iranian regime.
Saying that if Vance were president would have kept us out of the war sounds attractive. Nobody wants war. But what would he have done about Iran’s nuclear program? What would have replaced military action? Another agreement? Another inspection process? Another deadline? Another warning that Iran would ignore?
Carlson does not say.
(snip)
Carlson is not an unknown commentator sitting on the sidelines. He is widely viewed as close to Vance and as an important voice within the political movement surrounding him. When Carlson declares that Vance would have taken an entirely different path, Iran is not hearing only a debate about past decisions.
Iran may also hear a message about what would happen next.
EXCERPT
Logged
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," "psychopathic POS," "depraved SOB," "Never Trump Moron," "Lazarus," "sock puppet," and "Timber Bunny."
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ---George Orwell
