Author Topic: The Tenets Of Islam: License To Kill  (Read 120 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 422,060
The Tenets Of Islam: License To Kill
« on: Today at 05:15 am »
The Tenets Of Islam: License To Kill

Because the religion’s clearly stated rules are hostile to Western norms and our Constitution, Western governments fail their citizens by refusing to address it.

Shari Goodman | June 25, 2026

Since Islam’s arrival upon the world stage 1,400 years ago, when an illiterate Arab by the name of Mohammad, born in Mecca, claimed to be a messenger sent by God (whom he called “Allah”) to spread Allah’s word, approximately 270 million human beings have been slaughtered in Islam’s and Allah’s name, according to the Center for the Study of Political Islam. (Approximately 120 million Africans, 80 million Hindus, 60 million Christians, and 10 million Buddhists.)

Until fairly recently, Westerners were unfamiliar with Islam or its practitioners. However, since Congress enacted America’s Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, our doors have been flung wide open to a Third World, non-Western population whose values and norms are the antithesis of the Judeo-Christian principles that form the basis for our national foundation as outlined in our Constitution.

Unlike any other designated religion, Islam commands its followers not only to spread Islam throughout the globe but, in addition, to create a global Islamic Caliphate where no other religion but Islam reigns supreme. It explicitly commands adherents to “slay the unbelievers until all of dominion is for Allah” (Quran: Sura 9.5).

more
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/06/the-tenets-of-islam-license-to-kill/
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Mark Twain


“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34


Smokin Joe: Stupid people vote. If you have enough of them, you don’t need to steal an election

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 27,337
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Tenets Of Islam: License To Kill
« Reply #1 on: Today at 05:32 am »
Islam is evil.....   plain and simple.

A couple of times a year, I like re-posting a 10+ year old internet  article which has been quite prophetic in how Islam is carefully and methodically confiscating the planet.  Here it is, and also cut/pasted for your review....  Plus, btw, the data below reflects 2015 numbers.

https://www.godreports.com/2015/09/how-islam-takes-over-countries/


How Islam progressively takes over countries
September 23, 2015
By Mark Ellis —

Peter Hammond
Dr. Peter Hammond
In Dr. Peter Hammond’s book, “Slavery, Terrorism and Islam,” he documents the way Muslims slowly develop a presence in various countries and as their population numbers build, become more aggressive and assertive about exercising Sharia law.

“Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life,” Dr. Hammond notes in his book. “Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.”

Their takeover of a country, what Dr. Hammond refers to as “Islamization,” begins when the population of Muslims reaches a critical mass, and they being to agitate for various privileges.

Open, free, democratic societies are particularly vulnerable. “When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well,” he notes.

This is how it works, according to Dr. Hammond:

When the Muslim population remains under 2% in a country, they will be seen primarily as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the current situation in:

United States — Muslim 0.6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

As the Muslim population reaches 2% to 5%, they begin to recruit from ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, within prisons and street gangs. This is happening in:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

“From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population,” Dr. Hammond notes. “For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food” and increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature such food on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is happening in:

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%


Soon they begin to apply pressure to allow Sharia law within their own communities (sometimes ghettos).

“When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions,” Dr. Hammond notes. “In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam.” These tensions are seen on a regular basis in:

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 15%

The violence increases when the Muslim population reaches 20%. “After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues,” such as in:

Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

“At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare,” such as in:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, persecution of non-believing “infidels” rises significantly, including sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia law as a weapon, and Jizya, a tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out “infidels,” and move toward a 100% Muslim society, which has been experienced to some degree in:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

A 100% Muslim society will theoretically usher in their version of peace — the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. “Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrassas are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word,” such as in:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 100%

Dr. Hammond observes this Islamic ideal is seldom realized. “Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.”

“It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia law,” he states.

Dr. Hammond is also concerned by demographic trends. “Today’s 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world’s population,” he observes. “But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world’s population by the end of this century.”
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Online BobfromWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Gender: Male
  • Fishing the line, Bristol Bay, AK. Memories ...
Re: The Tenets Of Islam: License To Kill
« Reply #2 on: Today at 06:19 am »
Democrats would rather rule over ashes than govern a functioning Republic

Online Luis Gonzalez

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,189
  • Gender: Male
  • Better to the grave with memories than dreams
    • Boiling Frogs
Re: The Tenets Of Islam: License To Kill
« Reply #3 on: Today at 07:35 am »
@Luis Gonzalez

I don’t need made-up historical “thresholds” or pseudo statistical curves to understand that radical Islamist movements are dangerous. That part is already clear and widely acknowledged. The problem is that the post you shared tries to turn that into a scientific looking model of religion and population behavior, and that is where it falls apart logically and methodologically.

The core issue is that it treats Islam as if it behaves like a single coordinated system that changes behavior at specific population percentages. That is not how societies, religions, or political movements work. There is no credible evidence in sociology or political science for those claims that 2 percent, 5 percent, or 10 percent automatically produces predictable escalation. It is a narrative presented in the form of data.

It also mixes completely different categories together. Peaceful religious practice, cultural integration issues, crime, insurgency warfare, and organized terrorist groups are all blended into one linear progression. That is not analysis, it is category collapse. Once you separate those elements, the supposed pattern disappears.

On top of that, it relies heavily on selective examples from conflict zones without accounting for the actual drivers of instability in those places. Factors like state collapse, foreign intervention, civil war dynamics, and governance failure explain far more of the violence than religious demographics do.

Finally, it assumes causation from correlation without proper controls. High conflict regions are treated as if religion alone explains outcomes, but the model breaks when you compare it with stable Muslim majority countries or integrated Muslim minorities in stable democracies. If a framework does not consistently predict reality, it is not a reliable model.

So yes, extremist Islamist groups are dangerous. That part is real. But the framework used in that post to explain it is not scientific. It does not hold up under basic scrutiny or real world comparison.
"The growth of knowledge depends entirely upon disagreement." — Karl Popper

“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place." — Frederic Bastiat

“Perhaps we’ll have some answers, at least, before the end. I always dreamed of dying well-informed.” ― Joe Abercrombie, The First Law Trilogy

Offline catfish1957

  • The Conservative Carp Rapscallion of Brieferville
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 27,337
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Tenets Of Islam: License To Kill
« Reply #4 on: Today at 07:45 am »
I don’t need made-up historical “thresholds” or pseudo statistical curves to understand that radical Islamist movements are dangerous. That part is already clear and widely acknowledged. The problem is that the post you shared tries to turn that into a scientific looking model of religion and population behavior, and that is where it falls apart logically and methodologically.

The core issue is that it treats Islam as if it behaves like a single coordinated system that changes behavior at specific population percentages. That is not how societies, religions, or political movements work. There is no credible evidence in sociology or political science for those claims that 2 percent, 5 percent, or 10 percent automatically produces predictable escalation. It is a narrative presented in the form of data.

It also mixes completely different categories together. Peaceful religious practice, cultural integration issues, crime, insurgency warfare, and organized terrorist groups are all blended into one linear progression. That is not analysis, it is category collapse. Once you separate those elements, the supposed pattern disappears.

On top of that, it relies heavily on selective examples from conflict zones without accounting for the actual drivers of instability in those places. Factors like state collapse, foreign intervention, civil war dynamics, and governance failure explain far more of the violence than religious demographics do.

Finally, it assumes causation from correlation without proper controls. High conflict regions are treated as if religion alone explains outcomes, but the model breaks when you compare it with stable Muslim majority countries or integrated Muslim minorities in stable democracies. If a framework does not consistently predict reality, it is not a reliable model.

So yes, extremist Islamist groups are dangerous. That part is real. But the framework used in that post to explain it is not scientific. It does not hold up under basic scrutiny or real world comparison.

I guess the concept of extrapolative correlation to simplify complex world geo-political trending is a concept beyond your comprehension.   I think the causal viewer will get a better understanding of the problem like this versus your psuedo-academic like mumble jumble.

So tell me what exactly what in this article is incorrect? (2015)
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.  Note:  Posts may also be allegorical in nature, and not literal.

Online Luis Gonzalez

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,189
  • Gender: Male
  • Better to the grave with memories than dreams
    • Boiling Frogs
Re: The Tenets Of Islam: License To Kill
« Reply #5 on: Today at 07:50 am »
I guess the concept of extrapolative correlation to simplify complex world geo-political trending is a concept beyond your comprehension.   I think the causal viewer will get a better understanding of the problem like this versus your psuedo-academic like mumble jumble.

So tell me what exactly what in this article is incorrect? (2015)

If your opening move is “beyond your comprehension” and “pseudo-academic mumble jumble,” you’re not really trying to debate anything. You’re just signaling frustration with the style while pretending it’s an intellectual win. It isn’t.

Now on the actual point you’re trying to make: “extrapolative correlation” vs “causal viewer.”

That distinction only matters if you can show where the article actually commits the error you’re alleging. Right now you haven’t done that. You’ve just labeled it.

Correlation becomes a problem in analysis only when it’s treated as causation without accounting for intervening variables or structural change. That’s a valid critique. But you haven’t pointed to a single claim in the article where that happens.

So when you ask, “what exactly is incorrect in the article?” the honest answer is: nothing specific has been identified yet that demonstrates an error. You’ve rejected the framing, not engaged the reasoning.

If you want to actually make your case, it’s simple:

quote the claim you think is wrong
show what assumption it relies on
explain what breaks in that chain

Until then, it’s not analysis versus analysis. It’s just dismissal versus silence on substance.
"The growth of knowledge depends entirely upon disagreement." — Karl Popper

“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place." — Frederic Bastiat

“Perhaps we’ll have some answers, at least, before the end. I always dreamed of dying well-informed.” ― Joe Abercrombie, The First Law Trilogy

Offline bigheadfred

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,954
  • Gender: Male
  • One day Closer
Re: The Tenets Of Islam: License To Kill
« Reply #6 on: Today at 12:04 pm »
Dan Burmawi

@DanBurmawy
·
6h
Islam's moral ceiling is fixed. It was set 1,400 years ago, by Muhammad and the Qur’an.

You can’t go higher than Muhammad. He’s the limit. The ceiling.

Muhammad married a child, took slaves, ordered executions, waged wars, lied, raped, hated, and stole.

So how can anyone say those things are wrong if the man who did them is still your highest example?

That’s why Islam doesn’t change, not because Muslims don’t want it to, but because they’re not allowed to imagine anything better than what’s already been given.

The West, shaped by centuries of Judeo-Christian moral struggle, leaves space to climb. It admits mistakes. It reforms. It questions. It separates power from holiness.

Islam doesn’t.

That’s why it doesn’t evolve, and why, when it enters a modern society, it doesn’t integrate. It collides.

Because a faith that locks morality in the 7th century can’t live peacefully in a world that keeps growing
She asked me name my foe then. I said the need within some men to fight and kill their brothers without thought of Love or God. Ken Hensley