Author Topic: The Implausibility of the New York Times ‘Dog Rape’ Lie is the Whole Point  (Read 35 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 189,724
 
 
The Implausibility of the New York Times ‘Dog Rape’ Lie is the Whole Point
An leftist cover-up to distract attention from Islamic atrocities.
May 13, 2026 by Daniel Greenfield 2 Comments

Newsletter

There are two ways to smear someone.

1. You make up a plausible story, e.g.. he’s having an affair, he embezzles money.

2. You make up something shocking, insane and unbelievable, e.g. he has a thing for gerbils.

The gerbil story is ‘sticky’. It’s not plausible, but that doesn’t matter. The shocking and disgusting nature of it is such that it was forever associated with Richard Gere. It’s something people repeat and then laugh about.

Fast forward to now and just as Israel was about to release a report on atrocities and rapes by Hamas, some pro-Hamas groups coordinated with the New York Times to preempt it with a bizarre column accusing Israel of getting dogs to rape imprisoned terrorists.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-implausibility-of-the-new-york-times-dog-rape-lie-is-the-whole-point/
“An evil man will burn his own nation to the ground to rule over the ashes.” ~ Sun Tzu

Online escapeefromtaxachusetts

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 122
  • Gender: Male
The anti-semitism of the NY Times has been on display for nearly a century. They buried coverage of the Holocaust deep inside the paper when coverage might have shown light on it and saved lives. Nothing has changed.
"If you see an a**hole, there's an a**hole. If everywhere you look there's an a**hole, maybe you're the a**hole."