Author Topic: Abigail Spanberger signed HB965 into law handing the states electoral votes to the national popular  (Read 90 times)

Timber Rattler and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 419,310
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Mark Twain


“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34


Smokin Joe: Stupid people vote. If you have enough of them, you don’t need to steal an election

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,907
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Has this been challenged for constitutionality? It disenfranchises electors and the voters both.

That said, didn't Trump with the popular vote?
The Republic is lost.

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 67,119
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Has this been challenged for constitutionality? It disenfranchises electors and the voters both.

That said, didn't Trump with the popular vote?

It's not "ripe" until the required number of states pass it to get to 270 Electoral Votes. I would think SCOTUS would stomp this like a bug.  The EC is specified clearly in the US Constitution, and there is a clause that prohibits Compacts between the Several States.
I don’t owe tolerance to people who disagree with my existence.
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,907
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
It's not "ripe" until the required number of states pass it to get to 270 Electoral Votes. I would think SCOTUS would stomp this like a bug.  The EC is specified clearly in the US Constitution, and there is a clause that prohibits Compacts between the Several States.

That's right, I forget that. At least it's dead till some more States jump on.
The Republic is lost.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,546
Has this been challenged for constitutionality? It disenfranchises electors and the voters both.

There is no Constitutional prohibition against disenfranchisement in a Presidential election.  Voting is a privilege granted to you by States, not a federal right.  However, there is a penalty for it in Amendment XIV.  So the Constitutional challenge would be this.  By handing the election of state electors over to the entire country, a State will have effectively diluted the voting power of each of its citizens (i.e. partial disenfranchisement).  And according to the 14th Amendment, their representation in Congress should be reduced accordingly.  So Virginia's representation in Congress would be reduced from 11 seats down to 1.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Jim Jones was a socialist Democrat.