“It’s like the Dred Scott decision, where the Court said that the black man has no rights that the white man is bound to respect. The Supreme Court is saying that the black voter and the brown voter has [sic] no rights that it respects and.”
That author doesn't get it. He criticizes the Dred Scott decision, which was written by Chief Justice Roger Taney, a democrat. So, this decision just reaffirms what democrats have held throughout the history of American justice and democrat policy and he's obviously a democrat trying to atone for his party.
Of course, I'm being facetious, mostly, but it's the only response worthy of the stupidity of this article. It's a theatrical piece of crap targeting the emotions, not reason.
