Author Topic: S.Ct. hands crisis pregnancy center win in fight against New Jersey’s donor list subpoena  (Read 60 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 67,363
Supreme Court hands crisis pregnancy center win in fight against New Jersey’s donor list subpoena
 Story by Jack Birle and Kaelan Deese, Washington Examiner via MSN
April 29, 2026

The Supreme Court handed a crisis pregnancy center a significant win on Wednesday in the anti-abortion center's bid to quash New Jersey's subpoena demanding it hand over its donor lists, after the center successfully argued it was unlawfully targeted.

The justices found that First Choice Women’s Resource Centers had established a "present injury" to its First Amendment rights, allowing it to continue its case in federal court, where the pregnancy center has alleged that the subpoena unlawfully chills its First Amendment free speech rights.

The case, First Choice Women’s Resource Centers v. Platkin, stems from a dispute over whether First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, a pregnancy center that offers resources for expectant and new mothers, can challenge the constitutionality of the subpoena from then-New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin in federal court. Platkin argued that the subpoena was part of an investigation into whether First Choice misled donors into thinking it is an abortion clinic, something pregnancy centers do not typically do. ...
[H]umanity repeats the worst mistakes of previous generations and ... every free, prosperous civilization will eventually be destroyed by that small fraction of its people who find no satisfaction in anything but anger.
-- Dean Koontz, "The Friend of the Family"

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 67,363
SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog
The first opinion of the morning is in First Choice Women's Resource Centers v. Davenport, a case about whether a nonprofit can challenge a subpoena demanding the identities of its financial supporters in federal court. The court unanimously says yes.
https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-781_pok0.pdf
10:04 AM · Apr 29, 2026


FIRE
@TheFIREorg
The Court credited the pregnancy centers’ claim that the subpoena caused actual and ongoing injury to their First Amendment rights by deterring donors from associating with them. FIRE congratulates @ADFLegal on this important victory.
12:50 PM · Apr 29, 2026


More: https://x.com/TheFIREorg/status/2049531755489636823
[H]umanity repeats the worst mistakes of previous generations and ... every free, prosperous civilization will eventually be destroyed by that small fraction of its people who find no satisfaction in anything but anger.
-- Dean Koontz, "The Friend of the Family"

Offline Wingnut

  • The problem with everything is they try and make it better without realizing the old way is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,772
  • Gender: Male
Quote
Platkin argued that the subpoena was part of an investigation into whether First Choice misled donors into thinking it is an abortion clinic,

Seriously?
Everyone knows for abortions your 1st stop is Planned Parenthood. 
You don’t become cooler with age but you do care progressively less about being cool, which is the only true way to actually be cool.