JUST IN: House Republicans Form Coalition to Block All Senate Bills Until the SAVE Act Passes — Her

[American Girl]

Excerpt:
Frustration inside the Republican Party is boiling over, and a group of House conservatives just decided they’re done waiting.
A coalition of House Republicans has reportedly formed with a very clear message for the Senate: nothing moves until the SAVE Act moves.
According to statements shared on Fox News and circulating widely online, several lawmakers are pledging to vote **against any Senate legislation** until the upper chamber finally brings the SAVE Act up for passage. The legislation, formally known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, would require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections.






I think the house members are finally waking up and realizing that corrupt senators are ruining the House reps' chances to get their jobs back in the midterms
The whole house should apply maximum pressure on the Senate


https://www.rightjournalism.com/house-republicans-form-coalition-to-block-all-senate-bills-until-the-save-act-passes-here-are-the-members/

[catfish1957]

So much for the Trump agenda.  Mired in infighting, arm twisting,  and confusion. 

Our democratic enemies are laughing their asses off at us,. 

[roamer_1]

So much for the Trump agenda.  Mired in infighting, arm twisting,  and confusion. 

Our democratic enemies are laughing their asses off at us,.

Over an act the SCOTUS will find invariably unconstitutional, btw... 

[libertybele]

Over an act the SCOTUS will find invariably unconstitutional, btw... 

??? Not so sure about SCOTUS finding it unconstitutional, if that were the case, having to show ID to obtain a driver's license, obtain medical care, apply for a mortgage, open a bank account, etc., etc., would be unconstitutional.  Also one needs to provide a birth certificate (proof of citizenship) in order to obtain a social security card.

Having to show proof of citizenship in order to get a voter ID is NOT unreasonable and follows the same premise as having to use ID in the other instances that I mentioned. 

This isn't one of Trump's brainstorms but he is giving his base one of the logical cases that they have made against ILLEGALS voting. Secondly, it is helping to ensure that, that avenue of fraudulent voting is shutdown.

[roamer_1]

??? Not so sure about SCOTUS finding it unconstitutional, if that were the case, having to show ID to obtain a driver's license, obtain medical care, apply for a mortgage, open a bank account, etc., etc., would be unconstitutional.  Also one needs to provide a birth certificate (proof of citizenship) in order to obtain a social security card.

Having to show proof of citizenship in order to get a voter ID is NOT unreasonable and follows the same premise as having to use ID in the other instances that I mentioned. 

This isn't one of Trump's brainstorms but he is giving his base one of the logical cases that they have made against ILLEGALS voting. Secondly, it is helping to ensure that, that avenue of fraudulent voting is shutdown.

I get all that, but it doesn't matter. The Constitution specifically delegates the 'how' of elections to the state legislatures respectively... SPECIFICALLY to keep the fed from telling em what to do, and using the power of the federal government to stack elections.

That is why it is unconstitutional on its face.