I briefly listened to Glenn Beck this morning. It was chilling. There is a group active in MN (and other parts of the country) that are organizing a takeover of our country to make the U.S. a Palestinian state and destroy America. The transcript of that show isn't available yet, but the below article gives you an idea -- his research is impeccable. You may not like him, nor believe him, but I have found him to be absolutely correct on what he is saying. This is no exception -- the group
Accelerationism: The next dangerous stage
For a long time, we treated political violence like a weather event: rare, localized, tragic—then over. But law enforcement and researchers have been warning for years about a mindset that is different from normal extremism. It’s not “I want my side to win.”
It’s “I want the system to break.”
This mindset has a name: accelerationism.
This is exactly what is happening in Minnesota right now. It’s moved beyond peaceful protest; it’s even moved beyond “mostly” peaceful protest. Things have begun to accelerate. “Accelerationism”—right or left—has a recognizable logic. It is a rising ideology that believes society is corrupt beyond repair. Institutions are illegitimate. Chaos is a tool. Violence is an accelerant. That’s not a theory. That is an observable ideological pattern across multiple movements and decades. The key change in the last several years is this: it’s more connected than it used to be. It is not necessarily more disciplined. It is not necessarily bigger in raw numbers. But it is more connected—more quickly mobilized—more capable of spreading tactics, targets, and narratives. Accelerationism is going mainstream. That changes the risk profile.
The second fact: The line between “protest” and “insurgent behavior” is being tested,
Protest is protected. Even loud, offensive protests that make you furious.
But there’s a line that every stable society must defend, or it ceases to be stable. That line is crossed when groups begin to coordinate to obstruct lawful operations as a strategy, not an accident. They track or identify government personnel for intimidation. They build parallel communications networks specifically designed to evade accountability. They justify targeting state actors as morally necessary.
Those are not theoretical markers. They are historically recognizable markers. When those behaviors appear, the question is no longer, “Is this a demonstration?” The question becomes: “Is someone trying to build veto power over law enforcement through fear?” Because once a movement believes it can control outcomes by making enforcement too costly—too dangerous—too politically radioactive—then law becomes optional. And when law becomes optional, the next step is not persuasion.
It’s escalation.
The third fact: Cities become laboratories when enforcement is inconsistentThis is the part that’s hard to say out loud, because it sounds like an insult to the city. It isn’t. It’s sociology. When you have an environment with deep political polarization, high distrust of institutions, uneven prosecution, activist ecosystems with strong NGO infrastructure, and a constant media feedback loop, those conditions don’t automatically produce violence. But they do produce something else. They produce repeated stress tests. It is not “one riot.” It is not “one clash.” It is a series of probes.
How fast can we mobilize?
What are police allowed to do?
Will prosecutors follow through?
Will federal authority pull back if we make it ugly enough?
Can we create martyrs?
Can we flood the zone with a narrative before facts catch up?
That is what “laboratory” means: not that everyone is guilty, but that the environment is ideal for testing the boundaries of the state. If the state responds with either overreach (which manufactures recruits) or paralysis (which manufactures militias), then you have a recipe for replication.
What it means: You’re watching a legitimacy war, not just a street conflict...................
.............
The most dangerous phase is the early phaseHistory is blunt here. The phase that destroys republics is not when violence is everywhere. It’s when violence is still sporadic—but is being justified, romanticized, excused, and operationalized. That’s when recruitment grows. That’s when copycats appear. That’s when people stop trusting investigations. That’s when each side begins preparing for the worst—and preparation itself becomes self-fulfilling...........................
https://glennbeck.com/read/articles/accelerationism-the-next-dangerous-stage
