Horror as woman is stabbed to death while browsing books in Barnes & Noble

[240B]

Horror as woman is stabbed to death while browsing books in Barnes & Noble

Daily Mail
By NATASHA ANDERSON
24 December 2025



A woman was stabbed to death in an apparently unprovoked attack as she browsed the shelves at a Barnes & Noble in Florida.

Rita Loncharich, 65, was found unresponsive and with a knife in her back inside the bookstore in Palm Beach Gardens on Monday night, police told the Daily Mail.

Officers 'immediately rendered aid' at the scene and transported Loncharich to a nearby hospital, where she died from her injuries.

Her alleged killer - later identified as Antonio Moore - ran out of the store after the brutal attack, surveillance camera footage showed.

Moore, 40, was arrested in the woods near the store shortly after the stabbing and has since been booked on the charge of first-degree premeditated murder.

He allegedly admitted to stabbing Loncharich with a fixed-blade knife and claimed to have heard her say 'he stabbed me' before he fled, according to a probable cause affidavit obtained by ABC News.

He told police that he did not intentionally target Loncharich. She was just the 'closest person inside the store, the affidavit stated.

(more)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15412025/florida-woman-stabbed-death-browsing-barnes-noble.html

[240B]

Democrats LOVE this guy. Democrats want to release him NOW with no bail and no trial.

[mountaineer]

Described as a "mentally ill homeless man" by NY Post

[Wingnut]

If I saw a Negro freak like that I'd avoid him.  If he came up to me I'd have to make a snap decision.

[Kamaji]

If I saw a Negro freak like that I'd avoid him.  If he came up to me I'd have to make a snap decision.

What does "Negro" have anything to do with it?  If he was a blue-eyed aryan who looked that disheveled, I'd avoid him.

[Wingnut]

What does "Negro" have anything to do with it?  If he was a blue-eyed aryan who looked that disheveled, I'd avoid him.

Because Negroes are dangerous to whites.

[Smokin Joe]

What does "Negro" have anything to do with it?  If he was a blue-eyed aryan who looked that disheveled, I'd avoid him.

Yep!

[Fishrrman]

Wingnut wrote:
"Because Negroes are dangerous to whites..."

Yup.
And like Scott reminds us...

[Kamaji]

Because Negroes are dangerous to whites.

Just because of having African ancestry?  Prove it.

[verga]

Just because of having African ancestry?  Prove it.

https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezacjrp/asp/Offense_Race.asp
Blacks are roughly twice ss likely to commit ANY crime as whites while only making up roughly 14 percent of the population.
https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/fact-sheet/facts-about-the-us-black-population/#:~:text=The%20Black%20population%20of%20the,14.4%25%20of%20the%20country's%20population.

[Kamaji]

https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezacjrp/asp/Offense_Race.asp
Blacks are roughly twice ss likely to commit ANY crime as whites while only making up roughly 14 percent of the population.
https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/fact-sheet/facts-about-the-us-black-population/#:~:text=The%20Black%20population%20of%20the,14.4%25%20of%20the%20country's%20population.

You haven’t shown csusation, only correlation.  The likely causal factor is social and cultural,  neither of which is inherent to one’s ethnicity or skin color. 

Are we really so backwards here that we still think that culture and society are genetically predetermined??

[verga]

You haven’t shown csusation, only correlation.  The likely causal factor is social and cultural,  neither of which is inherent to one’s ethnicity or skin color. 

Are we really so backwards here that we still think that culture and society are genetically predetermined??

You asked for proof that blacks are dangerous to whites. There is the proof. When you are being stabbed, assaulted, or murdered, you don't give a shit about causation. Correlation si the ONLY thing that matters.

[Kamaji]

You asked for proof that blacks are dangerous to whites. There is the proof. When you are being stabbed, assaulted, or murdered, you don't give a shit about causation. Correlation si the ONLY thing that matters.

That’s not proof of the claim that blacks, qua being black, are inherently dangerous to whites. Furthermore, I don’t know about you, but if I’m being attacked - and I have been twice in NYC - I don’t give a rats ass about correlation or skin color, I care about what sort of injury that person - qua biped of the genus Homo sapiens - can do to me and what I can or must do to avoid that damage, either by fleeing, or turning and fighting back.

Only a f**king idiot thinks about skincolor at that point in time.

[verga]

That’s not proof of the claim that blacks, qua being black, are inherently dangerous to whites. Furthermore, I don’t know about you, but if I’m being attacked - and I have been twice in NYC - I don’t give a rats ass about correlation or skin color, I care about what sort of injury that person - qua biped of the genus Homo sapiens - can do to me and what I can or must do to avoid that damage, either by fleeing, or turning and fighting back.

Only a f**king idiot thinks about skincolor at that point in time.

I am glad to see that you are still not allowing facts to interfere with your line of thinking.

[Sighlass]

Discernment, a gift from God that should be used.

Yes, Blacks are dangerous in the great scheme of things. Given time with individuals one can discern that certain blacks are not likely to be dangerous, but strangers and groups of blacks should be avoided. Most of the time you will be ok, but after XX encounters odds are you will meet a bad apple(s). One could argue the same with all groups, but just playing the odds, blacks are far more dangerous.

Sorry (not sorry) if that offends anyone.

[Kamaji]

I am glad to see that you are still not allowing facts to interfere with your line of thinking.

What facts would those be?

Being black, by itself, neither makes a person dangerous, or innocuous; what makes a person dangerous is what he or she believes in, and what he or she does.  In short, what makes a person dangerous are the choices he or she has made as a moral agent - as a child of God.

Only a blaspheming racist would find this threatening and dangerous:



But this innocuous:

[IsailedawayfromFR]

What facts would those be?

Being black, by itself, neither makes a person dangerous, or innocuous; what makes a person dangerous is what he or she believes in, and what he or she does.  In short, what makes a person dangerous are the choices he or she has made as a moral agent - as a child of God.

Only a blaspheming racist would find this threatening and dangerous:



But this innocuous:

You believe you are so cute substituting this photo of the stabber for Donaldson.

Now tell us all why you decided to substitute.

[MeganC]

Because Negroes are dangerous to whites.

This is a statistically accurate statement.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

This is a statistically accurate statement.

If one is a racist, that makes no difference.

Don't you realize that everything is about racism?

[Kamaji]

You believe you are so cute substituting this photo of the stabber for Donaldson.

Now tell us all why you decided to substitute.

Very simple:  Do you find the first image scary?  Is that the picture of a threat to you?  Because that is the statement you are making.  You are clearly stating that a person having black skin ipso facto makes that person dangerous to you because you're white.

Which implies that the second image must fill you with warm fuzzies, because he simply can't be dangerous to you since he's white, not black, and your claim is that a person's dangerousness is determined by his (or her) skin color, and nothing more.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

Very simple:  Do you find the first image scary?  Is that the picture of a threat to you?  Because that is the statement you are making.  You are clearly stating that a person having black skin ipso facto makes that person dangerous to you because you're white.

Which implies that the second image must fill you with warm fuzzies, because he simply can't be dangerous to you since he's white, not black, and your claim is that a person's dangerousness is determined by his (or her) skin color, and nothing more.

I perceive no answer to that rant on why the subsitute occured.

All I read is a ranting racist who cannot control his racism.

Me, I like people smiling more than frowning.

[MeganC]

If one is a racist, that makes no difference.

Don't you realize that everything is about racism?

Truth is truth regardless of its source.

[Kamaji]

I perceive no answer to that rant on why the subsitute occured.

All I read is a ranting racist who cannot control his racism.

Me, I like people smiling more than frowning.

So benighted you cannot even see your own racism.  This is what you come down to:  Black is Bad.  Muslim is Bad.  The only way to deal with them is to kill them.

I'm not the one who keeps posting pictures of this:



As the "solution" to blacks and muslims.

In fact @Fishrrman doesn't even have the courage to post pictures of what necessarily follows from his "solution" to blacks and muslims:



and



I'm not the one who is pushing these things.  You Are

This is what your views will lead to if you do not moderate them.  If you do not stop judging people based on the color of their skin or their ethnicity or religion.

You.  Not me.  You.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

So benighted you cannot even see your own racism.  This is what you come down to:  Black is Bad.  Muslim is Bad.  The only way to deal with them is to kill them.

I'm not the one who keeps posting pictures of this:



As the "solution" to blacks and muslims.

In fact @Fishrrman doesn't even have the courage to post pictures of what necessarily follows from his "solution" to blacks and muslims:



and



I'm not the one who is pushing these things.  You Are

This is what your views will lead to if you do not moderate them.  If you do not stop judging people based on the color of their skin or their ethnicity or religion.

You.  Not me.  You.

Still no answer, I see.

And all I asked was why you decided to change the picture of the thug to that of a good guy.

[Kamaji]

Still no answer, I see.

And all I asked was why you decided to change the picture of the thug to that of a good guy.

To illustrate the absurdity of your racism.  Your pathetic, illogical, irrational, benighted racism.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

To illustrate the absurdity of your racism.  Your pathetic, illogical, irrational, benighted racism.

But remember I like smilers.

And your emoji is gone.

It is difficult to believe that the subject matter of this thread is the tragic loss of life of a woman who was doing nothing but browsing in a book store. The conversation has drifted from how one can mitigate this from happening by simple steps to be aware of your surroundings, including those exhibiting potential to harm you, all the way to vapid accusations of rampant accusations of racism.

Most people in that situation would shy away from someone like the thug who killed her.

What is important is not to concern oneself with what others might perceive as racism, but to not be harmed.

Self security trumps any racism perception every time.

[Kamaji]

But remember I like smilers.

And your emoji is gone.

It is difficult to believe that the subject matter of this thread is the tragic loss of life of a woman who was doing nothing but browsing in a book store. The conversation has drifted from how one can mitigate this from happening by simple steps to be aware of your surroundings, including those exhibiting potential to harm you, all the way to vapid accusations of rampant accusations of racism.

Most people in that situation would shy away from someone like the thug who killed her.

What is important is not to concern oneself with what others might perceive as racism, but to not be harmed.

Self security trumps any racism perception every time.

If that were true, then you would not be making, or ratifying, stupid comments like blacks are dangerous to whites.  That is a racist statement on its face, period.

Self protection is based on situational awareness and understanding the threats that the individuals near you may present, and a person's threat level is not a function of their skin color.  A person's threat level is a function of how that particular individual is acting with respect to you as a potential target.  If you are so unable to parse your surroundings and context that you have to assume that all blacks are dangerous, then you really shouldn't be in the situation because you don't have the ability to accurately gauge the risks you might face.

[verga]

So benighted you cannot even see your own racism.  This is what you come down to:  Black is Bad.  Muslim is Bad.  The only way to deal with them is to kill them.

I'm not the one who keeps posting pictures of this:

As the "solution" to blacks and muslims.
In fact @Fishrrman doesn't even have the courage to post pictures of what necessarily follows from his "solution" to blacks and muslims:
and
I'm not the one who is pushing these things.  You Are
This is what your views will lead to if you do not moderate them.  If you do not stop judging people based on the color of their skin or their ethnicity or religion.
You.  Not me.  You.

@Kamaji Actually you are the one advocating that we stand around doing NOTHING while innocent people are murdered, raped, assaulted, our tax dollars are being robbed and sent God know where, all the while saying; "Thank you sir may I have another."

[Kamaji]

@Kamaji Actually you are the one advocating that we stand around doing NOTHING while innocent people are murdered, raped, assaulted, our tax dollars are being robbed and sent God know where, all the while saying; "Thank you sir may I have another."

[MeganC]

If that were true, then you would not be making, or ratifying, stupid comments like blacks are dangerous to whites.  That is a racist statement on its face, period.

Facts are racist.

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/violent-crime-intraracial#:~:text=Black%20offenders%20chose%20white%20victims,and%2058.6%20percent%20of%20rapes.

Data from the 1981 national victimization survey reveal that more whites are victimized by whites (77 percent) than by blacks (17.1 percent), and more blacks are victimized by blacks (77 percent) than by whites (14.4 percent). Although violent crime by white offenders is apparently strongly intraracial, in that 96.9 percent of the white offenders chose white victims, violent crime by black offenders is apparently predominantly interracial, with 55.2 percent of the black offenders choosing white victims. Black offenders chose white victims in 63.9 percent of robberies, 51.8 percent of assaults, and 58.6 percent of rapes. In contrast, white offenders chose black victims in 8.3 percent of robberies, 2.7 percent of assaults, and 5.5 percent of rapes. These percentages suggest that each of the three violent crimes is strongly intraracial for white offenders but predominantly interracial for black offenders. This finding suggests that the motives behind black assault and rape are different than the motives behind white assault and rape. Reasons why the partially interracial character of violent crime has not been addressed are suggested.

It is also to be noted that black-on-black crime is also a problem.

This is because black men, in particular, perform a disproportionate amount of crime.

Even liberal-lefty Wikipedia agrees here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States#:~:text=Overall%2C%20black%20Americans%20are%20arrested,and%20robbery%20(8.1%20times).

Scholars have found that some racial and ethnic minorities, particularly African-Americans, are disproportionately represented in the arrest and victimization reports which are used to compile crime rate statistics in the United States. The data from 2008 reveals that black Americans are over-represented in terms of arrests made in virtually all types of crime, with the exceptions of "driving under the influence," "liquor laws," and hate crime. Overall, black Americans are arrested at 2.6 times the per-capita rate of all other Americans, and this ratio is even higher for murder (6.3 times) and robbery (8.1 times).

[Kamaji]

Facts are racist.

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/violent-crime-intraracial#:~:text=Black%20offenders%20chose%20white%20victims,and%2058.6%20percent%20of%20rapes.

It is also to be noted that black-on-black crime is also a problem.

This is because black men, in particular, perform a disproportionate amount of crime.

Even liberal-lefty Wikipedia agrees here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States#:~:text=Overall%2C%20black%20Americans%20are%20arrested,and%20robbery%20(8.1%20times).

Once again, you’re confusing culture with nature.  Anyone raised in that particular subculture is ipso facto more dangerous, not because of the color of their skin, but because of the content with which their character has been imbued.

[bigheadfred]

Once again, you’re confusing culture with nature.  Anyone raised in that particular subculture is ipso facto more dangerous, not because of the color of their skin, but because of the content with which their character has been imbued.

Blacks raised in poverty kill far more people than whites raised in poverty.

[Kamaji]

Blacks raised in poverty kill far more people than whites raised in poverty.

That’s not the sole determinant of the subculture in which they’re raised.  Stop being so blatantly racist and use the brains God gave you.

[bigheadfred]

That’s not the sole determinant of the subculture in which they’re raised.  Stop being so blatantly racist and use the brains God gave you.

Lame

[verga]

That’s not the sole determinant of the subculture in which they’re raised.  Stop being so blatantly racist and use the brains God gave you.

@Kamaji Prove that African Americans commit less Crimes per capita than other groups or STFU!

[Kamaji]

@Kamaji Prove that African Americans commit less Crimes per capita than other groups or STFU!

Prove that they commit crimes because of something inherent in their genes, and not simply because of a crappy liberal-dominated culture.   Stop being a racist and use the brains God gave you.

[MeganC]

Once again, you’re confusing culture with nature.  Anyone raised in that particular subculture is ipso facto more dangerous, not because of the color of their skin, but because of the content with which their character has been imbued.

This is irrelevant to the simple facts being presented here. Here's Chris Rock to explain it to you:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zIcK8SKWn8

[Kamaji]

This is irrelevant to the simple facts being presented here. Here's Chris Rock to explain it to you:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zIcK8SKWn8

 Chris Rock makes my point for me - it’s how you behave, not the color of your skin, that determines how much trouble you get into.

Stop being such a racist.

[MeganC]

Prove that they commit crimes because of something inherent in their genes, and not simply because of a crappy liberal-dominated culture.   Stop being a racist and use the brains God gave you.

Turn this around: Can you show us a majority black neighborhood, city, county, state, province, or country that is not a cesspool of corruption and violence?

Can you show us the majority black neighborhood, city, county, state, province, or country that is the envy of the civilized and developed world?

Maybe you can write a list of at least one such majority black neighborhood, city, county, state, province, or country where you would want to move your family to?

 

[MeganC]

Chris Rock makes my point for me - it’s how you behave, not the color of your skin, that determines how much trouble you get into.

Stop being such a racist.

I am not being a racist. Nor is Chris Rock when he says he's not worried about white people when he goes to the ATM. He's worried about black people.

Facts simply do not square with your narrative and your bullshit claims of "racism" are not intimidating anyone into silence.

Much to the contrary, you are provoking a reaction to your histrionics.

[Kamaji]

I am not being a racist. Nor is Chris Rock when he says he's not worried about white people when he goes to the ATM. He's worried about black people.

Facts simply do not square with your narrative and your bullshit claims of "racism" are not intimidating anyone into silence.

Much to the contrary, you are provoking a reaction to your histrionics.

Yes, you are being a racist, because you’re assuming moral value based solely on skin color, without regard to an individual’s actual conduct. 

I’m sorry if it makes you feel bad, but right now you’re being a racist.  Hopefully you will see the error of your way and give up your racism.

[MeganC]

Yes, you are being a racist, because you’re assuming moral value based solely on skin color, without regard to an individual’s actual conduct. 

I’m sorry if it makes you feel bad, but right now you’re being a racist.  Hopefully you will see the error of your way and give up your racism.

You are reading things into my posts that simply are not there. I have a long standing policy of not defending things I have not said and I hope to make clear that your insistent defamatory accusations against me are a wasted effort.

[MeganC]

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
― George Orwell, 1984

[bigheadfred]

I have to laugh. "It wasn't genetics, it was their culture" in your dying last breath.

[GrouchoTex]

I heard something happened in a bookstore...

[verga]

Prove that they commit crimes because of something inherent in their genes, and not simply because of a crappy liberal-dominated culture.   Stop being a racist and use the brains God gave you.

@Kamaji Sorry sport the burden of proof is on you. You hold the "positives position"

[verga]

This is irrelevant to the simple facts being presented here. Here's Chris Rock to explain it to you:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zIcK8SKWn8

QFT

[Smokin Joe]

It is the old "Nature or Nurture" argument. Conveniently absent when discussing 'orientation', where nature is argued, but prominent in discussions of criminal behaviour, etc. And it is all blamed on people who had nothing to do with either.

But behind those strawmen, some folks seem to be dodging statistical probabilities.

Which is why my fish belly white ass is not seen in certain big city neighborhoods at night (and one more reason I avoid cities in general).

You can't deny the demographics, you can't deny the stats. Correlation is enough for me to stay in my lane.

And no, damnit I am not a racist. My wife, kids, grandkids, and great grandkids are all American Indian (Chippewa), but my parents and traced lineage back to before 1066 are all white. Fifty years ago, our marriage would have been illegal in many states.

[Sighlass]

Only a blaspheming racist would find this threatening and dangerous:

The model for the photos (2022 Istock) comes with description. Thoughtful male CEO with arms crossed looking away, Businessman, African-American People, Blue, Business, Business Person   Terms you probable googled for the photo.

Here is another snap they took (and sell)



Interesting that the model is used in an 2025 article in the Middle East (probable just snapped the picture up as you and I have to fit the story).

https://www.khaleejtimes.com/uae/dubai-metro-stations-to-reopen-soon-residents-cant-wait-for-daily-commute-to-ease?

He (model) is given a name (South African expatriate Imka Luan) in the article but I highly doubt they are the same people. My Google-fu showed no further pictures of "Imka Luan" as this person, so all my bets are slanted that they not the same, just the author wanted to show a face that looked professional (and used the same keywords to find a picture). Another tell that they are not the same is the time difference from 2022 to 2025 when the article was published (did Imka Luan just hand them a photo from a photo-shoot from 2022?).

I did a crime search for area I am included in.



You can do your own overlay of demographics to my crime stat map.

[berdie]

Once again, you’re confusing culture with nature.  Anyone raised in that particular subculture is ipso facto more dangerous, not because of the color of their skin, but because of the content with which their character has been imbued.

I'm going to agree with you @Kamaji  based on when I was growing up. There were both black, white and Hispanics in my middle class neighborhood. We were all raised the same and parents had the same values as a rule. And would bust their kid's rump if they misbehaved. For the most part we all got along pretty well.

The year after I graduated they started bussing. Thankfully, I missed that. But my brother's didn't. I would listen to them talk about the kids being bussed in. Of course some were good kids. But the vast majority were...of a different mind set. I don't blame that on the kids. I blame that on the area they lived in. It was learn to fight or get creamed. jmho