« on: December 06, 2025, 03:29:00 pm »
What's next after Supreme Court approves pro-Trump Texas map for 2026?USA TODAYBy Bart JansenDec. 6, 2025
Rick Hasen, an election-law professor at the University of California Los Angeles, called the Supreme Court's decision “a green light for there to be even more re-redistricting, and a strong message to lower courts to butt-out.”Here is what to know about redistricting in states across the country:What did the Supreme Court decide in Texas?The decision in the Texas case was unsigned but allowed the state’s redrawn congressional map to stand for 2026 because that election was so close.It relied on a separate 2019 high court ruling that found partisan maps cannot be challenged, even if racially discriminatory maps could be. The case was urgent because of the Dec. 8 filing deadline for Lone Star State candidates.Justice Samuel Alito wrote for Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch that the impetus for the new Texas map, like a map subsequently adopted in California, “was partisan advantage pure and simple” rather than along racial lines.(more)https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/12/06/supreme-court-texas-congress-maps-redistricting/87622153007/
Logged
You may find 'nobility' in a savage. But never forget that his first instinct is to kill you.
You cannot "COEXIST" with people who want to kill you.
If they kill their own with no conscience, there is nothing to stop them from killing you.
Rational fear and anger at vicious murderous Islamic terrorists is the same as irrational antisemitism, according to the Leftists
