Where Is Trump’s DoJ On Denaturalizing Zohran Mamdani?

[mystery-ak]

October 28, 2025
Where Is Trump’s DoJ On Denaturalizing Zohran Mamdani?
By Joseph Ford Cotto

When a man seeks to lead the largest city in America, his citizenship should be beyond question. Yet the candidacy of Zohran Mamdani, an avowed socialist Democrat and recently naturalized U.S. citizen, has raised a troubling question: Did he obtain his citizenship under false pretenses?

That question became official on June 26, when Congressman Andy Ogles, Republican of Tennessee, formally asked the Department of Justice to investigate whether Mamdani’s 2018 naturalization should be revoked under 8 U.S.C. §1451(a) for “willful misrepresentation or concealment of material support for terrorism.”

The request, addressed to Attorney General Pam Bondi, was not a partisan stunt. It was a carefully structured one-page letter that laid out specific evidence, cited public sources, and explained why Mamdani’s own words may point to something more serious than youthful rebellion or artistic expression.

more
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/10/where_is_trump_s_doj_on_denaturalizing_zohran_mamdani.html

[catfish1957]

Leave him alone, and let him do his damage to NYC.,

Sometimes you have to play the Long Game.

[Fishrrman]

catfish wrote:
"Leave him alone, and let him do his damage to NYC.,
Sometimes you have to play the Long Game."

That strategy might work in some places, but not in New York City.

As more and more of the "traditional-minded" folks are driven out, the collective political mindset of those who remain grows "bluer and bluer".

No matter how far to the left they're led (and pushed), those who remain will just swallow it down and thirst "for more".

Think that zombie-mammi will be bad?
Wait until you see who the folks of New York elect AFTER him...!

[libertybele]

Leave him alone, and let him do his damage to NYC.,

Sometimes you have to play the Long Game.

I absolutely disagree; damaging NYC will be irreversible.  Madani was born in Uganda -- so IMHO he has NO right to have any position of political power in the U.S.   1/8 of the population in Uganda is Muslim.  We don't know Madani's background only that he wasn't born here.  This is critical. 

The Long  Game?   We can't afford to play games.  We are talking a major city with a Muslim population of around 9% and it looks like a socialist is going to become the mayor.

Anyone not seeing the potential for the fall of NYC and eventually NY?  They have a huge population; again 9% Muslim.  Take a look at France, Belgium, Denmark -- their Muslim populations may be small in comparison to their overall populations, but they are dominating!


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zohran_Mamdani

[Kamaji]

I absolutely disagree; damaging NYC will be irreversible.  Madani was born in Uganda -- so IMHO he has NO right to have any position of political power in the U.S.   1/8 of the population in Uganda is Muslim.  We don't know Madani's background only that he wasn't born here.  This is critical. 

The Long  Game?   We can't afford to play games.  We are talking a major city with a Muslim population of around 9% and it looks like a socialist is going to become the mayor.

Anyone not seeing the potential for the fall of NYC and eventually NY?  They have a huge population; again 9% Muslim.  Take a look at France, Belgium, Denmark -- their Muslim populations may be small in comparison to their overall populations, but they are dominating!


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zohran_Mamdani

Have to disagree.  Whatever damage he does won’t be permanent in the long run, and is likely the only thing that will get most NY’ers to actually pay attention to what’s going on.  Sort of like what happened in the late 1970s - the last time the City was “permanently” written off.

[libertybele]

Have to disagree.  Whatever damage he does won’t be permanent in the long run, and is likely the only thing that will get most NY’ers to actually pay attention to what’s going on.  Sort of like what happened in the late 1970s - the last time the City was “permanently” written off.

So do you think the Muslim population won't take over???  When the rest of the NY'ers wake up it will be far too late. It will likely be too late for the rest of NY as well. 

As an example; did those that voted for Omar in MN wake up?  No. They voted her in again.  Minneapolis is now known as the American Somali capital.

District by district, city by city IF we don't do something we will wind up like the UK only we are armed and it will be quite more confrontational.

[Wingnut]

The only good or moderate Muslim is a dead one.  There is no coexist.

[Kamaji]

So do you think the Muslim population won't take over???  When the rest of the NY'ers wake up it will be far too late. It will likely be too late for the rest of NY as well. 

As an example; did those that voted for Omar in MN wake up?  No. They voted her in again.  Minneapolis is now known as the American Somali capital.

District by district, city by city IF we don't do something we will wind up like the UK only we are armed and it will be quite more confrontational.

No, I don't; but that is also a distinct discussion from whether Mamdani's damage to NYC will be permanent and irreversible.

[Wingnut]

No, I don't; but that is also a distinct discussion from whether Mamdani's damage to NYC will be permanent and irreversible.

Muzzies suck.  The only reason they seem docile is they are out numbered...for now.  Never let the barbarians get close to power.  If they get NY they will be empowered.

[Kamaji]

Muzzies suck.  The only reason they seem docile is they are out numbered...for now.  Never let the barbarians get close to power.  If they get NY they will be empowered.

How many muslims do you personally know?

[Wingnut]

How many muslims do you personally know?

Why would I want to know one?  I see how they act in large numbers.  They are scum.

[Kamaji]

Why would I want to know one?  I see how they act in large numbers.  They are scum.

So in other words, you're engaging in group judgment and collective guilt.  Get progressive much?

[libertybele]

So in other words, you're engaging in group judgment and collective guilt.  Get progressive much?

Group judgement?  Nope.  Case in point -- we went to a New Years celebration and we were sitting at a table with two available seats left.  A group (roughly ten or twelve) of Muslims surrounded us -- two took the remaining seats at the table and they kept talking in their foreign tongue louder and louder and acting unruly hoping that we would leave the table so that they would have our seats and take over the area we were in.There was no doubt that they were trying to intimidate us to leave. We stood our ground until the fireworks were done and then we left.  @Wingnut is absolutely correct, in a group they become aggressive.

My grandson and I went to the park.  Muslims took up every single barbecue grill along the water making comments in foreign tongue of anyone that tried to walk along the river and moved closer to those trying to walk along the river to block those in their path.  Again, group intimidation.  They were only a very small percentage of the people that were there, but it become quite clear that no one was going to be free to walk where they had a foot hold. Well their intimidation worked because I grabbed my grandson and we left.  No, they weren't just making a friendly visit to that local park.  I have been going to that park for well over 20 years and never felt unsafe until then.

Do you honestly think that the Muslim population is here for a better way of life or to assimilate to our way of life??? No.  Absolutely not!!!  They want their jihad. 

You truly need to do a little research and take a look at Dearborn, MI. I used to work in the area. My stepmother used to have a home there.  Now a call to worship can be loudly heard. Mosques have been built. They now make up the majority of the population. Americans that once lived in the area have left...again...group intimidation.  Dearborn now has an all Muslim city council. Yes they were voted in -- funny don't you think that they didn't make up the majority of the population but they sure managed to somehow get enough votes necessary to win. 

Do you think that they are going to stop taking over small cities and then progressively take over larger areas??  It's not that they make up a greater percentage of the populace it is that they intimidate or become ruthless until they have taken over an area.  Take a look at what has happened in the UK, Germany, France, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, etc..... they are demanding that citizens be punished for not adhering to their customs!! The law is now on their side.  How did that happen?  Group intimidation and ruthless behavior. Europe is now forever changed.

[Wingnut]

So in other words, you're engaging in group judgment and collective guilt.  Get progressive much?

Group judgement?  Progressive quilt.  What the f*uck is wrong with you?  I knowthe enemy when I see them, and unlike what Pogo said, they ain't us.

[Kamaji]

Case in point -- we went to a New Years celebration, we were sitting at a table with two available seats left.  A group of Muslims surrounded us -- two sat at the table and they kept talking louder and louder and acting unruly hoping that we would leave the table so that they could sit.  We stood our ground until the fireworks were done and then we left.  @Wingnut is absolutely correct,

So, you also aren't willing to judge individuals as individuals, but rather than as members of a group, in a reductive manner, presuming that the sins of the worst members automatically apply to every person who happens to share one of the relevant characteristics you've used to define that group?

[Kamaji]

Group judgement?  Progressive quilt.  What the f*uck is wrong with you?  I knowthe enemy when I see them, and unlike what Pogo said, they ain't us.

With me?  I'm not the one who is judging every member of a group on the basis of collective guilt.  You are.  So yes, that makes you a progressive, because you're engaging in exactly the same conduct progressives engage in.

[Wingnut]

With me?  I'm not the one who is judging every member of a group on the basis of collective guilt.  You are.  So yes, that makes you a progressive, because you're engaging in exactly the same conduct progressives engage in.

Bugger off moron.  You are so full of Muzzie love you must be RiV sister from another father.

[libertybele]

So, you also aren't willing to judge individuals as individuals, but rather than as members of a group, in a reductive manner, presuming that the sins of the worst members automatically apply to every person who happens to share one of the relevant characteristics you've used to define that group?

I've laid out more than one instance.  Again, take a look at Europe; you are very foolish to think that the majority are here in peace.

[DCPatriot]

Bugger off moron.  You are so full of Muzzie love you must be RiV sister from another father.

   STOP!  You guys are killing me!!   

[Kamaji]

 

One either judges each individual as an individual, or one judges based on class membership, which is what progressives do.

Pretty simple choice.  Are you a conservative, or a progressive?

[Smokin Joe]

One either judges each individual as an individual, or one judges based on class membership, which is what progressives do.

Pretty simple choice.  Are you a conservative, or a progressive?

What makes a group a group?

Ultimately, shared values are a biggie.

Part and parcel of the Muslim Religion is conquest and the eradication or conversion of non-believers. Not Love, not forgiveness, not tolerance, but their religious laws and conquest.

Anyone who adheres to those beliefs has already violated your bit about judging people as individuals and not part of a group, and they will cut your head off for being a nonbeliever.

While being 'nice' (taqiyah) gets Muslims in the front door when they are few (and I have seen that, so long as no one disses their prophet), it is no longer necessary when they own the doors.

[Kamaji]

What makes a group a group?

Ultimately, shared values are a biggie.

Part and parcel of the Muslim Religion is conquest and the eradication or conversion of non-believers. Not Love, not forgiveness, not tolerance, but their religious laws and conquest.

Anyone who adheres to those beliefs has already violated your bit about judging people as individuals and not part of a group, and they will cut your head off for being a nonbeliever.

While being 'nice' (taqiyah) gets Muslims in the front door when they are few (and I have seen that, so long as no one disses their prophet), it is no longer necessary when they own the doors.

So, you too prefer to judge based on collectivism and collective guilt.  Too bad.